High-level dialogue on Shaping the future of the digital economy (UNCTAD)
5 Dec 2023 15:00h - 18:00h UTC
Knowledge Graph of Debate
Session report
Full session report
Doreen Bogdan-Martin
The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) recently hosted a conference focusing on radio communications. The conference aimed to address the importance of radio communications in digital technologies like smartphones, GPS, weather forecasting, etc. The discussions emphasized minimizing interference and enabling innovative frameworks for future technologies. The ITU’s efforts in this area are considered instrumental in ensuring the optimal functioning of these technologies.
Additionally, the conference covered topics related to spectrum and satellite orbits. It was acknowledged that spectrum and satellite orbits are finite resources, requiring consensus and cooperation for effective management. As a result of these discussions, a treaty with a four-year effectiveness was established.
In terms of future advancements, the ITU introduced a new framework for the development of 6G. The conference also highlighted the crucial importance of energy efficiency in the development of both 5G and 6G technologies. Initiatives should be undertaken to increase energy efficiency for sustainable and environmentally friendly telecommunications systems.
Concerns were raised about the potential negative impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on existing inequalities. In societies facing a digital divide, there are fears that AI implementation could further exacerbate inequalities. Policy measures should be implemented to mitigate these risks.
The conference emphasized the need to bridge the digital divide. Issues such as cost, skills, content challenges, safety concerns, and device affordability need to be addressed to ensure widespread usage of digital technologies. Initiatives like Giga, aimed at connecting every school in the world to the internet, are being implemented to address digital connectivity gaps.
Gender inclusion in information and communication technology (ICT) was also emphasized. There is a significant gender gap in access to technology and the ICT workforce, leading to biases and disparities in emerging technologies like AI. Efforts to promote gender equality in ICT were deemed crucial.
Finally, the conference highlighted the importance of supporting countries in rolling out and scaling digital services. Initiatives like GovStack, partnering with Estonia, Germany, and Dial, aim to bring e-government services to nations. Assisting countries in adopting digital services can lead to enhanced efficiency and improved access to governmental services.
In summary, the ITU conference covered a range of topics including radio communications, spectrum management, energy efficiency, AI’s impact on inequalities, bridging the digital divide, gender inclusion in ICT, and the roll-out of digital services. The discussions aimed to drive towards a more inclusive and sustainable digital future.
Linda Bonyo
The discussions surrounding the digital economy in Africa shed light on various challenges and areas for improvement. One key issue identified is the knowledge gap regarding the digital economy, which hampers Africa’s progress and ability to fully participate in the digital revolution. Participants noted a significant disparity in the number of Africans with degrees or master’s degrees in the legal sector compared to their counterparts in Germany, highlighting a major imbalance. The dominance of big tech companies in Africa is another major concern raised during the discussions. It was highlighted that the annual turnover of companies like Amazon surpasses the GDP of several African countries. This dominance poses challenges for governments in holding these companies accountable for their actions. Efforts to regulate and oversee the activities of these tech giants are hindered by their overwhelming influence and reach. Support for local innovation and startups emerged as a pressing need. Many African startups feel unsupported in their home countries and are subsequently compelled to move to the US for better opportunities and support. Participants emphasized the role of African governments in boosting the local innovation ecosystem by providing the necessary resources and creating an enabling environment for startups to flourish. The lack of skilled regulators in Africa to effectively engage in digital economy regulation was also highlighted. Many regulators lack the necessary skills to navigate and regulate the ever-evolving digital landscape. This presents a significant obstacle in formulating effective policies and regulations for the digital economy. It was noted that this issue was also acknowledged in the executive order on AI issued by President Biden, underlining the importance of developing the necessary skills for effective regulation. The discussion raised concerns about the suitability of current regulation models, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which are copied from Europe. Participants emphasized that these models do not cater to the unique needs and issues of Africa due to budget constraints and different socio-political contexts. Implementing similar regulation models with limited resources in Africa is considered infeasible, and there is a call for customizing regulation models that align with Africa’s specific circumstances. Taxation on new technologies such as laptops and phones was identified as a hindrance to digital development. For instance, the Kenyan government’s introduction of a 1.5% tax on laptops discourages access and adoption. The fear of potential taxation on new phones also disincentivizes users from purchasing them. The negative impact of such taxation on digital development was emphasized during the discussions. Investment in digital public infrastructure was identified as a crucial aspect for the development of digital economies. Participants emphasized the need for Africa to focus on providing its own internet infrastructure to reduce dependence on specific tech companies. This investment in digital infrastructure is seen as a key driver for digital economies in Africa. The potential of remote work was highlighted as a significant opportunity for developing countries. It was observed that software developers in Kenya and Nigeria are working for companies abroad, leveraging the benefits of remote work. Remote work has the potential to provide economic opportunities and bridge the gap between skilled professionals and job markets in developing countries. Promoting STEM education, especially for women, was identified as an important policy consideration. The discussions emphasized the need for more girls to get into STEM fields, in order to bridge the gender gap and foster inclusive technological development in Africa. Energy scarcity emerged as a significant challenge for digital economies in developing countries. Participants noted issues such as load-shedding in South Africa, increased energy prices in Kenya, and energy-related challenges in Nigeria. The lack of reliable and affordable energy hampers digital infrastructure and technology adoption. Harmonizing policies across small markets was identified as important when dealing with tech monopolies. The discussions emphasized the need for a unified approach from African countries to engage with tech companies. It was noted that finding ways for all 54 African countries to effectively communicate and negotiate with tech giants is crucial in achieving fair and equitable outcomes. The importance of inclusive, interoperable, and open-sourced digital economies was emphasized during the discussions. Participants stressed the need to fight vendor lock-in, which restricts competition and stifles economic growth. Open-source approaches and interoperable systems were seen as integral to creating a level playing field and fostering innovation. Collaboration and partnerships were recognized as pivotal for progress in the digital economy. The discussions highlighted the funding provided by organizations like Mozilla and Omidyar, which support initiatives that drive the development of the digital economy in Africa. The Africa Law and Tech Festival was also noted as a significant platform that showcases the power of collaboration and networking. Finally, it was acknowledged that tech companies can play a positive role in addressing challenges in Africa’s digital economy. The discussions highlighted how big tech companies have supported internet infrastructure development in Africa. Their funding and investments help to bridge the gap and create opportunities for digital growth and development. In conclusion, the discussions around the digital economy in Africa revealed several challenges and areas for improvement. Addressing the knowledge gap, the dominance of big tech companies, and the need for support for local innovation and startups are crucial aspects in advancing Africa’s digital economy. Enhancing regulatory skills and tailoring regulation models, reducing taxation barriers, investing in digital infrastructure, and promoting STEM education and remote work will contribute to the growth and inclusivity of digital economies. Overcoming energy scarcity, harmonizing policies, fostering open and interoperable systems, and encouraging collaboration and partnerships are also vital for achieving digital transformation in Africa.
Francis Dufay
The challenges faced by e-commerce in Africa are numerous and diverse. One major obstacle is the difficult state of transportation and logistics across the continent. The infrastructure for moving goods and products is lacking, making it challenging to deliver items to customers in a timely manner. This is compounded by the preference for cash transactions over digital payments. Many people in Africa still rely on physical currency, which can be a barrier to widespread adoption of e-commerce.
Another significant challenge is the low purchasing power in many areas of Africa. Economic disparities and poverty levels make it difficult for a large proportion of the population to afford online purchases. Additionally, the market fragmentation in Africa presents a major issue for e-commerce. The continent is vast and segmented into many small markets, making it challenging to scale the e-commerce model effectively across the entire region.
However, despite these challenges, there is an abundance of entrepreneurial spirit in Africa. The continent is filled with individuals and companies who are eager to drive impact and make a positive difference. This entrepreneurial drive is a promising sign for the growth of e-commerce in Africa.
One of the main arguments highlighted is the unnecessary barriers faced by digital entrepreneurs in African markets. Outdated regulations, such as restrictions on postal monopolies, hinder their progress and potential for success. The need for adaptation to the unique operations of e-commerce in Africa also presents additional costs and time constraints for companies.
On a positive note, there is a call for simplification and a more favourable business environment to unleash the potential of local entrepreneurship. The African continental trade agreement is seen as a potential game-changer for digital players. This agreement has the potential to facilitate trade and create new opportunities for e-commerce companies operating in Africa.
Interestingly, giant tech companies like Amazon have not yet shown substantial interest in the African market. This provides an opportunity for local players, such as Jumia, to establish a strong presence and dominate the e-commerce sector.
The analysis also reveals the vibrancy of emerging markets in Africa, with a focus not just on profit but also on driving real social impact and promoting inclusiveness. However, there is a need to move beyond good intentions and speeches and to create practical changes that enable inclusiveness in the digital economy.
In conclusion, while there are significant challenges to overcome, including transportation and logistics, preference for cash transactions, low purchasing power, and market fragmentation, the entrepreneurial spirit and willingness to drive impact present promising opportunities for e-commerce in Africa. Simplification, favourable business environments, and the potential of the African continental trade agreement can all contribute to the growth and success of e-commerce in the region.
Rebeca Grynspan
There are serious concerns about the potential misuse of AI, with some experts suggesting that it could be weaponised in the wrong hands. The risk of AI technology advancing to a point where AI systems act autonomously adds to these worries. This negative sentiment emphasises the need for precautions and responsible use of AI.
On the other hand, AI and digital technologies have shown remarkable progress in various sectors. In healthcare, AI has improved diagnostics and personalised medicine, leading to better patient outcomes. In education, AI has enabled tailored learning experiences, allowing students to learn at their own pace and style. In agriculture, AI has made farming practices more efficient and sustainable, addressing the pressing issue of food security. Moreover, AI is also being utilised in environmental protection, particularly in monitoring climate change and aiding in disaster response.
Inequality remains a significant barrier to integrating into the digital economy. Many people, especially those in developing countries, still lack access to digital technology, with approximately 2.6 billion individuals remaining offline. This divide disproportionately affects women and rural populations. Furthermore, there is an inequality in skills and preparedness to take advantage of the digital economy. These barriers highlight the need for efforts to close the digital divide and ensure equitable access to technology and digital skills.
Despite the challenges, the digital economy has the potential to be a tool for equality. It can empower communities worldwide, particularly in the developing world, by bringing financial services and educational opportunities to those who previously had limited or no access. The digital economy breaks down geographical and physical limitations, allowing equal opportunities for all.
Ensuring inclusive processes in digital strategies is essential, and these inclusive strategies withstand government changes. Evidence from an independent evaluation has shown that inclusive digital strategies can be sustained, providing a roadmap for ongoing progress regardless of the shifts in political leadership. This highlights the importance of long-term, inclusive planning and decision making in digital strategies.
Addressing global challenges requires global action and governance. Given the concentration of power in a few digital platforms, there is a need for a global perspective to protect human rights and privacy. Civil society and developing governments play a crucial role in supporting a global compact and intergovernmental processes to effectively address these challenges.
Enhancing national strategies and visions is key to leveraging technology for societal improvement. Initiatives like computer labs in public schools in countries like Costa Rica demonstrate the positive impact of government decisions translating into concrete actions. By aligning national strategies with technological advancements, countries can harness the potential of technology to drive economic growth and improve quality of life.
A comprehensive ecosystem approach involving the private sector, government, civil society, and citizens at large is essential for success. Collaboration and cooperation between these stakeholders create an environment conducive to digital transformation and inclusive growth. This approach allows for the sharing of resources, expertise, and ideas, leading to collective progress.
Informed and efficient regulation is critical to enable progress without undermining rights and innovation. Establishing standards and regulations can be challenging, as seen in the difficulties faced by Europe. However, a unified knowledge base can aid in the effective regulation of AI and digital technologies. This balance between regulation and innovation is key to ensuring the responsible and ethical use of technology.
In conclusion, while concerns exist regarding the misuse of AI, AI and digital technologies have significantly advanced sectors such as healthcare, education, agriculture, and environmental protection. Inequality remains a significant barrier to integrating into the digital economy, but efforts to close the digital divide can pave the way for equal access and opportunities worldwide. Inclusive digital strategies can persist even with changes in government, and global challenges necessitate unified global action and governance. Enhancing national strategies and adopting an ecosystem approach can leverage technology for societal improvement. Informed and efficient regulation is crucial to enable progress without compromising rights and innovation.
Amandeep Singh Gill
The global digital compact is a vision put forth by the Secretary General that aims to address the digital divide and accelerate progress on the sustainable development goals. One of the three pillars of this compact focuses specifically on addressing the digital divide. This highlights the importance of bridging the gap between those who have access to digital technology and those who do not, in order to ensure that everyone has equal opportunities for development.
In order to steer digital transformation, it is crucial to build the capacity of the public sector. Developing countries are recognising the need to make the right choices in implementing digital transformation, and ministers, presidents, and prime ministers are expressing their support for this. By strengthening the public sector’s ability to navigate and lead digital transformation, countries can ensure that the benefits of technological advancements are harnessed effectively and equitably.
Another key aspect highlighted is the importance of replicating success stories from other countries. Executives from the Global South are particularly interested in implementing successful digital public infrastructure models like those in India and Kenya. By learning from these success stories, countries can adopt effective strategies and approaches for digital development and inclusive growth.
It is also highlighted that measuring the impact of digital transformation is necessary. Ministers and officials in developing countries are keen on distinguishing between hype and real results when it comes to digital transformation. By effectively measuring and evaluating the impact of digital initiatives, countries can gain insights into their effectiveness and make informed decisions on future strategies and investments.
The necessity of private-public partnerships in advancing the digital economy is emphasised. Government officials realise that they cannot achieve digital transformation alone and need to partner with the private sector. By collaborating with the private sector, countries can leverage the expertise, resources, and innovation capabilities of private companies to drive digital economic growth and create inclusive opportunities.
When shaping the future of the digital economy, it is important to balance opportunities and risks while considering the societal impact. This includes considering shifts in jobs, protecting human rights, and addressing wealth concentration. By carefully assessing the risks and benefits of the digital economy, countries can work towards creating an equitable and sustainable digital future.
The role of smart devices and combating energy poverty are highlighted for an inclusive digital economy. Accessibility to smart devices and resolving energy poverty are essential for cutting-edge digital economy applications. By equipping people with smart devices and ensuring access to affordable and clean energy, countries can enable the participation of all individuals in the digital economy, reducing inequalities and fostering inclusive growth.
Global South participation in shaping an inclusive and empowering digital future is stressed. The global process aims to lower the entry barriers to the digital economy discussion, particularly for the global majority, especially in the Global South. This reflects the need for diverse perspectives and voices in shaping digital policies and strategies that cater to the needs and aspirations of all.
The need for cooperation among diverse stakeholders in navigating technological advancements is highlighted. With the rapid advancement of technology, it is crucial for governments, private sector entities, civil society, and other stakeholders to work together in order to understand and address the challenges and opportunities that arise. By leveraging the collective expertise and perspectives of multiple stakeholders, countries can navigate the complexities of technology and shape its development in a manner that is inclusive, ethical, and sustainable.
The role of the private sector is acknowledged as crucial in technological advancements, particularly in regards to data and infrastructure. Private companies increasingly control the computing and cloud infrastructure that underpins advanced AI technologies. This recognises the influence and power that the private sector holds in shaping technological advancements and emphasises the need for effective collaboration and governance to ensure ethical and responsible use of data and infrastructure.
In conclusion, addressing the digital divide, building public sector capacity, replicating success stories, measuring impact, fostering private-public partnerships, balancing opportunities and risks, ensuring access to smart devices and combating energy poverty, encouraging Global South participation, promoting stakeholder cooperation, and acknowledging the role of the private sector are crucial aspects of shaping an inclusive and empowering digital future. By focusing on these areas, countries can harness the transformative potential of digital technologies while ensuring that no one is left behind.
Mitchell Baker
Mozilla is a unique organization in the tech industry. Despite being a non-profit public benefit organization, it competes with major tech giants like Google, Microsoft, and Apple. What sets Mozilla apart is its focus on a “public benefit mission” rather than maximizing profits. This mission drives its actions and sets it apart from the big tech companies.
One area where Mozilla stands out is its commitment to privacy, security, and different data use. They prioritize these aspects and have even launched a small venture arm to invest in companies that share these values. By investing in these companies, Mozilla aims to expand its reach and influence while also promoting business success based on privacy and responsible data use.
Another key focus for Mozilla is building technology that supports a less centralized digital future. They envision personal artificial intelligence (AI) that doesn’t contribute data back to centralized entities. This approach challenges the current trend of AI development and promotes a more democratic and distributed model.
Mozilla also recognizes the challenges faced by technologists who want to build a better digital world but lack the necessary resources or platforms. They seek to bring together a critical mass of these technologists to create platforms and systems that enable meaningful contributions toward a better digital future.
In order to translate their commitment to inclusivity into action, Mozilla runs various initiatives and programs. These include a trustworthy AI initiative that aims to empower individuals working at the intersection of technology, AI, trust, and safety. They also expand geographically into regions that are underrepresented in global tech platform development, providing a platform for local leaders to contribute.
Ethics and diversity are two other important considerations for Mozilla. They acknowledge that it’s not straightforward to label technology as ethical given its potential for misuse. They emphasize the need for observability and understanding to make ethical judgments. Additionally, they highlight the importance of diversity in development to avoid flawed understanding and potential damage to society.
Mozilla also highlights the externalization of harm caused by technology, particularly in relation to social media platforms. They criticize the centralization of control and profit, while the negative impacts are often borne by communities and societies at large.
Access to innovation and creation, as well as the future of technology, are issues that Mozilla believes require attention. They believe in the importance of providing a spectrum of access to creation and new society, ensuring that no one is left behind.
In conclusion, Mozilla’s focus on a “public benefit mission” and commitment to privacy, security, and responsible data use distinguishes it from the big tech corporations. They strive to build a less centralized digital future, empower technologists, promote inclusivity, address ethical concerns, and advocate for diversity. By emphasizing the externalization of harm caused by technology, they draw attention to the need for responsible development and access to innovation.
(Note: The summary has been edited for grammatical errors, sentence formation issues, and typos. UK spelling and grammar have been used throughout the summary.)
Audience
The discussion primarily focused on the urgent need to bridge the digital divide, ensuring that all individuals have equal access to digital technology. One major concern raised was regarding internet accessibility issues in Zimbabwe, where only 45% of the population have access to the Internet. Despite 92% mobile access, limited participation in the digital economy persists due to these accessibility issues. The individuals involved in the discussion expressed concern and stressed the importance of addressing this divide before diving into the opportunities that the digital world offers.
Ownership of data was also a critical aspect discussed. There were questions raised regarding who owns the data being generated every minute and how it is being utilized. The argument put forth was that understanding how this data is used is essential to ensure that everyone is included in the digital economy. This issue was regarded as crucial in the context of SDG 9 on industry, innovation, and infrastructure.
The role of governments in digital inclusion was another prominent topic. It was highlighted that governments play a crucial role in ensuring the spread of digital technologies. There was a strong emphasis on the need to include people in rural areas and those outside the digital domain, emphasizing SDGs 9, 10, and 11, which represent industry, innovation, reduced inequality, and sustainable cities and communities.
The discussion also emphasized the significance of investing in robust digital infrastructure to enable developing economies to participate in digital trade, which aligns with SDG 9. It was mentioned that reliable internet access is crucial for developing a strong digital infrastructure.
The importance of a clear e-commerce regulatory framework was another key point discussed. The participants stressed that regulation fosters fair competition and provides consumer protection in the digital marketplace. This supports the principles of SDG 8, which focuses on decent work and economic growth.
Data privacy and cybersecurity were highlighted as important factors in building trust in digital trade. Enhancing cybersecurity was seen as crucial in protecting customers against cyber threats. This aligns with SDG 16, which focuses on peace, justice, and strong institutions.
Financial inclusion initiatives promoting inclusive financial systems and digital payment systems were regarded as positive steps towards ensuring wider participation in digital trade. This was viewed as an important aspect of reducing inequalities as represented by SDG 10.
Streamlining customs procedures and reducing trade barriers were identified as necessary steps to facilitate cross-border transactions, particularly for businesses in developing countries. This underscores the importance of SDG 17, which focuses on partnerships for the goals.
In terms of the role of developing countries, it was argued that they should not just adopt technologies but also adapt and innovate. Developing countries were seen as having the potential to contribute by developing tailored solutions specific to their needs. This aligns with the principles of SDG 9, which encourages industry, innovation, and infrastructure.
The discussion also highlighted the importance of policy advocacy, collaboration, and capacity building in developing countries. This was seen as enhancing the skills and capabilities of the workforce in various digital fields like marketing, data analytics, cybersecurity, and AI. These efforts were viewed positively and aligned with SDGs 17 and 4, which focus on partnerships for the goals and quality education, respectively.
The conversation also examined the potential negative effects of rapid digital innovation. It was noted that technology disruption tends to be non-neutral, creating winners and losers and exacerbating existing gaps and inequalities within society. The participants emphasized the need for intervention to ensure that digital technology aims for a future where everyone can thrive.
The discussion also brought attention to how technology can impact human diversity and values. Instances were shared where technology, such as migration amplified by social media and AI-generated healthcare algorithms, caused errors or wrongful arrests due to biased facial recognition software. Ensuring that technology respects human diversity and values was regarded as vital.
The participants stressed the importance of collaborative solutions to address challenges unique to developing countries. They acknowledged the potential harm that economic imbalance beneath technological progress can have on developing nations. This aligns with the principles of SDGs 17 and 8, which focus on partnerships for the goals and decent work and economic growth respectively.
The conversation also highlighted the need for accessible, affordable, and reliable digital connectivity, essential digital literacy and skills, and a safe and productive digital space with fair and transparent data governance. These aspects were seen as necessary to make digital technology accessible to all and aligned with SDGs 4, 9, and 17.
In conclusion, the discussion emphasized the urgency of bridging the digital divide and ensuring equal access to digital technology. The speakers stressed the importance of collaboration, capacity building, and reducing inequality in the digital world. They also highlighted the need for intervention to prevent rapid digital innovation from exacerbating existing gaps and inequalities. The discussions revolved around key topics such as internet accessibility, data ownership, government’s role, robust digital infrastructure, e-commerce regulation, data privacy, financial inclusion, customs procedures, technology adoption, and policy advocacy. Several SDGs were referenced throughout the discussion, including SDGs 1, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11, 16, and 17. Noteworthy insights included the potential negative effects of technology on human diversity and values, the importance of collaborative solutions, and the significance of developing countries adapting and innovating in the digital realm.
Peter Okwoche
The discussion centred on the significance of digital technology in today’s world. It was emphasised that digital technology plays a crucial role in providing accessible research through mobile devices, replacing heavy textbooks. Additionally, the integration of TV and radio into devices has expanded convenience and possibilities within digital technology.
There was a general appreciation for the positive impact of digital transformation. The existence of influential figures in the digital realm, such as Amandeep Singh Gill, Doreen Borgdan-Martin, and Michelle Baker, was highlighted as evidence of the positive changes brought about by digital technology. These influencers have likely played a significant role in advancing the digital agenda and shaping the digital economy.
However, concerns were voiced regarding the digital divide and the challenge of aligning digital progression with individuals who are technologically behind. It was recognised that while digital technology has enabled progress and innovation, it is crucial to ensure that everyone is on an equal technological footing before further advancements are made. This issue raises questions about inclusivity and bridging the gap between those who are technologically proficient and those struggling to adapt to digital transformations.
Another important topic of discussion was the concentration of power and control in the digital realm. The presence of tech monopolies and their impact on public interests and inclusion in the digital economy were highlighted. Peter, in particular, inquired about measures that ordinary people can take to safeguard themselves and ensure that no one is left behind in this digital era. This concern reflects a broader sentiment about the need to promote public interests and inclusivity in the digital landscape.
In response to these concerns, there was an advocacy for the empowerment of ordinary people in the face of digital monopolies. The focus was on ensuring that no one is left behind and that everyone has the necessary skills and opportunities to thrive in the digital era. This stance aligns with the goal of reducing inequalities and promoting inclusivity.
In conclusion, the discussion underscored both the positive impact and potential challenges of digital technology. While it has provided numerous benefits, such as accessible research and convenience, it is crucial to address the digital divide and ensure inclusivity. Additionally, there is a need to safeguard public interests and empower ordinary individuals in the face of tech monopolies. Overall, the discussion called for a balanced approach to digital transformation, taking into consideration the needs and concerns of all individuals in society.
Michele Jawando
The analysis covers a range of topics related to technology, data, and social impact. Omidyar Network, a social impact venture, strongly believes in the power of philanthropy and social impact to build more equitable societies. They have invested about $2 billion over the last 15 years towards this goal, focusing on building inclusive and equitable economies and systems.
On the other hand, the analysis raises concerns about the lopsided relationship with data and market dominance. It is argued that five platforms currently receive over 70% of the world’s advertising revenue, indicating a concentration of power in the hands of a few. This trend is seen as detrimental to both public societal benefits and innovation. Closed data systems are also criticized for not allowing for the broader sharing and utilization of data for societal good.
The importance of open-source and scalable solutions is highlighted as key to building an equitable tech future. MOSIP, an open-source digital identity system, is cited as an example of a scalable solution that can be utilized by researchers, academics, and multilaterals to build solutions in various areas. It is argued that open systems allow for greater collaboration, innovation, and inclusivity.
The need to invest in and scale effective opportunities is emphasized throughout the analysis. Omidyar Network is committed to investing in and scaling opportunities that have a positive societal impact. They support institutions and civil society organizations, such as UNECA and Lynda, and have funded successful projects like MOSIP.
Michele Jawando, an advocate for change in the tech industry, raises several important points. She highlights the need to consider where the value of data lands in a digitized society and economy. Michele emphasizes that it is crucial to rethink our relationship with data and questions the notion of data ownership. She also raises concerns about the data divide, emphasizing the necessity of including more diverse stakeholders in conversations about technology.
Furthermore, Michele supports the need for variety in leadership and company development in the tech industry. She calls for a more diverse conversation, challenging the traditionally wealthy and male-dominated tech industry. Michele advocates for involving stakeholders from all around the world to ensure a rich and diverse conversation.
Building a digital society that is inclusive and benefits everyone is emphasized. The analysis argues that ordinary people must be included when building a digital society. This involves focusing on areas such as digital public infrastructure, global governance, standards, cybersecurity, open source, public options, and AI. The overall well-being of society is at stake, and technology should be designed and shaped to serve the benefit of society.
The analysis ends on an optimistic note, with the belief that it is possible to design technology for societal benefit. It is acknowledged that making this change may not happen immediately, but the speakers encourage everyone to work towards this goal.
Overall, the analysis provides a comprehensive exploration of various perspectives on the role of technology, data, and social impact in creating more equitable societies. It highlights the need for inclusive and collaborative approaches and calls for reevaluating existing power dynamics in the tech industry.
Speakers
AS
Amandeep Singh Gill
Speech speed
163 words per minute
Speech length
1188 words
Speech time
438 secs
A
Audience
Speech speed
124 words per minute
Speech length
1513 words
Speech time
730 secs
DB
Doreen Bogdan-Martin
Speech speed
161 words per minute
Speech length
1199 words
Speech time
446 secs
FD
Francis Dufay
Speech speed
181 words per minute
Speech length
1610 words
Speech time
533 secs
LB
Linda Bonyo
Speech speed
212 words per minute
Speech length
3097 words
Speech time
876 secs
MJ
Michele Jawando
Speech speed
174 words per minute
Speech length
2187 words
Speech time
753 secs
MB
Mitchell Baker
Speech speed
176 words per minute
Speech length
2079 words
Speech time
708 secs
PO
Peter Okwoche
Speech speed
159 words per minute
Speech length
3465 words
Speech time
1310 secs
RG
Rebeca Grynspan
Speech speed
133 words per minute
Speech length
3189 words
Speech time
1440 secs
Related event
