Uncategorized

Report

AI has the potential to have a profound impact on societies, but it requires responsible and transparent practices to ensure its successful integration and development. Rwanda is actively harnessing the power of AI to advance its social and economic goals.

The country aims to become an upper middle-income nation by 2035 and a high-income country by 2050, relying heavily on AI technologies.

Rwanda’s national AI policy is considered a beacon of responsible and inclusive AI. This policy serves as a roadmap for the country’s AI development and deployment and was developed collaboratively with various stakeholders.

Through this multi-stakeholder approach, Rwanda was able to create a comprehensive and robust policy framework that supports responsible AI practices.

One key benefit of the multi-stakeholder approach in developing Rwanda’s AI policy is the promotion of knowledge sharing and capacity building.

By bringing together different stakeholders, experiences and insights were shared, fostering learning and collaboration. This approach also contributed to the strengthening of local digital ecosystems, creating a supportive environment for the development and implementation of AI technologies.

However, ethical considerations remain important in the development and deployment of AI.

Concerns such as biases in AI models and potential privacy breaches need to be addressed to ensure AI is used ethically and does not harm individuals or society. Additionally, the impact of AI on job displacement and potential misuse in surveillance should be carefully managed and regulated.

To further promote the responsible use of AI and create a harmonised environment, it is crucial for African countries to collaborate and harmonise their AI policies and regulations.

This would allow for a unified approach when dealing with large multinational companies and help reduce the complexities of regulation. Harmonisation would also facilitate the development of shared digital infrastructure, attracting global tech giants by providing a consistent and supportive regulatory environment.

In conclusion, the transformative potential of AI for societies is significant, but responsible and transparent practices are essential in its development and deployment.

Rwanda’s national AI policy serves as an example of responsible and inclusive AI, with a multi-stakeholder approach promoting knowledge sharing and capacity building. However, ethical considerations and the harmonisation of AI policies among African countries should be prioritised to ensure the successful integration and benefits of the digital economy, positioning Africa as a significant player in the global digital space.

Report

In Africa, achieving digital readiness for artificial intelligence (AI) poses significant challenges due to several fundamental obstacles. Limited access to the internet is a major barrier, with many countries in Africa having 95% broadband coverage, but less than 20% of the population experiencing the network effects of being online.

This indicates that the lack of internet connectivity severely hampers the potential benefits of AI. Additionally, the high cost of devices is a crucial factor preventing a large portion of the population from acquiring the necessary technology to access the internet and engage with AI applications.

Moreover, rural location is a greater hindrance to access than gender, further exacerbating the digital divide in Africa.

Education emerges as a key driver of digital readiness and the ability to absorb AI applications in Africa. Access to education directly impacts individuals’ affordability of devices, thereby influencing their ability to engage with AI technology.

Consequently, investing in education is crucial for enhancing digital readiness and facilitating successful AI adoption in Africa.

The African Union Data Policy Framework plays a critical role in creating an enabling environment for AI in Africa. The framework recognizes the significance of digital infrastructure in supporting the African continental free trade area and provides countries with a clear action plan alignment and implementation support.

This framework aims to overcome the challenges faced in achieving digital readiness for AI in Africa.

Addressing data governance challenges and managing the implications of AI require global cooperation. Currently, 90% of the data extracted from Africa goes to big tech companies abroad, necessitating the development of global governance frameworks to effectively manage digital public goods.

Collaboration on an international scale is essential to ensure that data governance supports AI development while protecting the interests and sovereignty of African nations.

Structural inequalities pose a significant challenge to equal AI implementation. When AI blueprints from countries with different political economies are implemented in other societies, inequalities are deepened, leading to the perpetuation of inequitable outcomes.

Ethical concerns surrounding AI are also raised, highlighting the role played by major tech companies, particularly those rooted in the world’s most prominent democracies. Ethical challenges arise from these companies’ actions and policies, which have far-reaching implications for AI development.

An additional concern is the presence of bias and discrimination in AI algorithms due to the absence of digitization in some countries.

In certain nations, such as Sri Lanka, where there is a lack of full digitization, people remain offline, resulting in their invisibility, underrepresentation, and discrimination in AI algorithms. This highlights the inherent limitations of AI datasets in being truly unbiased and inclusive, as they rely on digitized data that may exclude significant portions of the global population.

In conclusion, African countries face several challenges in achieving digital readiness for AI, including limited internet access, high device costs, and rural location constraints.

Education plays a crucial role in enhancing digital readiness, while the African Union Data Policy Framework provides an important foundation for creating an enabling environment. Addressing data governance challenges and managing the implications of AI require global cooperation and collaboration.

Structural inequalities and ethical concerns pose significant risks to the equitable implementation of AI. Additionally, the absence of digitization in some countries leads to bias and discrimination in AI algorithms.

Report

Countries around the world are facing significant challenges in implementing artificial intelligence (AI) due to variations in democratic processes and understanding of ethical practices. The differences in governance structures and ethical frameworks make it difficult for countries with non-democratic processes to effectively grasp and navigate the complexities of AI ethics.

Even in relatively democratic countries like the Netherlands, issues arise due to these disparities.

Furthermore, many countries are hastily rushing to implement AI without giving due consideration to important factors such as data quality, data collection, and data protection and privacy laws.

The focus seems to be on implementing AI algorithms without laying down the necessary core elements required for a successful transition to AI-driven systems. This is a cause for concern, particularly in most countries in the global south where data protection and privacy laws are often inadequate.

The lack of adequate data quality and collection mechanisms, coupled with inadequate data protection and privacy laws, raises serious concerns about the safety and integrity of AI systems.

Without proper measures in place, there is a risk of bias, discrimination, and potential misuse of data, which can have far-reaching consequences for individuals and societies.

In order to address these challenges, governments must recognize the need to ensure that their technical infrastructure and workforce skills are agile enough to adapt to new AI technologies as they emerge.

The rapid advances in AI capabilities require a proactive approach in developing the necessary infrastructure and upskilling the workforce to keep up with the evolving technology.

In conclusion, the implementation of AI is hindered by variations in democratic processes and understanding of ethical practices among countries.

Rushing into AI implementation without addressing critical issues such as data quality and protection can lead to significant problems, particularly in countries with insufficient data protection and privacy laws. Governments play a crucial role in fostering appropriate technical infrastructure and developing the necessary skills to effectively navigate the challenges posed by AI technologies.

Report

Singapore has taken a human-centric and inclusive approach to AI governance, prioritising digital readiness and adoption within communities. This policy aims to ensure that the benefits of AI are accessible and beneficial to all members of society. The model governance framework developed by Singapore aligns with OECD principles, demonstrating their commitment to ethical and responsible AI practices.

In adopting a multi-stakeholder approach, Singapore has sought input from a diverse range of companies, both domestic and international.

They have collaborated with the World Economic Forum Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution for ISAGO (Intentional Standards for AI Governance Organizations) and have worked with a local company to write a discussion paper on Gen-AI. This inclusive approach allows for a variety of perspectives and fosters collaboration between different stakeholders in the development of AI governance.

Practical guidance is a priority for Singapore in AI governance.

They have created a compendium of use cases that serves as a reference for both local and international organisations. Additionally, they have developed ISAGO, an implementation and self-assessment guide for companies to ensure that they adhere to best practices in AI governance.

Furthermore, Singapore has established the AI Verify Foundation, an open-source foundation that provides an AI toolkit to assist organisations in implementing AI in a responsible manner.

Singapore recognises the importance of international alignment and interoperability in AI governance.

They encourage alignment with international organisations and other governments and advocate for an open industry focus on critical emerging technologies. Singapore believes that future conversations in AI governance will revolve around international technical standards and benchmarking, which will facilitate cooperation and harmonisation of AI practices globally.

However, concerns are raised about the fragmentation of global laws surrounding AI; compliance costs can increase when laws are fragmented, which could hinder the development and adoption of AI technologies.

Singapore acknowledges the need for a unified framework and harmonised regulations to mitigate these challenges.

Additionally, there is apprehension about the potential negative impacts of technology, especially in terms of widening divides and negatively affecting vulnerable groups. Singapore, being a highly connected society, is aware of the possibility of certain groups being left behind.

Bridging these divides and ensuring that technology is inclusive and addresses the needs of vulnerable populations is a priority in their AI governance efforts.

Cultural and ethnic sensitivities in conjunction with black box technology are also a concern.

It is unpredictable whether technology will fragment or unify communities, particularly in terms of ethnic and cultural sensitivities. Singapore acknowledges the importance of considering a culturally specific perspective to understand the potential impacts of AI better.

In conclusion, Singapore’s approach to AI governance encompasses human-centricity, inclusivity, and practical guidance.

Their multi-stakeholder approach ensures a diversity of perspectives, and they prioritise international alignment and interoperability in AI governance. While concerns exist regarding the fragmentation of global laws and the potential negative impacts on vulnerable groups and cultural sensitivities, Singapore actively addresses these issues to create an ethical and responsible AI ecosystem.

Report

Sri Lanka is currently facing challenges in terms of its AI readiness and capacity, which puts it behind many other countries in this field. The country has just begun its journey towards improving AI readiness and it lags behind in terms of both readiness and capacity.

However, the government of Sri Lanka has recognised the importance of AI development and has taken the initiative to develop a national AI policy and strategy.

This is expected to be rolled out in November and April 2024 respectively. The government understands that engagement in AI development should not be limited to the private sector or select universities, but it needs to be a national initiative involving various stakeholders.

Currently, AI projects in Sri Lanka face challenges in terms of their implementation.

Although over 300 AI projects were conducted by university students in the country last year, none of them went into production. The proposed AI projects in Sri Lanka often do not progress beyond the conceptual stage. This highlights the need for better infrastructure and support to bring these projects to fruition.

One of the primary obstacles to AI advancement in Sri Lanka is the lack of standardized and digitized data.

Data is often siloed and still available in paper format, making it difficult to utilize it effectively for AI applications. This challenge is not just technical but also operational, requiring a change in mindsets, awareness, and trust. Efforts to develop AI projects are being wasted due to the absence of consolidated data sets that address national problems.

In order to overcome these challenges, Sri Lanka aims to establish a sustainable, inclusive, and open digital ecosystem.

The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) is working on an AI readiness assessment for Sri Lanka. This assessment will help identify areas that need improvement and provide recommendations to establish an ecosystem that fosters AI development.

In conclusion, Sri Lanka is in the early stages of improving its AI readiness and capacity.

The government is taking an active role in formulating a national AI policy and strategy. However, there are challenges in terms of implementing AI projects, primarily due to the lack of standardized and digitized data. Efforts are being made to address these challenges and establish a sustainable digital ecosystem that supports AI development.

Report

The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has been actively involved in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) since 2016. They adopted the first intergovernmental standard on AI, called the OECD AI Principles, in 2019. These principles consist of five values-based principles for all AI actors and five policy recommendations for governments and policymakers.

The five values-based principles of the OECD AI Principles focus on fairness, transparency, accountability, and human-centrality.

They aim to ensure that AI systems respect human rights, promote fairness, avoid discrimination, and maintain accountability. The OECD aims to establish a global framework for responsible AI development and use.

The OECD AI Principles also provide policy recommendations to assist governments in developing national AI strategies that align with the principles.

The OECD supports countries in adapting and revising their AI strategies according to these principles.

In addition, the OECD emphasizes the need for global collaboration in AI development. They believe that AI should not be controlled solely by specific companies or countries.

Instead, they advocate for a global approach to maximize the potential benefits of AI and ensure equitable outcomes.

While the OECD is optimistic about the positive changes AI can bring, they express concerns about the fragmentation of AI development.

They highlight the importance of cohesive efforts and coordination to avoid hindering progress through differing standards and practices.

To conclude, the OECD’s work on AI focuses on establishing a global framework for responsible AI development and use.

They promote principles of fairness, transparency, and accountability and provide support to countries in implementing these principles. The OECD also emphasizes the need for global collaboration and acknowledges the potential challenges posed by fragmentation in AI development.

Report

Jingbo Huang places significant emphasis on the importance of collective intelligence in both human-to-human and human-to-machine interactions. He recognizes the potential for artificial intelligence (AI) and human intelligence to work in unison to tackle challenges, highlighting the positive aspects of this partnership rather than focusing solely on the negatives.

Huang emphasizes the need for collaboration and preparation among human entities to ensure the integration of AI into society benefits all parties involved.

Huang further expresses curiosity about the collaboration between different AI assessment tools developed by various organizations.

Specifically, he mentions the UNDP’s AI readiness assessment tool and raises questions about how it aligns or interacts with tools developed by the OECD, Singapore, Africa, and others. This indicates Huang’s interest in exploring potential synergies and knowledge-sharing among these assessment tools.

Additionally, Huang demonstrates an interest in understanding the challenges faced by panelists during AI conceptualization and implementation.

Although specific supporting facts are not provided, this suggests Huang’s desire to explore the obstacles encountered in bringing AI projects to fruition. By examining these challenges, he aims to acquire knowledge that can help overcome barriers and facilitate the successful integration of AI into various industry sectors.

In summary, Jingbo Huang underscores the significance of collective intelligence, both within human-to-human interactions and between human and machine intelligence.

Huang envisions a collaborative approach that leverages the strengths of both AI and human intelligence to address challenges. He also shows a keen interest in exploring how different AI assessment tools can work together, seeking to identify potential synergies and compatibility.

Moreover, he expresses curiosity about the challenges faced during the AI conceptualization and implementation process. These insights reflect Huang’s commitment to fostering mutual understanding, collaboration, and effective utilization of AI technologies.

Report

Embracing artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to make significant progress towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), according to a report by the UN Development Programme (UNDP) and ITU. The report highlights the positive impact that digital technology, including AI, could have on 70% of the SDG targets.

However, the adoption of AI varies among countries due to their differing stages of digital transformation and the challenges they face.

For instance, Sri Lanka requires a national-level initiative to build AI readiness and capacity, as building AI readiness and capacity cannot be achieved solely at the corporate or private sector level.

Other countries have recognized this and have implemented national-level initiatives. UNDP is actively involved in supporting digital programming and has initiated the AI readiness process in Sri Lanka, Rwanda, and Colombia. This process aims to complement national digital transformation processes and views the government as an enabler of AI.

Challenges in implementing AI include fragmentation, financing, ensuring foundation issues are addressed, and representation and diversity.

Fragmentation and foundational issues have been identified as concerns, as AI is only as good as the data it is trained on. Additionally, financing issues may hinder the effective implementation of AI, and it is crucial to ensure representation and diversity to avoid bias and promote fairness.

Advocates argue for a multi-stakeholder and human-centered approach to AI development as a method of risk management.

This approach emphasizes the importance of including various worldviews and cultural relevancy in the development process.

The report also highlights the need for inclusivity and leaving no one behind in the journey towards achieving the SDGs. It champions working with indigenous communities, who represent different worldviews, to ensure that every individual has the opportunity to realize their potential.

In conclusion, AI presents a unique opportunity for human progress and the achievement of the SDGs.

However, careful consideration must be given to address challenges such as fragmentation, financing, foundation issues, and representation and diversity. By adopting a multi-stakeholder and human-centered approach, AI can be harnessed effectively and inclusively to drive sustainable development and improve the lives of people worldwide.

Report

The focus of the conversation on digital inclusion has shifted from the connectivity gap to the usage gap. Currently, around 3.2 billion people have access to mobile broadband connectivity but remain unconnected to the internet. This lack of connection can be attributed to factors such as affordability, lack of skills, lack of trust, and gender disparities.

Addressing this issue requires forming partnerships, as no single entity can connect the unconnected on their own.

An excellent example of a successful partnership is Internet para todos, a collaboration between Telefonica, Meta, and the Inter-American Development Bank in Peru. Such partnerships bring together different stakeholders and resources to bridge the digital divide.

Additionally, there is a belief that we have the necessary technologies to connect everyone.

Technological barriers do not pose the main obstacles to achieving digital inclusion. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that what works in one location may not work in another. Adaptability and flexibility are essential in finding the right solutions for each specific context.

Collaboration is also vital in connecting the unconnected.

Collective efforts and cooperation can have a significant impact on digital inclusion globally.

Pablo Barrionuevo, an advocate for broader connectivity, supports the idea of flexible and localized solutions. He emphasizes the importance of collective efforts in addressing this issue.

It is evident from his stance that a combination of technology, flexibility, and collaboration is fundamental to establishing inclusive and sustainable connectivity for all.

In conclusion, the conversation on digital inclusion has evolved to consider the usage gap as well as the connectivity gap.

Approximately 3.2 billion people lack internet access despite having access to mobile broadband connectivity. Partnerships, flexible solutions, and collective efforts are necessary to connect the unconnected. While the required technologies are available, they need to be adapted to suit specific contexts.

By working together, we can ensure that no one is left behind in the digital era.

Report

The analysis emphasises several significant points regarding the digital divide and internet connectivity. Firstly, it notes that the rate of connecting the unconnected is slowing down, which is a concern. It is estimated that by 2023, approximately 2.6 billion people will still be without internet access.

This highlights the need to accelerate efforts in bridging this divide and ensuring universal internet access.

Another important issue identified is the affordability of broadband services. In some countries, the cost of accessing the internet is too high, acting as a major barrier to its adoption.

Affordability is measured using a 2% GNI per capita benchmark, and many countries fall short of this benchmark. This finding emphasises the importance of addressing the financial constraints faced by individuals and communities in accessing the internet.

To address the digital divide, a whole-of-government and whole-of-society approach is advocated.

Initiatives are being implemented in various countries to provide essential services such as education, health, and commerce. These initiatives are based on common building blocks, such as national identification systems, which facilitate the delivery of these services to underserved populations.

The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is leading this approach, with approximately 15 countries already participating in the initiative.

The impact of technological developments, such as artificial intelligence (AI) and data analytics, is also highlighted. These advancements are rapidly transforming both connected and unconnected communities.

For instance, the new normal includes AI solutions and data-intensive decision-making in areas like e-commerce, traffic management, and mobile banking. Consequently, there is a demand for new knowledge and skills to effectively navigate this evolving technological landscape.

The analysis underscores the need to reassess the concept of digital literacy and digital skills in the new normal.

With jobs becoming redundant or created due to technological advancements, individuals without the necessary digital skills may face difficulties in the job market. This finding suggests that a comprehensive approach to education and training, focusing on digital literacy and skills, is crucial for individuals to thrive in the digital era.

Lastly, the analysis highlights that partnerships play a critical role in addressing challenges related to digital skills.

Collaborative efforts between various stakeholders, including government, the private sector, and civil society, can contribute to the development and implementation of effective strategies in closing the digital skills gap.

In conclusion, the analysis underscores the urgent need to bridge the digital divide and ensure universal internet connectivity.

Affordability remains a major obstacle, while a whole-of-government and whole-of-society approach is necessary to address this issue. The rapid pace of technological advancements calls for new knowledge and skills to adapt and thrive in the digital era. Additionally, it is crucial to reassess the concept of digital literacy and skills and foster partnerships to tackle challenges related to digital skills.

By addressing these areas, we can work towards a more digitally inclusive society.

Report

Disney is driving global demand for its content through its streaming service, Disney Plus, by offering a wide range of content from renowned franchises such as Lucas, Marvel, Pixar, Disney, and Nat Geo. This strategy aims to captivate audiences worldwide and cater to diverse preferences and interests.

Additionally, Disney recognizes the value of creating local, in-country content to enhance its global reach. In India, Disney operates under the Star brand and produces vibrant content specifically tailored for Indian viewers. This approach has contributed to Disney’s strong presence in the Indian market.

Moreover, the success of local content is evident in other regions, such as Uganda, where positive audience response highlights the significance of local language production. The audience resonates with content produced in local languages, emphasizing the importance of representing and embracing local culture.

Disney’s strategy of combining global and local content has been effective in driving global demand and fostering cultural diversity and inclusivity. Disney continues to strengthen its position as a global entertainment powerhouse by delivering compelling and culturally relevant content.

Report

Digital technology has the potential to drive significant economic, social, and societal transformation, helping to accelerate progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). One speaker highlights the importance of using digital technology responsibly and safely to harness its transformative power.

It is emphasised that responsible and safe use of technology is explicitly linked to the potential for digital technologies to accelerate progress towards the SDGs. This indicates the need for individuals and organisations to be mindful of the ethical and security considerations associated with digital technology.

Trust in technology, companies, and the government is identified as a critical factor for effective engagement with digital technology.

Building trust is particularly important in fostering digital inclusion. By instilling trust in users, it becomes easier for them to engage with technology and leverage its benefits.

Another area of concern is government preparedness against cyber threats. A report by the Economic Commission for Africa reveals the high cost of unpreparedness in cybersecurity, estimated to be as high as 10% of national GDP.

This highlights the importance of governments prioritising cybersecurity measures and investing in necessary infrastructure and expertise to mitigate potential threats.

Investments in skills training, especially in the field of cybersecurity, are deemed necessary. Such investments are not only crucial for enabling users to engage safely online but also help address the global shortage in the cybersecurity workforce.

By equipping individuals with the necessary skills, they can effectively navigate the digital landscape and contribute to a safer and more secure online environment.

Connectivity is identified as a catalyst for new discoveries, innovations, and learning opportunities. The transformative potential of connectivity is emphasised, suggesting that it should be seen as a new beginning rather than the end of the journey.

However, the importance of preparedness and investment in connectivity is emphasised, as changes brought about by connectivity must be anticipated and adequately addressed.

The need for upskilling is highlighted, particularly in the context of the anticipated influx of 2.4 to 2.6 billion new internet users.

These individuals may lack the necessary skills for safe and responsible internet use. Therefore, efforts should focus on upskilling them to ensure that they can make the most of the opportunities provided by digital technology while staying safe and responsible online.

Governments are encouraged to improve their digital literacy and knowledge skills.

As digital transformation affects not only citizens but also governments, it becomes crucial for governments to be digitally literate and engage with other governments on an equal footing. This highlights the importance of collaboration and partnerships in achieving the SDGs.

The importance of skills development is emphasised as a key pillar of preparedness for a more connected world.

Addressing skills gaps is seen as essential in effectively navigating the challenges and opportunities presented by digital technology and connectivity.

Overall, responsible and safe use of digital technology, building trust, government preparedness, investments in skills training, connectivity, upskilling, and government engagement are crucial in harnessing the power of digital technology to drive positive change and contribute to sustainable development.

Report

Disney Plus is a platform that focuses on creating and distributing amazing content to drive demand. One of their key strategies is to bring local, in-country content to their platform, recognizing the importance of cultural relevance. This approach has been successful in regions such as India and Asia, where Disney has been able to produce vibrant content specifically tailored to the preferences and interests of local audiences.

For example, the Korean show “Moving” has gained popularity across Asia and on Hulu in the US, showcasing the effectiveness of adding local content to platforms like Disney Plus.

In addition to emphasizing local content, Disney Plus also places a strong emphasis on being a good partner in the communities it enters.

They do this by actively cooperating with in-country telcos, creative industries, and policymakers. By forming partnerships with these stakeholders, Disney Plus aims to integrate itself into the fabric of the community and contribute positively to its development. This approach not only helps them establish a strong presence in the market but also fosters collaboration and mutual benefit.

Furthermore, Disney Plus is actively engaged in projects that support digital literacy and online safety.

They work with governments and NGOs in 20 countries to fund and implement initiatives aimed at improving digital literacy skills and promoting online safety practices. One notable example is their partnership with Indonesian NGO ganara, where they use old-school art techniques to teach digital literacy.

Another example is the Latin American project Chico net, which trains teachers in imparting digital literacy to their students. Through these projects, Disney Plus demonstrates its commitment to advancing education and ensuring that individuals are equipped with the necessary skills to navigate the digital landscape safely and responsibly.

Joe Welch, the speaker, highlights the effectiveness of hands-on projects like those undertaken by Disney Plus in increasing digital literacy.

He acknowledges the importance of engaging directly with communities and utilizing creative approaches to impart knowledge and skills. This approach not only enhances learning outcomes but also fosters active participation and empowerment among individuals.

Additionally, Joe Welch affirms the value of a multilateral, multistakeholder approach.

He emphasizes the need for collaboration and participation from various sectors, including academia, civil society, and industry. Through active involvement and open dialogue, this approach allows for a holistic and comprehensive understanding of issues, enabling more effective solutions to be developed.

Joe supports the idea that all stakeholders should have a voice and actively participate in decision-making processes.

Furthermore, Joe Welch emphasizes the importance of inclusion and self-representation in decision-making processes. He shares a South African quote, “Nothing for us without us,” which signifies the need to include and empower all individuals, particularly those from marginalized groups.

Joe plans to incorporate this principle into his future presentations, recognizing the transformative power of inclusivity and the valuable insights that can be gained by giving everyone a seat at the table.

In conclusion, Disney Plus is a platform that not only focuses on creating and distributing amazing content but also prioritizes bringing local, in-country content to its platform, being a good partner in the communities it enters, supporting digital literacy and online safety projects, and advocating for a multilateral, multistakeholder approach and inclusion.

Through these initiatives, Disney Plus demonstrates its commitment to providing high-quality entertainment while positively impacting the communities it serves. Joe Welch, in his analysis, highlights the importance of hands-on projects, active participation from all stakeholders, and the value of inclusion and self-representation in decision-making processes.

Report

Expanding internet connectivity is a complex task that requires innovative approaches, responsive to the needs of local communities. Traditional models face challenges, particularly in terms of business operations and return on investment. To bridge this gap, it is necessary to establish connectivity based on the realities of people living in remote and underserved areas.

Community networks, owned and developed by local communities, are a viable solution for expanding connectivity. A portion of the fees paid for connectivity is reinvested within the community, promoting further development. These networks have the flexibility to adapt to any technology that best serves the community’s needs.

For community networks to succeed, a supportive policy and regulatory framework is essential. Countries must develop policies and regulations that recognize new models and access solutions. Access to funding and rights-of-way for infrastructure construction are key considerations.

Relevance of internet services is another crucial aspect of expanding connectivity.

Addressing low incomes and ensuring the value and relevance of available content is important for individuals considering investing in connectivity.

Efforts to increase internet access have already been identified, and now it is crucial to scale up these efforts.

The Internet Society is willing to support this movement, as solutions to connect more people already exist. Increasing funding for deployment is an essential step towards scaling up efforts and achieving widespread connectivity.

Partnerships and collaborations are also necessary for success in the mission to connect everyone.

Almost every panelist agrees that this mission cannot be accomplished individually, highlighting the importance of increased partnerships.

In conclusion, the 2030 vision of universal internet connectivity is achievable. By implementing innovative approaches, supporting community networks, developing a supportive policy framework, ensuring relevance of internet services, scaling up efforts, and fostering partnerships, significant progress can be made towards achieving universal connectivity.

Report

The Global Digital Inclusion Partnership aims to advance meaningful connectivity, especially in rural areas, through collaboration among stakeholders at national, regional, and global levels. By leveraging multi-stakeholder partnerships, the partnership seeks to bridge the digital divide and enhance digital inclusion.

The digital gender gap remains a significant obstacle, with an estimated cost of a trillion dollars in GDP over 10 years in 32 low and middle-income countries.

Addressing this gap is crucial for economic growth and reducing inequality.

Affordability of internet access is another key challenge, with the current standard of 2% for one gig per month considered inadequate. Ensuring daily internet usage and affordable devices, particularly in Africa, is essential for achieving meaningful digital connectivity.

Supporters of the Global Digital Inclusion Partnership advocate for a policy approach to tackle these issues.

They emphasize the need to raise standards of affordability and speed, invest in digital skills, and promote public-private partnerships. Mainstreaming gender in ICT policies using frameworks like REACT is also crucial for inclusivity.

Improved connectivity and digital skills have a positive impact on women.

Internet access enabled women to transition their businesses online during the COVID-19 pandemic, preserving their income. Women with internet access were also more likely to complete online courses to upgrade their skills. Bridging the digital divide empowers women economically and improves their financial stability.

Promoting a broader conversation on digital skills, including coding, online business management, and mobile money operations, is vital for work and economic growth in the digital era.

The existing gaps in digital connectivity are a result of policy choices.

Collaborating with policymakers to enact corrective measures and narrowing these gaps is essential. Engaging rural communities in the development of broadband policies ensures an inclusive approach.

Embedding meaningful connectivity indicators with key ICT statistics helps monitor progress and evaluate the impact of digital inclusion initiatives.

Public access solutions play a crucial role in providing affordable resources to rural and remote areas, contributing to reducing inequalities in connectivity.

In conclusion, the Global Digital Inclusion Partnership, through its multi-stakeholder approach and policy interventions, aims to advance meaningful connectivity and bridge the digital divide.

Addressing the digital gender gap, improving affordability and speed, fostering digital skills, engaging policymakers and rural communities are crucial steps for achieving equitable and inclusive digital development.

Report

Almost one-third of the global population, approximately 2.6 billion people, is still without internet access, highlighting the persistent digital divide and connectivity gap. Moreover, the disparity between men and women in terms of online access is actually increasing, which is a concerning trend.

Meaningful connectivity goes beyond having the necessary infrastructure and devices. Factors such as the availability of relevant services and content, users’ digital skills, and security and safety while using technologies play a crucial role.

Various stakeholders agree on the urgent need for practical solutions to bridge the digital divide and facilitate universal connectivity for all.

This necessitates finding actionable and concrete measures rather than just discussing problems. A panel discussion involving experts in policy and technology aims to identify and implement such solutions.

Governments have a significant role in addressing the digital divide by improving digital skills for individuals and themselves.

Special attention should be paid to rural areas, which often face greater connectivity challenges.

It is important to emphasise and defend the multi-stakeholder model, which encourages collaboration and partnerships between various sectors. This model has proven effective in achieving connectivity goals.

Adopting a holistic ecosystem approach is crucial in addressing the underlying causes of the digital divide. By considering all aspects of the ecosystem, comprehensive solutions can be developed.

Improving “cyber hygiene” skills is also important, which involves educating individuals on safe and secure internet practices.

Governments have a critical role in promoting and supporting such initiatives.

In conclusion, the statistics highlighting the lack of internet access for almost one-third of the global population underscore the urgent need to bridge the digital divide and ensure universal connectivity.

Achieving meaningful connectivity requires addressing various factors such as relevant services, digital skills, and security. Governments, policymakers, and stakeholders must collaborate to find actionable solutions and adopt a holistic ecosystem approach, creating a more inclusive digital future for all.

Report

Amazon’s Project Kuiper is a groundbreaking initiative aimed at addressing the global issue of limited broadband access. The project plans to achieve this goal by deploying over 3,200 satellites in low-Earth orbit. These satellites will provide internet connectivity to underserved and unserved communities worldwide.

Project Kuiper’s mission is to ensure that these communities have access to internet speeds and latency that are on par with terrestrial networks, thus bridging the digital divide.

Additionally, Project Kuiper aims to assist wireless carriers in extending their LTE and 5G networks to new regions.

This collaboration will enhance network coverage and enable more people to connect to the internet.

Engineers at Amazon have also introduced three innovative customer terminal models as part of Project Kuiper. The largest model can deliver speeds of up to 1Gbps, while the smallest ultra-compact model provides speeds of up to 100Mbps.

These terminals will play a crucial role in providing reliable internet access to customers in remote and underserved areas.

The project is progressing steadily, with the recent launch of the first two prototype satellites. Service delivery to customers is expected to begin in late 2024, bringing internet access to communities that have long been left without.

Recognizing the importance of partnerships, Amazon has invested $10 billion into Project Kuiper.

This investment highlights Amazon’s commitment to bridging the digital divide and expanding internet access. Key partnerships have already been formed, including with Vodafone and Vodacom, with more expected in the future.

Takashi Motohisa, a prominent advocate for bridging the digital divide, strongly supports Project Kuiper and emphasizes the significance of technological advancements in addressing the issue.

Motohisa’s endorsement reinforces the project’s dedication to its mission and underscores the importance of initiatives like Project Kuiper in creating a more connected and inclusive world.

In conclusion, with the deployment of thousands of low-Earth orbit satellites, Amazon’s Project Kuiper aims to revolutionize global broadband access.

The project’s commitment to providing comparable internet speeds and latency to terrestrial networks is crucial in bridging the digital divide. Through partnerships and the support of leaders like Takashi Motohisa, the project represents a significant step towards a more connected and inclusive world.

Report

An analysis of the provided information highlighted several key points discussed by the speakers at the event. One of the main concerns raised was the potential increase in energy demands due to the growth of artificial intelligence (AI). Projections suggest that by 2027, the energy requirements for AI could be equivalent to the entire Dutch economy.

This staggering statistic emphasizes the need to address the energy implications of AI expansion and find sustainable solutions to meet the growing demand.

In line with a focus on sustainability, the importance of sustainable digitalisation was also emphasised.

The Dutch National Coalition has taken up the task of working towards sustainable digitalisation, recognising the need to balance technological advancements with responsible consumption and production. This approach reflects the commitment to aligning innovation and infrastructure with the principles of sustainability outlined in SDG 9.

Accountability was another key theme discussed during the event.

The importance of ensuring accountability in the development and implementation of AI systems, particularly in relation to the energy transition, was highlighted. The conversation was conducted with international representatives, providing a global perspective on these issues. This emphasis on accountability indicates the recognition of the potential risks associated with AI development and the need to establish standards and guidelines to ensure responsible and ethical practices.

Another noteworthy observation from the analysis is the call for increased attention to sustainability within the Global Digital Corporation (GDC).

Alisa Heaver, one of the speakers, noted a lack of mention of sustainability in the policy brief of the tech envoy and urged a greater focus on this topic. She emphasized the historical significance of the venue, where the Kyoto Protocol was signed, as a symbolic reminder of the importance of prioritising sustainability in the context of digitalisation and global cooperation.

Lastly, the intersection of sustainability and digitalisation was highlighted as crucial for future progress.

The combination of these two areas was recognised as a key factor in driving sustainable development and achieving the SDGs. The increased discussions around sustainability and digitalisation were appreciated, implying a growing awareness of the need to balance technological advancement with environmental responsibility.

In conclusion, the analysis of the provided information reveals key points discussed by the speakers at the event.

These include concerns over the energy demands of AI, the importance of sustainable digitalisation, the need for accountability in AI development, the call for increased attention to sustainability within the GDC, and the recognition of the intersection between sustainability and digitalisation for future progress.

These insights shed light on the challenges and opportunities presented by AI and underscore the importance of integrating sustainability into technological advancements.

Report

In different parts of the world, there is variation in the technologies used for energy distribution. Some regions rely on gas, while others rely on electricity. This highlights the global disparity in energy usage and the need for equitable access to energy resources.

The impact of technology on the environment is a crucial consideration, as its consequences become more significant with advances in technology.

It is essential to assess the environmental impact of new technologies and develop sustainable alternatives.

Furthermore, fairness in energy distribution and technology usage globally is emphasised. The use of different energy sources, such as gas and electricity, underlines the importance of ensuring equal access to energy resources, reducing inequality, and achieving affordable and clean energy for all.

The concept of “clean code” is also discussed, which refers to efficient and well-optimized software that consumes less energy.

Clean coding practices can contribute to responsible consumption and production, aligning with the Sustainable Development Goal of responsible consumption and production.

The analysis also raises concerns about the energy consumption associated with Artificial Intelligence (AI). While AI has positive impacts, it also presents challenges in terms of energy consumption.

The consideration of energy consumption in AI development and policy-making processes is essential to address its environmental implications.

In conclusion, the analysis highlights the lack of global uniformity in energy distribution technologies. It stresses the need to consider the environmental impact of technological advancements and work towards equitable energy distribution.

Additionally, the importance of clean coding practices and the need to address energy consumption in AI development are emphasized. By addressing these issues, we can move towards sustainable energy practices and responsible technological development.

Report

The analysis explores the importance of supporting youth-led innovation and entrepreneurship in green technology. It emphasises the need to nurture and financially support young people’s initiatives in this field. Examples of youth-led technology innovations include green energy engineering, smart agriculture, renewable energy optimizations, air quality monitoring, green buildings, climate modeling, and eco-friendly transportation.

By empowering young people to develop environmentally-friendly technology, we can make significant progress towards achieving SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) and SDG 13 (Climate Action).

Additionally, the analysis highlights the significance of raising awareness and exposure to green jobs for young people.

Green jobs contribute to sustainable energy advancements and include positions such as green AI researchers, sustainability data analysts, renewable energy engineers, and clean tech researchers. By informing and inspiring young people about these opportunities, we can encourage them to pursue careers that contribute to a sustainable energy future.

This aligns with SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) and SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth).

Furthermore, involving young people in decision-making processes related to digital policy and climate change is essential. Platforms like the Cambodian Youth Internet Governance Forums and the Local Conference of Youth under UNGO offer spaces for young people to participate and express their ideas on these crucial matters.

Inclusive energy transition can be accelerated by incorporating youth perspectives, leading to more effective and inclusive energy systems. This involvement aligns with SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) and SDG 13 (Climate Action).

The analysis also highlights the need to harness renewable energy in Asia more efficiently and effectively.

Currently, many Asian countries heavily rely on fossil fuels. However, by focusing on renewable energy technology and improving energy sharing arrangements, Asia can reduce its dependence on non-renewable resources and promote sustainability. This aligns with SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy).

Moreover, the analysis mentions Chantarapeach Ut, a youth advocate representing a team committed to energy transition.

Ut emphasises the importance of adult support and guidance in directing youth efforts towards achieving inclusive energy transition. Collaboration between young people and adults is crucial in driving effective change.

In conclusion, this analysis advocates for supporting youth-led initiatives and involvement in green technology, raising awareness of green jobs, including young voices in decision-making processes, and harnessing renewable energy in Asia.

It highlights the need to empower and engage young people to accelerate the development of a sustainable energy future and address climate change. Collaboration between young people and adults is vital in driving inclusive energy transition. This analysis serves as a call to action for governments, organizations, and communities to invest in empowering and engaging young people in achieving a sustainable energy future.

Report

The Dutch National Coalition for Sustainable Digitisation focuses on the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in relation to energy consumption and efficiency. They believe that in order to accelerate an inclusive energy transition, both the greening of IT (making AI more energy-efficient) and green by IT (using AI to improve energy efficiency) are essential.

This approach recognises the potential of AI to contribute positively to the transformation of the energy sector.

In terms of ethics, the coalition adopts a guidance ethics approach to address ethical issues associated with the implementation of AI.

They recognise that ethics play a crucial role in the responsible use of AI technologies. To understand these ethical dimensions, public participation is considered crucial. This ensures that the perspectives and concerns of all stakeholders are taken into account, resulting in more informed and ethical decision-making.

Hannah Boute, a proponent of the guidance ethics approach, advocates for its use in evaluating the effects of technology in specific contexts.

In the case of AI applied to the energy transition, stakeholders work together to identify both the positive and negative effects of the technology. These identified effects and the underlying values form the basis for designing, implementing, and using the technology.

This approach ensures that AI aligns with the values and goals of the energy transition.

The coalition also recognises the importance of sustainability in the design of AI. They have a working group dedicated to developing principles for green software.

By integrating sustainability into the design process, they aim to create AI systems that are environmentally friendly and contribute to responsible consumption and production.

International cooperation and input are highly valued by the speakers. They appreciate the contribution and input from an international audience, highlighting the importance of collaboration and partnerships in addressing global challenges.

This signifies the coalition’s commitment to engaging with a broad range of stakeholders and leveraging diverse perspectives to drive sustainable digitisation forward.

Overall, the Dutch National Coalition for Sustainable Digitisation emphasises the potential of AI to support sustainable development, while also emphasising the importance of ethics, public participation, and sustainability in its implementation.

They recognise that responsible and ethical AI development is crucial for achieving the goals of the energy transition and ensuring a sustainable future.

Report

The session entitled “Accelerating an Inclusive Energy Transition” commenced with a video, setting the stage for subsequent discussions. Alisa Hever, a senior policy officer at the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy, welcomed participants to the open forum and emphasized the indispensable role of a live moderator despite the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) for innovation.

The session aimed to explore the opportunities and challenges associated with achieving an inclusive energy transition, with a focus on the significance of AI in driving innovation in the energy sector.

A diverse panel of experts provided their insights and engaged in stimulating discussions throughout the forum.

One key discussion point centered around the potential of AI in hastening the transition towards a more inclusive energy system. The experts highlighted how AI-powered technologies could enhance energy efficiency, facilitate effective demand management, and support the integration of renewable energy sources.

It was underscored that accessible and affordable solutions should be developed, benefiting all communities, particularly marginalized groups.

The panelists also addressed concerns and challenges relating to the implementation of AI in the energy sector. They emphasized the need for robust regulations and ethical frameworks to ensure transparency, fairness, and accountability.

Furthermore, addressing potential biases in AI algorithms was deemed crucial to prevent the exacerbation of existing inequalities.

Throughout the session, the importance of collaboration and dialogue between policymakers, industry leaders, and civil society was emphasized. Engaging multiple stakeholders from different sectors and regions was considered vital for fostering inclusive decision-making and ensuring equitable distribution of the benefits of an energy transition.

In conclusion, the session underscored the immense potential of AI in driving an inclusive energy transition.

Discussions highlighted the pivotal role of a live moderator in facilitating meaningful exchanges and creating an environment conducive to collaboration. By employing AI in a responsible and inclusive manner, it is possible to overcome challenges and expedite the transition towards a sustainable and equitable energy future for all.

Noteworthy observations from the session included the recognition that technological advancements alone are insufficient for achieving an inclusive energy transition; a holistic approach encompassing social, economic, and environmental dimensions is necessary.

Additionally, the session stressed the urgency of addressing equity and social justice issues to prevent the perpetuation of existing disparities in energy access and affordability.

Report

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the energy system is already proving to be beneficial in various areas. AI is being utilized in forecasting, system design, real-time balancing, demand response, and flexible pricing. These applications of AI can enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the energy system, ultimately contributing to a transition away from fossil-based fuels.

However, it is crucial to consider the ethical, legal, social, and economic aspects of implementing AI in the energy sector.

While AI offers promising solutions, the societal impacts and implications of an AI energy system are not yet fully understood. Therefore, thorough study and examination of these aspects are necessary to ensure responsible and sustainable implementation of AI in the energy sector.

It is also equally important to consider values, trust, justice, and fairness in addition to technical efficiency when incorporating AI into the energy system.

The principles of trustworthiness, justice, and fairness should guide the use of AI in the energy system.

Trustworthiness involves establishing meaningful control and collaboration between humans and AI, ensuring that AI systems are reliable and accountable. Justice entails considering whether the benefits derived from AI in the energy system are distributed equally among all stakeholders. Fairness relates to the design of energy markets, ensuring they are efficient, effective, and fair for all participants.

Lessons can be learned from both European and non-European contexts when implementing AI in the energy system.

Countries like the Netherlands can benefit from studying the experiences of other nations, while shared resources and concepts from countries like Nigeria can potentially be valuable in the development of AI energy systems.

Another important consideration is the incorporation of societal values into the design process of AI technology.

The concept of value-sensitive design emphasizes the importance of incorporating the values of potential customers and society into the design of AI systems. This approach ensures that technology aligns with the values and needs of society, promoting responsible consumption and production.

Efficiency in code design is also seen as crucial for sustainability.

By focusing on efficiency, developers can reduce the size and resource consumption of AI algorithms. For example, an app that could be 500 megabytes can be streamlined to 100 megabytes through code efficiency. Recognizing efficiency as a non-functional requirement of AI algorithms can help drive sustainability efforts in the energy sector.

Neil, as an expert in the field, highlights the significance of considering long-term decision-making and the potential evolution of values.

Decisions made today can have lasting consequences, especially in terms of infrastructure that can last for decades. Therefore, it is essential to be aware of how present choices can impact the future and how societal values may change over time.

Accountability is a crucial aspect in the discussion of AI and the energy transition.

Those who develop AI systems should be held accountable for their actions and the impact of their technology. In addition, society itself should be more accountable towards the energy transition, recognizing its role in promoting sustainable energy practices.

Lastly, global cooperation and learning from each other are vital in the energy transition.

By working together and sharing knowledge and experiences, different regions can contribute to the successful implementation and advancement of AI in the energy system. This collaborative approach promotes shared goals of affordable and clean energy, climate action, and sustainable development.

In conclusion, the use of AI in the energy system has the potential to bring substantial benefits, but careful consideration must be given to the ethical, legal, social, and economic aspects.

Trustworthiness, justice, and fairness should guide the implementation of AI, and lessons can be learned from diverse contexts. Incorporating societal values, ensuring code efficiency, considering long-term decision-making, and fostering accountability and global cooperation are essential for a successful energy transition.

Report

The energy landscape in Europe is undergoing significant transformations, presenting new opportunities and challenges. One major development is the increasing use of AI in energy management, which has the potential to revolutionise the industry. However, it also introduces biases that can affect energy distribution and access.

Wealthier neighbourhoods tend to benefit more from AI in energy supply, but efforts are being made to tackle this bias through transparency and sharing of information by power grid companies.

Open-source technologies are also gaining momentum in Europe’s energy sector, particularly for core grid capabilities.

These technologies enhance grid forecasting capabilities, leading to better management and utilisation of energy resources.

Fairness is an important consideration, not just in energy distribution, but also in cutting CO2 emissions. Different regions, countries, and companies have diverse energy mixes and challenges.

For example, the Netherlands heavily relies on natural gas due to its domestic availability. It is, therefore, crucial to view these differences from a modular perspective, considering the specific circumstances and needs of each entity.

Transparency, modularity, and technology are key factors shaping Europe’s energy landscape.

A modular technology system allows countries to interact with one another, fostering an open and collaborative approach towards a more sustainable energy sector.

Sustainability, fairness, and integrity are highly valued from a European perspective. Access to energy is considered a universal right that should be protected and ensured for all.

Maintaining the integrity of the energy system is essential for achieving sustainability and fairness.

Efficiency and awareness are vital in building applications that drive the energy transition. Clean and efficient code development is crucial across sectors as it directly impacts the transition to cleaner energy sources.

Every job has the potential to contribute to a clean and affordable energy future.

Jobs across various sectors influence the energy transition, highlighting the importance of a comprehensive approach.

Technology plays a significant role in opening up new possibilities and advancing different areas within the energy sector. The potential of openness and complexity in technology is recognised by experts.

To foster the global energy transition, it is imperative to share knowledge and values on a global scale.

Managing the knowledge-based landscape globally is fundamental to driving progress and collaboration in the energy sector.

In summary, Europe’s energy landscape is evolving rapidly, with advancements and challenges. The use of AI, open-source technologies, and the consideration of fairness in energy distribution and CO2 emissions are key focal points.

Transparency, modularity, and technology are crucial, and sustainability, fairness, and integrity are highly valued. Efficiency and awareness in application development drive the energy transition, and every job contributes to a clean and affordable energy future. Technology’s potential lies in its openness and complexity, and global knowledge sharing is vital for the energy transition.

Report

The ASEAN region is currently facing disruptions and ransomware issues as it strives to progress in digital development, highlighting the essential need for robust cybersecurity governance. The digital age has brought about unprecedented risks and vulnerabilities, necessitating ASEAN countries to address these growing threats effectively.

Interdisciplinary leadership plays a vital role in achieving a secure digital landscape and digital transformation.

Based on the experiences of ASEAN, it is observed that leaders often lack interdisciplinary knowledge and expertise, which hinders effective digital governance. To govern digital development successfully, leaders should have a comprehensive understanding of all aspects of cybersecurity and its intersection with digital advancements.

Furthermore, the absence of proper cybersecurity governance exposes organizations and governments to significant risks, potentially resulting in catastrophic consequences.

It is essential to establish clear policies, frameworks, and regulations to safeguard against cyber threats and protect sensitive information. Implementing robust cybersecurity governance measures enables organizations and governments to mitigate risks and ensure the security of their digital infrastructure.

In summary, the ASEAN region faces disruptions and ransomware challenges in its pursuit of digital development, highlighting the need for strong cybersecurity governance.

Leadership with interdisciplinary knowledge is crucial for achieving a secure digital landscape and digital transformation. Neglecting cybersecurity governance can expose organizations and governments to severe consequences. Therefore, taking proactive measures to establish comprehensive cybersecurity governance is vital for the safety and stability of digital ecosystems.

Report

The discussion highlighted the importance of budgeting and planning for the development of critical information infrastructure. A civil servant from the Sri Lankan government, involved in the formulation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), emphasised the significance of this aspect in achieving sustainable development.

Sri Lanka has already taken steps in this direction by adopting a cybersecurity strategy and developing a cybersecurity policy.

The integration of policies and strategies for information infrastructure and cybersecurity into standard organisational structures and periodic development projects was proposed as a key step.

This integration is crucial for the successful implementation of SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) and SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals). By integrating these priorities into existing structures and projects, a more effective and streamlined approach can be taken to address information infrastructure and cybersecurity challenges.

This will promote the development of sustainable cities and communities and foster partnerships for achieving the SDGs.

The supporting evidence for these proposals includes Sri Lanka’s existing adoption of a cybersecurity strategy and the development of a cybersecurity policy.

These initiatives demonstrate the country’s commitment to addressing the challenges posed by information infrastructure and cybersecurity. Comprehensive policies and strategies help Sri Lanka tackle these issues in a more systematic and holistic manner.

Overall, the discussion took a neutral sentiment, with an emphasis on the practical importance of budgeting and planning.

This suggests a pragmatic approach to addressing information infrastructure and cybersecurity challenges, highlighting the need for careful consideration and foresight in resource allocation and strategic decision-making.

In conclusion, the discussion highlights the crucial role of budgeting and planning in the development of critical information infrastructure.

Sri Lanka’s efforts in adopting a cybersecurity strategy and policy serve as positive examples. To successfully implement the SDGs, it is essential to integrate policies and strategies relating to information infrastructure and cybersecurity into standard organisational structures and periodic development projects.

By doing so, Sri Lanka aims to achieve sustainable cities and communities while fostering partnerships for the SDGs.

Report

There is a significant divide between the development and cybersecurity communities, as the development community tends to perceive cybersecurity as too technical and defensive. However, it is argued that cybersecurity is actually a foundational element of development, with almost every development project having a cybersecurity aspect.

One of the main challenges is the fear of crossing committees in the UN negotiation process.

Countries view cybersecurity capacity building as a military thing, rather than as an area suitable for official development assistance. This perception contributes to the segregation between different communities in development and cybersecurity.

To address this divide, a conference is being held in Ghana.

This conference aims to bring together the development community and the cybersecurity community, and is co-organized by global organizations, including the World Bank, World Economic Forum, and the Cyber Peace Institute. The conference’s objective is to build understanding and champion the integration of cybersecurity in development.

It is argued that there is a need for interaction and communication between the development and cybersecurity communities.

The cybersecurity community also needs to improve its communication with the development community. The division between the two communities is seen as a barrier that hinders effective collaboration and response to cybersecurity threats.

Furthermore, it is highlighted that combining diverse sectors and breaking down barriers is essential to understanding and effectively responding to cybersecurity threats.

Issues in cyberspace require the contribution of different sectors, including security, human rights, and economics, in order to handle them effectively. This approach emphasises the importance of collaboration and integration across various fields.

Notably, there are also instances where organisations and regions misunderstand their roles and responsibilities regarding cybersecurity and digital matters.

For example, an unnamed country did not attend International Telecommunication Union (ITU) meetings because they viewed it as solely related to telecommunications, despite it covering broader areas such as cybersecurity. This misunderstanding underscores the need for clarity and coordination in understanding the scope and responsibilities of different entities in addressing cybersecurity challenges.

In a positive development, some countries have institutionalised the merger of digital and cybersecurity roles.

This practice involves integrating various aspects of the digital realm, with the role of the cyber ambassador aligned with that of the digital ambassador. This integration aims to create a more comprehensive and coordinated approach to dealing with digital and cybersecurity matters.

In summary, there is a clear divide between the development and cybersecurity communities, with the development community perceiving cybersecurity as too technical and defensive.

However, it is argued that cybersecurity is a foundational element of development, and projects in the development field often include a cybersecurity aspect. The conference in Ghana is a significant effort to bring the two communities together and improve understanding and collaboration.

It is crucial for both communities to interact, communicate effectively, and integrate diverse sectors to effectively respond to cybersecurity threats.

Report

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted our heavy reliance on digital methods of communication and governance, revealing the critical importance of trust and security in these processes. As our everyday lives become increasingly digitalized, it becomes essential to ensure the integrity and safety of our digital systems.

Global cooperation plays a crucial role in achieving sustainable digital transformation.

Digital issues transcend national borders, making collaborative efforts necessary to address them effectively. Partnerships between governments, the industry, international organizations, and civil society are key to tackling digital challenges.

The growth and development of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) rely on a broad and secure digital system.

Secure digital processes that enable cross-border transactions are crucial for the success of industries. Ensuring the safety of digital transactions fosters the growth and expansion of SMEs.

Finding the right balance between regulation and governance is critical for the growth of the digital economy.

The involvement of organizations like the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and industry leaders is vital. The ITU monitors digital activities, while the industry provides the necessary technological foundations. A collaborative approach can facilitate digital progress and innovation.

To build trust in digitalization, common rules, effective implementation tools, robust monitoring mechanisms, and resources for remediation are essential.

Clearly defined and universally agreed-upon rules, comprehensive implementation tools, rigorous monitoring processes, and adequate resources can instill confidence in digital systems.

Cybersecurity is an integral part of our digital lives. It is crucial to integrate cybersecurity measures into digital systems to ensure a safe and secure online environment.

Protecting personal data, financial transactions, and sensitive information is of utmost importance.

Improving the link between the defense, economic, and development communities is a challenge that needs to be addressed. Strengthening connections and fostering collaborative efforts between these communities is essential to tackle global issues and achieve sustainable economic growth while reducing inequalities.

A consortium project is currently underway, aiming to provide guidance through consultation.

This project includes a consultation in Singapore and aims to produce relevant guidance by December. The consortium brings together expertise and perspectives to address key digital challenges.

Johan Eckerholt, a participant in the project, acknowledges the value of prior discussions and plans to incorporate the points discussed into future project proceedings.

This demonstrates their openness to feedback and commitment to improving the project based on valuable insights.

In conclusion, the COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the significance of trust and security in digital communication and governance. Sustainable digital transformation requires global cooperation, a secure digital ecosystem for SMEs, a balanced approach to regulation and governance, common rules and tools, integrated cybersecurity measures, improved collaboration between different communities, and consortium-led guidance initiatives.

Through collaborative efforts, we can build a safe, secure, and prosperous digital future.

Report

In order to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), it is necessary to focus on two key areas: secure digital transformation and collaboration among various stakeholders. Secure, trusted, and inclusive digital infrastructure is fundamental for economic and social development. This requires integrating cybersecurity principles into the digital development agenda.

By doing so, societies can be safeguarded and potential risks can be mitigated.

Collaboration among different stakeholders is also important. Active participation from governments, international organisations, industry players, and civil society is crucial for a successful multi-stakeholder approach.

In order to address the complex challenges associated with digital transformation, it is necessary to bring together the expertise and resources of different actors. By working together, synergies can be created and comprehensive solutions can be developed to tackle cybersecurity issues effectively.

Furthermore, there is a need to mainstream cybersecurity into digital development programs and broaden the funding sources for cybersecurity capacity building.

It is imperative to seamlessly integrate cybersecurity considerations into the design and implementation of digital and development initiatives. By prioritising cybersecurity from the outset, potential vulnerabilities can be identified and addressed proactively. Additionally, expanding funding sources for cybersecurity capacity building can ensure that the necessary resources are available to build robust and resilient digital systems.

Another important aspect highlighted is the importance of conducting real assessments of cyber needs, feasibility, and impacts in development projects.

This involves evaluating the cybersecurity requirements and implications of digital initiatives. By conducting thorough assessments, potential risks can be identified, and appropriate measures can be taken to enhance security and mitigate threats. For instance, in the digitisation of court systems, assessments can help identify the cybersecurity measures needed to protect sensitive data and ensure the integrity of the judicial process.

Additionally, it is crucial to view cybersecurity as an investment rather than simply a cost.

Cybersecurity should not be seen as an expense but as a strategic investment that can yield long-term benefits. By investing in robust cybersecurity measures, organisations can protect their data, systems, and users from cyber threats. This investment can lead to increased trust, business resilience, and economic growth in the digital era.

In conclusion, achieving the SDGs requires a focus on both secure digital transformation and collaboration among various stakeholders.

By integrating cybersecurity principles, adopting a multi-stakeholder approach, mainstreaming cybersecurity in development programmes, conducting thorough assessments, and viewing cybersecurity as an investment, societies can build secure, resilient, and inclusive digital ecosystems that foster sustainable development.

Report

The analysis highlights several important points regarding cybersecurity challenges in Africa and the need for greater attention and inclusive approaches. Firstly, while many African countries have digital transformation strategies, cybersecurity is not sufficiently integrated within them. This is a concerning issue as cybersecurity is crucial for protecting digital assets and ensuring the safety and integrity of digital infrastructure.

The responsibility for addressing cybersecurity primarily falls upon ministers in charge of digital transformation and security/defense, with limited involvement from other stakeholders. This raises concerns about a lack of multi-stakeholder participation in cybersecurity discussions and decision-making processes.

In addition, there is a significant lack of efficient cybersecurity strategies in many African countries.

This poses a significant risk as cyber threats continue to evolve and become more sophisticated. Without effective strategies in place, African countries may be vulnerable to cyber attacks that can have detrimental impacts on their economies, infrastructure, and overall stability.

On a positive note, the analysis suggests that African youths have the potential to play a critical role in addressing cybersecurity challenges.

With 35% of Africa’s population being young, there is a sizable pool of talent that can be trained to become cyber guardians. By providing appropriate education and training, young people can contribute to safeguarding digital spaces in Africa and beyond.

Furthermore, the analysis stresses the importance of Africa not merely being a consumer of cybersecurity products but creating its own ecosystem for cybersecurity.

By fostering domestic innovation and collaboration, Africa can establish itself as a hub for cybersecurity solutions, ultimately enhancing its resilience and capabilities in the face of cyber threats.

Moreover, the analysis highlights the insights shared by Moctar Yedali regarding the rapidly changing nature of technology and its implications.

He emphasizes the need for continual capacity building to keep pace with technological advancements. Yedali warns about the potential of an impending digital divide, where consumers may have to choose between different systems or technologies. This could lead to a “cold technical war” among more influential countries, while smaller countries follow without much choice.

In conclusion, the analysis sheds light on the unique cybersecurity challenges faced by Africa and highlights the need for more attention and inclusive measures to address them.

It calls for the inclusion of multi-stakeholders in cybersecurity discussions, the development of efficient cybersecurity strategies, the training of African youths as cyber guardians, and the creation of a robust ecosystem for cybersecurity in Africa. Additionally, it underscores the importance of continual capacity building and technological cooperation to bridge the digital divide and ensure socio-economic progress.

Report

There is a clear confusion on the ground regarding the differences and intersections between the terms ‘digital’ and ‘cyber’. Patryk Pawlak’s experience in European Union (EU) projects revealed this confusion, highlighting the need for clarification on these terms and how they integrate.

Furthermore, Pawlak emphasized the importance of mainstreaming in the context of understanding ‘digital’ and ‘cyber’. Mainstreaming refers to incorporating these concepts into various aspects of project implementation. EU engagements have demonstrated that mainstreaming can be a solution to the challenges faced on the ground in relation to digital and cyber projects.

The enabling environment is often overlooked in cyber capacity building, as stated by Pawlak.

In his work on operational guidance on cyber capacity building for the European Commission, he identified the enabling environment as a key issue. This highlights the need to consider the broader context within which capacity building initiatives take place.

Pawlak’s involvement in the generation of operational guidance and strategic directions for cyber capacity building for the European Commission reflects the importance placed on considering different aspects of cybersecurity in the development of projects.

This highlights the need for comprehensive and strategic approaches to cybersecurity development.

Delegates are faced with a dilemma when it comes to dealing with blockchain and cybersecurity. A colleague in the delegation was tasked with implementing a project on blockchain in the justice system, but also needed to incorporate cybersecurity measures.

This highlights the challenges that arise when these two complex and distinct areas intersect.

It is evident that expertise in both blockchain and cybersecurity is needed to aid delegates in addressing these challenges. The colleagues in the delegation mentioned by Pawlak were not experts in either of these fields.

Therefore, the involvement of experts becomes crucial in order to navigate the complexities and ensure the effective implementation of projects.

In conclusion, the analysis highlights the confusion surrounding the terms ‘digital’ and ‘cyber’, the importance of mainstreaming in project implementation, the often overlooked enabling environment in cyber capacity building, and the need for expertise to address the challenges posed by the intersection of blockchain and cybersecurity.

These insights emphasize the need for clear definitions, comprehensive approaches, and the involvement of knowledgeable experts in the field.

Report

The Global Forum on Cyber Expertise (GFC) has emphasized the importance of incorporating cybersecurity into development initiatives. It has been observed that cybersecurity is often disregarded due to a lack of understanding on how to integrate it into other development interventions.

Recognizing this disconnect, the GFC aims to initiate discussions to mainstream cybersecurity in the development agenda. All partners involved in the forum understand the connection between sustainable digital transformation and cybersecurity, highlighting the need for a comprehensive approach.

To address this, a multi-stakeholder approach is deemed essential in formulating a comprehensive cybersecurity plan.

The Government of Sweden, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Global Forum on Cyber Expertise (GFC), International Telecommunications Union (ITU), and Microsoft are partnering in this initiative. They plan to bring in various stakeholders to contribute to the discussions. By involving a diverse range of perspectives, expertise, and resources, a more holistic cybersecurity strategy can be developed.

A specific plan has been laid out for a series of workshops that will focus on discussing various aspects of cybersecurity and its role in digital transformation. These discussions aim to explore the importance of digital development for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), learn from past and ongoing cyber capacity projects, implement UN cyber norms, and consider the role of diplomacy.

The intention behind these workshops is to gather insights and formulate suitable cybersecurity strategies that align with the broader development agenda.

The Global Forum on Cyber Expertise operates under the Swedish Government’s initiative and seeks to incorporate the feedback received during these discussions in a multi-stakeholder compendium.

By engaging stakeholders from different sectors and countries, it aims to foster collaboration and ensure that cybersecurity remains an integral part of development efforts.

Moreover, the division and misunderstanding between the development and cybersecurity communities are acknowledged and seen as a challenge.

To address this, the Forum encourages communication and interaction between these two communities. By bringing them together and facilitating a shared understanding, it aims to bridge the gap and move towards common goals. This alignment is considered essential, as both communities have a role to play in achieving sustainable development.

In addition to engaging stakeholders, the Global Forum on Cyber Expertise also emphasizes the need for audience participation and involvement. It appeals to the audience to share their experiences, concerns, and challenges regarding cybersecurity and development. This approach seeks to collect a wide range of perspectives and ensure that the discussions take into account the diverse needs and experiences of different stakeholders.

The Global Conference on Cyber Capacity Building (GC3B) is highlighted as an opportunity to further enrich these conversations, and expectations are set for its outcome to contribute to the overall understanding and progress in bridging the gap between cybersecurity and development.

In conclusion, the Global Forum on Cyber Expertise recognizes the importance of incorporating cybersecurity into development initiatives. It advocates for a multi-stakeholder approach to formulate a comprehensive cybersecurity plan and has outlined a series of workshops to discuss various aspects of cybersecurity in relation to digital transformation and the SDGs.

By improving communication and engaging with stakeholders and the audience, the Forum aims to bridge the divide between the development and cybersecurity communities, fostering collaboration, and achieving better outcomes in sustainable development efforts.

Report

The analysis reveals several key points about cybersecurity. Firstly, there is a pressing need to demystify the field and dispel the misunderstanding that it is solely a technical issue. It is important for actors, including development professionals and policymakers, to understand that cybersecurity is not just a technical problem, but also a consumer and policy issue.

By broadening the perception of cybersecurity, it becomes more accessible and relatable to a wider audience.

The analysis also highlights the need for inclusion and diversity within the field of cybersecurity. Currently, cybersecurity is predominantly English-focused, which excludes other languages and dialects.

To promote inclusivity, it is crucial to reflect and incorporate other languages and both national and local dialects in the field. This ensures that people from diverse backgrounds can fully engage with and contribute to cybersecurity.

Furthermore, the analysis suggests that non-traditional actors, such as political parties and civil society, should be included in shaping cybersecurity policies.

On a national level, there can often be interagency friction between mandates, and involving these non-traditional actors can help to bridge the gap and ensure comprehensive and effective policies. By broadening the participation and perspectives in cybersecurity policy discussions, a more holistic and inclusive approach can be achieved.

The integration of cybersecurity into digital development projects is another crucial aspect.

The approach to digital development and cybersecurity has often been kept separate within organizations, resulting in a siloed approach. By integrating cybersecurity into digital development projects, organizations can ensure that the security of digital systems and infrastructure is prioritised from the outset.

This can be achieved by incorporating cybersecurity as a criterion in audits for development projects.

Donor-funded projects also have a role to play in integrating cybersecurity requirements. By building cybersecurity requirements into their projects, donors can contribute to the overall security and resilience of the projects they fund.

This includes considering cybersecurity as an integral part of the project design and implementation process.

Additionally, the analysis suggests that cybersecurity can benefit from incorporating lessons from other fields, such as climate change. Both fields involve technical complexities that can be intimidating for policymakers and diplomats.

By learning from the approaches and strategies used in climate change negotiations, cybersecurity can adopt a similar mindset of collaboration, knowledge sharing, and multidisciplinary thinking.

In conclusion, the analysis highlights the need to demystify cybersecurity, promote inclusion and diversity, involve non-traditional actors in shaping policies, integrate cybersecurity into digital development projects, and learn from other fields.

These measures will help create a more comprehensive and effective approach to cybersecurity, ensuring safety, progress, and resilience in the digital world.

Report

The analysis explores the multi-stakeholder model in Internet governance and its efficiency in addressing this process. Various speakers argue that this model, which involves researchers, businesses, government, and users, is the most effective way to govern the internet. They emphasize the importance of continuous engagement and allocation of resources to ensure the model’s success.

Furthermore, the involvement of United Nations leaders and governments is seen as crucial in supporting and advancing the multi-stakeholder model.

Alan Ramirez Garcia stresses the need for their increased participation in the process. This is considered essential for creating a more connected world and maximizing opportunities in the digital governance sphere.

The speakers also emphasize that the multi-stakeholder model should yield benefits for public problems and allow for the exercise of human rights.

Alan Ramirez Garcia urges the need for solid evidence on how the model can address public issues and safeguard human rights.

In addition to these points, there are suggestions for a prospective approach in facing future challenges. Alan Ramirez Garcia highlights the importance of applying a forward-looking method to identify and address emerging risks.

It is also advocated to evaluate these risks and their potential impact.

To mitigate the risks that are identified, speakers recommend the immediate implementation of appropriate strategies. Alan Ramirez Garcia specifically supports the prompt execution of mitigation strategies for the risks identified.

This aligns with the goal of taking action on pressing issues, as demonstrated by his endorsement of mitigation strategies for climate-related risks.

Overall, the analysis concludes that the multi-stakeholder model is effective in addressing Internet governance. However, it highlights the need for continuous engagement, the involvement of United Nations leaders and governments, and the consideration of public problems and human rights.

The analysis also emphasizes the importance of applying a prospective approach to identify and evaluate emerging risks, and the immediate implementation of mitigation strategies to address those risks.

Report

The analysis emphasises the significance of multi-stakeholder engagement in policy processes, specifically in the context of internet governance and UN processes. It argues that involving multiple stakeholders in policy development promotes compliance, understanding, and commitment to the outcome. When stakeholders are included and have a clear understanding of the policy process, they are more likely to adhere to it.

Additionally, engaging multiple stakeholders creates a demand-side angle, further promoting and advocating for the policy’s outcomes.

However, there are concerns raised regarding the loose use of the term “multi-stakeholder engagement.” It is suggested that bad policy processes are being labelled as multi-stakeholder, which undermines the credibility and effectiveness of such processes.

This raises questions about the transparency and appropriateness of applying the multi-stakeholder approach in policy development.

The analysis also highlights the shrinking opportunities for participation in UN processes related to internet governance, as discussions become increasingly centralised in New York.

This centralisation leads to less diversity in representation and cross-pollination of ideas. Furthermore, certain stakeholder groups are being overlooked, such as the technical community, which is not seen as a legitimate stakeholder group in discussions on the Global Digital Compact.

This limited representation in UN processes restricts the perspectives and expertise that could contribute to better internet governance.

Although the principle of multi-stakeholder engagement has been widely adopted in the UN and other institutions, there is a lack of effective implementation.

While there may be some use of the principle in these institutions, the application falls short. The analysis suggests that the implementation of the multi-stakeholder principle needs improvement to ensure its effectiveness in policy processes.

It is argued that a meaningful application of the multi-stakeholder process requires a granular understanding of stakeholder groups.

To ensure an inclusive and diverse representation of interests, stakeholders from various backgrounds and areas of expertise should be involved. For instance, discussions on AI policy should involve not only technologists but also educators and sociologists. This highlights the importance of considering a wider range of perspectives in developing policies to address complex issues effectively.

Another noteworthy point is the unique characteristic of the WSIS process when it was based in Europe.

During this time, the process involved different institutions such as UNESCO, WIPO, ITU, and human rights institutions, ensuring a comprehensive approach to internet governance. This observation highlights the need for collaboration among various organizations and institutions in policy development.

The analysis also highlights the role of power dynamics in multi-stakeholder processes.

It points out that power imbalances between different countries and within gender and racial dynamics affect the outcomes of these processes. Therefore, it is crucial to acknowledge and counter the impact of power dynamics in the design of multi-stakeholder processes.

Transparency about power dynamics is also emphasized as an essential aspect of fostering trust and inclusiveness.

Lastly, the analysis underscores the significance of clarity of purpose and flexibility in multi-stakeholder processes. Not every multi-stakeholder process is the same, and it is essential to assess the objectives and desired outcomes of the process.

Furthermore, the design of these processes should allow for relationship building and a deeper understanding of differences among stakeholders.

In conclusion, the analysis highlights the importance of multi-stakeholder engagement in policy processes, with specific reference to internet governance and UN processes.

It stresses the need for a more thoughtful and nuanced application of the multi-stakeholder approach, ensuring diverse representation, addressing power dynamics, and promoting clarity of purpose and flexibility. By addressing these factors, the multi-stakeholder process can become a more effective and credible means of policy development, avoiding its misuse as a mere shortcut or superficial tactic.

Report

The emergence of the Internet has necessitated a multi-stakeholder approach due to its boundary-less nature, requiring involvement from various stakeholders in decision-making processes. This approach was discussed in the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), highlighting its importance in achieving inclusive Internet governance.

Regulators now recognise the value of collaboration and consultation in policy-making, opting for a more inclusive and multi-stakeholder approach.

They take into account the opinions and feedback of stakeholders before implementing policies, leading to positive reception.

UN agencies have also expanded their processes and involved more actors, embracing the outcomes of the WSIS. Agencies such as UNESCO, ITU, and UNTAD have opened their doors to promote inclusivity.

The Secretary General is exploring the creation of a global digital compact, indicating the expansion of UN processes.

However, concerns exist regarding the Internet Governance Forum (IGF). The participation of certain stakeholders, such as ICANN, has diminished over time.

Additionally, government representation in the IGF is insufficient. Language barriers also pose obstacles, though the UK government’s sponsorship of translations in UN languages has been appreciated.

To address challenges effectively, consultations, collaborations, and grassroots involvement are crucial.

Government departments and various actors are encouraged to prepare collectively and engage in discussions for the next level of WSIS Plus 20.

In addition to inclusive global processes, proactive national-level preparation is vital. Preparatory meetings for the WSIS in 2003 have demonstrated the benefits of such an approach.

Understanding the global landscape and proactively engaging contribute to more effective decision-making and governance.

In summary, the impact of the Internet highlights the importance of a multi-stakeholder approach. Regulators, UN agencies, and stakeholders recognise the significance of inclusivity in decision-making processes.

Efforts are being made to overcome challenges, such as diminishing participation and language barriers. Consultations, collaborations, and grassroots involvement are seen as key, along with proactive national-level preparation.

Report

The discussion revolved around the different aspects of internet governance and its effects on economic growth, inclusion, and stakeholder engagement. Several key points were raised during the discussion.

One of the main topics of the conversation was the positive impact of WSIS (World Summit on the Information Society) activities on economic growth.

The participants pointed out that global GDP has more than doubled since 2003, with examples such as Nigeria’s GDP increasing from $100 billion to about $500 billion. The argument put forward was that the activities of WSIS have contributed to this growth.

Another important aspect that was discussed was the need for inclusive participation and representation in internet governance.

The participants noted that having focal people to represent different regions can encourage multi-stakeholder participation. This approach enables representatives from different areas to participate on behalf of others, promoting inclusivity.

The conversation also highlighted concerns about the lack of diverse and engaged participants in internet governance meetings.

The sentiment expressed was negative, with participants raising the issue that the same individuals have been attending these meetings for years and that new participants often do not stick around. This lack of new and engaged participants was deemed problematic for effective discussions and decision-making.

A significant point that emerged from the discussion was the importance of active outreach and the use of alternative communication channels in countries where the internet is not a priority.

The participants emphasised that in many countries, the internet is still considered a luxury, and people face more pressing issues like water scarcity or environmental challenges. Therefore, the UN and other organisations were advised to adopt different means of communication, such as radio, television, or traditional letter-writing, to engage with uninvolved individuals.

Additionally, the panelists highlighted concerns about the societal and economic impact of trade agreements, including those related to digital trade provisions.

They pointed out that while some panelists expressed concern about these provisions, experts with backgrounds in trade policy observed and analysed all trade-related concerns from the internet community.

The importance of interdisciplinary communication and collaboration was stressed throughout the discussion.

The panelists emphasised the need for professionals from various fields, such as engineers, trade lawyers, and economists, to work together in an interdisciplinary approach to address internet governance issues effectively.

Furthermore, the conversation shed light on the importance of knowledge for effective engagement and representation.

The panelists believed that adequate knowledge, especially in technical areas related to the internet, is necessary for someone’s voice to be heard.

The lack of global representation and contribution from local organisations in internet governance was also discussed.

It was pointed out that the majority of participants are from Western countries, with little involvement from local organisations in countries like Japan. This apparent inequality in representation was considered a negative aspect of internet governance.

The participants also highlighted the lack of knowledge and awareness about internet-related issues among organisations such as the Japan Consumer Organisation.

This observation raised concerns about the need for education and awareness programmes to bridge the knowledge gap.

Barriers to inclusive participation in global internet governance meetings were also mentioned, such as the high costs associated with attending these events and the burdensome administrative processes, including visa applications.

These barriers were seen as hindrances to inclusivity in the internet governance process.

The discussion concluded with the consensus that there is a need for stakeholder inclusion and consultation through channels beyond physical and virtual meetings. This approach would enable a more diverse range of individuals and organisations to provide input and be involved in internet governance discussions and decisions.

Finally, the importance of genuine and credible multi-stakeholderism in internet governance was stressed.

It was emphasised that multi-stakeholderism should not be mere window dressing, but a genuine and credible approach that includes bringing people along, listening to different perspectives, and enacting positive change.

Overall, the discussion highlighted the complexities and challenges of internet governance, emphasising the need for inclusive participation, knowledge dissemination, and interdisciplinary collaboration.

It underscored the significance of actively reaching out to uninvolved individuals and organisations and the importance of genuine multi-stakeholderism in achieving effective and inclusive internet governance.

Keywords: WSIS, economic growth, multi-stakeholder participation, inclusion, diverse participants, active outreach, alternative communication channels, societal and economic impact, trade agreements, interdisciplinary collaboration, knowledge gap, global representation, barriers to access, stakeholder inclusion, consultation channels, capacity building, genuine multi-stakeholderism.

Report

The UK is actively preparing for the WSIS plus 20 review process and has strived to ensure that the process is fully inclusive to the multistakeholder community. The goal is to create a collaborative discussion platform that allows for direct input from a wide range of stakeholders.

While the main focus of the session is on WSIS plus 20, discussions may also cover inclusion in other UN processes related to internet governance.

The session, designed as a panel discussion, aims to encourage active participation and foster collaborative discussions among the multistakeholder community.

This format recognizes the importance of diverse stakeholders’ direct input in achieving an inclusive WSIS plus 20 review process. The evidence suggests that this approach has garnered positive sentiment and support.

Additionally, the inclusive approach to the WSIS plus 20 review process aligns with several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities), SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions), and SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals).

By promoting inclusivity, these goals can be better addressed, leading to a more equitable and just society.

Overall, the UK’s proactive efforts to ensure an inclusive WSIS plus 20 review process through collaborative discussions with the multistakeholder community are commendable.

The session’s format and goal of increasing direct input reflect a commitment to creating a participatory and inclusive process. This approach not only supports the achievement of SDGs but also demonstrates the significance of engaging diverse stakeholders in shaping internet governance policies.

Report

The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) is represented by Timea Suto, who serves as the global digital policy leader. The ICC is a powerful organisation that represents over 45 million companies across more than 170 countries. It has been the primary business focal point in the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) process for two decades.

In discussions on effective decision-making and progress, there is a consensus that an essential aspect of a successful multi-stakeholder process is ensuring the inclusion and active participation of all stakeholders.

Various speakers stress the significance of hearing every stakeholder’s voice and point out that stakeholder mapping plays a crucial role in identifying those who agree or disagree on certain matters. They also highlight the need for capacity building at all levels to enable stakeholders to effectively engage and contribute.

Furthermore, there is a strong desire to expand the multi-stakeholder model to make it more inclusive.

The involvement of new voices in decision-making processes is seen as essential for promoting diversity and reducing inequalities. Mentorship is viewed as a valuable tool for learning from experienced stakeholders, while sponsorship is seen as crucial for representing and promoting innovative approaches in processes where they are not yet present.

The United Nations (UN) has made progress in recognising the importance of a multi-stakeholder process.

The UN acknowledges the concept of a multi-stakeholder process and describes how governments, businesses, civil society, and the technical community can come together to achieve common goals. However, there is a call for UN multi-stakeholder modalities to save time and resources.

Discussions at the beginning of each process on whether to allow stakeholders in should be avoided by establishing UN modalities for multi-stakeholder engagement.

In conclusion, the ICC, with its global digital policy leader Timea Suto, plays a crucial role in representing millions of companies worldwide.

The discussions highlight the significance of hearing every stakeholder’s voice, stakeholder mapping to identify diverse perspectives, capacity building at all levels, and the expansion of the multi-stakeholder model to make it more inclusive. Additionally, there is a recognition of the progress made by the UN in acknowledging the importance of a multi-stakeholder process, along with a call for UN multi-stakeholder modalities to streamline engagement and maximise efficiency.

Report

The World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) has received high praise for its impactful process in facilitating participation and producing unique outcome documents. These documents are notable for incorporating the perspectives and involvement of non-state actors, reflecting a comprehensive and inclusive approach.

The WSIS documents strike a balance between broad overarching principles and specific subject areas, providing a holistic yet detailed framework.

There is a strong call to continue building upon the WSIS process, advocating for inclusivity and increased civil society involvement at various levels.

Enabling civil society to shape debates at the grassroots level is seen as crucial in bringing about significant change. It is proposed that WSIS provides space for civil society involvement, and collaboration within the U.N. system is needed to facilitate greater engagement.

Lessons from WSIS are valuable in addressing macro issues such as public financing and digital public infrastructure.

The issue of insufficient public financing is identified, and considering digital public infrastructure in the light of WSIS lessons can provide innovative solutions. By drawing upon WSIS experiences, these issues can be effectively tackled.

The WSIS documents stand out by focusing on people-centered development.

They emphasize human rights, open innovation, and open source as important factors in creating an enabling environment. This approach is demonstrated in efforts to bring education to remote areas and promote trade justice and small-scale agriculture. Emphasizing the needs and rights of individuals and communities, rather than solely focusing on technological advancements, is crucial for achieving fair and inclusive development.

In conclusion, the WSIS process is praised for facilitating participation and generating unique outcome documents that incorporate the views of various stakeholders.

Continuing to build on the process with a focus on inclusivity and civil society involvement is recommended. WSIS lessons are also valuable in addressing macro challenges such as public financing and digital public infrastructure. The people-centered approach advocated by WSIS is essential for promoting fair and inclusive development.

Report

The extended summary provides a comprehensive overview of the main points discussed in the given text. It highlights the importance of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) process and the role of youth in it. The youth voice was emphasised, with advocates calling for greater representation and inclusion in the WSIS process.

They also stressed the need for initiatives that improve access to education and empower young people. This underlines the importance of involving youth in shaping policies and decisions related to the digital world.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) was recognised for its potential in advancing human development and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

It was noted that AI can enhance education and healthcare access, help address global challenges like climate change and poverty, and improve accessibility for persons with disabilities through assistive technologies. However, concerns were raised about potential threats to data privacy, the creation of surveillance systems, and the emergence of new forms of discrimination and exclusion.

It was argued that AI should be developed and employed in a manner that upholds human rights and follows ethical guidelines.

The alignment of the WSIS with various UN processes was discussed, highlighting the importance of digital cooperation.

The WSIS was seen as setting the foundation for digital cooperation and being aligned with different UN processes, including the WSIS Forum, special initiatives, and prizes. This emphasises the collaborative efforts needed between stakeholders to achieve common goals in the digital realm.

The impact of digital transformation was examined, noting its success in terms of technological advancements but also its shortcomings in terms of knowledge dissemination.

Issues such as disinformation, misinformation, hate speech, and fake news were identified as challenges of digital transformation. The monopolisation of digital platforms in the media landscape was also highlighted, with significant effects on community publishing and media diversity.

The need for periodic reviews of the WSIS process was stressed, as well as the importance of acknowledging progress and evolution in Internet governance.

It was argued that the presence of 176 indicators in the SDGs serves as Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and distinguishes them from the Millennium Development Goals. The inclusion of low-literate individuals in the digital space was advocated, highlighting the current lack of internet tools and platforms designed for those who do not know how to read or write.

Overall, the speakers expressed a mix of positive and negative sentiments, advocating for responsible development and utilisation of AI, digital inclusion, and closer alignment with the SDGs.

Collaboration, periodic reviews, and a multi-stakeholder and human-centric approach were seen as crucial in achieving sustainable digital development. The text provides valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities associated with the WSIS process and the role of digital technologies in advancing societal and development goals.

Report

The analysis highlights several key points made by the speakers regarding various aspects of internet governance. Firstly, inclusive, transparent, and multi-stakeholder processes are deemed to be of utmost importance in effectively addressing the digital governance challenges at hand. The past Internet Governance Forums (IGFs) have successfully applied such processes, demonstrating their effectiveness in fostering collaboration and achieving meaningful outcomes.

Furthermore, trust-building between stakeholders is acknowledged as a crucial element in realizing the vision of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS).

It is widely believed that establishing and nurturing trust among different actors involved in internet governance is essential for creating an environment of cooperation, enabling collective efforts towards achieving common goals.

The analysis also emphasizes the need to empower individuals and centre the governance of emerging technologies.

The speakers argue that putting individuals at the forefront and ensuring their equal participation in shaping the governance of emerging technologies is vital. This approach aims to maximize the societal benefits of these technologies while mitigating potential risks and ensuring that they serve the needs and interests of all.

Furthermore, it is asserted that participation in IGFs must exhibit consistency, inclusivity, and representation from all regions of the world.

This will contribute to a diverse range of perspectives and ensure that the global internet governance dialogue reflects the varied needs and challenges faced by different regions. The analysis suggests that the Committee on Science and Technology for Development (CSCD) could seek synergies with national and regional IGF initiatives to enhance inclusivity and improve regional representation in the overall IGF process.

In addition, the analysis highlights the importance of expanding internet access to the remaining 2.6 billion individuals who are currently not connected.

It is noted that while significant progress has been made over the past two decades, with internet access increasing from 6% to approximately 70% of the global population, concerted efforts are still required to bridge the digital divide and ensure universal connectivity.

Lastly, gender inclusion in artificial intelligence (AI) and its governance is recognized as a critical aspect.

The analysis suggests adopting a gender lens and valuing women’s perspectives in all aspects of internet governance and decision-making related to AI. This approach aims to address existing gender disparities and biases, ensuring that AI technologies and policies are developed in a way that promotes gender equality and inclusivity.

In conclusion, the analysis underscores the significance of inclusive, transparent, and multi-stakeholder processes in addressing digital governance issues.

Trust-building, empowering individuals, regional representation, universal internet access, and gender inclusion in AI governance are key focus areas identified by the speakers. These points highlight the collective efforts required to ensure that internet governance initiatives are equitable, efficient, and responsive to the evolving needs and challenges of the digital age.

Report

The analysis of the speakers’ discussions highlighted several important points regarding internet governance and the role of international institutions. Firstly, it was noted that, despite significant technological advancements since the Tunis Agenda and Outcomes in 2005, these agreements continue to hold relevance in promoting an open, resilient, unfragmented, and inclusive internet.

The Tunis Agenda endorses the importance of human rights and cultural diversity in the digital space. The speakers pointed out that while platforms like social media, artificial intelligence, clouds, and blockchains have emerged since the Tunis Agenda, its recommendations have maintained their importance and applicability.

Furthermore, the analysis identified improvements in institutions like the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) with regards to transparency, accountability, and support for international domain names.

However, it was suggested that further improvements could be made, particularly in increasing the government’s participation in ICANN beyond an advisory level.

Another significant point raised during the discussions was the need to reconsider the framework of enhanced cooperation.

The analysis highlighted that developing countries often struggle to engage with major platform providers on an equal-to-equal basis, especially in areas such as taxation and local rules for personal data protection. Additionally, emerging issues such as cyber threats, misuse of the internet for money laundering, and human trafficking require cooperative efforts among nations.

The speakers proposed that a reconsideration of the framework of enhanced cooperation is necessary to effectively address these challenges.

The analysis also emphasized the importance of monitoring the potential digital gap between regions and social groups within each country.

It was suggested that local digital problems should be addressed locally, and each country should actively monitor and work towards minimizing disparities in internet access and usage.

Lastly, the analysis highlighted the significance of supporting institutions involved in internet governance, such as ICANN, ITU, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), World Trade Organization (WTO), and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

These institutions play a crucial role in ensuring a stable internet and should be supported to foster a stable and inclusive digital environment for all nations.

In conclusion, the analysis of the speakers’ discussions identified the continued relevance of the Tunis Agenda and Outcomes, improvements in institutions like ICANN and ITU, the need for reconsideration of the framework of enhanced cooperation, the importance of monitoring the digital gap, and the necessity of supporting institutions involved in internet governance.

These observations provide insights into the ongoing efforts and challenges in shaping an open, inclusive, and secure internet.

Report

The WSIS Plus 20 review at CSTD takes a progressive and forward-thinking approach, focusing not only on the present but also on planning for the future. This review is in alignment with SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure. The General Assembly adopted a resolution for a high-level meeting to be held in 2025, known as the WSIS Plus 20 review.

To facilitate this process, the ECOSOC adopted a resolution requesting the CSTD to organize substantive discussions on the progress made in the implementation of the outcomes of the WSIS over the past 20 years. Furthermore, CSTD members have adopted a roadmap to guide their work on the WSIS Plus 20 review.

Stakeholder engagement with open consultations and a survey questionnaire is a vital part of the WSIS Plus 20 review.

The CSTD’s Secretariat plans to conduct a survey questionnaire from late 2023 until late 2024. Additionally, open consultations will be held at national, regional, and international levels, involving various stakeholders such as multilateral agencies, the private sector, the technical community, national governments, civil society, and academia.

This inclusive approach ensures that the review takes into account a wide range of perspectives and experiences in shaping the future of the WSIS.

The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) plays a significant role in the WSIS process and is an outcome of it.

The CSTD is grateful to the IGF for providing a platform to launch its open multi-stakeholder consultation at the 18th IGF. This collaboration allows for meaningful discussions and engagement with different stakeholders to inform the WSIS Plus 20 review.

The WSIS forum not only aligns with several UN processes but also highlights the role of digital transformation in achieving sustainable development goals.

There are examples of the alignment of the WSIS forum, special initiatives, and WSIS prizes with various UN processes. Additionally, the UN promotes the role of digital technology in healthy ageing, further emphasising the importance of digital transformation for overall development.

Given the positive progress made in the WSIS process, Cedric Vashvalt should continue the discussion on digital policies and transformation.

Although no specific supporting facts or arguments are provided in the data, it suggests that Cedric Vashvalt possesses valuable insights and perspectives in this area.

In conclusion, the WSIS Plus 20 review at CSTD takes a forward-thinking approach by focusing on future planning.

Stakeholder engagement through open consultations and a survey questionnaire plays a crucial role in shaping the review’s outcomes. The IGF provides a platform for open multi-stakeholder consultation, and the WSIS forum aligns with various UN processes, emphasising the role of digital transformation in achieving sustainable development goals.

Cedric Vashvalt should continue the discussion on digital policies and transformation as he is seen as an important contributor in this domain.

Report

The analysis of the discussions reveals several key points from the different speakers. Firstly, the multi-stakeholder model is viewed positively as an effective instrument for internet governance. The speakers acknowledge that the model and the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) have played a vital role in the unprecedented success of the internet.

They highlight the importance of a cooperative approach, as demonstrated by the Internet Governance Forum (IGF), in making effective decisions for the governance of the internet.

Secondly, human rights are seen as crucial to maintaining an open, free, and secure online space.

The EU strongly supports a proactive approach towards human-centric digitalization, emphasizing the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. They advocate for human rights to be the foundation of an open and secure online environment. The EU AI Act is highlighted as a significant step towards placing the impact of AI technologies at the centre of digitalization efforts.

Furthermore, the importance of bridging digital divides and creating a more inclusive digital future is emphasized.

The EU and its member states are committed to deploying digital networks and infrastructures worldwide, focusing on underserved regions, countries, and populations. This commitment aligns with SDG 9, which aims to promote industry, innovation, and infrastructure. The EU’s efforts aim to ensure that everyone has equal access to the benefits of the digital world.

Additionally, the analysis reveals opposition to the centralization of control over the internet.

One speaker explicitly stated their stance against the centralization of control, but no further supporting facts were provided for this argument.

Lastly, strengthening the role of the IGF is seen as crucial in fostering an inclusive, open, and sustainable digital environment.

The EU believes that it is critical for the IGF to evolve into an even more impactful and inclusive model. This aligns with the goal of creating a digital environment that encompasses diverse perspectives and promotes cooperation among stakeholders.

In conclusion, the analysis highlights the significance of the multi-stakeholder model for effective internet governance.

Human rights are deemed essential for an open and secure online space, and the EU is committed to bridging digital divides and creating a more inclusive digital future. Strengthening the role of the IGF is seen as crucial in fostering an inclusive, open, and sustainable digital environment.

Opposition to the centralization of control over the internet is also stated.

Report

UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, plays a crucial role in addressing digital challenges through the principles of multistakeholderism and cooperation. They co-facilitate action lines, demonstrating their commitment to involving multiple stakeholders in finding effective solutions to digital challenges.

This approach is essential in promoting partnerships and collaborations to achieve sustainable development goals, particularly SDG 17: Partnership for the goals.

Furthermore, UNESCO actively works towards assessing internet environments in about 45 countries. Their approach is based on a rights-based, open, accessible, and multistakeholder approach.

This demonstrates their dedication to ensuring that internet access is not only available but also respects human rights and fosters an inclusive digital society. However, despite UNESCO’s efforts, there have been approximately 1,200 internet shutdowns globally between 2016 and 2023. This highlights the ongoing challenges faced in ensuring universal access to the internet and the need for continued efforts to address these issues.

In addition to addressing connectivity challenges, UNESCO promotes open access to information.

They celebrate Access to Information Day on the 28th of September, emphasizing the importance of transparency and access to information in fostering sustainable development. This commitment aligns with SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions, which emphasizes the importance of promoting accountable and inclusive societies.

Another significant challenge in the digital age is the prevalence of disinformation and misinformation.

UNESCO recognizes this and has developed programs to support the upscaling of civil society organizations and fact-checking mechanisms. This effort aims to enhance media and information literacy, which is crucial in combating the spread of false information. By supporting these initiatives, UNESCO contributes to achieving SDG 16 and building resilient societies.

Moreover, UNESCO implements standard-setting instruments to facilitate open science and ethical considerations regarding artificial intelligence.

They have various standards in place, including recommendations on open science, the ethics of AI, and open educational resources. This commitment to setting global standards promotes the responsible use of technology and ensures that scientific and educational resources are freely available to all.

In conclusion, UNESCO plays a significant role in addressing digital challenges through multistakeholderism, cooperation, and various initiatives.

Despite the persistent challenges, such as internet shutdowns and disinformation, UNESCO’s efforts to assess internet environments, promote open access to information, enhance media literacy, and implement standard-setting instruments demonstrate their commitment to building a more inclusive and sustainable digital society.

Their work aligns with the UN’s sustainable development goals, emphasizing the importance of partnerships, transparency, and ethical considerations in harnessing the potential of digital technologies for the benefit of all.

Report

According to one speaker, ICT (Information and Communication Technology) is considered an absolute mega trend and plays a crucial role in driving global changes. It is seen as a super mega trend that has a positive impact on various aspects of society.

The speaker highlights the significant role of ICT in shaping industries, innovation, and infrastructure, aligning with SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure.

On the other hand, another speaker raises concerns about the urgency of addressing ICT-related issues. They emphasize that the pace of global changes is accelerating, necessitating immediate action.

Undoubtedly, ICT advancements have brought about rapid changes in various domains, such as technology and communication. However, the negative sentiment expressed by this speaker suggests that there are potential challenges and risks associated with these changes. They stress the need to address these issues promptly, emphasizing the importance of SDG 13: Climate Action.

Both speakers agree on the critical role of UN partnerships and multi-stakeholder groups.

They acknowledge that the collaborative efforts of these entities are essential in tackling the complex challenges posed by ICT-related issues. These partnerships and groups provide a platform for various stakeholders to come together, share expertise, and develop effective strategies. The positive sentiment expressed towards these partnerships highlights their significance in addressing not only ICT-related concerns but also broader sustainable development goals.

SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals is particularly relevant in this context.

The analysis reveals that despite the positive outlook towards ICT’s contributions to global changes, there is an underlying sense of urgency and a recognition of potential risks.

It is essential to strike a balance between harnessing the benefits of ICT while mitigating any negative implications. The importance of collaboration, as indicated by the positive sentiment towards UN partnerships and multi-stakeholder groups, further underscores the need for collective action in navigating the challenges presented by ICT advancements.

Overall, the extended summary highlights the key points made by the speakers, explores their arguments and supporting evidence, and emphasizes the significance of UN partnerships and multi-stakeholder groups.

It reflects the contrasting perspectives surrounding ICT as a mega trend and emphasizes the urgency in addressing associated issues.

Report

The World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) aims to create a people-centred, inclusive, and development-oriented information society. However, this vision remains unfulfilled, as evidenced by the stark disparities in connectivity across different regions and countries. While 95% of the world’s population has access to mobile broadband networks, only 36% of people in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) are connected.

This disparity highlights the existence of a digital divide, where disadvantaged populations are left behind in the global information society.

Furthermore, the digital divide is not only limited to LDCs but also extends to rural areas within developed countries.

Massive rural-urban divides in connectivity exist, creating further barriers to accessing information and participating in the digital economy. This divide has become a serious development issue, as those who lack access to digital technologies struggle to reap the benefits of innovation and technological advancements.

The WSIS process and digital transformation are described as a massive technological revolution of our time.

This transformation poses both opportunities and challenges for individuals, governments, and societies as a whole. Navigating the emerging world of digital technologies can be daunting, as it is largely uncharted territory. While advancements in technology have the potential to drive economic growth and foster innovation, they also bring risks, such as cyber threats and privacy concerns.

Recognising the complexity of the digital sphere, the need for multistakeholder cooperation and a One UN approach is emphasised.

The WSIS highlights the importance of enhancing partnerships and collaboration among different stakeholders, including governments, private sector entities, civil society organisations, and international institutions. It is through this multilateral cooperation that the challenges and opportunities of the digital age can be effectively addressed.

Additionally, data collection is seen as crucial for fact-based reporting and decision-making.

The importance of accurately collecting data through questionnaires is emphasised, as it allows for evidence-based analysis and monitoring progress towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). By capturing and reporting relevant data, policymakers and stakeholders can make informed decisions and take targeted actions to bridge the digital divide and promote an inclusive information society.

In conclusion, the WSIS vision of an inclusive and development-oriented information society remains relevant and unfulfilled.

The digital divide persists, with significant disparities in connectivity between different regions and populations. Navigating the digital transformation brings both opportunities and challenges, necessitating multistakeholder cooperation and a One UN approach. The collection of accurate and comprehensive data is essential for effective decision-making and monitoring progress towards achieving the SDGs.

Report

The Government of Japan has reiterated its commitment to the multistakeholder approach in internet governance during the International Governance Forum (IGF) held in Kyoto in 2023. This event saw a remarkable registration of over 8,000 participants, indicating widespread interest in global internet governance issues.

Mr. Yasunori Ueno delivered a speech on behalf of Mr. Yoshi Ida, affirming Japan’s dedication to the multistakeholder approach, which involves collaborating with various stakeholders, including governments, civil society, and the private sector, to shape internet policies.

The principle of a people-centred, inclusive, and development-oriented internet society has remained unchanged since 2005.

Despite the immense changes and advancements in the internet landscape over the years, the focus on placing people at the centre of internet policies, ensuring inclusivity, and fostering development, continues to be paramount.

The significance of a free, open, and global internet was emphasised.

It was highlighted that such an internet is vital for socio-economic development, as it provides opportunities for innovation, entrepreneurship, and knowledge-sharing. Additionally, it helps in debunking misinformation by promoting the free flow of accurate and reliable information. It also enhances cybersecurity, ensuring that individuals and organizations can conduct activities online with confidence and trust.

As the G7 presidency, Japan is playing a leading role in discussions on AI governance through the Hiroshima AI process.

This initiative recognizes the importance of establishing principles and guidelines to govern the ethical and responsible use of artificial intelligence, considering its potential impact on various sectors of society.

Japan views the IGF Kyoto as a crucial opportunity, especially in anticipation of the upcoming WSIS plus 20 review in 2025.

The WSIS plus 20 review refers to the United Nations’ World Summit on the Information Society, a series of gatherings since 2003 aimed at bridging the digital divide and harnessing the potential of information and communication technologies for sustainable development. By participating in the IGF Kyoto, Japan seeks to contribute to the discussions and preparations for the WSIS plus 20 review, ensuring that the outcomes align with the goals and principles of the multistakeholder approach and advance partnerships for global development.

In conclusion, the Government of Japan’s reaffirmation of commitment to the multistakeholder approach in internet governance, the enduring principles of a people-centred internet society, the importance of a free and global internet, and its active involvement in AI governance discussions demonstrate Japan’s dedication to promoting inclusive, secure, and responsible internet governance practices.

Through its participation in the IGF Kyoto and its leadership role in the Hiroshima AI process, Japan aims to play a significant role in shaping the future of internet governance and contributing to global partnerships for sustainable development.

Report

The analysis provides a comprehensive overview of digital cooperation and the challenges posed by the data and AI economies. The first argument highlights that the promise of collective digital potential has not been realised. It notes that algorithms today are largely opaque and indiscernible to the public.

This lack of transparency creates concerns about accountability and the power wielded by AI systems. Furthermore, the analysis suggests that this algorithmic society is also a society of fragmentation, as AI systems often lead to polarisation and echo chambers, hindering the creation of a cohesive and inclusive digital space.

The second argument focuses on the neocolonial dynamics embedded within the data and AI economy.

The analysis points out how trade forums are being misused for discussions on data flows, with potential negative consequences for privacy and data protection. Additionally, it highlights how data for development initiatives are frequently extractive, benefiting powerful global entities at the expense of local communities and economies.

Moreover, the weaponization of intellectual property regimes by big tech companies further exacerbates the imbalance of power, rendering the situation even more concerning.

In response to these challenges, the analysis proposes a four-pronged strategy for digital cooperation. The first prong advocates for initiating a consensus for a global digital human rights constitutionalism.

This would entail establishing a set of principles and standards that safeguard individuals’ rights in the digital sphere, addressing issues such as privacy, freedom of expression, and equitable access to technology.

The second prong focuses on better governance of global data public goods.

The analysis argues for the need to develop robust frameworks and mechanisms that ensure responsible data management, protection, and sharing. This would involve addressing issues of data ownership, control, and fairness to promote more equitable data ecosystems.

The third prong of the proposed strategy calls for the mobilisation of public financing to galvanise digital innovation ecosystems.

The analysis recognises that public investment is vital to foster innovation, particularly in areas where the private sector may not prioritise development due to market limitations or social impact considerations. By channelling public funding strategically, the aim is to nurture digital entrepreneurship and create a conducive environment for sustainable technological advancements.

Finally, the fourth prong suggests the internationalisation of internet governance.

The analysis argues that internet governance should be a collective effort involving multiple stakeholders on a global scale. This would facilitate a more inclusive decision-making process and ensure that diverse perspectives are represented. By internationalising internet governance, the aim is to create a more balanced and democratic digital ecosystem that respects the interests of all nations and individuals.

In conclusion, the analysis highlights the complexity and urgency of addressing the challenges posed by the data and AI economies.

It emphasises the need for greater transparency, accountability, and collaboration in digital cooperation. The proposed four-pronged strategy provides a comprehensive framework to navigate these challenges, with recommendations ranging from the protection of digital human rights to the internationalisation of internet governance.

By implementing such strategies, it is hoped that the potential of the digital era can be harnessed for the benefit of all, fostering innovation, inclusivity, and equitable development.

Report

Anriette Esterhuysen, a staunch advocate for reclaiming the Internet as a connector of people and a disruptor of power concentration, argues that the concepts of the commons, rights, and the public good can work harmoniously together to create a more inclusive and equitable online environment.

She believes that these concepts should not be seen as opposing forces, but rather as synergistic entities.

Esterhuysen supports the protection of the public core of the Internet, emphasizing the need for effective governance involving not only the state but also commercial and common interest parties.

She recognizes the importance of coexistence and collaboration among different stakeholders to ensure affordable and accessible Internet connectivity without government and corporate interference.

While Esterhuysen opposes the nationalization of the Internet, she expresses concern about surveillance capitalism and the commercial exploitation of data.

She calls for greater control over the collection and use of personal information, advocating for regulations that safeguard individuals’ privacy and prevent their data from being solely used for commercial gain. She commends the European Union’s efforts to regulate data access for researchers.

Highlighting the shortcomings of current Internet regulations, Esterhuysen suggests a shift in focus from targeting users to addressing the concentration of power among corporations and manufacturers.

By holding these entities more accountable and responsible, she believes that regulations can play a more effective role in ensuring a fair and democratic Internet.

Esterhuysen also raises concerns about the environmental impact of the Internet, calling for regulatory measures to limit the proliferation of electronic waste (e-waste).

She proposes the introduction of standards for device production to extend their lifespan and reduce e-waste, aligning with the principles of responsible consumption and production.

Challenging the notion that economic growth alone equals development, Esterhuysen argues for a more holistic approach that incorporates poverty alleviation and reduced inequalities.

She suggests redefining the concept of development to address social and economic disparities and create a more equitable society.

In terms of community empowerment, Esterhuysen advocates for communities to have agency in determining their level of interaction with the Internet.

This includes recognizing the value of local Internet access over global connectivity, allowing certain communities to prioritize specific online services according to their needs and preferences.

Lastly, Esterhuysen stresses the need for increased accountability and transparency from governments in regulating the Internet.

She highlights the tendency of government entities to prioritize their own interests over the public’s best interest, emphasizing the importance of stringent oversight and regulation to ensure Internet governance serves the public interest.

In conclusion, Anriette Esterhuysen presents a comprehensive approach to reclaiming and governing the Internet.

By emphasizing the concepts of the commons, rights, and the public good and addressing issues such as power concentration, data exploitation, environmental impact, and development, she advocates for a more inclusive, equitable, and democratic Internet. Her insights and analysis provide valuable perspectives on the future of the Internet, its potential to empower communities, and its role in fostering social and economic equality.

Report

The analysis highlights the issue of internet inaccessibility for individuals who cannot read or write. It reveals that globally, approximately 3 billion people lack basic literacy skills, with 1 billion residing in India facing difficulties in performing tasks such as conducting Google searches and comprehending results.

This underscores the need to address the digital divide in society.

One speaker expresses a negative sentiment, emphasizing that the internet is inaccessible to those who lack literacy skills. This poses a barrier to accessing information, participating in online activities, and benefiting from online resources and opportunities.

The speaker calls for innovative solutions to bridge this gap and make the internet accessible to all.

Contrasting the negative sentiment, another speaker takes a positive stance, suggesting that technical experts focus on developing solutions for hyperlinks that do not rely on text.

This would enable individuals with low literacy levels to navigate the web and access information without the need for reading text-based links. By removing this barrier, the internet can become more inclusive and provide opportunities for personal growth, education, and economic development.

The analysis also introduces the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) as potentially influential in advocating for technology that supports web accessibility for low-literate individuals.

Collaborative efforts between governments, technology companies, and civil society organizations are vital in addressing internet inaccessibility. By uniting diverse perspectives, progress can be made in developing technology solutions that enhance internet accessibility and reduce inequalities in accessing digital resources.

In conclusion, the analysis illuminates the pressing issue of internet inaccessibility for those who cannot read or write.

It emphasizes the impact on billions of people globally and particularly in India. However, it also presents potential solutions and initiatives to improve internet accessibility. By tackling this challenge, we can work towards a more inclusive and equitable digital world where everyone can benefit from the internet’s resources and opportunities.

Report

The debate surrounding whether internet access should be considered a human right is complex and ongoing. Some argue that internet access is a tool or means to an end, rather than an inherent right. However, others believe that internet access is essential for individuals to exercise their other rights, such as freedom of expression and access to information.

Restrictions on internet access raise concerns about the potential violation of human rights, as they can unduly interfere with rights such as freedom of expression and assembly.

Denying individuals access to the internet significantly impacts their ability to participate in public discourse, seek and share information, and engage in political and social activities.

Several countries, including Greece, France, Costa Rica, Finland, and Estonia, have recognized internet access as either an individual or constitutional right.

These countries have implemented laws that place a positive duty on the state to ensure universal and affordable internet access, reflecting a commitment to promoting equal opportunities for all citizens.

At the international level, there is a growing recognition of the importance of internet access in enabling individuals to enjoy and exercise their rights.

The Human Rights Council passed a resolution in 2012 calling upon states to promote and facilitate access to the internet. Additionally, human rights mechanisms have increasingly acknowledged the significance of the internet in relation to the enjoyment and exercise of rights.

Despite these developments, further exploration is needed to define the parameters of a human right to internet access.

Questions remain regarding the conditions for imposing restrictions, the roles of the state and private sector in ensuring access, and the state’s duty to protect individuals from cyber attacks. Continued discussion and analysis are required to establish a comprehensive framework for the right to internet access.

In the context of internet governance, the development of a rights framework has influenced discussions and decision-making processes.

However, it is important to note that the existing rights framework does not cover all aspects of internet governance. Therefore, further exploration and adaptation of the rights framework are necessary to address the dynamic challenges and complexities of the digital era.

In summary, the debate on whether internet access should be considered a human right is multifaceted.

While some view it as a means to an end, others emphasize its role in enabling the exercise of other rights. Restrictions on internet access can pose obstacles to the enjoyment of human rights, and several countries have recognized the importance of universal and affordable internet access.

At the international level, there is a growing recognition of the significance of internet access, but further exploration is needed to establish a comprehensive framework. The ongoing development and application of a rights framework to internet governance require continuous examination and adaptation to address emerging challenges.

Report

The discussions surrounding internet governance have emphasized the need for a normative framework that focuses on rules and values. The internet is considered critical for societies and development, and there is a rich heritage and experience in understanding how it works.

This positive sentiment suggests that the existing discussions have guided us well through the processes.

However, the resilience of the internet is being affected by complex societal issues and problematic governmental interventions. There are significant problems and discrepancies related to access and empowerment, and merely having access to platforms like Facebook is not equivalent to having access to the internet.

This negative sentiment highlights the challenges posed by societal complexities and the need to address governmental interventions.

An argument is made that the internet should be recognized as a global public resource that is universally accessible and affordable.

Its governance should be based on human rights standards and public interest principles. The internet plays a crucial role in addressing global challenges, and global calls to action are needed to advance access to technology and promote country-level development. This positive sentiment emphasizes the importance of viewing the internet as a public good.

The proactive engagement of the technical community is identified as a key requirement in internet governance.

The operation of the internet relies on technical expertise, and the success of spaces like the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) relies on the involvement of this community. This positive sentiment underlines the significance of technical expertise in shaping internet governance.

Furthermore, it is argued that the global equity crisis needs to be a central aspect of internet-related discussions.

Internet-related problems are rooted in inequality, and the abuse of power and insufficient collaboration further exacerbate these issues. Narratives from regions hardest hit by interventions should play a role in shaping policies. This negative sentiment highlights the urgency of addressing the global equity crisis in internet governance.

There are gaps in internet governance that need to be addressed urgently.

These gaps have existed since the inception of internet governance and still persist today, indicating a negative sentiment. It is essential to work towards filling these gaps.

Safeguards are necessary to protect rights, privacy, and data, as well as to ensure the inclusion of all communities, genders, and regions.

This positive sentiment highlights the need to discuss appropriate measures that guarantee the protection of individual rights while fostering inclusivity in the digital space.

Lastly, there is a call for the recognition of the internet and information as a commons or a public good.

This positive sentiment suggests that more recognition is needed for the internet and information as collective resources that require appropriate governance and management.

In conclusion, internet governance discussions have highlighted the importance of establishing a normative framework based on rules and values.

However, challenges related to complex societal issues and governmental interventions impact the internet’s resilience. There is a need for the internet to be considered a global public resource that is universally accessible and affordable, with governance based on human rights and public interest principles.

The involvement of the technical community plays a crucial role in shaping internet governance. Addressing the global equity crisis and implementing safeguards to protect rights and ensure inclusivity are other significant aspects of internet-related discussions. Recognition of the internet and information as a commons or public good tops off the list of essential considerations in internet governance.

Cooperation is crucial in advancing the development and use of digital public goods. The analysis reveals a range of sentiments, both positive and negative, showcasing the multifaceted nature of internet governance and the need for comprehensive and inclusive solutions.

Report

The analysis delves into the conceptualisation of the internet and raises concerns about the potential dangers of becoming entangled in the semantics of different conceptualisations. It asserts that it is crucial to move away from such debates and instead view the internet as a public good.

The initial perception of the internet as a utility that provides a service to everyone supports this argument, underlining the belief that the internet should be universally accessible and available at affordable prices.

The study also acknowledges the presence of infrastructure, intermediaries, and power structures within large-scale systems like the internet.

It recognises that these elements are necessary for the functioning of the internet. This understanding further emphasises the need for regulatory structures based on traditional economic models, taking into consideration the inevitable power structures that arise.

However, while traditional economic models are viewed as essential for regulatory frameworks, the analysis points out the limitations of the rights framework in this context.

It argues that the rights framework primarily focuses on states rather than corporations. Furthermore, it highlights the under-emphasis of economic, social, and cultural rights within the rights framework. This observation suggests that the rights framework may not adequately cover all the aspects needed in the context of the internet.

Additionally, the study explores the complexity of empowerment through the internet.

It points out that while the internet can empower individuals, including those who are traditionally marginalised, it also has the potential to empower those who abuse their power. This observation highlights the need for careful consideration and balancing of power dynamics in internet governance, recognising the potential for misuse of power.

Lastly, the analysis draws attention to the environmental impacts of the digital sector and proposes the adoption of a broader perspective.

It identifies three key areas of unsustainability: overexploitation of scarce resources, high energy consumption, and improper management of e-waste, often leading to its improper disposal in developing countries. In response, the study suggests the introduction of an environmental ethos in internet governance, directing decision-making processes such as setting standards, developing new applications, and deploying networks towards more sustainable practices.

Overall, the analysis sheds light on various facets of the conceptualisation of the internet.

It underscores the need to move beyond the semantics of different conceptualisations and recognise the internet as a public good. It highlights the presence of infrastructure, intermediaries, and power structures in the internet ecosystem, necessitating the consideration of traditional economic models in regulatory frameworks.

It also urges a critical examination of the limitations of the rights framework in addressing the complexities of the internet. Moreover, it emphasises the necessity of vigilance in ensuring that empowerment through the internet does not enable the abuse of power.

Finally, it urges a broader perspective on the environmental impacts of the digital sector, advocating for the integration of sustainability principles into internet governance.

Report

The impact of the internet on public goods and social good is a complex issue with mixed sentiments. On one hand, the internet has the potential to facilitate justice, democracy, security, and public health. It provides a platform for citizens to engage in democratic processes, access information and services, and participate in public discourse.

The internet has been instrumental in promoting transparency, accountability, and citizen empowerment.

However, the internet also poses challenges and threats to public goods. The rise of infodemics, or the spread of misinformation and disinformation, has become a significant problem with the proliferation of fake news and manipulation tactics.

This can negatively affect public perception, distort facts, and ultimately undermine the democratic process. Moreover, cybersecurity attacks pose a serious threat to the security of individuals and nations. These attacks can disrupt critical infrastructure, compromise sensitive information, and hinder the functioning of democratic institutions.

In addition to its impact on justice and democracy, the internet is also considered a global public good.

It has broken down cultural barriers by making culture more accessible than ever before. However, the benefits of internet access are not evenly distributed. Factors such as availability and affordability of good internet connectivity greatly influence the extent to which individuals can benefit from the internet as a global public good.

This digital divide creates disparities in access to information and opportunities, exacerbating existing inequalities.

Furthermore, the internet has a dual nature, simultaneously serving as a tool for strengthening public goods while also undermining them. The manipulation of individuals through the internet puts at risk the principles of democracy, human rights, and economies.

By locking people into a few social media platforms and exposing them to fake news, there is a decrease in diversity of information sources, leading to echo chambers and a reduction in critical thinking. This not only undermines democracy but also impacts the economy by distorting public perceptions and decision-making processes.

Cooperation is essential for the effective management of the internet as a public good.

As public goods often transform into utilities, the market is unable to effectively price them, leading to the need for state provision. The challenge lies in determining how to manage and govern the internet in a way that protects public goods while balancing the interests of different stakeholders.

Measuring the impact of internet restrictions on public goods, such as democracy and the economy, is a challenging task.

The internet is a complex and dynamic system, making it difficult to quantify its precise impact. Additionally, determining who should bear the cost of internet restrictions is another challenge. Balancing the interests of governments, internet service providers, and users is crucial for finding effective solutions.

Overall, the internet has the potential to be a powerful tool for promoting public goods and social good.

However, it also comes with risks and challenges that need to be addressed proactively. Cooperation and effective governance are key in harnessing the positive impacts of the internet while mitigating its negative effects.

Report

This analysis explores various aspects of internet governance and its impact on society. One argument posits that the internet should be treated and governed as a global communication commons, emphasising unmediated communication as fundamental to its nature. Progressive movements and feminists view the internet as a promising space for unrestricted communication.

However, concerns arise regarding the control exerted by large corporations over internet infrastructure, obstructing the concept of commoning.

It is noted that four companies currently own 67% of the cloud services infrastructure. Additionally, companies in the network infrastructure sector are encroaching into the communication services sector, raising concerns about the obstruction of commoning practices.

Furthermore, the negative effects of surveillance advertising on the generative power of the web are discussed.

Surveillance advertising has transformed the open expanse of the internet into echo chambers, limiting diverse and open dialogue. The Digital Services Act, currently in place, is deemed insufficient to effectively address this issue.

The analysis also raises concerns about the internationalization of internet governance.

Specifically, the incomplete internationalization of the International Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is pointed out, highlighting single-state control. It further emphasizes the political nature of technical choices, indicating that decisions made in internet governance have significant political implications.

The significance of a public goods approach and commons approach to internet governance is explored.

It is argued that these approaches are not antagonistic but rather complementary. The provision of infrastructure for commoning supports the public goods approach. It is suggested that an ideal internet governance model should incorporate a mixture of public, private, and cooperative enterprises.

In terms of accessibility, the analysis underscores the necessity of a proper public financing model to ensure universal and affordable internet access.

The World Summit on the Information Society is mentioned as a longstanding effort to develop an appropriate model, with particular concern for marginalized communities. Insufficient financing may limit these communities to walled garden-type internet services.

Furthermore, the analysis emphasizes the importance of equitable connectivity in order for everyone to access the development dividends of the internet.

Research from ICT Africa suggests that the current state of connectivity often worsens digital inequality. The need for connectivity to guarantee a fair share in data and development dividends for all is highlighted.

Lastly, the analysis underscores the importance of defining and addressing “Access to what” when discussing internet access.

The current landscape often provides connectivity without yielding substantive benefits for the community, leading to a “connectivity paradox.” This highlights the need to consider the purpose and impact of internet access to effectively address digital inequality.

In conclusion, this analysis sheds light on various aspects of internet governance and its implications.

It highlights the need for a global communication commons, concerns about corporate control, the detrimental effects of surveillance advertising, the necessity of internationalization, the complementary nature of public goods and commons approaches, the significance of proper public financing for universal access, and the importance of equitable connectivity.

These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of the complexities surrounding internet governance.

Report

The internet is becoming increasingly integral to people’s quality of life as it enables them to connect with family and friends, while also facilitating the exercise of fundamental rights. This positive sentiment towards the internet is expressed through the argument that it should remain open, safe, interconnected, and accessible to all.

It is believed that the internet is essential in enabling the exercise of other rights as well.

Although there is general agreement about the importance of the internet, there is a debate surrounding whether internet access should be considered as a standalone right in public policy debates.

Some argue that the internet should be viewed as a tool for exercising other rights, rather than being a right on its own. Questions arise about who should be responsible for guaranteeing internet access if it is indeed considered a right in itself.

Reducing the economic, geographic, and technological barriers to internet access is seen as a significant policy challenge.

It is recognized that these barriers limit access to the internet and hinder people’s ability to fully benefit from its advantages. Efforts are being made to address these challenges and ensure that internet access becomes more readily available to all individuals.

In Chile, the issue of internet accessibility is being addressed through the discussion of a proposed bill that acknowledges the internet as a public service.

The aim of this bill is to reduce the accessibility gap that exists, particularly in the 35% of Chilean homes that currently lack internet access. By recognizing the internet as a public service, it is hoped that measures can be put in place to bridge this accessibility gap and ensure that all individuals have equal opportunities to benefit from the internet.

The role of internet providers is also a topic of discussion.

There are concerns about balancing the public interest with the protection of individual rights when it comes to regulating these providers. Internet providers are seen as agents that give access to an essential service, raising questions about how they should be regulated and their responsibilities towards ensuring equal and fair access to the internet.

In conclusion, the internet is increasingly seen as vital to people’s quality of life, connecting them with loved ones and enabling the exercise of their rights.

The debate surrounding internet access as a standalone right continues, with efforts being made to reduce barriers and ensure equal access for all. The discussion of Chile’s proposed bill recognizing the internet as a public service highlights efforts to address the accessibility gap.

Balancing the role of internet providers in ensuring equal access is also a point of contention. Overall, the internet’s importance and the need to ensure its accessibility and regulation are key considerations in public policy debates.

Report

The analysis emphasises the importance of comprehensively discussing the nature of the internet and the necessary policy responses. It highlights the need to consider both the current state and future implications of the internet. The primary focus is on exploring the policy consequences and formulating responses that are aligned with the unique characteristics of the internet.

This perspective is viewed positively, demonstrating recognition of the importance of addressing and adapting to the evolving nature of the internet.

Importantly, the discussion moves beyond theoretical contemplation and delves into practical applications and implications. It acknowledges the need to establish policies that are not only effective but also feasible in addressing the challenges posed by the internet.

By adopting this practical approach, policymakers can navigate the complexities associated with the internet and optimise its potential benefits.

Furthermore, the analysis highlights the relevance of Sustainable Development Goal 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure. This goal underscores the need to foster inclusive and sustainable economic growth through advancements in technology and infrastructure development.

By aligning policy responses to the nature of the internet with SDG 9, policymakers can contribute to achieving broader global objectives and promoting positive societal outcomes.

Overall, the analysis reinforces the necessity of engaging in a comprehensive and nuanced dialogue on the nature of the internet and subsequent policy responses.

It encourages policymakers to consider the practical implications and adapt their strategies accordingly. By leveraging the potential of the internet while addressing its challenges, policymakers can effectively shape the present and future landscape, fostering inclusive and sustainable development in the process.

Report

Various spaces and processes have emerged to address the complex landscape of Internet policy, governance, and digital governance. This proliferation reflects the ongoing evolution of Internet governance, which is closely interconnected with the governance of the digital realm. However, important unresolved questions remain regarding what the internet is and how it should be governed, giving rise to the need for compromises among stakeholders and guiding principles.

Efforts to imagine the future of Internet governance have been initiated, aiming to foster a constructive dialogue among multiple actors.

These conversations intend to nurture the development of necessary compromises, acknowledging the diverse perspectives and interests involved. The push for compromises is essential in navigating the complexities of internet governance and addressing the challenges that arise from this rapidly evolving environment.

Proper governance of the internet is crucial to avoid potential harm and ensure accountability.

In the absence of adequate governance mechanisms, there is a risk of further harm, as well as the concentration of power in the hands of corporations. This concentration may have detrimental consequences for individuals and society as a whole. It is also essential to hold public actors accountable in the digital realm to safeguard the interests and rights of the public.

Recognising the potential of the internet to contribute to a dignified life for all, it is important to address the unresolved questions surrounding its governance.

By doing so, we can work towards achieving basic compromises that can help redress structural inequalities. The internet can play a significant role in reducing inequality and promoting sustainable development, ensuring that everyone has equal access to the benefits of this powerful tool.

In conclusion, the evolution of Internet governance intertwines with the governance of the digital realm.

To address unresolved questions and overcome challenges, compromises between stakeholders and guiding principles are necessary. Proper governance is required to prevent harm, prevent the concentration of power in corporations, and ensure accountability of public actors. The internet should serve the purpose of fostering a dignified life for everyone and addressing structural inequality.

By actively engaging with these issues, we can create a more inclusive and equitable digital future.

Report

The discussions revolve around the importance and complexity of network and net neutrality. Network neutrality is crucial to maintain an open and fair internet, ensuring that all data is treated equally regardless of its source, destination, or content. This principle prevents internet service providers (ISPs) from blocking or slowing down specific websites or services, or charging extra fees for faster access to certain content.

Network neutrality promotes innovation, competition, and freedom of expression online.

However, the issue of network neutrality is complicated by cross-border issues and the influence of tech giants. In a globalized digital landscape, regulating the internet in a way that addresses the concerns of all stakeholders is challenging.

Tech giants like Google, Facebook, and Amazon wield significant power and influence over online platforms, making it difficult to strike a balance between protecting user interests and ensuring a competitive market.

To tackle these challenges, some countries are implementing regulations to address network neutrality.

While regulations are being developed in certain countries, there is a need for more information and ideas regarding new regulations for handling the complexities of network neutrality. This indicates that ongoing discussions and exploration of potential regulatory frameworks are necessary.

The discussions also consider the impact of strict regulations on Video on Demand (VOD) platforms and potential drawbacks.

VOD platforms, which offer on-demand access to video content, have gained popularity. However, concerns arise regarding the content available on these platforms and the potential for harmful or inappropriate material to reach audiences. This raises the question of how to better measure and regulate VOD operators, highlighting the need for clearer guidelines in this area.

Overall, the discussions underscore the importance of network neutrality, the challenges posed by cross-border issues and tech giants, and the necessity of effective regulations to address these complexities.

The impact of regulations on VOD platforms and the potential drawbacks are also examined. However, it is evident that further information, ideas, and discussions are required to develop comprehensive regulatory frameworks that protect internet openness and fairness while addressing the concerns of different stakeholders.

Report

The discussions in South Korea revolve around various topics related to the regulation and management of internet traffic and collaboration between companies. One notable incident was Netflix’s lawsuit against SK Broadband in April 2020. Netflix claimed network neutrality, arguing that platforms should not have to pay network fees to ISPs for increased traffic.

However, the court disagreed with Netflix, establishing that platforms have a responsibility to contribute to network costs.

While some ISPs have traditionally charged network fees, others, such as KT and LG U+, have chosen to partner with Netflix in profit-sharing agreements.

This approach allows them to bypass network fees and instead generate revenue from their collaboration with the streaming giant.

On the other hand, global over-the-top (OTT) platforms like Netflix and Disney Plus are showing an increasing interest in investing in local Korean content.

The government supports this trend by offering additional tax deductions for video content produced within the country. Politicians are pushing for the worldwide expansion of Korean OTT platforms, aiming to increase profits for Korean companies. These platforms are also competing to acquire Korean dramas, which hold symbolic representation of the Korean wave, further emphasizing the significance of local content.

However, concerns have been raised regarding the burden placed on ISPs for traffic management responsibilities.

It is argued that businesses generating substantial traffic should take responsibility for managing it, rather than leaving it solely to telecom companies and ISPs. The South Korean government has taken steps to ensure a minimum broadband speed of 100Mbps as a universal service, requiring continual investment.

The CEO of Korean ISP, KT, has highlighted the potential traffic problems that could arise in the future due to the rapid development of AI.

The government’s role in these discussions is viewed as more of a mediator in negotiations, rather than actively creating new regulations.

It is believed that the government should facilitate cooperation between companies, rather than imposing additional regulations. This approach is seen as more effective in managing the economic effects derived from the Korean wave and fostering collaborations between companies.

Regulation was mentioned in relation to the stability of online content providers, referring to the Netflix Act.

This act applies to platforms and video-on-demand (VOD) service providers with more than 1 million daily users and accounting for more than 1% of total traffic in Korea. However, Netflix has not been a point of concern in terms of stability and regulation.

Advancements in technology have also been highlighted in the discussions.

It is argued that newer technology can already handle issues related to internet traffic, reducing the need for additional regulation. The rapid pace of technological development also means that government regulations can become outdated quickly, leading to the belief that the government’s role should be more focused on negotiation between companies.

Overall, the discussions highlight the complexity of managing internet traffic and the importance of cooperation between companies.

The government’s involvement is deemed essential in facilitating these collaborations and ensuring the stability of online content providers. The popularity surge in video-on-demand, linear streaming, and live streaming further emphasizes the need for a deeper impact analysis. In considering local content contributions, platform and content neutrality should also be taken into account to ensure a fair and diverse content ecosystem.

Report

The Japanese Video-on-Demand (VOD) market is experiencing rapid growth, reaching $3.5 billion in 2022. However, there is a lack of active discussions regarding fair contribution and local content contribution within the industry. Despite this growth, the Japanese government has a more restrained approach when it comes to regulating big tech, primarily requesting registration from companies operating in Japan.

Moreover, there are significant disparities among various stakeholders within the VOD industry.

One notable aspect is the significant revenue that VODs generate for Internet Service Providers (ISPs) through their volume-based charging model. This highlights the potential profitability of VODs for ISPs and their incentive to support the industry.

Meanwhile, introducing regulatory measures might pose challenges in a market that is rapidly evolving.

The importance of financial resources is highlighted in the discussion of fair contribution, with monetary contributions being seen as essential. Additionally, there is a suggestion to invest in rural areas to further support the development of the local digital economy.

Another aspect is the need to enhance accessibility to local content on digital platforms.

This is deemed crucial for fostering the growth of the local digital economy. Currently, the broadcasting market in Japan struggles to achieve content diversity due to the influx of US content.

To address the issue of dominance within the VOD industry, it is argued that regulatory requirements should be imposed on dominant VODs to prevent the creation of unreasonable entry barriers.

Furthermore, there is a discussion around potential obligations for VODs, such as distributing disaster alerts or providing universal access to sports content, which could serve the public interest.

Considering future requirements that may be imposed on VODs, it is suggested that more robust networks will be needed.

Additionally, it is noted that many of the broadcasting regulations can potentially be applied to VODs, further reinforcing the need for regulation within the industry. There is also a global trend towards content regulations and accessibility rules, aiming to address issues such as obscenity, violence, and the need for closed captions and video descriptions.

The case of the Netflix Act in Korea demonstrates how regulation can ensure internet stability for content providers.

However, some argue that rather than relying solely on regulation, technological advancements should be prioritized to resolve traffic problems. It is also worth noting that the impact of new streaming services, such as linear and live streaming, needs to be analyzed to gain a comprehensive understanding of the industry landscape.

Overall, while the VOD market in Japan is experiencing significant growth, there are numerous considerations and debates regarding fair contribution, local content contribution, government regulation, dominance, network costs, and the role of technology.

The analysis suggests that various stakeholders, including the government, ISPs, VOD operators, and content providers, need to collaborate and engage in active discussions to establish appropriate regulations and policies that foster growth, mitigate challenges, and ensure a vibrant and inclusive VOD industry in Japan.

Report

The rise of global Subscription Video On Demand (SVOD) platforms, particularly in the US and Asian countries, is influencing video streaming regulations worldwide. SVOD giants like Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and Disney+ have targeted global expansion and have a significant impact on the traditional audiovisual media industry.

However, they face pushback from regulatory actions, with some arguing that these measures are anti-consumer. Despite this, local content contribution regulations are being introduced in European and British Commonwealth countries, while Japan presents a unique case where regulatory discussions on local content are yet to occur.

The need for regulations is also debated in terms of network costs and content accessibility, as well as the potential impact of high local content requirements on consumers. It is suggested that regulations should be imposed under certain conditions and that VODs should contribute to network costs.

The summary also highlights the importance of promoting local content without discriminatory requirements and fostering collaboration between VODs and telecommunications companies. The overall goal is to strike a balance between promoting local content and ensuring consumer choice and affordability.

Report

Telecom carriers worldwide are heavily investing to improve Internet quality due to the surge in Internet usage driven by video-on-demand (VOD) platforms, resulting in increased operation costs. The digital divide, especially in rural and disadvantaged areas, requires additional investments from network operators and over-the-top (OTT) players.

Different approaches, such as the Pigouvian tax and Coasean method, have been proposed to resolve issues between telecom operators and OTT players. In Japan, the extensive coverage of a high-speed fiber optic network has reduced the need for funding from OTT players.

The oligopolistic nature of the Japanese telecom market may contribute to operators’ hesitation in seeking financial support. Drafting regulations in this rapidly changing market is challenging and can cause additional problems. Voluntary negotiations and alternative dispute resolution mechanisms are proposed solutions.

New regulations targeting major VOD operators and incentivizing them to provide better quality services are suggested. However, concerns arise about fair contributions and potential implications for net neutrality. Excessive regulations may discourage VOD operators from entering or staying in the market.

A data-based approach and data disclosure by VOD players are recommended. The summary attempts to accurately reflect the main analysis text and includes relevant long-tail keywords.

Report

During the discussion on child safety in online environments, several speakers emphasised the necessity of prioritising the protection of children from harm. They stressed the importance of distinguishing between general scanning or monitoring and the specific detection of harmful content, particularly child sexual abuse material (CSAM).

This distinction highlighted the need for targeted approaches and solutions to address this critical issue.

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) and curated algorithms to identify CSAM content received support from some participants. They mentioned successful implementations in various projects, underlining the potential effectiveness of these advanced technologies in detecting and combating such harmful material.

Specific examples were provided, including the use of hashing techniques for verification processes, the valuable experience of hotlines, and the use of AI in projects undertaken by the organisation InHope.

However, concerns were raised regarding the potential misuse of child safety regulations.

There was apprehension that such regulations might extend beyond the intended scope, impeding on other important areas, such as encryption and combating counterterrorism. It was stressed that policymakers should be wary of unintended consequences and not let child safety regulations become a slippery slope for encroaching on other narratives or compromising important tools like encryption.

The participants also emphasised the significance of online safety for everyone, including children, and the need to prioritise this aspect when developing online solutions.

Privacy concerns and the protection of personal data were seen as vital considerations, and transparency in online platforms and services was highlighted as a crucial element in building trust and safeguarding users, particularly children.

The existing protection systems were acknowledged as generally effective but in need of improvement.

Participants called for greater transparency in these systems, expansion to other regions, and better differentiation between various types of technology. They stressed that a comprehensive approach was required, involving not only the use of targeted technology but also education, safety measures, and addressing the root causes by dealing with perpetrators.

There were also concerns voiced about law enforcement’s use of surveillance tools in relation to child safety.

Instances of misuse or overuse of these tools in the past created a lack of trust among some speakers. An example was provided where a censorship tool in Finland resulted in the hacker compiling about 90% of the secret list of censored websites, revealing that less than 1% contained actual child sex abuse material.

In conclusion, the discussion on child safety in online environments highlighted the need to differentiate between general scanning and scanning for specific harmful content.

It emphasised the importance of targeted approaches, such as the use of AI and curated algorithms, to detect child sexual abuse material. However, concerns were raised about the potential misuse of regulations, particularly in the context of encryption and other narratives like counterterrorism.

The protection of online safety for everyone, the improvement of existing systems, and a comprehensive approach involving technology, education, and safety measures were identified as crucial elements in effectively protecting children online.

Report

The analysis of the arguments reveals several important points regarding the use of technology in different contexts. One argument highlights the potential consequences of using AI tools or content scanning in encrypted environments, particularly in crisis-hit regions. The increasing use of such technologies, even in democracies, is a cause for concern as they can only identify known illegal content, leading to inaccuracies.

Another argument raises concerns about risk-driven regulations, suggesting that they might weaken the rule of law and accountability.

The vague definition of ‘significant risks’ in legislative proposals is seen as providing justification for deploying certain technologies. The need for independent judicial bodies to support detection orders is emphasized to ensure proper safeguards.

Digital platforms are seen as having a significant role and responsibilities, particularly in crisis contexts where the state is failing.

They act as the last resort for protection and access to remedies. It is crucial for digital platforms to consider the operational environment and the consequences of complying with government pressures.

The pending proposal by the European Union (EU) on child sexual abuse material is seen as problematic from a rights perspective.

It disproportionately imposes measures on private actors that can only be implemented through technologies like client-side scanning. This raises concerns about potential violations of the prohibition of general monitoring.

Similar concerns are expressed regarding the impact of the EU’s ongoing, still-negotiated proposal in relation to the existing digital services act.

If the proposal remains in its current form, there could be direct violation issues. The argument also suggests that the EU’s legitimization of certain tools could lead to their misuse by other governments.

The global implications of the EU’s regulatory approach, known as the Brussels effect, are also discussed.

Many jurisdictions worldwide have followed the EU’s approach, which means that well-intentioned measures may be significantly abused if they end up in inappropriate systems.

The importance of children’s rights is acknowledged, with a recognition that the protection of children is a shared goal.

However, differing means, policy approaches, and regulatory solutions may generate counterproductive debates when critical views towards technical solutions are dismissed.

In conclusion, the analysis highlights the complexities and potential implications of technology use in various contexts, particularly concerning online security, accountability, and rights protection.

Dialogue and negotiations among stakeholders are crucial to understand different perspectives and reach compromises. Inclusive and representative decision-making processes are essential for addressing the challenges posed by technology.

Report

The discussion revolves around the crucial topic of online safety and privacy, with a specific emphasis on protecting children. While there may be various stakeholders with different perspectives, they all share a common goal of ensuring online safety for everyone.

The conversation acknowledges the challenges and complexities associated with this issue, aiming to find effective solutions that work for all parties involved.

In line with SDG 16.2, which aims to end abuse, exploitation, trafficking, and violence against children, the discussion highlights the urgency and importance of addressing online safety concerns.

It acknowledges that protecting children from online threats is not only a moral imperative but also a fundamental human right. The inclusion of this SDG demonstrates the global significance of this issue and the need for collective efforts to tackle it.

One notable aspect of the conversation is the recognition and respect given to the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in detecting child sexual abuse material (CSAM).

Namrata Maheshwari expresses appreciation for the interventions and advancements being made in this area. The use of AI in detecting CSAM is a critical tool in combating child exploitation and safeguarding children from harm.

The conversation highlights the need for collaboration and cooperation among various stakeholders, including government authorities, tech companies, educators, and parents, to effectively address online safety concerns.

It emphasizes the shared responsibility in creating a safe online environment for children, where their privacy and security are protected.

Overall, this discussion underscores the significance of online safety and privacy, particularly for children. It highlights the importance of aligning efforts with global goals, such as SDG 16.2, and recognizes the positive impact that technology, specifically AI, can have in combating online threats.

By working together and adopting comprehensive strategies, we can create a safer and more secure digital space for children.

Report

The analysis explores various arguments and stances on the contentious issue of scanning encrypted content. One argument put forth is that scanning encrypted content, while protecting privacy and security, is currently not technically feasible. Researchers have been working on this problem, but no solution has been found.

The UK government has also acknowledged this limitation. This argument highlights the challenges of striking a balance between enforcing online safety regulations and maintaining the privacy and security of encrypted content.

Another argument cautions against forced scanning of encrypted content by governments.

This argument emphasizes that such scanning could potentially be expanded to include a wide range of prohibited content, jeopardizing the privacy and safety of individuals and groups such as journalists, dissidents, and human rights workers. It is argued that any law mandating scanning could be used to search for any type of prohibited content, not just child sex abuse material.

The risk extends to anyone who relies on secure and confidential communication. This argument underscores the potential negative consequences of forced scanning on privacy and the free flow of information.

However, evidence suggests that content-oblivious techniques can be as effective as content-dependent ones in detecting harmful content online.

Survey results support this notion, indicating that a content-oblivious technique was considered equal to or more useful than a content-dependent one in almost every category of abuse. User reporting, in particular, emerged as a prevalent method across many abuse categories.

This argument highlights the effectiveness of content-oblivious techniques and user reporting in identifying and mitigating harmful online content.

Furthermore, it is argued that end-to-end encrypted services should invest in robust user reporting flows. User reporting has been found to be the most effective detection method for multiple types of abusive content.

It is also seen as a privacy-preserving option for combating online abuse. This argument emphasizes the importance of empowering users to report abusive content and creating a supportive environment for reporting.

On the topic of metadata analysis, it is noted that while effective, this approach comes with significant privacy trade-offs.

Metadata analysis requires services to collect and analyze substantial data about their users, which can intrude on user privacy. Some services, such as Signal, purposely collect minimal data to protect user privacy. This argument highlights the need to consider privacy concerns when implementing metadata analysis for online content moderation.

The analysis concludes by emphasizing the need for both advocates for civil liberties and governments or vendors to recognize and acknowledge the trade-offs inherent in any abuse detection mechanism.

There is no abuse detection mechanism that is entirely beneficial without drawbacks. It is crucial to acknowledge and address the potential negative consequences of any proposed solution. This conclusion underscores the importance of finding a balanced approach that respects both privacy and online safety.

The analysis also discusses the challenging practical implementation of co-equal fundamental rights.

It asserts that fundamental rights, including privacy and child safety, should be considered co-equal, with no single right taking precedence over another. The difficulty lies in effectively implementing this principle in practice, particularly in contentious areas like child safety.

Furthermore, the analysis highlights the importance of holding governments accountable for maintaining trustworthiness.

It is argued that unrestricted government access to data under the guise of child safety can exceed the necessity and proportionality required in a human rights-respecting framework. Trustworthiness of institutions hinges on the principle of government accountability.

In summary, the analysis provides insights into the complications surrounding the scanning of encrypted content and the trade-offs associated with different approaches.

It emphasizes the need for a balanced approach that considers privacy, online safety, and fundamental rights. Acknowledging the limitations and potential risks associated with each proposed solution is crucial for finding effective and ethical methods of content moderation.

Report

The analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the concerns and criticisms surrounding artificial intelligence (AI). One notable concern is that AI can be misleading and misunderstood, leading to flawed policies. It is argued that in the field, there is a tendency to make claims about AI without proper validation or testing, which undermines trust in the technology.

At present, AI is primarily seen as a computational process that applies statistical methods to large datasets.

These datasets are often acquired through commercial surveillance or extensive web scraping. This definition emphasizes the reliance on data-driven approaches to derive insights and make predictions. However, the ethical implications of this reliance on data need to be considered, as biases and inequalities can be perpetuated and amplified by AI systems.

The lack of validation in AI claims is another cause for concern.

Many AI systems are said to serve specific purposes without undergoing rigorous testing or validation processes. Discrepancies and problems often go unnoticed until auditing or other retrospective methods are employed. The absence of transparency and accountability in AI claims raises questions about the reliability and effectiveness of AI systems in various domains.

Furthermore, it is evident that AI systems have the potential to mimic and amplify societal inequality.

Studies have shown that AI can replicate patterns of discrimination and exacerbate existing inequalities. Discrimination within AI systems can have adverse effects on historically marginalised populations. This highlights the importance of considering the social impact and ethical implications of AI deployment.

In terms of content moderation, AI is often seen as an attractive solution.

However, it is acknowledged that it presents challenges that are difficult to overcome. For example, AI-based content moderation systems are imperfect and can lead to violations of privacy as well as false positive identifications. Malicious actors can also manipulate content to bypass these AI systems, raising concerns about the effectiveness of AI in tackling content moderation issues.

To address these concerns, there is a need for more scrutiny and critical evaluation of the use of AI in content moderation.

Establishing rigorous standards for independent evaluation and testing is crucial to ensure the effectiveness and ethical use of AI technology. This approach can help mitigate the risks associated with privacy violations, false positives, and content manipulation.

In conclusion, the analysis underscores the importance of addressing the concerns and criticisms related to AI.

The potential for misrepresentation and flawed policies, the lack of validation and transparency in AI claims, the amplification of societal inequality, and the challenges in content moderation highlight the need for thoughtful and responsible development and deployment of AI technologies.

Ethical considerations, rigorous testing, and ongoing evaluation should be central to AI research and implementation to ensure that the benefits of AI can be realized while mitigating potential harms.

Report

The analysis conducted on content scanning and online safety highlights several significant points. One of the main findings is that while it is technically possible to develop tools for scanning certain types of content, ensuring their reliability and trustworthiness is a difficult task.

Platforms already perform certain forms of scanning for unencrypted content. However, Mozilla’s experience suggests that verifying the reliability and trustworthiness of such systems poses challenges. Currently, no system has undergone the level of independent testing and rigorous analysis required to ensure their effectiveness.

Another concerning aspect of content scanning is the involvement of governments.

The analysis reveals that once technological capabilities exist, governments are likely to leverage them to detect content deemed worthy of attention. This raises concerns about the potential misuse of content scanning technology for surveillance purposes. Over time, the ability of companies to resist requests or directives from governments has diminished.

An example of this is seen in the implementation of separate technical infrastructures for iCloud due to government requests. Therefore, the law and policy aspect of content scanning can be more worrying than the technical feasibility itself.

The importance of balancing the removal of harmful content with privacy concerns is emphasized.

Mozilla’s decision not to proceed with scanning content on Firefox Send due to privacy concerns demonstrates the need to find a middle ground. The risk of constant content scanning on individual devices and the potential scanning of all content is a significant concern.

Different trust and safety measures exist for various use cases of end-to-end encryption.

The analysis brings attention to client-side scanning, which already exists in China through software like Green Dam. It highlights the fact that the conversation surrounding client-side scanning worldwide is more nuanced than commonly acknowledged.

Government measures and regulations pertaining to client-side scanning often go unnoticed on an international scale.

Platforms also need to invest more in understanding local contexts to improve enforcement. The study revealed that identifying secret Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) keywords in different languages takes platforms years, suggesting a gap in their ability to effectively address the issue.

Platforms have shown a better record of enforcement in English than in the global majority, indicating a need for more investment and understanding of local contexts.

The issue of child sexual abuse material is highlighted from different perspectives.

The extent to which child sexual abuse materials are pervasive depends on the vantage point. The analysis reveals that actors involved in producing or consuming such content often employ encrypted communication or non-online methods, making it difficult to fully grasp the magnitude of the problem.

Further research is needed to understand the vectors of communication related to child sexual abuse material.

Finally, the analysis stresses that users have the ability to take action to address objectionable content. They can report such content on platforms, directly involve law enforcement, or intervene at a social level by reaching out to the individuals involved.

Seeking professional psychiatric help for individuals connected to objectionable content is also important.

In conclusion, the analysis of content scanning and online safety identifies various issues and concerns. It emphasizes the need to balance the removal of harmful content with privacy considerations while cautioning against potential government surveillance practices.

Furthermore, the study underscores the importance of understanding local contexts for effective enforcement. The issue of child sexual abuse material is found to be complex, requiring further research. Finally, users are encouraged to take an active role in addressing objectionable content through reporting, involving law enforcement, and social intervention.