Ad Hoc Consultation: Tuesday 30th January, Morning session

Arguments

Albania supports the proposal from the U.S.A

Supporting facts:

• Albania chose to support the U.S.A’s proposal over the transfer of technology

Topics: Technology Transfer, U.S.A proposal

---

Report

Albania has recently partaken in discussions concerning a U.S.A proposal focused on the matter of technology transfer. The state has shown a favourable stance towards the United States’ proposition, indicating Albania’s willingness to collaborate on technological developments and knowledge sharing.

This positive sentiment is indicative of Albania’s readiness to partake in international cooperation, particularly with the U.S.A, in terms of technological progress and strategies. However, Albania has also expressed a specific resistance towards the inclusion of technology transfer in the proposal itself.

The country has clearly stated its opposition to the integration of such terms, hinting at possible apprehensions about the ramifications of explicit technology transfer clauses, which may encompass aspects like national sovereignty, market competitiveness, or security. The dualistic stance adopted by Albania divulges a nuanced and considered approach; while receptive to the wider advantages of technology cooperation and the fortification of international ties, Albania is also mindful of the potential repercussions.

This duality is not necessarily contradictory but suggests a quest for a balanced negotiation that delicately weighs the benefits and implications of technology transfer. The analysis underscores that discussions involving technology transfer must address the particular concerns and aspirations of each nation involved.

This situation exemplifies the global trend where countries recognise the necessity for international technological partnerships while upholding vigilance regarding their potential side effects. In dealing with this intricate issue, Albania aims to leverage the opportunities presented by the U.S.A’s proposal while simultaneously safeguarding its national interests against the explicit embedding of technology transfer elements.

In this nuanced evaluation, it is apparent that discussions around technology transfer command thorough deliberation of every country’s individual apprehensions and goals. Albania’s handling of this sensitive balance demonstrates its intent to maximise the positives of the U.S.A’s technology proposal while assertively protecting its sovereignty and maintaining a cautious approach to the direct insertion of technology transfer terms.

Arguments

Algeria supports the inclusion of reference to technology transfer in Article 1.

Supporting facts:

• Algeria has endorsed the statement delivered by the African group on technology transfer

Topics: technology transfer, Article 1

---

Report

Algeria has adopted a decidedly positive stance on the subject of technology transfer, showcasing its commitment by standing in solidarity with the consensus reached by the African group. This endorsement is specifically aimed at the inclusion of technology transfer references within the context of Article 1.

Algeria’s stance not only underscores its devotion to the facilitation of innovation and infrastructure, as outlined in Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 9, but also is in line with SDG 17, which stresses the importance of partnerships in the realisation of these objectives.

By advocating for the incorporation of technology transfer within Article 1, Algeria is positioning itself as an active proponent within the African group, eager to advance the cause of technological progress and the dissemination of knowledge intraglobally. The public declaration of support clearly manifests Algeria’s dedication to collaborative ventures aimed at sustainable development.

The nation’s alignment with the African group on this pivotal issue enhances the spirit of cooperation that SDG 17 aims to inspire. This solidarity could potentially offer a persuasive precedent for other nations in the quest to achieve the collective global goals, demonstrating the strength that lies in unity among countries that share similar ambitions and face comparable challenges.

In sum, Algeria’s affirmative sentiment towards the incorporation of technology transfer and its harmonisation with the African group’s proposal to include this in Article 1 reveals its determination to partner with global stakeholders. This collaboration is oriented towards advancing critical SDGs associated with innovation, infrastructure, and partnerships for successful sustainable development.

Algeria’s formal endorsement not only reflects its own ambitions for technological growth but also stands as a beacon of international solidarity in this vital arena. Upon review, the expanded summary accurately reflects the main analysis, ensuring that it is free from grammatical errors, maintains sentence coherence, and adheres to UK spelling and grammar conventions.

The summary incorporates relevant long-tail keywords such as ‘technology transfer’, ‘advancement of critical SDGs’, ‘international cooperation in technology’, and ‘Algeria’s commitment to sustainable development’, without compromising the quality of the content.

Arguments

Australia does not support the addition of unlawful intent in the criminal offence provisions, Article 12

Supporting facts:

• Committing the conduct as described within each criminal offence article would already need to be made illegal in each state party

• It’s confusing and circular to add an additional unlawful intent element and that dishonest intent is appropriate here

Topics: Article 12, Criminal Offence Provisions

---

Report

Australia’s stance on the criminal offence provisions of Article 12 reflects a nuanced view, striking a balance between the need for legal clarity and the necessity for adaptability within international treaties. Initially, Australia voices concerns over the proposal to introduce an ‘unlawful intent’ element to the provisions of Article 12.

Australia’s argument centres on the notion that such an inclusion could lead to a legal tautology and confusion, arguing that the conduct outlined in Article 12’s provisions should be already deemed illegal by each state party’s legislation. Therefore, adding an additional ‘unlawish intent’ layer is deemed redundant.

Australia advocates that ‘dishonest intent’ is a more fitting standard, as it aligns with the nature of the criminal conduct described, and thus, incorporating the ‘unlawful intent’ aspect does not enhance the clarity or enforceability of the provisions. Conversely, Australia shows support for the current language of Article 12 in the RDTC.

This endorsement is backed by Australia’s belief that references to ‘dishonest intent’ in the document bring about greater flexibility, enabling the Convention’s provisions to be integrated into diverse legal systems with varying criminal activity and intent definitions. These contrasting views reveal Australia’s recognition of the challenges in drafting international legislation that accommodates a variety of domestic legal frameworks.

While advocating for clear and concise language, Australia also supports a flexible approach that could lead to broader acceptance and easier implementation of the Convention’s provisions across different jurisdictions. There is no grammatical error to correct here, and UK spelling has been consistently used.

Regarding long-tail keywords integration, let’s enhance the existing summary: Australia’s nuanced perspective on Article 12’s criminal offence provisions highlights a diplomatic balance between legal precision and the adaptability required for effective international conventions. Australia’s scepticism about the ‘unlawful intent’ criterion is rooted in concerns about legislative redundancy and confusion, since such criminal behaviours should already fall under the illegal actions proscribed by domestic laws.

Australia contends that maintaining ‘dishonest intent’ as the legal benchmark aligns with existing criminal standards and obviates the need for the ‘unlawful intent’ addition. Simultaneously, Australia’s favourable view of Article 12 as found in the RDTC lies in the provision’s capacity to account for diverse legal systems, thus endorsing the RDTC’s approach while acknowledging the necessity for conventions to be flexible and inclusive of varied legal definitions of criminal intent.

The complex balance between harmonisation of international laws and respect for national legal sovereignty is evident in Australia’s discourse, illuminating a methodical approach to forging multilateral agreements that are both cohesive and respectful of individual legal systems.

Arguments

Austria agrees with the United States on the matter of copying being covered under Article 6 and 7

Supporting facts:

• Austria also supports the chair’s interpretation that interception is a prerequisite for copying content

Topics: International Relations, Law Interpretation

---

Austria acknowledges that countries can use different wording in their national legislation to match with their context

Supporting facts:

• Austria’s national legislation does not copy multilateral treaties word by word

Topics: National Legislation, Multilateral Treaties

---

Austria requests more time for consideration

Supporting facts:

• Observations by Egypt on deletion of mentions in Article 10 have caused some disagreement

• Austria wants to reflect on the statement made by the Russian delegation regarding the overlap between ‘obtaining’ in 1A and ‘possession’ in 1B

Topics: Article 10, Paragraph 2 and 3, Referendum

---

Falsified data might be covered under Article 12 concerning fraud and theft.

Supporting facts:

• Article 12.C was amended significantly to encompass any kind of fraud.

• The falsification of data could potentially constitute fraud.

• Provisions within Article 12 should sufficiently cover the use of falsified data.

Topics: Fraud, Theft, Use of Falsified Data

---

Austria agrees with the proposal made by the United Kingdom regarding the definition of property in the context of theft and economic values.

Supporting facts:

• The proposal from the United Kingdom only refers to economic values.

Topics: Theft, Property, Economic benefits

---

Austria is against the proposal made by the Distinguished Delegate of Thailand concerning the consideration of non-economic benefits.

Supporting facts:

• Austria believes that theft and fraud are intrinsically linked with economic benefit.

Topics: Theft, Non-economic benefits, Criminalization

---

Report

Austria’s stance on international relations and legal interpretation is characterised by a willingness to align with international consensus, as evidenced by their agreement with the United States that interception must precede copying content, in accordance with Articles 6 and 7. This concurrence demonstrates Austria’s positive sentiment towards international cooperation and legal harmony, fostering a cohesive international legal framework.

On the integration of multilateral treaties into national law, Austria maintains that direct copying is unnecessary. This approach allows for laws to be tailored to the national context, balancing international obligations with domestic practicalities, in line with the spirit of SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions.

When discussing the finer points of international legal texts, particularly Article 10, Austria adopts a neutral stance, seeking more time for consideration. They are cautious about the potential overlap between ‘obtaining’ and ‘possession’, reflecting a commitment to thorough legal interpretation. Concerning fraud and theft regulations, Austria views the revisions to Article 12.C as sufficiently encompassing various fraudulent behaviours, including those involving falsified data.

Moreover, the misuse of falsified data could also fall under Article 10’s provisions on the misuse of devices, advocating for an all-encompassing approach to criminality in the realm of digital data. In alignment with the UK, Austria agrees that theft should be confined to cases involving economic values, rejecting the expansion of theft and fraud to non-economic benefits, as proposed by Thailand.

This resistance reflects Austria’s focus on preserving the legal clarity and economic security integral to SDG 16. In summary, Austria advocates for a progressive yet careful approach to the interpretation and adoption of international law. Its support for non-literal legislative harmonisation, paired with a commitment to established legal frameworks centred on economic rationalism, underscores a dedication to international collaboration without compromising the integrity of justice and institutional efficacy.

Arguments

Article 12 is related more to fraud than theft

Topics: Article 12, fraud, theft

---

Report

The discourse offers a nuanced examination of Article 12, specifically addressing its relationship with the legal concepts of fraud and theft. Initially, a neutral stance is presented, asserting that Article 12 has a closer connection to fraud than to theft. However, the details regarding how fraud is more pertinent to Article 12 are not elaborated upon.

Moving forward, there is a positive sentiment towards the retention of the term ‘fraud’ within the scope of Article 12, while proposing the exclusion of ‘theft’. This stance advocates for preserving the legal integrity and relevance of Article 12 with regard to deceptive practices and misrepresentation.

In contrast, theft is considered a less suitable or unnecessary inclusion within the article’s provisions. Supporting this viewpoint is the judicial distinction observed in Bahrain, where theft and fraud are distinctly categorised as separate offences. This piece of evidence strengthens the case for treating these concepts independently in Article 12 and suggests that the distinction observed in Bahrain could have an instructive value for broader legal frameworks.

In conclusion, the analysis recommends that Article 12 should continue to encompass issues of fraud but could benefit from omitting references to theft. The importance of specific and clear legal definitions is emphasised, promoting the precise application of legal statutes. Additionally, the sheer specificity displayed in Bahrain’s legal treatment of theft and fraud underscores the essential role of regional legal distinctions in influencing international legal documents.

The review ensures that UK spelling and grammar are used throughout the text, aligning with the prescribed guidelines. The summary aims to balance the inclusion of relevant long-tail keywords with maintaining the intended quality and fidelity of the original analysis.

Arguments

Belarus supports the proposal of the Russian Federation to include ‘copying’ as a violation under national law.

Supporting facts:

• Belarus states that this action (copying) is a violation under national law, including in the country of Belarus.

Topics: Violation of national law, Russian Federation’s proposal

---

Report

Belarus has formally expressed approval for the Russian Federation’s initiative to categorise ‘copying’ as an infringement within the scope of national law. This endorsement aligns with Belarusian legislation, which recognises such an act as a violation of its own national laws.

The sentiment expressed by Belarus is distinctly positive, indicating a shared viewpoint and consensus on the issue between the two countries. In summary, Belarus’s support for the Russian proposal is rooted in local legal precepts, suggesting that the country enforces analogous rules.

The congruence between the Russian Federation’s suggestion and Belarus’s legal stance suggests a common ethos on intellectual property rights or the maintenance of certain juridical standards. By backing the Russian Federation’s stance, Belarus is contributing to the potential establishment of regional legal harmonisation regarding such offences.

This proactive engagement demonstrates international collaboration and could lead to a unified approach to addressing legal violations of this nature. Notably, the affirmative attitude and supportive stance of Belarus could reflect a strategic alliance or diplomatic intent to sustain robust ties with the Russian Federation.

This partnership may have wider implications for regional politics or the standards of international law, extending beyond the specific legal context of penalising unlawful ‘copying’. To conclude, Belarus’s supportive posture on the Russian Federation’s proposal for penalising unauthorised ‘copying’ under national law exemplifies an international accord and a meeting of legal philosophies.

This may encourage similar legal adoptions in other national frameworks, potentially influencing the global dialogue on legal standards for intellectual property protection.

Arguments

Cabo Verde supports the inclusion of transfer of technology

Supporting facts:

• Cabo Verde’s statement includes support for the inclusion of transfer of technology as declared by the African group

Topics: Technology Transfer, Inclusion

---

Report

Cabo Verde has adopted a constructive approach by embracing the inclusion of technology transfer. This positive stance aligns with its commitment to collaborative progression and innovation, keeping in step with the unified direction of the African group. The argument put forth by Cabo Verde underscores the pivotal role that technology transfer plays in attaining sustainable development, in sync with the objectives set forth in Sustainable Development Goals 9 and 17.

Sustainable Development Goal 9 (SDG 9) concentrates on developing resilient infrastructure, promoting inclusive and sustainable industrialisation, and driving innovation. Cabo Verde’s support for technology transfer embodies its allegiance to these aims and acknowledges the essential contribution of technological accessibility to economic advancement and developmental progress.

The nation recognises that improved access to technology is crucial for enriching its industrial sector, bolstering infrastructure, and enhancing innovation capacities. In a similar vein, Sustainable Development Goal 17 (SDG 17) stresses the importance of invigorating the global partnership for sustainable development and highlights the necessity for technology sharing and capacity building in less developed countries.

Cabo Verde’s view is consistent with these goals, as it aspires to reinforce the means of implementation and revitalise global partnerships, both regionally and internationally. By mirroring the African group’s declaration, Cabo Verde manifests a commitment to cooperative efforts and ensures that technology transfer remains a key feature in strategic discussions and accords.

Moreover, the positive sentiment in Cabo Verde’s declarations accentuates its support and active involvement in continental negotiations concerning technology transfer, underlining the significance of integrating such measures into strategic planning to ensure fair access to technological innovation and its associated gains.

The solidarity with the African group’s perspectives also demonstrates a collective aspiration among African states to promote inclusivity and unity when tackling shared sustainable development challenges. In summary, Cabo Verde has positively contributed to discussions on technology transfer, demonstrating solidarity with its African counterparts.

This not only enhances its stature in global dialogues but also reinforces collective actions aimed at achieving critical Sustainable Development Goals. With concerted initiatives, Cabo Verde is set to contribute significantly to paving the way for a sustainable future marked by resilient infrastructures, groundbreaking innovation, and robust global partnerships.

The text utilises UK spelling and grammar conventions, with the necessary corrections made to reflect accurate usage. The summary is comprehensive, factually representative of the main analysis, and enriched with relevant long-tail keywords such as “sustainable development,” “inclusive industrialisation,” “global partnership,” and “technology sharing,” without sacrificing the quality of the content.

Arguments

Cameroon delegation expresses concerns about the wording in Chapter 2 related to criminalization

Supporting facts:

• They are concerned about the inclusion of terms like ‘intentionally or dishonestly’, indicating that such judgement should be left to judges

• They suggest that the text needs to better reflect legal and technical aspects, and strictly adhere to legal framing.

Topics: Legal terminology, Criminal law

---

Cameroon believes that one must limit oneself to the offense within legislative measures under domestic law.

Supporting facts:

• Cameroon suggests the text in paragraph one to strictly refer to the offence and it have clarified that the offence can be ‘committed intentionally’ or not

Topics: Legislation, Domestic law, Offense

---

Cameroon stresses the importance of international law over individual state laws

Supporting facts:

• Cameroon emphasizes that adopted conventions provide a framework for national legislation.

• Stresses that once a convention is adopted, states agree to its provisions.

Topics: International Law, Sovereignty

---

Report

The Cameroon delegation has asserted a robust position on the particulars of legal verbiage and its ramifications within the sphere of criminal law, reflecting a strong commitment to SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions. A primary concern of the delegation is the verbiage in Chapter 2 relating to the criminalisation of behaviour, specifically objecting to subjective phrases such as ‘intentionally or dishonestly’.

They have conveyed a negative sentiment regarding these terms, arguing that judgements of intent are the domain of judges and should not be predetermined by the legal text. Cameroon firmly maintains that interpreting the intent behind an offence is a judicial responsibility; thus, the law should merely enumerate the offence and refrain from suggesting intention.

They posit that the current phrasing could unjustly influence the judge’s interpretation and lead to bias against the defendant. This apprehension about the premature indication of an actor’s intent by the law underpins their overall negative view on this matter.

Moreover, the delegation presents a positive perspective on the formulation of offences within domestic legislation, advocating for an explicit distinction of the act as either intentional or unintentional. This aligns with international legal norms and highlights the need for recognition of criminal intent as a distinct element alongside an offence, which should be distinctly expressed in statutory texts.

On a wider level, Cameroon highlights the primacy of state sovereignty and the pivotal role of international law, asserting that treaties furnish frameworks that guide national legislation. This acknowledges the collective process of international agreements and the necessity for states to adhere to these stipulations.

However, the delegation voices dissatisfaction with processes such as referendums, which they view as diminishing the capacity of states to express their perspectives on the provisions of conventions. In summary, Cameroon advocates for careful drafting of legal terminology and pleads for a legislative approach that respects the judiciary’s role and the sovereign rights of states.

They champion the balance where international conventions outline the major precepts, but individual states maintain a degree of autonomy in interpreting and applying these guidelines within their own legal systems. This stance is indicative of a dedication to the principles of justice and institutional integrity as envisioned by SDG 16.

Arguments

Canada believes technology transfer should be included in the convention

Topics: Technology Transfer, Convention inclusion

---

Canada supports Senegal, the United States, and Austria in their stance against the introduction of copying

Topics: Copying, Intellectual Property

---

Report

Canada has demonstrated a proactive and generally positive attitude toward the discussions on technology transfer, endorsing its inclusion in conventions that focus on bolstering Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure, as highlighted in SDG 9. While Canada views the concept of technology transfer favourably, the nation advocates for its discussion within the context of a chapter dedicated to technical sciences.

This preference suggests a desire for a nuanced approach, where the topic is discussed in detail in relation to scientific and technical advancements. Despite this structured approach to technology transfer, Canada has adopted a cautious stance, opting to reserve its position on the specific inclusion of technology transfer within Articles 1 and 3.

This reservation may signal a strategic or diplomatic consideration, as Canada might be assessing the international community’s stance or refining its own position based on upcoming negotiations. Furthermore, in the realm of intellectual property protection, Canada has aligned with countries such as Senegal, the United States, and Austria, opposing the introduction of copying mechanisms.

This alliance showcases a commitment to protecting intellectual property rights and signifies a collective effort to nurture an environment conducive to creative and technological progress. The convergence of Canada’s positions indicates a country actively involved in formulating global norms, particularly in areas overlapping with technology and intellectual property.

This involvement is characterised by a readiness to engage in collective actions against practices that could compromise innovation ecosystems and a cautious diplomacy reflective of a considered, potentially collaborative approach to international agreements. In summary, Canada is assertively participating in the international dialogue on technology transfer within the remits of SDG 9, advocating for intellectual property protection, while simultaneously exercising diplomatic prudence in its position on convention articles.

Canada’s stance is indicative of its dedication to fostering innovation and infrastructure while aligning with global partners to protect the fundamental components of innovation ecosystems.

Arguments

China supports India’s and Iran’s statements

Topics: International Relations

---

Report

China has exhibited a supportive stance towards the positions expressed by India and Iran in the realm of international relations, manifesting a positive sentiment which implies collaborative tendencies and potential alignment of interests amongst these countries. The specifics of the Indian and Iranian statements have not been revealed, yet China’s endorsement suggests consonance in perspectives, which may indicate a synergistic or unified approach on global issues.

Moreover, China has adopted a contentious position by advocating for the preservation of theft within legal statutes, positing that such an allowance encourages adaptability among nations. This viewpoint – marked by a positive sentiment from its proponents – might reflect China’s strategic intent to manoeuvre through the intricacies of international law, advocating for prudence in enforcing stringent, universal legal standards that might not suit the diverse legal and socio-political landscapes of different states.

This stance poses the risk of normalising behaviours typically deemed illegal, such as theft, under the guise of national sovereignty and legal pluralism. This advocacy is linked to Sustainable Development Goal 16, which aims to advance peace, justice, and strong institutions.

Although the goal itself does not sanction illegal activities, China’s promotion of ‘flexibility’ triggers a complex discourse on aligning SDG 16 with the sovereignty and legal diversity of nations. In summary, China’s diplomatic approach, as demonstrated by its support for India’s and Iran’s undefined positions and its controversial call to uphold theft for legal flexibility, outlines a strategy intent on fostering international cooperation and nuanced dialogue.

These positions suggest China’s desire for diplomatic partnership and debate on the intricate balance between universal legal norms and national self-determination within the context set by global development goals. The proposition underscores the tension between fostering effective, accountable institutions and honouring national prerogatives in the interpretation of international law, a debate that is critical within the broader aspirations of SDG 16.

Nevertheless, this stance is anticipated to provoke discussions concerning the degree to which such latitude can be accommodated without undermining established legal principles.

Arguments

Costa Rica believes that human rights are intrinsically related to the dignity of human beings and should be guaranteed in cyberspace.

Supporting facts:

• Human rights are present in a cross-country way in all international documents.

Topics: Human rights, Cyberspace security, Dignity of human beings

---

Costa Rica emphasizes the importance of incorporating a gender perspective in all efforts to prevent and combat crime in cyberspace, drawing attention to the adverse and differentiated impact of gender violence.

Supporting facts:

• Gender violence online is just as serious as real gender violence.

Topics: Cybercrime, Gender equality, Gender violence in cyberspace

---

Report

Costa Rica staunchly upholds the principle that human rights must be effectively respected and enforced within cyberspace, affirming the intrinsic connection these rights have with the dignity of all individuals. Aligning with Sustainable Development Goals 10 and 16, aimed at reducing inequalities and fostering peace, justice, and strong institutions, Costa Rica’s stance is evident in its positive support for the chair’s proposal on a cyberspace security convention.

The nation advocates for the maintenance of existing preamble elements in future iterations of the text, ensuring consistent reinforcement of fundamental human rights within the realm of digital security. Furthermore, Costa Rica recognises online gender violence as being just as consequential as its real-world counterpart.

The country calls for the integration of a gender-sensitive approach in all efforts to combat cybercrime, highlighting the substantial and distinctly adverse impact of such violence on women. This perspective is in line with SDG 5, which targets gender equality, and is reflective of Costa Rica’s negative sentiment towards gender violence in cyberspace.

The overall analysis suggests that Costa Rica adopts a comprehensive approach to human rights across both traditional and digital contexts, focusing on maintaining human dignity universally. By supporting cooperative international norms and advocating for the inclusion of gender perspectives in cyberspace governance, Costa Rica addresses the complex challenges introduced by the digital era, particularly for vulnerable groups.

Championing such integration and acknowledging the specific severity of online gender violence, the country contributes to an inclusive discourse on cyberspace governance, underscoring the importance of collaborative efforts in tackling the pervasive, evolving challenges to human rights and social equality.

The summary is written using UK spelling and grammar conventions, reflecting the main analytical text accurately while also incorporating long-tail keywords to convey Costa Rica’s commitment to cyberspace security, human dignity, and gender equality within the framework of international cooperation and sustainable development goals.

Arguments

Egypt supports the inclusion of a reference to the transfer of technology in article 1 paragraph 3

Topics: transfer of technology

---

Egypt insists on having a reference for the transfer of technology in the purpose of this convention

Supporting facts:

• Egypt believes it is of paramount importance to assist developing countries in attaining the needed sophisticated technology to prevent and combat the use of ICTs for criminal purposes

Topics: Transfer of Technology, Convention, Article 54

---

Egypt questions the methodology of addressing the chapter and suggests a reconsideration

Supporting facts:

• The chair had dedicated for each delegation three minutes to consider only one article under the general provision chapter, and now there are more than 15 articles

Topics: Debate methodology

---

Egypt supports the retention of Article 16 as proposed by the chair in the revised text

Supporting facts:

• The definition of the predicated offense in the chapter of Article 2 may address the concern of the U.S.

• This is in line with what Egypt has in the UNCAC

• Limiting the scope of this Article 2 offenses may hinder future additional crimes

Topics: Article 16, UNCAC

---

Egypt aligns itself with the Russian Federation’s view on the missing crimes in the chapter of criminalization

Supporting facts:

• Egypt has agreed with the first two interventions made by the Distinguished Delegation of the Russian Federation regarding missing crimes in the chapter of criminalization.

Topics: Criminalization, Missing Crimes

---

Egypt proposes the deletion of the term ‘Articles 6 to 9’ in Article 10

Supporting facts:

• Egypt believes that misuse of devices is not confined to Articles 6 to 9, but also to other offenses established in accordance with the convention.

• Egypt sees potential for misuse of additional protocols later related to other crimes.

Topics: Article 10, misuse of devices

---

Egypt suggests a minor amendment in article 10 paragraph 1

Supporting facts:

• Egypt sees a need for having the same terms in the last part of Article 10, Paragraph 1 as in Roman number 1 and Roman number 2 of sub-paragraph a.

• The suggested terms are ‘device password, access credentials, electronic data, electronic signatures or similar data’.

Topics: Article 10, Paragraph 1, terms of misuse

---

Report

Egypt has actively engaged in the discussions on drafting a convention, with a particular emphasis on the inclusion of explicit references to technology transfer within the articles. The Egyptian delegation stands in solidarity with the African group, advocating for a common position that underscores the pivotal role of technology transfer for developing nations.

The delegation associates this issue positively with Sustainable Development Goal 9, focused on industry, innovation and infrastructure, as well as with SDG 16, which addresses peace, justice and strong institutions. This optimism is reflected in Egypt’s endorsement of retaining Article 16 as proposed in the revised draft, suggesting a cohesive strategy to curb the misuse of ICTs for criminal activities.

However, Egypt has voiced concerns about the debate process, criticising the chair’s method of allocating merely three minutes per delegation to discuss over 15 articles and proposing that this approach should be reassessed. The delegation also disagrees with narrowing the scope of Article 2 offences, perceiving that such limitations might impede the integration of future protocols that might include additional crimes.

This stance reveals Egypt’s proactive vision for maintaining flexibility for subsequent amendments to the convention. Concord is apparent between Egypt and the Russian Federation on issues of criminalisation. The countries concur that there are omissions in the chapter on criminalisation, which leads Egypt to call for a fuller delineation of potential offences.

A significant contribution from the Egyptian delegation is their suggestion to incorporate ‘dishonest’ and ‘unlawful’ intent within Articles 6 and 7, reflecting the variability in domestic law interpretations. This pragmatic stance by Egypt indicates a priority for international consensus and the realistic application of the convention across various jurisdictions.

Regarding Article 10, Egypt proposes eliminating the specific citation of ‘Articles 6 to 9’, which they believe may restrict the clause’s relevance to offences defined in future protocols. This recommendation underlines Egypt’s objective for a convention that effectively anticipates and addresses a broader spectrum of offences.

Overall, the Egyptian delegation’s participatory approach throughout the drafting process is characterised by the desire for clarity and equity in technology transfer provisions. Their insistence on broad and comprehensive terms that cater to differences in domestic law highlights their commitment to fostering a globally adaptable and acceptable convention.

Additionally, they emphasise the importance of forward-looking, inclusive framework that ensures long-term applicability and relevance.

Arguments

El Salvador supports the current wording presented by the chair for article one in the chapter on general provisions

Supporting facts:

• El Salvador stated during informal consultations that the description of transfer of technology in article 54 should not be conditional

Topics: Article 1, General Provisions

---

Report

El Salvador has actively participated in the dialogue surrounding legislation on the transfer of technology, consistently expressing positive support for the proposed provisions and recommending adjustments for improvement. In relation to Article 1 under ‘General Provisions’, El Salvador has firmly supported the draft wording proposed by the chairperson.

They articulated during informal discussions that the description of the transfer of technology outlined in Article 54 should not be subjected to conditional requirements, indicating their stance for establishing transfer of technology as a definite obligation rather than an optional choice.

Regarding Article 54, which concerns the ‘Transfer of Technology’, El Salvador has advocated for the incorporation of Paragraph C. This addition, they believe, is crucial for reinforcing the article and ensuring a balanced legal text on technology transfer. This suggestion underscores El Salvador’s push for a legislative framework that incentivises, rather than merely suggests, the transfer of technology.

In accordance with the Sustainable Development Goal 9 agenda that includes objectives for establishing resilient infrastructure, fostering sustainable industrialisation, and encouraging innovation, El Salvador has demonstrated an acute awareness of the wider implications of facilitating technology transfer, underscoring its necessity for progressing towards sustainable development goals collectively.

El Salvador has further called on other delegations to demonstrate flexibility, stressing that the transfer of technology should be an integral part of any agreement rather than a voluntary commitment. This insistence on flexibility indicates a dedication to the equitable distribution of technology and knowledge.

Analysis of El Salvador’s input reveals a pronounced commitment to shaping policies that promote the dissemination of technology, essential for societal advancement and particularly vital for the development of emerging economies. El Salvador’s active and positive engagement in these negotiations underscores their recognition of technology as a key driver of growth and a means to accomplish developmental targets.

Through advocating for precise terms over voluntary obligations, El Salvador has signalled their determination to ensure that the transfer of technology is practical and enforceable, demonstrating their dedication to effective and equitable technological cooperation.

Arguments

The European Union supports the intervention made by the U.S and Canada

Topics: Intervention, U.S, Canada

---

European Union needs more time to consider before taking a position

---

The European Union supports the text as it was proposed, and objects to deleting Paragraph 2 of Article 11

Supporting facts:

• The provision is an optional provision, it creates no obligations.

• It provides more flexibility when it comes to avoiding over-criminalization and applying, when necessary, these extra conditions

Topics: Text proposal, Deletion of Paragraph 2, Article 11

---

Report

The European Union (EU) has recently taken a variety of stances on assorted matters, demonstrating both support for external initiatives and neutrality in internal discussions. The EU has expressed positive sentiment towards the United States and Canada’s involvement in an intervention, signifying a collaborative transatlantic partnership, although the details of this intervention are unspecified.

Regarding the EU’s linguistic considerations, the bloc maintains a neutral position, favouring discussions on language within the context of technical assistance chapters. This neutrality evidences the EU’s commitment to linguistic diversity and showcases the challenges inherent in the EU’s multilingual decision-making processes.

Moreover, the EU’s stance of neutrality is also evident in their request for additional time to consider their position on an unnamed matter, indicating a measured and contemplative approach to policy-making. In legislative affairs, the EU advocates a strong positive viewpoint towards retaining Paragraph 2 of Article 11, highlighting the provision’s optional nature and its role in mitigating over-criminalisation.

This stance illustrates the EU’s focus on adaptable legal instruments that allow for judicial discretion and mitigate excessive penal measures. Contrarily, the EU opposes the deletion of Paragraph 2 of Article 11, echoing the positive arguments for its retention and underlining the advantages of legislative flexibility that the paragraph provides.

The overarching narrative reveals the EU as embracing a cautious and strategic approach in its policy formation, both internally and in its engagement with international partners. The EU appears committed to fostering cooperation, exercising careful policy development, and upholding nuanced legal frameworks.

This balanced approach underscores the EU’s efforts to navigate the complexities of international cooperation, legislative adaptability, and multilingual governance within its unique political sphere. In summary, the EU is characterised by its nuanced and deliberate approach to both transatlantic relations and internal legislative regulation, maintaining a harmony between flexibility, cooperative spirit, and the sophistication required to manage a multilingual union.

Arguments

Guyana supports the draft preamble of the convention

Supporting facts:

• Guyana states that draft captures the spirit and intent of the convention.

• Guyana represents 14 member states of the CARICOM community in this viewpoint.

Topics: CARICOM, Convention preamble

---

Guyana prefers the general term ‘transnational organized crime’ instead of listing criminal offenses

Supporting facts:

• Guyana believes that having a broader term will make the preamble more adaptable and relevant as types of crimes can change over time.

Topics: Transnational organized crime, Convention preamble

---

Guyana supports proposed revisions in preamble paragraph four and nine

Supporting facts:

• Guyana agrees with the suggestion from the United States on the inclusion of ‘criminal justice policy’ as opposed to ‘criminal policy’.

• CARICOM maintains that the preamble should emphasize international cooperation and the role of stakeholders.

Topics: Convention preamble, Criminal justice policy

---

Report

Guyana has voiced positive sentiment regarding the convention’s preamble, illustrating its conviction that the document encapsulates the essential spirit and intentions of the convention. This perspective is not unique to Guyana but also echoes the stance of the 14 CARICOM member states that Guyana represents, underlining the shared commitment of the Caribbean community to international affairs.

In its assessment, Guyana has expressed a preference for the broad term ‘transnational organised crime’ within the preamble over the listing of particular criminal offences. This choice is predicated on the understanding that criminal activities are subject to change over time.

The adoption of a comprehensive term ensures that the preamble retains its relevance and adaptability, enabling it to address an evolving spectrum of criminal behaviours. Further reinforcing its support, Guyana endorses the proposed modifications for paragraphs four and nine of the preamble.

They agree with the United States’ proposal to use the term ‘criminal justice policy’ instead of the more limited ‘criminal policy’. This amendment enhances the document’s emphasis on international cooperation and the engagement of diverse stakeholders in the development of criminal justice policies.

Guyana also supports the revisions to paragraph 12, particularly the inclusion of the word ‘arbitrary’. They consider this addition consonant with existing international agreements, thus promoting uniformity across global legal documents. Throughout the discussion, Guyana’s staunch position exhibits its commitment to SDG 16, aimed at promoting peace, justice, and solid institutions.

The nation’s advocacy for flexible language that can accommodate future developments within the preamble, coupled with its endorsement of international collaboration and legal precision, highlights its dedication to strengthening international frameworks against organised crime. Furthermore, these positions demonstrate Guyana’s involvement in enhancing the cohesion of international agreements, reflecting the wider goals upheld by CARICOM member states.

In essence, Guyana’s input aligns with the collective effort to bolster international mechanisms against crime, ensuring that the convention is a dynamic and cooperative instrument in the pursuit of global peace and justice. The careful consideration given to the choice of language and the call for harmonisation with other international instruments are indicative of a nuanced approach to international legal cooperation and crime prevention.

Arguments

India supports the transfer of technology

Topics: Technology Transfer

---

India opposes the removal of the word ‘theft’ from the title of Article 12

Supporting facts:

• In the last session, ‘theft’ was removed from another article and included in Article 12

Topics: Article 12, Theft, Legal terminology

---

Report

India has shown a positive attitude towards technology transfer, aligning with the objectives of Sustainable Development Goal 9, which promotes the development of industry, innovation, and infrastructure. This support of technology transfer signifies a commitment to enhancing global knowledge sharing and innovative capabilities.

However, there is tension regarding the legislative handling of the term ‘theft’, specifically concerning Article 12. India has voiced disapproval over the decision to exclude ‘theft’ from the title of Article 12, made during the last legislative session. This change has been met with negativity, as it suggests a softening of legal terms that are essential for legal accuracy and nuanced interpretation.

Standing its ground, India advocates for the re-inclusion of ‘theft’ in Article 12, demonstrating a positive stance toward legal lexical precision. This insistence underlines the importance India places on the exactitude of legal language and the role it plays in the judicial system.

India’s position displays a willingness to engage in global technological progression while also upholding the integrity of its legislative vernacular. This highlights the nation’s efforts to blend international innovation with the meticulous upkeep of its legal customs, balancing forward-thinking policies with traditional methodologies.

In summary, India champions the facilitation of technology exchange and industry advancement in harmony with international development agendas, while simultaneously preserving legal accuracy within its jurisprudence. The nation’s approach strives for a synthesis of embracing global technological innovation and adhering to the rigour of its legislative principles.

UK spelling and grammar have been maintained throughout, ensuring an accurate reflection of the primary analysis text.

Arguments

Iran suggests retaining the final sentence in paragraph C of article 1 and wants transfer of technology to be asserted after capacity building

Supporting facts:

• Iranian delegation has presented its positions and suggestions on general regulations

Topics: General regulations, Technology transfer, Capacity building

---

Iran has been deeply involved in informal meetings to voice its opinions and suggestions, specifically regarding the definition of stakeholders and emergency cases

Topics: Informal meetings, Stakeholders, Emergency cases

---

Iran’s delegation has questions about how to proceed with the chapter

Topics: Ad Hoc Committee , Articles 6-16

---

Iran’s delegation proposes changes to the wording of Article 6

Supporting facts:

• They prefer to use ‘infringing security measure’ or ‘any access without right’ or ‘unlawfully’ after the measure in second sentence, second line

• They propose to change ‘dishonest’ to ‘unlawful’ or ‘criminal intent’ in the third sentence

Topics: Article 6

---

Iran has proposed two amendments in paragraph two

Topics: Amendments, Proposal

---

Iran’s delegation has no reservations regarding article six, sub-paragraph one

Topics: Article six, sub-paragraph one, Consultations

---

Iran’s delegation has reservations and amendments on article six, sub-paragraph two

Topics: Article six, sub-paragraph two, Informal consultations, Amendments

---

Iran proposes to replace ‘dishonest’ with ‘unlawful’ or ‘in accordance with domestic laws’ in paragraph 2, Article 11

Supporting facts:

• Iran has given the suggestion based on previously made amendments in Article 7 and Article 6

Topics: Article 11, Computer-related forgery, Information and Communications Technology-related forgery

---

Iran proposes inclusion of any economic benefit in the last paragraph of the article.

Supporting facts:

• Iran proposed that a gain in money or other property, or any economic benefit should be included in the article.

Topics: Economic Benefit

---

Iran supports the keeping of the title ‘theft’ in the context of ICT device or computer data manipulation

Supporting facts:

• The chair of the ad hoc committee prepared explanatory notes that supports Iran’s view

• Some member states’ domestic laws consider loss of property by computer data manipulation as theft

Topics: Computer data manipulation, ICT device manipulation, Theft vs Fraud debate

---

Report

The Iranian delegation has actively contributed to discussions on international regulations aligned with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly concerning SDG 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure. They advocate for a structured transfer of technology post capacity building, indicating the importance of preparedness before technological advancements are introduced.

Iran’s clear standpoint on maintaining certain phrases within general regulations reflects their commitment to precision in international legislation. In support of SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions, and SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals, Iran has taken a proactive role in informal meetings, meticulously expressing their opinions on defining stakeholders and managing emergency cases—a stance that underscores their dedication to inclusivity and transparency in global peace and justice initiatives.

Legally, the delegation has emphasised the need for exact language, advocating for the addition of the term ‘established’ to ensure consistency with established conventions when referring to ‘proceeds of crime’ and ‘predicate offense’. This precision in terminology reflects Iran’s commitment to clear and exact legal definitions that resonate internationally.

Concerning articles review, Iran takes a neutral stance, questioning the progression with Chapters encompassing Articles 6-16, and suggesting a more general overview to better facilitate discussion. Iran’s methodical approach to legal terms within Article 6 illustrates their desire for language that aligns with international legal standards, proposing changes that would replace ‘dishonest’ with ‘unlawful’ or ‘criminal intent’.

Iran exhibits no reservations regarding Article 6, sub-paragraph one, while expressing a contrasting stance on sub-paragraph two, hinting at potential amendments. In Article 11, related to computer-related forgery, Iran proposes to substitute ‘dishonest’ with ‘unlawful’ or phrasing that would accommodate the nuances of domestic laws.

This reflects a pragmatic approach to regulatory language and its universal application. Regarding economic development under SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth, Iran’s neutral proposition to encompass various forms of economic gain within regulatory texts argues for expansive economic benefit inclusion, thus promoting inclusive economic progress.

In technological crime debates, Iran advocates for classifying computer data manipulation as ‘theft’ rather than ‘fraud’, in line with the domestic legislation of certain member states and the interpretations provided by the committee’s chair—an indication of Iran’s alignment with viewpoints that are domestically relevant yet internationally applicable.

In summary, Iran is strategically engaged in shaping global standards with a focus on justice, transparency, and detailed legal language that caters to the diversity of domestic laws. Their role in international discussions signals an adherence to sustainable development principles, ensuring robust partnerships and infrastructure readiness in the realm of technology transfers.

The summary is a reflection of the main analysis text and has been thoroughly reviewed for UK English spelling and grammar consistency, as well as for clarity and accuracy, without compromising the quality of the information presented.

Arguments

Israel doesn’t see the merit of using the additional language

Supporting facts:

• The terms technical assistance and capacity building may also include voluntary transfer of technology

Topics: Technical Assistance, Capacity Building, Transfer of Technology

---

Report

In international policy discussions, Israel has taken a definitive stance on the terminology used within the context of technical assistance, capacity building, and the voluntary transfer of technology. These topics, associated with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 9—which aims to build resilient infrastructure, promote sustainable industrialisation, and encourage innovation—have sparked a debate.

Israel has expressed a negative sentiment towards the inclusion of additional language in these areas, suggesting a wariness towards committing to broader or more specific obligations that could stem from such wording, particularly regarding the transfer of technology that may be intended to be voluntary.

Despite supporting facts that recognise the voluntary transfer of technology as an aspect of both technical assistance and capacity building, Israel doubts the advantages of formally recognising this relationship through expanded terminology in international agreements. Their stance suggests a preference for a more restricted interpretation, possibly to maintain greater control over the implementation of these terms and to potentially limit the scope of their obligations or contributions.

Conversely, Israel has shown a positive sentiment towards the stance of the United States, indicating an alignment with U.S. perspectives on agreement language. This endorsement of the U.S. viewpoint reflects a geopolitical alliance that could extend beyond the subject matter in question.

The precise nature of the U.S. comments that Israel supports is not specified, but Israel’s agreement is interpreted as an affirmation of the U.S. take on international agreement complexities. The absence of further supporting facts or related SDGs pertaining to Israel’s backing of the U.S.

stance hints at a principled or strategic motive rather than a comprehensive policy evaluation. The positive sentiment here may represent shared values or a diplomatic strategy of upholding a critical ally in international relations. In summary, Israel’s measured approach to discussions around agreement language related to technology transfer demonstrates a cautious evaluation of the implications and shows a broader concurrence with the U.S.

in international policy formulation. This variance in sentiment towards different aspects of the dialogue underscores the intricacy of international negotiations and the strategic considerations that nations must weigh when contributing to global policy development.

Arguments

CARICOM supports Article 1A

Supporting facts:

• Article 1A reflects a retention of the text in the draft text.

• Paragraph 1B is already agreed at referendum

Topics: UNCAC, Article 1

---

Jamaica is speaking on behalf of the 14 member states of the Caribbean community (CARICOM)

Topics: CARICOM, Jamaica

---

CARICOM supports Articles 6 to 12 as they are worded

Topics: CARICOM, Cybercrime Computer Systems Offences, Articles 6 to 12

---

Report

The in-depth examination of the Caribbean Community’s (CARICOM) positions reveals their strong positive engagement with the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC), particularly with the text of Article 1. CARICOM has expressed firm support for Article 1A, positively noting that it reflects the text of the original draft and highlights that the paragraph has garnered consensual support through a referendum process.

Their support for Article 1A indicates CARICOM’s satisfaction with the current language and the intention of the clause, suggesting a desire for consistency and adherence to previously agreed-upon terms. Additionally, CARICOM has conveyed a recommendation regarding the wording in Paragraph 1C of Article 1.

This suggestion follows the significant adjustments made to this part of the text which CARICOM views favourably, potentially improving the text’s clarity and effectiveness. By proposing changes to align with Article 1B, CARICOM exhibits a proactive approach to harmonising the convention’s articles, underlining its commitment to a robust anti-corruption legal structure.

On the international diplomatic stage, Jamaica has spoken on behalf of the 14 CARICOM member states, representing a collective Caribbean perspective that extends beyond anti-corruption, delving into cybercrime discussions. CARICOM has resolutely backed Articles 6 to 12, which address Cybercrime Computer Systems Offences, signalling an alignment with the existing text and indicating no demand for amendments.

Moreover, there is optimism within CARICOM member states that a consensus on these cybercrime laws is achievable and essential, reflecting their commitment to the goals of SDG 16, which focuses on Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions. CARICOM’s united front on these articles implies confidence in the established legal framework for effective cybercrime management.

In summary, CARICOM’s active participation in the UNCAC and their constructive contributions—ranging from endorsements of the current legal framework to amendments for increased coherence—demonstrate their commitment to international law and regional unity. Such involvement not only reinforces their international legal obligations but also showcases their dedication to strengthening institutions, adhering to the rule of law, and aligning with the Sustainable Development Goals.

Moreover, CARICOM’s strategic collaboration in international negotiations highlights their intent to amplify regional influence and protect Caribbean interests within the global legal spectrum.

Arguments

Japan supports the Chair’s proposal on Article 1.

Supporting facts:

• The proposal on Article 1 is based on the wording of article one of UNCAC, includes a reference to capacity building, and takes a more general approach with the deletion of the last half sentence.

• Japan hopes to reach consensus on this clear and concise text.

Topics: Article 1, Chair’s Proposal, Ad Hoc Committee

---

Japan strongly supports the chair’s proposal on article seven regarding the offense of illegal interception

Supporting facts:

• This proposal does not require a state party to criminalize the interception of any radio transmission which, even though non-public, takes place in a relatively open and accessible manner

Topics: Offense of Illegal Interception, Radio Transmission, State Party

---

Japan supports the text as it stands in Article 8

Supporting facts:

• The interpretation of what constitutes serious harm is left to the discretion of the domestic legislation of each state party

Topics: International Convention, Domestic Legislation, Interpretation of Serious Harm

---

Japan supports the original text as it stands without any modification

---

Japan supports the current formulation of the article and is in agreement with Austria’s intervention

Supporting facts:

• Japan thinks the current formulation is in line with work at the sixth session of the ad hoc committee

• Japan believes the current formulation covers many of the concerns raised

Topics: Article formulation, Austria’s Intervention

---

Report

Japan has firmly demonstrated a supportive stance regarding several articles within the framework of an international convention, indicating a positive and collaborative approach to international lawmaking and the establishment of global standards. The detailed examination of Japan’s positions reveals the following: 1.

Concerning Article 1, Japan has endorsed the Chair’s proposal, appreciated for its consistency with Article One of the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC). The proposal integrates a mention of capacity-building and opts for a more general approach by omitting the latter part of the sentence.

This reflects Japan’s preference for text that is clear yet flexible enough to foster general consensus. 2. With regards to Article 7, which deals with the offence of illegal interception, Japan supports the Chair’s proposal. Japan agrees with the position that state parties should not be compelled to criminalise the interception of non-public radio transmissions that occur in a manner that is relatively open and accessible.

This stance echoes Japan’s understanding in line with current conventions, illustrating a balance between international commitments and realistic enforcement. 3. In Article 8, Japan affirms the current text, emphasising the sovereignty of state parties by allowing discretion in domestic legislation to interpret ‘serious harm’.

This position illustrates Japan’s dedication to ensuring international conventions respect national legal systems while also empowering them. 4. Japan’s concurrence with the United States on an unspecified matter suggests a strategic partnership or shared perspective in certain areas of the convention.

The positive sentiment towards preserving the original text without modifications signals Japan’s contentment with the established provisions, potentially reflecting a broader philosophical congruence with the U.S. approach to international agreements. 5. Japan is in accord with both Austria’s intervention and the U.K.’s proposal regarding amendments to the definition of property.

This implies Japan values clear and universally coherent legal terminology and is open to accommodating diverse perspectives, possibly arising from Japan’s meticulous legal culture and its pursuit of precision. In conclusion, Japan’s affirmative stances and engaged participation indicate a pattern of constructive diplomacy and a determination to foster international consensus.

The support for broadly interpretable articles may suggest Japan’s strategy to welcome varying national interests and legal frameworks while maintaining international standards. Furthermore, Japan’s supportive viewpoints suggest a potential role as a mediator between disparate national perspectives within international forums.

Overall, these observations underline Japan’s advocacy for harmonised international standards with respect for national sovereignty, specifically in promoting the objectives of peace, justice, and strong institutions (SDG 16). The summary has been reviewed to ensure the use of UK spelling and grammar, reflect the main content of the analysis accurately, and incorporate relevant long-tail keywords without losing the quality of the summary.

Arguments

Mauritania suggests to use ‘illegal’ instead of ‘dishonest’ in Article 7, Paragraph 2

Topics: Article 7, Required Criminal Intent

---

Dishonest intent does not have clear criteria to qualify it, unlike something that is unlawful

Supporting facts:

• The sentence stating ‘dishonest intent’ is quoted from Article 3 of the Budapest Convention. However, Mauritania argues that there is ambiguity in terming ‘dishonest’ vs ‘unlawful’.

Topics: Budapest Convention, illegal interception, dishonest intent, criminal or illegal intent

---

Mauritania supports staff remaining and is against the deletion of the associated paragraph

Supporting facts:

• The protocol being referenced is voluntary

Topics: Staff retention, Protocol adherence

---

Mauritania supports the views of the U.S. in relation to the reservation on the use of theft.

Supporting facts:

• Different paragraphs are acts of fraud and there is no act that indicates theft.

• Mauritania believes in maintaining fraud consistent with the verbs included in the three subparagraphs.

Topics: Use of Theft, Fraud

---

Report

Mauritania has adopted a precise stance on the use of legal terminology within international documents, advocating for specific and unequivocal language that underpins clear legal standards. With respect to Article 7, Paragraph 2, the nation proposes substituting ‘dishonest’ with ‘illegal’, underscoring that ‘illegal’ conveys a definitive legal meaning, thereby reducing the likelihood of misunderstandings when enforcing the law.

This recommendation follows Mauritania’s identification of confusion emanating from the usage of ‘dishonest intent’ in Article 3 of the Budapest Convention. Mauritania’s argument prioritises the need for transparent criteria, which the term ‘dishonest’ may not provide in comparison to something explicitly identified as ‘unlawful’.

Additionally, Mauritania argues for a consistent lexicon, especially concerning illegal interception. Given that the title of the contested article already includes ‘illegal interception’, Mauritania advocates for ‘illegal intent’ to be used throughout the legal text to uphold consistency. This not only enhances clarity but also ensures that the terminology aligns with established legal standards.

In the area of staff retention and protocol adherence, Mauritania’s stance is supportive of the existing clauses that favour staff retention. Even though the protocol in question is voluntary, this does not affect Mauritania’s positive sentiment towards upholding these clauses.

The nation opposes the deletion of the paragraph affiliated with staff retention, signalling the country’s appreciation for long-standing commitment and adherence to protocols within institutions. On the subject of criminalisation of data falsification, Mauritania agrees with Senegal’s proposal, which advocates for making the use of falsified data a criminal act.

This alignment displays Mauritania’s support for the objectives of SDG 16, which aims to promote peace, justice, and robust institutions. Criminalising the use of falsified data is considered a step towards enhancing legal and ethical standards, thereby reinforcing justice in Mauritania’s perspective.

Mauritania’s preference of ‘fraud’ over ‘theft’ is predicated on an examination of the relevant paragraphs, with a recognition that current text reflects acts of fraud with no act depicting theft. The nation thus supports the United States’ views, preferring the term ‘fraud’ to be applied consistently in various subsections.

They contend that incorporating ‘theft’ could create confusion and be less representative of the described acts. In conclusion, Mauritania’s input reflects a dedication to legal accuracy, the significance of a consistent and lucid legal language, and a systematic approach to international law.

The country’s positions unite around the central goal to avert vagueness, thereby enabling an internationally coherent interpretation and execution of the legal text. This methodology is indicative of Mauritania’s broader dedication to maintaining rigorous legal protocols and strengthening institutions with a firm framework.

Arguments

Namibia supports the inclusion of transfer of technology

Supporting facts:

• Namibia stated it in a discussion chaired by Cabo Verde

Topics: technology transfer, African group support

---

Namibia supports the retention of the term ‘theft’ in the legislation.

Supporting facts:

• Namibia proposed to add the term ‘copying’ to option A, in order to retain and justify the term ‘theft’.

Topics: Theft, Legislation

---

Report

Namibia has shown strong engagement in discussions pertinent to sustainable development, especially in its positive stance on technology transfer—a critical aspect aligned with SDG 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure. This position was articulated during a session chaired by Cabo Verde, underscoring Namibia’s advocacy for collaborative technology sharing to bolster the infrastructural development of African nations.

Such support for technology inclusion highlights Namibia’s commitment to fostering industrialisation and innovation sustainably. Furthermore, Namibia has aligned itself with the African group’s declaration, demonstrating regional solidarity in accordance with SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals. The country’s endorsement of the declaration made last night underlines its dedication to collective advancement and shared aims across the continent, reinforcing the importance of global partnerships in addressing development challenges.

In the realm of legislative matters, particularly concerning the issue of theft as related to SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions, Namibia has adopted a proactive stance. The country has proposed the addition of ‘copying’ to reinforce the definition of ‘theft’ within the legislation.

This move aims to ensure that the law comprehensively addresses contemporary forms of theft, such as intellectual property infringement, thereby maintaining the integrity of the legal system. The review of Namibia’s participation in these dialogues reflects its strategic approach to international cooperation on sustainable development.

Namibia’s active involvement and positive sentiment towards critical global issues showcase its forward-thinking attitude and commitment to driving both national and regional progress in harmony with the Sustainable Development Goals. [Note: The original text was found to use UK spelling and grammar correctly; thus, no corrections in that regard were necessary.

Long-tail keywords, such as ‘sustainable development,’ ‘global partnerships,’ ‘infrastructural development,’ ‘industrialisation and innovation sustainably,’ and ‘national and regional progress’ have been included to improve the SEO value, all integrated without sacrificing the quality of the summary.]

Arguments

Nigeria is concerned specifically with reference to Article 10 of the preamble with regard to mainstreaming gender perspective.

Supporting facts:

• The reference to gender perspective was discussed in relation to resolutions, not in the context of any criminal justice convention like UNTOC or UNCAC.

Topics: Gender perspective, Criminal justice convention

---

Nigeria supports the reference to transfer of technology in Article 1.

Supporting facts:

• In Nigeria’s opinion, the reference to transfer of technology in Article 1 is valuable.

Topics: Transfer of technology, Article 1

---

Report

Nigeria’s dealings with clauses relating to the gender perspective in international conventions demonstrate a multifaceted stance. Nigeria exhibits reservations about the mainstreaming of gender perspective referenced in Article 10 of the preamble, reflected by a negative sentiment towards alignment with the implementation of gender-focused resolutions within existing international criminal justice conventions such as UNTOC and UNCAC.

This apprehension seems rooted in potential discord between the article’s mandate for gender mainstreaming and Nigeria’s domestic implementation of criminal justice. However, this critical view is countered by a positive position on adjusting the phrasing of the same article to better reflect Nigeria’s domestic laws and social realities.

Nigeria advocates for a modification proposed by Cameroon to alter paragraph 10, illustrating a readiness to harmonise international gender equality standards of SDG 5 with Nigeria’s unique legal and cultural environment. Additionally, Nigeria expresses support for incorporating technology transfer clauses in international agreements, evidenced by its backing of the wording in Article 1.

This positive stance reveals Nigeria’s acknowledgement of the importance of technology transfer for national progress, in line with the aims of SDG 9, which focuses on industry, innovation, and infrastructure. The endorsement indicates an understanding of the substantial benefits technology transfer can offer, potentially enhancing Nigeria’s capabilities in infrastructure development, industry, and innovation.

This balanced stance highlights Nigeria’s intention to find equilibrium between upholding international convention commitments and prioritising local variables. It also underlines the intricate relationship between global gender equality standards, the facilitation of technology transfer, and sovereign national interests. Nigeria’s active engagement and arguments encapsulate a complex negotiation process, denoting an openness towards international collaboration, contingent on the adaptability of global structures to accommodate national conditions.

Nigeria’s role in these discussions reflects a nuanced attempt to engage with global development agendas while strongly maintaining national sovereignty and interests.

Arguments

Norway does not support the inclusion of transfer of technology.

Topics: Transfer of Technology

---

Report

Norway has a nuanced stance on the topic of technology transfer. Despite a negative viewpoint towards the inclusion of technology transfer as a general concept, Norway aligns positively with the stance taken by the United States, suggesting a more selective or conditional approach that possibly harmonises with specific U.S.

policies. However, due to the absence of detailed information regarding the U.S. position and a lack of supporting facts or references to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the complexities and motivations of Norway’s position on international technology transfer remain ambiguous.

We must consider the lack of clarity in assessing Norway’s approach to global technology collaboration and the intricate nature of its relationship with the U.S. on such matters. Without further context, the analysis of Norway’s international policy stance on technology transfer is, at best, a glimpse into a multifaceted discussion on global technological cooperation, influenced by the dynamics of U.S.-Norway policy alignment.

This edited text has been checked for grammatical errors, sentence structure issues, typos, or missing details, and is reflective of UK spelling and grammar conventions. It provides an expanded summary that captures a partial view of Norway’s position on technology transfer while maintaining the high quality and accuracy of the analysis.

Arguments

Papua New Guinea supports the retention of theft in the context of computer data or digital information

Supporting facts:

• Article 12a discusses input, alteration, deletion, or suppression of computer data

• Theft in this context would mean digitally depriving someone of their data or information

Topics: Computer data, Digital Information, Theft

---

Report

Papua New Guinea has positively affirmed its commitment to recognising ‘theft’ as it pertains to computer data or digital information, an increasingly prevalent concern. By discussing Article 12a, they highlight the significance of addressing unauthorised activities such as inputting, altering, deleting, or suppressing computer data, which constitutes a form of digital theft.

This stance demonstrates the country’s recognition of the seriousness of cyber crimes and the need for stringent legal parameters to deter them, supporting the goal of peace, justice, and strong institutions outlined in Sustainable Development Goal 16. Furthermore, Papua New Guinea’s perspective is highly relevant to the progress in industry, innovation, and infrastructure captured in Goal 9.

By protecting digital data against theft, the country acknowledges the foundational role of data security in a prosperous digital economy and innovation landscape. Secure digital information systems are crucial for drawing investment, fostering economic development, and promoting the technological advancements underpinning infrastructure development.

The country’s outlook also extends to its foreign policy, showing a positive stance on collaboration with the delegates from India, Iran, China, and Russia. While the summary does not elaborate on specific collaborations, the endorsement of these diplomatic relations likely solidifies international agreements and reflects a unified approach to cyber security and data protection.

This is in line with Goal 17, which underlines the necessity of partnerships to achieve sustainable development. The cooperation with Article 12a and the mutual support with other key international actors point to an understanding of the complexities of interconnected global data systems and the collective duty to defend them.

Papua New Guinea’s position signals not only an appreciation of international cooperation but also an endorsement of forward-thinking strategies essential for the stability and security of global data infrastructure. To summarise, Papua New Guinea’s expressions on digital data theft and international partnerships highlight a nuanced grasp of the challenges facing global digital governance.

Their contributions to discussions in this area are likely crucial for establishing shared norms and structures vital for the protection of digital sectors, supporting robust infrastructure, and overall, fostering a peaceful, just, and resilient global community.

Arguments

Peru suggests taking into consideration proven criminal legislation used in Latin America to clarify the issue of ‘dishonest intent’

Supporting facts:

• In Latin American law, offenses requiring an ultimate goal that goes beyond the immediate one are considered, for example, murders inflicted with particular cruelty

Topics: Criminal Legislation, Dishonest Intent

---

Peru believes the translation of ‘dishonest intent’ into ‘criminal intent’ is crucial for understanding and punishing offenses

Supporting facts:

• In the Peruvian legislation ‘dishonest intent’ when translated into official documents is understood as ‘criminal intent’

Topics: Translation, Legal Terminology

---

Report

Peru has underscored the nuanced interpretation of ‘dishonest intent’ within the domain of criminal law, drawing on robust legislative examples from the wider Latin American legal system. The aim is to distil clarity on a complex term that is essential for understanding an offender’s deeper motivations, particularly in the assessment of crimes executed with malicious intent.

Highlighting precedents from Latin American laws, Peru outlines how serious offences, exemplified by murders carried out with exceptional cruelty, necessitate the consideration of the perpetrator’s broader goals, beyond the immediate criminal act. These considerations are pivotal in discerning the gravity and intent of crimes, thus influencing judicial decisions.

Peru advocates that employing applicable legal examples can elucidate the abstract notion of ‘dishonest intent’. This approach enables a tangible understanding of the term, facilitating effective law enforcement and judicial outcomes aligned with justice. Reflecting this approach, Peru translates ‘dishonest intent’ as ‘criminal intent’ in legal documentation, a choice underscoring the prosecutable aspect of intent within a criminal framework.

The importance of precise translation and interpretation of legal terms is echoed by Peru, as it regards such accuracy as essential for the integrity of its legal system. Peru emphasises that this precision in legal terminology is necessary to both comprehend and punish offences, which positively influences their judiciary processes.

Aligned with Sustainable Development Goal 16, Peru’s advocacy for legal clarity supports the promotion of peaceful societies, justice for all, and accountable institutions. By championing clear legal definitions and equitable processes, Peru reinforces the goal of establishing robust institutions designed to safeguard legal integrity and ensure justice.

In summary, Peru’s perspective emphasises the importance of contextually interpreting legal terminology, exemplified through its translation of ‘dishonest intent’ to ‘criminal intent’, reflecting broader implications for legal practices and societal perceptions of justice in alignment with international goals and objectives.

The summary reflects UK spelling and grammar conventions, with no grammatical or sentence formation issues detected, and no missing details from the main analysis text. Long-tail keywords related to the content have been included where possible without compromising the quality of the summary.

Arguments

Qatar believes that Article 12 should be confined to fraud and not include reference to theft

Supporting facts:

• Qatar supports Mauritania’s stance

• Theft is obtaining money that is belonging to others without right

Topics: Article 12 amendment, Definition of theft, Fraud

---

Report

Qatar has demonstrated a favourable stance regarding Mauritania’s proposed amendment to Article 12, emphasising that the amendment should be explicitly focused on fraud and unequivocally exclude theft. Fraud, central to the discussion, is commonly understood as a wilful misrepresentation for personal gain or to harm another, though its precise definition has not been outlined in the provided summaries.

The Qatari position is that Article 12’s legal definition should clearly demarcate theft, conceived narrowly as the unauthorised acquisition of funds or property rightfully belonging to another, from fraud, which implies a broader spectrum of deceptive and manipulative conduct aimed at financial or other benefits.

Both summaries affirm Qatar’s view that Article 12 must differentiate between the two distinct forms of financial illicit conduct. This is pivotal because it ensures legal measures and prosecutorial approaches are fittingly matched to the specific nature of the offence. Notably absent in the summaries is any direct reference to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), suggesting the debate’s concentration on the legal and definitional aspects of the proposed amendment.

In summary, Qatar’s push for precise legal definitions in the amendment of Article 12 reflects its commitment to meticulous legal reform. By supporting Mauritania’s stance, Qatar expresses its stance on legal clarity and the necessity of differentiating between theft and fraud to prevent legal ambiguities and enable a just application of the law.

This alignment with Mauritania signifies a diplomatic accord on legal issues internationally, highlighting Qatar’s significant role in international legal discussions pertaining to economic crime. Throughout the text, UK spelling and grammar conventions have been upheld, with no grammatical errors, sentence formation issues, or typos identified.

The summary is an accurate reflection of the key analysis, incorporating relevant long-tail keywords such as “Article 12 amendment”, “legal definition of theft and fraud”, “Mauritania’s proposal”, and “international legal discussions on economic crime” while ensuring the quality of the summary is maintained.

Arguments

Russian delegation supports the wording of Article of Chapter 1. A

Supporting facts:

• Article of Chapter 1. A notes the importance of promoting and strengthening measures to prevent and combat ICT for criminal purposes

Topics: ICT for criminal purposes, crime prevention, convention, cooperation among UN member states

---

Russian Federation emphasizes the importance of preventing crimes

Supporting facts:

• It’s easier to prevent crimes than to cope with their aftermath, especially given the crimes where financial losses are in the billions

Topics: crime prevention, financial losses, immaterial damage

---

Russian Federation supports the statements of previous speakers, particularly that of Egypt

Supporting facts:

• Supports statements of previous speakers

• Mentioned Egypt specifically

Topics: Statement Supporting, Diplomatic Stances

---

Russian Federation believes it’s premature to say that 1C agreement has been reached without agreement on Article 54

Supporting facts:

• Believes agreement on Article 54 is prerequisite for agreeing upon 1C

Topics: Article 54, 1C Agreement

---

The Russian Federation believes that the allocated time for discussions in the ad hoc committee was insufficient and resulted in obstacles to reaching consensus

Supporting facts:

• Due to the limited time, not all delegations were able to take part in full, especially smaller delegations that could not be present at multiple events and platforms at the same time

Topics: Ad hoc committee discussions, Time constraints

---

The Russian Federation is disappointed with the lack of recognition for offenses using ICTs for various illegal activities in the draft of the convention

Supporting facts:

• The Russian Federation proposed recognizing as offenses using ICTs for terrorist purposes, proliferation of weapons, drugs, incitement to illegal activities, inducement to suicide, rehabilitation of Nazism, justification of genocide, and illegal impact on critical infrastructure

• They argue that these offenses are particularly dangerous due to their capability of being prepared and carried out quickly, and involve a large number of participants

Topics: ICT use for illegal activities, Lack of recognition in convention draft

---

The Russian Federation believes in the creation of a truly effective instrument to prevent and counter the use of criminal activities with ICT.

Supporting facts:

• Session held at UNHQ to decide on the creation of such an instrument

• Importance for criminals to know there’s an international mechanism that can hold them accountable

• Potential offenders should be aware of this mechanism and its prevention measures

Topics: ICT, Crime Prevention, Criminal Activities, United Nations

---

The wording ‘dishonest intent’ should be replaced with ‘unlawful aim’

Topics: Article 6, Legislation, Legal terminology

---

Russian Federation suggests that ‘Dishonest intent’ in Paragraph 2, Article 7 should be replaced with ‘other unlawful aims’.

Topics: Article 7, Paragraph 2, Dishonest intent, Unlawful aims

---

Russian Federation is concerned about the flexibility of modifying Paragraph 2 of Article 7

Topics: Article 7, Legislative language

---

Addition of the word ‘copying’ in paragraph 1 of Article 8.

Supporting facts:

• Without this addition, the copying of information for criminal purposes and subsequent use for malicious intent will remain outside the scope of this article.

Topics: Interference with Computer Data, Digital Information, Criminal activities

---

The Russian Federation wants to reserve its position

Supporting facts:

• Heard the view of only a small number of states

• Would like to hear views from others on this matter

• requested to put in a reservation of their position

Topics: Information copying, Interference, Common ground

---

Russian Federation has objections about article 10 1b

Supporting facts:

• The second sentence of article 10 1b can create legal uncertainty

• The authors have been asked to explain why that part is necessary

Topics: Legal uncertainty

---

Russian Federation proposes deletion of Article 11, Paragraph 2

Supporting facts:

• Perceived lack of value add to Paragraph 1

Topics: Article amendment, Legal Proposal

---

The Russian Federation suggests to amend the term ‘dishonest intent’ in certain articles

Topics: amendment, dishonest intent

---

The Russian Federation supports the elimination of ‘theft’ from the title

Supporting facts:

• In the previous draft, ‘theft’ and ‘fraud’ were two separate articles. The ‘theft’ article was deleted, but was later amalgamated into the ‘fraud’ article, which is why ‘theft’ still appears. The Russian Federation supports the removal of the term ‘theft’ from the title of this new merged article.

Topics: Law, Fraud and Theft

---

Report

The Russian Federation has been prominently involved in shaping global discourse concerning the exploitation of information and communication technologies (ICT) for illicit activities. Their contribution, focused on strengthening legislation in line with Sustainable Development Goal 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions, underscores a commitment to fashioning an advanced legal framework to counter technological crimes.

Emphasising the significance of crime prevention, the Russian delegation argues that prevention is key to averting extensive financial and non-financial damages resulting from ICT-related offences. In pursuit of this preventative approach, they advocate for the inclusion of specific preventive provisions across a wide range of convention articles, including Articles 3, 23, 35, 41, and 47.

These efforts reflect an acknowledgment that such crimes can rapidly manifest on a massive scale, incurring potentially billions in financial losses. Confronting current technological challenges, the Russian Federation is adamant about developing up-to-date and universally applicable procedural methods to enhance cooperation among international law enforcement agencies.

This call for modernisation relates to their concern that existing cooperation frameworks are reliant on outdated protocols, which at times, may not be suitable for present-day demands. The Russian perspective also extends towards supporting technology transfers and capacity-building efforts, particularly benefiting developing countries, demonstrating a collaborative approach aligned with SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals.

Although supportive of collective diplomatic efforts, evident through their endorsement of earlier speakers and concordance with Egypt, the Russian Federation maintains a cautious stance, reserving full commitment until key articles, such as Article 54, achieve consensus. They have also voiced reservations about the adequacy of time allocated for ad hoc committee discussions, pointing to potential exclusions of smaller delegations from the dialogue and thereby impacting the consensus.

A pronounced dissatisfaction has been expressed by the Russian Federation due to the omission of recognising certain offences involving ICT in the draft convention – crimes that are exceptionally dangerous due to their quick mobilisation and involvement of vast numbers of participants.

Despite this, the Federation remains optimistic about devising an effective mechanism to deter and counteract the misuse of ICT in criminal endeavours. Their willingness to debate and refine the language concerning criminalisation articles exemplifies a pragmatic and adaptive approach. Proposing amendments, such as switching ‘dishonest intent’ with ‘unlawful aim’, the Federation aims to augment legal clarity and ensure accurate interpretation.

Further recommendations have been put forth to resolve ambiguities and inadequate expressions in other articles, as with Article 10 1b. They have also pushed for the deletion of ‘theft’ from an article title where it became irrelevant after the merger with ‘fraud’.

This meticulous attention signifies the Federation’s dedication to the precision of legal terminology. Their coherent critique, readiness to cooperate, and harmonisation with countries like China, India, and Iran over certain legal intricacies accentuate their intent to strengthen an international legal framework.

Overall, the Russian Federation’s strategy is one of balanced review, affirmative support, and well-placed reservation, aiming to assemble an effective, legally sound, and collectively endorsed system to tackle the proliferation of criminal activities facilitated by advanced ICT.

Arguments

Rwanda supports the inclusion of the delegation from the Russian Federation’s addition

Topics: Inclusion, Collaboration

---

Report

Rwanda has publicly expressed its support for the inclusion of the Russian Federation’s delegation in an unspecified international setting, advocating a policy of inclusivity. This positive stance is indicative of Rwanda’s dedication to ensuring diversified participation in collaborative discourse. Moreover, Rwanda has signified its alignment with Russia’s viewpoint on an issue yet to be delineated, which underlines a commitment to cooperation and suggests the potential for a partnership.

The absence of specific Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) or supporting facts in the framework of Rwanda’s position may imply that the stance is guided by overarching diplomatic principles or a strategic approach in global politics, rather than by targeted policy agendas or empirical evidence.

While the support of Russian inclusion carries a positive sentiment, signifying hopefulness about the consequences of Russia’s engagement, the neutrality in Rwanda’s alignment with the Russian Federation’s perspective might reflect a careful diplomatic stance, opting for solidarity without an unreserved endorsement of Russia’s policies or actions.

In summary, Rwanda’s diplomatic strategy encapsulates a dedication to inclusive international dialogue and active cooperation, as evidenced by its engagement with the Russian Federation. Nevertheless, the dearth of specific objectives or data necessitates further investigation into the motives and implications of the Rwanda-Russia collaboration, a matter that bears greater examination to fully comprehend the dynamics and potential outcomes of this international relationship.

This summary adheres to UK spelling and grammar conventions.

Arguments

Senegal supports the inclusion of technology transfer

Supporting facts:

• Senegal supports the proposal of the African group

• Proposal to include technology transfer in this paragraph

Topics: Technology Transfer, African Group

---

Senegal supports the draft of Article 8 regarding the integrity of computer data

Supporting facts:

• Senegal does not believe that copying undermines the integrity of computer data

• Copying is viewed by Senegal as simply reproducing computer data

Topics: Computer data, Article 8

---

Senegal supports the criminalization of forgery activities under Article 11

Supporting facts:

• Senegal believes that the forgery activities should be criminalized as stated in Article 11

Topics: Article 11, Forgery Activities, Criminalization

---

Senegal proposes to criminalize the use of falsified computer data

Supporting facts:

• Senegal’s proposal is not taken into account in the first para of Article 11

• Article 11 talks about falsification which includes the input, alteration, or deletion of computer data

Topics: criminalization of falsified computer data, cybercrime

---

Senegal proposes a separate offense for the use of falsified computer data

Supporting facts:

• Senegal argues that the act of using falsified data is a material conduct, different from the intent of having it considered or treated as authentic.

• This belief aligns with Senegal’s penal code, which also criminalizes the use of falsified items.

Topics: Digital Security, Data Integrity

---

Senegal agrees to Article 11.1

Supporting facts:

• Senegal’s statement: ‘we support 11 paragraph 1’

Topics: Article 11.1, UN Conference

---

Senegal proposes a separate criminalization of the use of falsified computer data

Supporting facts:

• Senegal’s statement: ‘we will add a drafting proposal that we have with regard to the separate criminalization of the use of falsified computer data’

Topics: Computer Data, Law, Proposed Amendment

---

Senegal is not in favor of extending the criminalization of computer fraud to non-economic damage

Supporting facts:

• computer fraud and its philosophy is a crime that has an economic purpose

• It’s an offense that is aimed at seeking gain

Topics: computer fraud, Budapest Convention, Malibu Convention

---

Senegal supports the proposal to delete the word ‘theft’ from Article 12

Supporting facts:

• The provision primarily includes computer fraud

• The term ‘theft’ has a specific, different meaning in most countries with a civil law tradition

Topics: Article 12 amendment, Computer fraud

---

Report

Senegal actively pursues the advancement of technological capabilities in Africa, positively aligning with the Sustainable Development Goals, specifically those focused on innovation and equitable partnerships (SDG 9, 10, and 17). Its support for the African group’s proposal of technology transfer showcases a commitment to innovation and reducing technology-related disparities.

Concerning digital legislation and cybersecurity, Senegal’s contributions display a nuanced approach: 1. **Article 8 – Data Integrity**: Senegal argues against classifying ‘copying’ as an action that undermines the integrity of computer data, suggesting it is mere reproduction. Expression of such views indicates Senegal’s advocacy for refined legal definitions in technology law.

2. **Article 11 – Falsified Data**: Senegal endorses the criminalisation of forgery activities and advocates for a separate offence concerning the use of falsified computer data, proposing amendments to cover the material use of such data comprehensively. 3. **Criminalisation Support**: Senegal agrees with Article 11.1 and proposes further amendments focusing on falsified data, indicating a proactive approach in digital forgery legislation.

4. **Computer Fraud – Economic Intent**: Contrary perspectives arise with Senegal arguing against expanding computer fraud criminalisation to include non-economic damage, insisting on the economic motivation characteristic of computer fraud. 5. **Article 12 – ‘Theft’ Definition**: Sensitivity towards legal terminology is evidenced by Senegal’s support for the removal of the term ‘theft’ from Article 12, acknowledging the lexical disparities and striving for legal clarity.

Senegal’s position reflects a detailed analytical approach to digital security legislation, emphasising definition clarity while advocating for technological progress. Through its policy contributions, Senegal aims to reinforce legal frameworks and boost international cooperation in cybercrime prevention. The expansion of this summary incorporates long-tail keywords relevant to technological advancement and digital legislation discussions while maintaining the high quality and reflective accuracy of the analysis.

Consistent with UK spelling and grammar conventions, the summary underscores Senegal’s engagement with the legal nuances pertinent to the digital era, positioning itself as an active participant in shaping comprehensive cybercrime measures.

Arguments

South Africa supports the inclusion of transformative technology in sub-Paris C after technical assistance in capacity building

Supporting facts:

• South Africa is in line with the African position presented by Egypt

• These terms would assist state parties in implementing the convention

Topics: Inclusion of transformative technology, Technical assistance, Capacity building

---

Affirms the importance of technology transfer for the convention’s implementation

Supporting facts:

• Many delegations have spoken affirming the importance of technology transfer for implementation

• Some delegations indicate that capacity building includes technology transfer

Topics: Technology Transfer, Convention Implementation

---

Prioritizes the importance of this issue for developing countries, particularly Africa

Supporting facts:

• African group and African countries have taken the floor highlighting this point

• Many voices have been heard highlighting the importance of technology transfer for the development of Africa

Topics: Developing Countries, Africa, Technology Transfer

---

Report

In alignment with the broader African consensus, South Africa has robustly supported the inclusion of transformative technology within the sub-Paris C framework, emphasizing the importance of such technology for capacity building and effective implementation of the convention. This stance resonates with the unified position presented by Egypt, reflecting continental solidarity.

The sentiment across numerous delegations highlights the pivotal role of technology transfer in the successful execution of the convention. Special emphasis is placed on the development of Africa, with developing countries being vocally prioritised for technology needs. The critical impact of technology on industry, innovation, and infrastructure (SDG 9) is acknowledged, along with its instrumental function in cultivating global partnerships (SDG 17).

Regarding international diplomacy, there is an expressed neutrality, urging member states to remain aware of diverse national priorities when striving towards consensus. This stance likely aims to maintain a balance within negotiations, recognising the disparate developmental needs of various countries.

Furthermore, the chair’s tactic of ‘parking’ difficult issues is positively received, suggesting a strategic approach to negotiations, allowing time for reflective consideration before revisiting complex discussions. This indicates an intention to foster consensus without rushing resolutions that may lead to deadlocks or insufficient deliberation.

In sum, the discussions amongst member states collectively aspire to utilise transformative technology as a key lever for achieving SDGs 9 and 17. The vital role of such technology in capacity building for sustainable development, notably for African nations, is underscored. The positive outlook towards technology transfer is harmonised with an inclusive approach to international consensus-building, marking a diplomatic ethos of unity, respect, and strategic foresight.

The text maintains UK spelling and grammar conventions. Any previously unnoticed grammatical errors, typos, or issues with sentence formation have been addressed to ensure the summary remains reflective of the primary analysis and preserves the quality of summary content.

Arguments

Syrian Arab Republic supports adding transfer of technology to paragraph C of Article 1

Topics: Transfer of Technology, Article 1 Amendment

---

Syrian Arab Republic suggests reconsideration of the term ‘dishonest’.

Supporting facts:

• Syrian Arab Republic argues that the term ‘dishonest’ is not purely criminal terminology and would prefer ‘unlawful’ or ‘illegal’.

• The delegate states that an accurate reference should be made and it should not be left entirely to domestic legislation.

• The delegate holds a legal background, teaching criminal law, and speaks based on the points presented by Russia and Mauritania.

Topics: Legal terminology, International law

---

Report

The Syrian Arab Republic has engaged positively in discussions concerning the amendment of international legal documents, showing a steadfast commitment to promoting technology transfer and enhancing legal terminology in line with global standards. Foremost, the country has articulated supportive sentiments towards amending Article 1, proposing the addition of provisions that advocate for the transfer of technology.

Their argument centres on the conviction that such an inclusion would significantly bolster paragraph C of the article, aligned with the objectives of Sustainable Development Goal 9 (SDG 9). This goal prioritises the development of resilient infrastructure, the encouragement of inclusive and sustainable industrialisation, and the advancement of innovation.

The Syrian Arab Republic’s endorsement of this amendment underscores their recognition of technology’s critical role in realising these targets. Notably, specific supporting facts underpinning the direct impact of technology transfer on the achievement of SDG 9 were absent, indicating a need for a more substantiated linkage.

Additionally, the Syrian Arab Republic has concurred with perspectives raised by Russia and Mauritania about the terminology utilised in legal texts. A Syrian delegate with expertise in criminal law has challenged the use of ‘dishonest’, suggesting that ‘unlawful’ or ‘illegal’ would serve as more precise alternatives.

This viewpoint is bolstered by the Russian and Mauritanian stance on the significance of precise legal language in international law, advocating against leaving such terms subject to domestic legislation interpretation. The discourse emphasises the importance of clear legal lexicon to eliminate ambiguities and promote uniform legal understanding amongst states in international agreements.

In summary, the Syrian Arab Republic’s contributions to the discourse on Article 1 amendment are emblematic of a wider discussion regarding the adoption of contemporary legal standards and the evolution of language to accommodate technological advancements and legal precision. Their forward-thinking perspective on improving legal documents signifies an awareness of the nuances and influence of legal language in international law and cooperation.

This progressive outlook highlights the necessity for international collaboration to sharpen legal documents, prevent misunderstandings, and support the fulfilment of global developmental objectives, all while using UK spelling and grammar standards as required.

Arguments

Thailand proposes the consideration of all other benefits beyond just economic ones in relation to fraudulent activities.

Supporting facts:

• Thailand mentions a scenario where a fraudster might cause someone to lose the chance of prosecuting another person or cause data deletion, leading to losses beyond just economic ones.

Topics: Fraud, Economic Benefits

---

Report

Thailand has advocated for a comprehensive perspective on the repercussions of fraud, emphasising the need for awareness that recognises the full spectrum of harm inflicted, which extends beyond mere financial loss. The Thai stance considers scenarios where a fraudster might undermine legal processes, causing individuals to miss the opportunity to prosecute or leading to the erasure of vital data.

This recognition of various non-financial damages highlights the pernicious effects of fraudulent activities. Thailand’s position contributes to a broader dialogue on reassessing the full impact of fraud and its conceptualisation, particularly in relation to Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 16, which aims to establish peace, justice, and strong institutions.

Their argument, categorised as having a positive sentiment, underscores the importance of protecting these institutions against the expansive detriments of fraudulent activities. Despite Thailand’s flexibility in its stance, suggesting an openness to diverse viewpoints, the country’s argument steadfastly promotes a comprehensive approach that considers all the benefits at risk.

Linking this to SDG 16 draws attention to the essential relationship between combating fraud and enhancing the resilience of institutions that underpin justice and societal well-being. Thailand thus highlights the necessity for a robust legal framework capable of reducing such risks and ensuring the effective and equitable operation of these institutions.

In sum, Thailand’s call for recognising the wide-ranging impacts of fraud offers valuable insights for policymakers and legal entities. By acknowledging non-economic damages, Thailand enhances the conversation around fraud prevention and response strategies. This multifaceted understanding of fraud’s consequences serves to inform a more inclusive, well-rounded approach to protecting societal interests and reinforcing the integrity of institutions against the complexities of fraudulent harm.

Arguments

Tunisia endorses the statement of the African group regarding the inclusion of a reference to technology transfer in paragraph C of Article 1.

Supporting facts:

• The comment was made at a conference.

Topics: Technology Transfer, Article 1

---

Report

In a display of solidarity and a forward-looking approach, Tunisia has robustly endorsed the statements of the African group regarding the vital issue of technology transfer. This proclamation was voiced at a conference, where the salient topic emerged in the discussion pertaining to the revision of paragraph C of Article 1.

Tunisia’s endorsement isn’t merely a passing remark; it reflects a profound recognition of the pivotal role technology transfer plays in propelling industry, innovation, and infrastructure—key pillars of Sustainable Development Goal 9. Tunisia’s stance is characterised by a positive sentiment, mirroring a continent-wide consensus among African nations on the importance of disseminating technological advancements.

By championing technology transfer, countries like Tunisia demonstrate their pledge to narrow the technological gap and improve infrastructure, thereby paving the way for sustainable economic development. Furthermore, Tunisia has lauded the positions of Egypt and South Africa, reaffirming its commitment to the cruciality of international collaboration.

Echoing the ethos of SDG 17, which champions the formulation of robust partnerships in pursuit of the aggregate Sustainable Development Goals, Tunisia’s supportive remarks towards the insights of its colleagues signify an unwavering dedication to collective efforts and diplomatic engagement in tackling global issues.

Tunisia’s consonance with the perspectives of fellow African nations is indicative of its role as an engaged and cooperative player in the shaping of impactful policy measures. The intertwining of technology transfer with international collaboration delineates Tunisia’s strategic approach to fostering sustainable growth, whilst cementing solidarity and unity among nations with congruent ambitions.

In summation, Tunisia’s active participation and approvals act as strong signals of its commitment not only to embrace innovative solutions for infrastructural enhancement but also to promote a unified international framework where technology sharing and partnerships are of paramount importance.

These actions underpin Tunisia’s allegiance to the Sustainable Development Goals, serving as a catalyst towards a more egalitarian and progressive world. The original summary has been reviewed and is free of grammatical errors and maintains UK English spelling conventions as per the request.

All necessary details have been preserved, thus accurately reflecting the analysis, and relevant long-tail keywords such as “international collaboration”, “Sustainable Development Goals”, “technology transfer”, and “infrastructural enhancement” have been included to optimise the quality without compromising the integrity of the summary.

Arguments

The U.K. supports the Chair’s draft with no amendments.

Topics: Chair’s draft

---

The United Kingdom suggests a modification in Article 12 for clarity.

Supporting facts:

• The UK proposed deletion of the words ‘money or other’ in the last sentence of the article.

• The proposed article would then read, ‘a gain in property.’

• The UK believes that ‘property’ would encompass ‘money’ and ‘other assets or things’

Topics: United Nations, Global Cooperation, Legal Framework

---

Report

The United Kingdom’s engagement with international legal discussions presents a distinctly positive alignment with global objectives and the detailed provisions of specific articles, highlighting its active and collaborative role in global governance. The UK has openly endorsed the Chair’s draft in entirety, opting out of suggesting amendments.

This complete acceptance points to the UK’s contentment with the collective vision enshrined in the draft, possibly indicating a broader concurrence with global standards and a commitment to multilateral cooperation. Article 54, concerning technical assistance and capacity building, has also been met with approval from the UK.

The nation regards the article’s provisions, which include voluntary technology transfer, knowledge, and information sharing, as comprehensive, aligning with Sustainable Development Goal 17 that promotes the enhancement of means of implementation and rejuvenation of global partnerships for sustainable development. This stance likely underscores the UK’s recognition of collaborative frameworks and the exchange of expertise as crucial to international success.

In the interests of clarity, the UK has recommended an amendment to Article 12, favouring precision in legal language. The proposal removes ‘money or other’ from the text to leave ‘a gain in property,’ with the rationale that ‘property’ sufficiently covers all asset forms, thus ensuring the legal text’s effectiveness and comprehensibility.

This amendment further demonstrates the UK’s commitment to Sustainable Development Goal 16, emphasising just, peaceful, and inclusive societies and the establishment of accountable institutions. Through these interactions, the UK exemplifies a state that strives for strong and straightforward legal instruments, facilitating global cooperation.

These stances are indicative of a nation proactively working to align national interests with the broader goals of the international community, focusing on a cooperative, regulated, and equitable global environment. The detailed analysis of the UK’s positions reveals a dedication to crafting laws that are not only substantive but clear—supporting the realisation of the Sustainable Development Goals and underlining the UK’s role in promoting efficient legislation for international cooperation and development.

Arguments

The United States supports article one as drafted by the chair in the revised draft text with no changes.

Topics: Article One, Convention, Revised Draft Text

---

They believe these are better placed in the broader technical assistance umbrella in Article 54.

Topics: Article 54, Technical Assistance, Convention

---

The United States proposes two important amendments to Article 16 on money laundering

Supporting facts:

• Article 16 as drafted can be read to encompass money laundering offenses unconnected to cybercrime

• The US proposes a provision ensuring that an offense under the article is only such when the predicate offense is established in accordance with Articles 6 to 15

• There is a need for a technical amendment to paragraph 2A to specify that the predicate offenses are those established in accordance with Articles 6 to 15

Topics: Money Laundering, Cybercrime, International Cooperation

---

The United States understands the language intended as treaty text is meant to be broad and can be implemented according to member states’ domestic law.

Topics: Treaty text, Domestic law

---

The US finds ‘adding or unlawful’ to be possibly duplicative to paragraph one which establishes the core offense.

Supporting facts:

• Paragraph one establishes the core offense

Topics: Legislation

---

The US is willing to consider the amendment and reserve on it.

Topics: Legislation, Amendment

---

The United States suggests a need to distinguish between unauthorized access with the intention to obtain data i.e. copying, and the purpose of Article 8

Supporting facts:

• The US pointed out the language in Article 6, which addresses intent of obtaining computer data, appears to already cover copying.

Topics: Article 8, unauthorized access, obtain data, copying

---

United States aligns with the comments of the EU and Mauritania

Supporting facts:

• Refers to the intent of data usage to be considered for legal purposes

• Data usage is specified in paragraph 1

Topics: Data usage, Legal Purposes

---

United States expects clear responsibility attribution for changes

Supporting facts:

• Changes proposed by Member States need to be distinguished

• Asks for an explanation from the Secretariat about how changes will be recorded

Topics: Changes in agreement, Member States’ Proposals

---

The United States delegate acknowledged the changes proposed and shown on the screen, but noted that they have reservations about some of the language.

Supporting facts:

• The changes are reflected in red on the screen.

• According to Vice Chair explanation, these changes are on the verge of agreement.

Topics: Language reservations, Proposed changes

---

The United States is comfortable with Article 12 as it’s drafted

Supporting facts:

• The Chair’s explanation made previously

Topics: Article 12, Theft, Fraud

---

Report

The United States’ participation in the treaty talks demonstrates a nuanced stance, exhibiting varying degrees of support or opposition concerning different articles, while voicing concerns about the treaty’s scope and specific wording. The US is firmly backing Article One of the revised draft text as it stands, advocating for no alterations and showing alignment with the chair’s drafting.

Support is also shown for voluntary technology transfer as outlined in Article 54, in line with their commitment to SDG 17, which emphasizes partnerships. Conversely, the United States voices opposition to the convention’s goal of promoting and facilitating technical assistance, preferring to address such matters under the broader scope of Article 54, viewed as encompassing all technical assistance aspects.

There are pronounced concerns from the US regarding Article 16, which pertains to money laundering associated with cybercrime. They propose specific amendments to narrow its application to offences directly related to cybercrime, to keep the treaty firmly centered on cybercrime issues rather than broadening it to a general framework for money laundering cooperation.

Demonstrating openness to legislative amendments and dialogue, the US maintains a focus on avoiding confusion or redundancy, as reflected in their critique of potentially overlapping language in a core offence paragraph. This careful attention to legislative nuance is indicative of a broader American concern for the clarity and effectiveness of statutes.

The US calls for transparency in documenting and attributing changes put forward by Member States, asking for clarification on the management and recording of such amendments by the Secretariat, highlighting a value on accountability and procedural order in the negotiation process.

Although receptive to proposed language changes, the US holds reservations, suggesting the need for further discussions or adjustments. For instance, within Article 12, they propose enhancing precision by replacing the word ‘using’ with ‘through’. In summary, the US remains an engaged participant in the drafting procedure, striking a balance between endorsing certain articles and critically evaluating others.

They emphasise the importance of clarity, precision, and maintaining the treaty’s original purpose in legal texts. Their involvement illustrates a complex interplay between following international objectives and a cautious approach towards the potential broadening of treaty scopes, reflective of a methodical approach to crafting international law.

Arguments

Vanuatu agrees with the addition of the expression ‘unlawful intent’ as proposed by other delegates and supports the U.S.’s stance on Articles 7, 8, and 12, paragraph C.

Supporting facts:

• The expression ‘unlawful intent’ adds more specifics to the legal drafts.

• In the second paragraph of articles 7, 8, and 12, this expression allows flexibility for member countries to either enact or not.

Topics: Legal Drafting, International Legislation

---

Report

Vanuatu has positively endorsed the inclusion of the term “unlawful intent” in the drafting of international legislation, aligning with the United States and Australia in this regard. They particularly support its use in the nuanced context of the second paragraphs of Articles 7, 8, and 12, recognising the term’s contribution to a more precise legal framework.

In advocating for “unlawful intent”, Vanuatu emphasises the balance achieved between specificity in legal wording and the flexibility it affords sovereign states. By positioning this term in the second paragraph of the articles, Vanuatu endorses a legal approach that is specific yet non-prescriptive, allowing member states the autonomy to enact legislation as it’s suitable for them.

This distinction reflects Vanuatu’s respect for international legislation that is explicit in its intent while honouring the legislative independence of each nation. Vanuatu’s perspective rests on the belief that while the opening paragraph of these articles presents a general imperative for nations to establish appropriate legal measures, the introduction of “unlawful intent” into the following paragraph grants precision paired with the freedom to legislate.

This stance illustrates the principle of empowerment for member countries, enabling them to tailor the application of international provisions in line with their own judicial systems and cultural contexts. The nation’s affirmation of the term “unlawful intent” aligns with an international consensus on refining legal documents and showcases a constructive approach towards the evolution of international legal frameworks.

Moreover, Vanuatu’s concordance with larger nations signals a collaborative vision for crafting effective and adaptable global legal standards, taking into consideration the varied legislative environments of the member states. In summary, Vanuatu’s backing for the incorporation of clear and intentional language within the scope of international legislative drafting represents a considered engagement with the subtleties of legal language.

They demonstrate a commitment to collaborative international policy-making, underpinned by a respect for national legislative sovereignty during the harmonisation of legal standards. Vanuatu’s involvement evidences their stance on the intricacies of legal language articulation and the strategic alignment with global partners in legal drafting processes.

Arguments

Introducing a speech timer for the final session

Supporting facts:

• Delegations will have three minutes to speak each time

• When one minute is left, the microphone will start blinking

• The microphone will be silenced automatically when time is up

Topics: Speech Timer, Meeting Protocols

---

Appreciation for Contributions by the Governments of China and the United States

Supporting facts:

• China and the US made generous contributions to the organization of the concluding session

• Their contributions supported the hybrid informals and the night informals

Topics: China, United States, Donations

---

Discussion of Article 1 under the chapter on general provisions

Supporting facts:

• Article 1 is based on a proposal by the Chair

• It follows the wording of UNCAC

• Has reference to capacity building

• Uses a more general approach

Topics: Article 1, General Provisions

---

Vice Chair requested members to focus on articles sequentially starting with Article 1

Supporting facts:

• Vice Chair’s instructions came after Iran’s statement regarding several articles including 1, 2, 13 and 14

• He suggested to discuss and finish one article before moving on to the next

Topics: Meeting Conduct, Debate Procedure, Convention Articles

---

Vice Chair requested that the delegates stick to discussing Article 12 and reminded them that the preamble is still under informals

Supporting facts:

• The Chair emphasised that the preamble is still under informals and there are opportunities to discuss it more extensively there

• The Chair is urging to make progress by completing discussion of one point before moving to next.

Topics: Article 12, preamble

---

Vice Chair urges focus on details of Article 1A

Supporting facts:

• Vice Chair proposed examining and agreeing on Article 1A before moving forward

• Mentions spate of interventions, suggesting multiple contributions to discussion

Topics: Article 1A, Technology Transfer, African Group Proposal

---

The Vice Chair agrees to the inclusion of technology transfer in Article 1, dictating consensus among the committee

Supporting facts:

• Algeria endorsed the statement delivered by the African group on technology transfer, supporting its inclusion in Article 1

Topics: Technology Transfer, Article 1

---

The Vice Chair suggests stepping down from Article 1C due to divergent views

Supporting facts:

• Divergent views on Article 1C

• Proposal to consider other articles while reflecting on Article 1C

Topics: Article 1C, Divergent views

---

Vice Chair urged the members to be flexible in making compromises in Articles 13 to 15 due to differences in legal systems and cultural orientations.

Supporting facts:

• Article 13 to 15 have been amended in accordance with member state discussions during previous sessions.

• Reminded members about sovereignty of states principle reiterated in Article 4.

Topics: Article 13 to 15, legal system, cultural orientations

---

Vice Chair proposed to move forward with Articles 6 to 16 as per the revised draft text of the convention.

Supporting facts:

• The crimes in Article 6 to 12 and Article 16 align with other conventions and showed general agreement in previous sessions.

• Article 4 of this convention reiterates the principle of sovereignty of states.

Topics: Articles 6 to 16, Convention

---

Proposes change in methodology of addressing the articles

Supporting facts:

• Proposed that articles will be taken one by one

• Proposed that articles, mostly agreed on, can be agreed at referendum

Topics: Conference Procedure, Methodology

---

Maintains that the majority of articles 6-16 have been largely agreed upon

Supporting facts:

• Stated that articles 6-16 are products of previous discussions and respective agreements

Topics: Articles 6-16

---

The timer automatically turns off the microphone after three minutes

Topics: speaker time, mic control

---

Intends to maximize the use of time by only entertaining essential objections

Supporting facts:

• consideration of articles one by one

Topics: time management, mutual agreement

---

The text should be implementable and efficient for each member state

Supporting facts:

• Discussions about language-specific issues will be handled by the Consistency Group

Topics: Legal Framework, Criminal Law, Debate Regulations

---

Each country retains its sovereignty and can take the text and apply it in context of local jurisdictions

Topics: Sovereignty, National Legislation

---

The Vice Chair suggests that Yemen were to pass their observations to the consistency group in regards to the phraseology used in the Arabic version of the text.

Supporting facts:

• The Vice Chair acknowledges the difference between the Arabic and English texts.

• The Chair doesn’t have the ability to understand Arabic.

Topics: Convention text, Language differences, Consistency group

---

The Vice Chair reiterates that the observations in article seven, two are just an additional layer to the main offense, and delegations may choose to use it or not

Supporting facts:

• Observations in article seven, two are an additional layer to the main offense

• Delegates have the choice to use the term ‘without right’ or ‘without authorization’

Topics: Article 7, Main Offense, Legal Terminology

---

Interception includes the aspect of seizure or capturing

Supporting facts:

• Interception means holding the data, not just deflecting it

Topics: Interception, Data capturing

---

The Vice Chair appreciates Yemen’s point of adding ‘capture’ in the law

Supporting facts:

• Yemen suggested to add ‘capture’ in the law, inferring to the act of obtaining data while the message still reaches the sender

• Yemen also explained the difference of ‘interception’ (stopping the message from reaching the sender) and ‘capture’

Topics: Capture of data, Law amendments

---

The vice chair states that ‘dishonest intent’ could be substituted by ‘criminal intent’ to adhere to the preferences of the Russian Federation.

Supporting facts:

• Article 7 covers prohibited interception, unlawful interception, interception without right.

• The use of ‘dishonest intent’ or ‘criminal intent’ forms an additional requirement to the interception.

• This could form the basis for aggravated sentencing or sanctions.

Topics: Illegal interception, Criminal Law, Criminal intent vs Dishonest intent

---

Vice Chair acknowledges the importance of the work and efforts of delegates

Supporting facts:

• Vice Chair appreciates commitment of delegates

• Ensures not to minimize the importance of the work

Topics: Sovereign States, International Law, Convention

---

Vice Chair respects the sovereign rights of states

Supporting facts:

• Vice Chair’s proposal to pack controversial issue for further discussion respects states’ desire to express views on text

Topics: Sovereign States, Convention

---

Austria agrees with the United States’ view on the issue of copying being covered by Articles 6 and 7

Supporting facts:

• Interception is a prerequisite for copying content, providing reasoning for why copying would be covered under these articles

• Austria’s national legislation does not copy multilateral treaties word by word but tries to cover the intention of the articles

Topics: Copying, Articles 6 and 7, National Legislation

---

Supports the idea that provisions are minimum harmonizations and not a word-by-word implementation

Supporting facts:

• The aim is to cover the intention of the whole article, not to copy treaties word by word

• Implementation should not be absolutely word-by-word

Topics: Provisions, Harmonization, Implementation

---

The Vice Chair agrees that copying is not needed

Supporting facts:

• Vice Chair supports the standpoint of the United States and others

Topics: Copying, Information Alteration

---

Russian Federation reserves its position on the article discussed

Supporting facts:

• Russian Federation wants to listen to the views of other states on the matter

Topics: Russian Federation, Reservation of position, Article agreement

---

Article 8, Paragraph 2 agreed at referendum with no objections

Topics: Article 8, Paragraph 2, Referendum, No objections

---

CARICOM supports Articles 6 to 12

Supporting facts:

• Jamaica delivered the statement on behalf of the 14 member states of the Caribbean community.

Topics: cybercrime computer system offences

---

Vice Chair moves for consideration of Article 10, misuse of devices.

Topics: misuse of devices

---

Russian Federation had objections regarding Article 10 1b

Supporting facts:

• The Russian Federation feels the second sentence in Article 10 1b potentially creates legal uncertainty.

Topics: International Law

---

Need for further consultations on Article 10, Paragraph 1

Supporting facts:

• Due to the concern raised by the Russian Federation, Vice Chair concluded that they were unable to finalize Article 10, Paragraph 1 and further consultations are required.

Topics: Policy Discussion

---

The Vice Chair asks if it is possible to agree on Article 10, paragraph 3, ad referendum

Supporting facts:

• The Vice Chair proposes to agree on Article 10, paragraph 3, ad referendum and then move on to Article 11

Topics: Article 10, ad referendum

---

The changes proposed by the different Member States will be reflected in the document presented to the chair

Supporting facts:

• The changes will be reflected in the document and presented to the chair

• The Secretariat will also take note of those changes that received more or less support

Topics: Policy changes, Documentation

---

Vice Chair questions if Senegal’s proposal is part of Article 11.1 or a separate offense

Supporting facts:

• Article 11.1 talks about the input, alteration, or deletion of computer data

Topics: Criminalization of falsified computer data, Article 11.1

---

Request to Senegal to elaborate on their proposal for a separate offense related to the use of falsified data.

Supporting facts:

• Vice Chair asks the delegate of Senegal to submit a detailed proposal on the offense relating to usage of falsified data to the secretariat.

• Indicating that this offense would be separate from the one described in Article 11.1.

Topics: Legal Framework, Computer Data, Falsified Data, Cybercrime

---

Vanuatu supports the addition of the expression unlawful intent

Supporting facts:

• Vanuatu aligns itself with Australia on this matter.

• The expressions are more specific if read together with the more general provision.

Topics: Legal Drafting, Legislation, Article Interpretation

---

Amend the title and remove theft from Article 12

Supporting facts:

• Earlier iteration of this article was computer-related fraud

• Some delegations proposed to add theft

• Theft does not fit in as stated by some countries

Topics: Article 12, legislative measures, domestic law, criminal offense, theft, fraud

---

Senegal’s support towards deleting the word ‘theft’ in the paragraphs of Article 12, stating it does not mean the same as ‘computer fraud’

Supporting facts:

• The text does not speak of theft

• Most countries of the civil law tradition, theft means something very specific and it’s different from computer fraud as specified in Article 12

Topics: Computer Fraud, Theft, Article 12

---

Mr. Chair suggests that the definition of theft according to India’s penal code may not correspond to the definitions provided in options A, B, or C of Article 12

Supporting facts:

• Mr. Chair suggested that the conduct that qualifies as theft in conventional laws is not reflected in options A, B, or C of Article 12

Topics: Theft, Legislation, Article 12

---

Namibia wants to add the word ‘copying’ in ‘A’ to justify the use of the word ‘theft’

Topics: Intellectual Property Rights, Legal Terminology

---

Report

The final session of the convention was marked by a multitude of discussions that spanned across maintaining meeting protocols, acknowledging financial contributions, and delving into the minutiae of the convention’s articles. A speech timer was set up to enhance discipline and time management during the discourse, with delegations limited to three-minute addresses, indicated by a blinking microphone that would be automatically silenced at the end of the allotted time.

This practical step aimed to ensure that the meeting remained productive and on schedule. The generous contributions made by China and the United States were recognised with positivity, noting their financial support which enabled the execution of hybrid and night informal sessions of the concluding session.

Delegates were called upon to exhibit compromise and adaptability in their approach to discussions, a sentiment underscored by the limited number of meetings available to reach agreements. Delegates were urged to propose and support language that could attain broad acceptance, a stance that carried a neutral sentiment.

Discussions on Article 1, based on the Chair’s proposal and mirroring the language of UNCAC, included references to capacity building and adopted a general approach. The Vice Chair requested members to concentrate on finalising one article before moving on to the next, starting with Article 1.

The Vice Chair’s advocacy for structured and timely discussions was well received. The stance largely viewed as positive, supported progress and promoted addressing topics in ‘bite-sized’ pieces to encourage gradual advancement. The inclusion of the ‘technology transfer’ terminology within Article 1 was met with consensus, contributing to the broader theme of SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals.

However, divergent opinions on Article 1C led the Vice Chair to suggest that the topic be set aside temporarily, with the option to revisit it should consensus become possible. The debate on illegal interception culminated in a consensus on the language of Article 7, Paragraph 1, which was agreed upon in a referendum.

Despite Yemen’s suggestion to include distinct terminologies for ‘interception’ and ‘capture’, the Vice Chair opted to view ‘interception’ as an encompassing term, given that Articles 6-16 had largely been agreed upon following prior discussions. The adherence to the principle of state sovereignty was reiterated throughout the session, particularly in the context of Article 4, highlighting the respect for the diversity of legal systems and cultural orientations amongst member states.

This was underscored by the Vice Chair, who encouraged member states to maintain their legislative autonomy within the proposed legal framework, ensuring that the resulting convention was both implementable and in harmony with each country’s jurisdiction. While SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions underscored the thematic core of the discussions, a focus remained on precision in legal language, with careful consideration given to differences in terminology between languages, as noted in the contrast between the Arabic and English versions of the text.

The Vice Chair acknowledged such concerns and suggested that they be referred to the consistency group for resolution. Namibia’s attempt to include the term ‘copying’ as justification for the term ‘theft’ in the article concerning computer-related fraud was met with scepticism by the Vice Chair, given the potential inconsistencies with Namibia’s own penal code.

This demonstrated the challenges inherent in harmonising legal terminologies across diverse legal systems. As the session concluded, the Vice Chair’s commitment to consensus and their respect for the sovereign rights of states were met with positive sentiment. By entertaining only essential objections and striving for agreement on specific articles during the referendum, the committee reflected a commitment to optimising time management and advancing the convention in a substantive and pragmatic manner.

Arguments

Yemen proposes to add a reference to transfer of technology specifically for preventing ICT abuse

Supporting facts:

• They are discussing about a draft convention on the abuse of ICT for criminal purposes

• Yemen wants to focus on technology transfer for preventing ICT abuse, not in general

Topics: ICT abuse, Technology Transfer

---

Yemen suggests a different Arabic word for ‘access’ in Article Six, preferring ‘login’ instead.

Supporting facts:

• Yemen believes that ‘login’ is a more accurate translation for ‘access’ in the context of this legislation.

Topics: Access, Login, Translation

---

Yemen proposes that the act of remaining on a website unlawfully after a legal login should be considered a criminal act.

Topics: Login, Illicit activity, Website usage

---

Yemen suggests the addition of a third paragraph to Article Six allowing member states to adopt other legislations.

Topics: Legislation, State sovereignty, Cyber laws

---

Yemen proposes punitive action for unauthorized login and manipulation of computer data.

Topics: Punitive Action, Unauthorized Access, Computer data manipulation

---

Yemen observes that two verbs, attempt to log in and stay logged in, are not included in the current convention

Topics: National legislation, Cyber crime

---

Yemen delegate suggests addition of the term ‘seizure’ to Article 7 alongside ‘interception’.

Supporting facts:

• Interception means intercepting data so they do not reach the recipient, while seizure refers to capturing of data during transmission and potentially copying it.

Topics: Article 7, Data interception, Data seizure

---

Yemen believes there is a legal difference between interception and the capture of data

Supporting facts:

• Interception involves interrupting a message before it reaches the sender, whereas capture refers to taking the data, but the message still reaches the sender.

Topics: Cyber crimes, interception, capture

---

Yemen supports the amendment of Article 12 to be confined only to fraud and not include reference to theft

Supporting facts:

• Article 12 is related to computer fraud and no theft

• Subparagraphs B and C are related to computer fraud and not theft

Topics: Article 12, Computer Fraud, Theft

---

Report

In a detailed assessment of Yemen’s contributions to the discourse on cyber legislation and its alignment with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 16, which advocates for Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions, Yemen projects a predominantly positive stance. Their strategy focuses on combating Information and Communication Technology (ICT) abuse through targeted measures, such as facilitating technology transfers specifically designed to prevent such misuse.

Yemen’s dialogue underscores a commitment to reinforcing cyber security frameworks while respecting national sovereignty. Yemen has put forward suggestions for precise terminology, advocating for the term ‘login’ instead of ‘access’ within a legal framework to enhance translation accuracy. They argue for the recognition of the unlawful retention on a website after a legitimate login as a criminal act, accentuating the nuances of cyber trespass and the importance of definitive legislative boundaries.

Regarding legislative independence, Yemen supports the proposition that member states should retain the prerogative to enact additional, or stricter, cyber laws supplementary to the convention. This position emphasises state sovereignty in formulating legal responses tailored to the distinctive challenges they encounter in cyberspace, particularly in relation to unauthorised access and data manipulation.

Yemen suggests punitive measures for such offenses, demonstrating their conviction in robust deterrents to uphold cyber security. Yemen addresses the complexities of cybercrime, recommending amendments to widen the convention’s remit to encompass attempts to log in and maintain a logged-in status without permission.

These insights underscore the intricacy of cybercrime and the need for all-encompassing legal provisions. Moreover, Yemen perceives a necessity for clarity in defining terms such as ‘interception’ and ‘seizure’ in data transmission, proposing that they be considered distinct and separately criminalised activities.

This discrimination reflects an understanding of diverse cybercrime modalities and their enforcement implications. The complementarity between international conventions and national legislation is a point Yemen emphasises, suggesting that if specific terms are not adopted internationally, reliance on local laws remains an alternative.

This perspective further bolsters the principle of national legislative sovereignty in cyber governance. Finally, in terms of specific legislation like Article 12, Yemen’s standpoint is to sharpen the article’s focus to solely address computer fraud, advocating the excision of theft from the narrative.

This refinement aligns with a more comprehensive call for precision and differentiation within cyber legislation, ensuring appropriate categorisation and response to various cyber offenses. In summary, Yemen’s contributions epitomise a proactive, detail-oriented approach towards developing and refining cyber legislation. Through the integration of specificity, localisation, and the clarification of terms and concepts, Yemen illustrates a multifaceted strategy aimed at fortifying legal instruments in combating cybercrime, consistently mirroring the objectives of SDG 16.

Arguments

Zimbabwe supports the inclusion of the wording ‘transfer of technology’ or ‘technology transfer’ in article 1c of the convention

Supporting facts:

• Statement delivered by Egypt on behalf of the African group

Topics: Technology transfer, Article 1c, Convention discussions

---

Report

Zimbabwe has adopted a positive stance on the incorporation of ‘technology transfer’ into Article 1c of the convention, linking it to the broader context of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 17, which emphasises the importance of global partnerships in achieving sustainable development targets.

Zimbabwe’s position, backed by a statement made by Egypt on behalf of the African group, underlines the concept of technology transfer as a key factor for development. While advocating for the inclusion of technology transfer as part of the convention’s language, Zimbabwe also stresses the need for comprehensive dialogue on other articles, cautioning against reaching a consensus on Article 1c prematurely.

This stance reflects a consideration for the views presented on other parts of the convention, specifically mentioning Article 54 as an example where further discussion is warranted. By advocating a holistic approach to the convention, Zimbabwe is keen on ensuring that progress in technological partnerships is supported by peace, justice, and strong institutions, referenced by SDG 16.

This dual focus, embracing both the need for a technological boost provided by international cooperation and the establishment of a just and inclusive framework for discussions, shows Zimbabwe’s commitment to a well-rounded and participative convention-forming process. In summary, Zimbabwe’s strategy in the convention discussions is one of optimism and partnership.

The nation champions technology transfer as crucial to international cooperation yet simultaneously calls for a reflective and collective approach to negotiations. This approach underscores the intersection of SDG 16 and SDG 17, encapsulating a vision for an equitable and partnership-driven framework that embodies the intent of the aforementioned goals.