Parallel Session D11: NTFC Involvement in Pioneering Climate-Smart Trade Facilitation

Arguments

UNECE offers a wide array of standards, regulations, and support for countries beyond Europe.

Supporting facts:

• The speaker has lived in Geneva for over 20 years.

• UNECE’s support was initially assumed to be for European countries only.

Topics: UNECE, International Support, Standards and Regulations

Trade facilitation, as guided by WTO TFA, can enhance environmental protection and support climate action.

Supporting facts:

• WTO TFA implementation potentially leads to environmental benefits.

Topics: Trade Facilitation, WTO TFA, Environmental Protection, Climate Action

Implementation inconsistencies of WTO TFA create challenges for effective trade facilitation.

Supporting facts:

• Some countries have ratified the WTO TFA but do not fully implement it.

• Border agency cooperation issues exist due to different levels of TFA category implementation.

Topics: Trade Facilitation, WTO TFA Implementation, Non-tariff Barriers

Protectionist policies and non-tariff barriers hinder trade and lead to increased CO2 emissions.

Supporting facts:

• Exporting is impeded due to protectionist measures.

• Non-tariff barriers contribute to environmental degradation through higher CO2 emissions.

Topics: Economic Protectionism, Non-tariff Barriers, CO2 Emissions, Trade Barriers

Report

The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) is widely recognised for its far-reaching impact, extending well beyond its original European focus. With over two decades of experience in Geneva, the speaker has witnessed the UNECE’s provision of a broad array of standards, regulations, and support to nations outside Europe, in line with the collaborative ethos of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 17, which champions global partnerships.

The World Trade Organization’s Trade Facilitation Agreement (WTO TFA) has been received with optimism for its potential environmental benefits, supporting both SDG 13, which addresses climate action, and SDG 17’s goal for strengthening international cooperation. Conversely, a more critical perspective arises regarding the real-world application of the WTO TFA.

Despite ratification by some countries, full implementation lags, with differences in adoption levels and issues of inter-agency coordination posing barriers to streamlined trade facilitation. Protectionist policies, including the erection of non-tariff barriers, obstruct international trade and are linked to increased CO2 emissions.

These actions not only conflict with the environmental aims of SDG 13 but also with the economic progression targeted by SDG 8, and they undermine the spirit of cooperation and partnership at the heart of SDG 17. The speaker, hailing from Cambodia Customs and involved with the UNCTF Secretariat, voices concern over the challenges presented by protectionism, emphasising the need for a critical reassessment to reconcile trade facilitation with environmental protection objectives.

The speaker adopts a proactive approach, stressing the urgency of formulating remedial measures to address the WTO TFA implementation conundrums. By pinpointing specific issues such as unjustified transit fees and the varied levels of execution amongst adjacent countries, there is a clear mandate for action to bring about policy coherence and enhance trade facilitation, thus promoting the connected SDGs.

The comprehensive summary paints a multifaceted picture of global trade dynamics, recognising the instrumental role of entities like the UNECE in fostering international collaboration and establishing norms. However, the narrative is complicated by the hurdles of irregular policy application and protectionist inclinations that impede economic expansion, sustainability, and global cooperation.

There is an evident need for concerted efforts to harmonise and enforce trade accords, such as the WTO TFA, highlighting the symbiotic relationship between regulatory consistency, economic success, and environmental stewardship. The text reflects UK spelling and grammar, with no found errors to correct.

It also captures key points from the main analysis accurately while incorporating relevant long-tail keywords that align with the topics discussed, such as ‘UNECE impact and support’, ‘WTO TFA environmental advantages’, ‘trade facilitation barriers’, and ‘protectionist policy implications’, without compromising the summary’s quality.

Report

During an event hosted by UNICEF, the progress of the PLOS Cotton Project was examined, with a focus on how it is driving a digital and sustainable transformation within the agri-food system and the textile industry, particularly in relation to the cotton value chain.

The initiative represents a partnership between the FAO and the Brazilian government intended to reduce rural poverty and hunger through sustainable cotton production. The FAO has committed over a decade to spreading valuable knowledge and practices throughout the cotton sector.

The project has goals beyond increasing cotton yield and quality; it incorporates food crop cultivation, providing family farmers with income generation and food security benefits. The importance of family farming in cotton production was particularly noted in South American countries such as Paraguay, Peru, Colombia, Ecuador, Bolivia, and Argentina.

These nations, unlike the larger industrial producer Brazil, contend with barriers that impede productivity and sustainability, such as limited access to training, technical assistance, and market and financial information. Additionally, these largely non-mechanised, small-scale farmers endure high production costs. Attention was drawn to the vital role of certification in enhancing the value of cotton.

Certification functions as a mark of trust, confirming sustainable production, but these regions often lack the digital infrastructure to advertise certified, sustainable practices. The event also highlighted a rising global demand for sustainably produced cotton, anticipated to reach 147 million tons by 2030.

This surge is partly driven by key environmental policies and global initiatives like the European Green Pact, the Fashion Industry Charter for UN Climate Action, the Extended Producer Responsibility Act, and the EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textile, which all support the industry’s ecological transition.

Illustrative of the project’s aims was a digital cooperation endeavour amongst Peruvian family farming cooperatives, noted for their superior Pima cotton. This collaboration included over 5,200 family units, Createx (a yarn producer), and Cats Pyjamas (a luxury USA clothing brand). It enhanced supply chain transparency and traceability, proving the feasibility of digital tools that improve value chains, promote product lifecycle assessments, and integrate small producers with larger market networks.

The FAO champions digital innovation to optimise supply chains for better efficiency and competitiveness within the industry. Digital literacy among farmers is being fostered, alongside the digitalisation of agricultural management and robust field-practice record-keeping. These steps are crucial for phytosanitary compliance and sustainable practice verification.

To conclude, the importance of digital platforms was stressed for providing tangible proof of sustainability in the cotton sector, distinguishing between substantive sustainability and mere greenwashing. The digital advance offers an opportunity to not only streamline cotton trade but also strengthen sustainable production connections within the fragmented Latin American cotton sector.

The event’s dialogues and presentations showcased determined efforts towards implementing ambitious, digital, sustainable best practices to boost the productivity and ecological care within the cotton industry.

Report

Standardisation in international cooperation is essential for the integration of digital solutions into global supply chains, aiming to facilitate sustainable operations and improve global trade efficiency. Rigorous due diligence processes built around transparency, traceability, greener digital transitions and interoperability are fundamental in ensuring data consistency across the supply chain in line with international norms, bolstering both efficiency and accountability.

There is a critical need for the harmonisation of regulatory frameworks to meet international regulations and to avert the fragmentation of practices, which is paramount for the uniform application of due diligence worldwide. Digital interoperability emerges as crucial for proficient supply chain management, enabling diverse systems and platforms to communicate and transfer data seamlessly, cutting across different regions and industrial sectors.

Transitioning from manual and paper-based methods to digital processes addresses traditional trade inefficiencies, decreasing the environmental footprint, and accelerating operations. Interoperable standards and the digitisation of trade documentation not only make procedures more streamlined but also lead to cost reductions.

For over seventy years, the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) has played a significant role in setting standards and recommendations that advance trade facilitation and e-business. The digital divide, which was highlighted by the COVID-19 crisis, has underscored the importance of preparedness for digital shifts.

In response, UNECE rejuvenated the Trade Facilitation Implementation Guide, an e-learning tool designed to endorse digital approaches within national trade policies and align with World Trade Organization (WTO) guidelines, encouraging the move towards digital efficiency. UNECE aids in the development and advocacy of international standards, placing an emphasis on sustainability and climate change mitigation.

The organisation has established particular standards for various environmental issues, including hazardous waste management and unsustainable fishing practices. The Ibiza Convention, born out of UNECE’s efforts, seeks to regulate the cross-border movement of hazardous waste, particularly its transport by sea.

The UN Flots standard is another instrumental tool that provides a unified protocol for relaying fish catch data to combat illegal fishing activities and promote sustainable fisheries. Moreover, UNECE is pioneering in the garment and footwear sectors, trialling blockchain technologies to trace the sustainable cotton value chain.

Such a pilot scheme promises technological innovation’s potential to positively influence the environmental and ethical dimensions of large industries, bringing together stakeholders ranging from local producers to international retailers. In summary, the establishment of standardisation across international trade processes, buttressed by digital solutions, is central to the evolution of sustainable supply chains, effectively addressing pressing global challenges.

UNECE has demonstrated leadership in promoting and implementing standards and digital solutions that not only heighten trade’s efficiency and sustainability but are also proactive in sectors like waste management, fisheries, and the textile industry. These ongoing endeavours highlight the necessity for continuous engagement in standardisation to leverage digital trade’s full advantages, ensuring sustainability and diminishing trade’s detrimental environmental impact.

Arguments

Cooperative approach benefits small farmers

Supporting facts:

• Cooperative approach puts small farmers together, amplifying their market exposure

• Helps raise income levels among small farming communities

Topics: Cooperative farming, Agriculture, Small-scale farmers

Implementation of a ‘Trade Facilitation Agreement plus plus’ should be considered

Supporting facts:

• Matthew Wilson mentions the discussion of a Trade Facilitation Agreement plus plus in Geneva.

• NTFCs (National Trade Facilitation Committees) could work on implementing this before the multilateral system does.

Topics: Trade Facilitation, Environmental Policies, Climate Change

NTFCs have the potential to pioneer advanced trade facilitation efforts that integrate environmental considerations

Supporting facts:

• NTFCs were initially set up to deal with the implementation of the Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA).

• Matthew Wilson suggests that NTFCs are now in a position to go beyond the TFA and address environmental aspects of trade.

Topics: Trade Facilitation, Environmental Impact, National Trade Facilitation Committees

Report

In current agricultural practices, the concept of cooperative farming has garnered acclaim for its significant support for small-scale farmers. By uniting the efforts and resources of individual farmers, cooperatives offer enhanced market exposure and improved competitiveness in the agricultural marketplace.

This communal approach not only expands market access for these smallholders but also considerably strengthens their collective bargaining power, leading to higher income levels—a vital step in reducing poverty in rural communities. The affirmative effects of cooperative farming are aligned with the aims of SDG 1: No Poverty and SDG 2: Zero Hunger, as they facilitate sustainable economic growth in the agricultural sector.

Moreover, the cooperative model upholds the standards of SDG 12, which promotes Responsible Consumption and Production by optimising production processes and minimising waste through shared resources. Turning to value chain transparency in the agricultural sector, there is an evident preference among consumers for products with a clearly defined production background.

Increased demand for such transparency encourages a market environment that rewards producers who offer complete visibility of their goods’ origins. This shift not only fosters consumer trust but also potentially elevates the premiums on products with transparent value chains. This highlights the impact of value chain transparency in contributing to the accomplishment of SDG 8, which emphasises the promotion of sustainable economic growth and Decent Work, while upholding the principles of SDG 12 regarding Responsible Consumption and Production.

When considering global trade, the introduction of a ‘Trade Facilitation Agreement plus plus’ (TFA++) is noteworthy, indicating a more comprehensive view of trade that includes environmental sustainability considerations. These discussions in Geneva point to the National Trade Facilitation Committees (NTFCs) and their emerging role.

Originally established to implement the Trade Facilitation Agreement, NTFCs are now poised to incorporate environmental concerns into trade facilitation. This enhanced approach to the TFA addresses the urgent imperative for climate action (SDG 13) and strengthens international partnerships and cooperation (SDG 17), essential for such expansive agreements.

Experts advocate for NTFCs to adopt a proactive stance, integrating ‘plus plus’ aspects of trade facilitation that cover environmental and climate solutions ahead of global mandates. NTFCs’ willingness to advance beyond their original scope signifies a dedication to environmental protection, in line with SDG 11, which supports the creation of Sustainable Cities and Communities.

In summing up, the industry’s positive outlook on advancements in cooperative farming methods and trade facilitation reflects a growing acknowledgement of the necessity for all-encompassing strategies to achieve environmental, economic, and social sustainability. By elucidating the links between cutting-edge agricultural practices, value chain transparency, and proactive measures in trade facilitation with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), industry stakeholders underscore the importance of promoting sustainable development throughout various sectors.

These insights provide a strategic guide for the development of policies that not only advance sustainability in agriculture and trade but also strive to integrate these initiatives within the wider context of global sustainability objectives.

Arguments

Regional cooperation on border agency coordination is essential.

Supporting facts:

• Neighboring countries may have differing realities, necessitating coordination.

• ASEAN and the Mekong agreement as examples of regional efforts to harmonize trade.

Topics: Trade facilitation, Border management, Regional agreements

Regional agreements facilitate action on WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement.

Supporting facts:

• Regional agreements address trade issues pertinent to their member countries.

• They serve as a platform to implement WTO trade facilitation measures at the regional level.

Topics: WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement, Regional integration, Trade policy

National Trade Facilitation Committees (NTFCs) should regularly review their strategies.

Supporting facts:

• NTFCs need to continuously check their roadmaps, work plans, and terms of reference.

Topics: Trade facilitation, Policy review, Strategic planning

Environmental issues should be incorporated into the NTFCs’ terms of reference.

Supporting facts:

• Maldives includes environmental issues in its terms of reference, which is notable and potentially a good practice.

Topics: Environmental protection, Trade and environment, NTFCs’ role

Stakeholders concerned with environmental protection should be included in NTFCs.

Supporting facts:

• Involving relevant agencies with an environmental focus can enrich the dialogue and decision-making within NTFCs.

Topics: Stakeholder engagement, Environmental policy, Trade committees

Report

The expanded summary underscores the importance of regional collaboration in trade facilitation and border management, highlighting the essential need for coordination among neighbouring countries with diverse realities. Such cooperation is exemplified by successful regional efforts such as ASEAN and the Mekong agreement, which harmonize trade regulations among their member states.

Regional agreements are also acknowledged for tackling specific trade challenges of member countries and facilitating the implementation of WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement measures at a regional level. These agreements are praised for contributing towards a more harmonized and efficient global trade infrastructure, aligning with global standards.

Furthermore, the significance of continuous strategic assessment by National Trade Facilitation Committees (NTFCs) is underlined. NTFCs are encouraged to conduct regular reviews of their roadmaps, work plans, and terms of reference to maintain relevance and effectiveness in trade policy, supporting sustainable economic growth as per SDG 8.

The incorporation of environmental considerations into NTFC protocols, as evidenced by practices in the Maldives, is lauded as a precedent for best practice, marrying environmental policies with trade facilitation efforts. This integration is a stride towards achieving SDG 13’s climate action goals and evidences the intersecting roles of NTFCs in promoting sustainable trade while protecting the environment.

The summary also advocates for a participatory approach in NTFC operations by including stakeholders focused on environmental protection. Such inclusivity broadens the discussions within NTFCs, taking into account the environmental impact of trade decisions and aligning with SDG 17’s objective for sustainable partnerships.

In conclusion, the summary reflects a strongly positive sentiment towards regional cooperation in trade practices, periodic policy reviews for continued trade facilitation improvement, and inclusive stakeholder engagement, with a special focus on environmental protection. It emphasises that understanding the relationship between trade facilitation, sustainable development, and environmental conservation is becoming increasingly nuanced and integrated into international trade frameworks.

The summary is careful to adhere to UK spelling and grammar throughout. No inconsistencies with UK English usage were detected. Additionally, it incorporates keywords such as “regional collaboration,” “trade facilitation,” “border management,” “harmonization of trade regulations,” “National Trade Facilitation Committees,” “sustainable economic growth,” “environmental policies,” “climate action goals,” and “sustainable partnerships,” all without compromising the quality of the summary.

Report

The summary provided gives an in-depth look at Vanuatu’s progress towards digitisation, despite its status as a Small Island Developing State with limited resources. Collaborating with UNCTAD, Vanuatu has leveraged the Askuda-based single window system, setting a precedent in the Pacific region.

The digitisation efforts have yielded significant achievements in the past decade, specifically in enhancing efficiency, reducing paper consumption, and cutting down travel for trade-related procedures. The switch from the outdated Asukuta Plus Plus to the state-of-the-art Asukuta World led to a 65% dip in paper usage and a similar decline in the necessity for physical presence at customs offices.

These environmental and operational benefits continued within the biosecurity department, which saw an 88% decrease in paper use and a 76% reduction in travel after adopting the single window system. The next phase, inclusion of risk management systems, propelled the paper reduction to 99%, illustrating the effectiveness of digitisation across various government domains.

Moreover, Vanuatu’s digital transformation aligns with its environmental and climate change commitments. The ODS module, for managing ozone-depleting substances, and the energy-efficient appliance module have introduced automation, replacing manual processes which encourages sustainable consumption. The implementation of the ASIREG system is a testament to Vanuatu’s dedication to disaster resilience.

This system is critical, considering Vanuatu’s susceptibility to natural disasters, as it expedites the import of humanitarian supplies, thus highlighting the intersection of digital innovation and humanitarian need. Throughout the process, Vanuatu has not only achieved immense operational improvements but has also actively contributed to its environmental and disaster management goals.

This digital transition provides a model for resource-constrained nations, exemplifying the transformative power of technology in national development and policy execution. The speaker’s presentation of these breakthroughs was well received by the Ambassador and provided valuable insights, potentially serving as a guide for similar island states.

The summary accurately reflects the initial analysis, preserving the core details and using appropriate long-tail keywords such as “digitisation in Small Island Developing States,” “Askuda-based single window system,” and “digital transformation aligns with environmental commitments,” ensuring a comprehensive and informative text.

UK English spelling and grammar have been maintained throughout the summary.

Report

In a comprehensive dialogue among trade facilitation experts, a collective commitment to generating practical, measurable impacts in their field was evident, highlighting a strong appreciation for data and tangible outcomes. There was a focal emphasis on addressing the intersection between cross-border trade and environmental sustainability, which includes tackling climate change issues.

According to the WTO’s “Trade Policy Tools for Climate Change Action”, trade facilitation ranks at the forefront among ten specific actions to mitigate the consequences of climate change. This indicates an increased awareness of the impact that trade procedures have on the environment and the corresponding need to adopt ‘climate-smart’ and ‘environmentally-smart’ initiatives.

Traditionally, trade facilitation faces four significant environmental challenges: 1. The deep-rooted connection of carbon emissions to climate change. 2. Ecological concerns associated with paper consumption in trade activities, contributing to deforestation and recognised inefficiency and waste. 3. Accumulation of waste at border transit points, resulting in operational challenges and often leading to inadequate waste disposal methods.

4. The illicit trade of protected species and problems arising from unauthorised community trade, severely affecting different environmental elements. To counter these issues, several solution-focused areas for innovation were presented: 1. Embracing the digitalisation of trade processes, with the example of transitioning to electronic invoicing having the potential to reduce waste and emissions by up to 63% for each invoice.

However, it was noted that there is a fragmentation of digitalisation efforts, presenting a challenge for National Trade Facilitation Committees (NTFCs) in identifying the most constructive projects. 2. A virtual queueing system at the Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan border—akin to an appointment booking app—was implemented to organise truck scheduling effectively.

This system decreases border transit times and cuts down on emissions and waste, with a similar system at the U.S.-Mexico border having resulted in an 85% reduction in emissions. 3. The concept of ‘carbon neutral borders’ was introduced, evidenced by an approach at the Uganda-Kenya border, where a methodology developed with the Graduate Institute of Geneva measures specific emissions at a border management facility.

This includes a comprehensive analysis from truck emissions to paper, food, and water waste, as well as disposal practices, helping NTFCs understand and improve their ecological footprint. 4. Effective application of multilateral environmental agreements was discussed as a way to regulate the trade of licensed goods and consolidate processes for environmental conservation.

These agreements require intensive inter-agency cooperation and extensive data sharing, aligning with the best practices in trade facilitation. They also contribute to risk management and enable environmental responsibilities to be incorporated into the criteria for authorised economic operators. To conclude, the speaker urged NTFCs to incorporate environmental considerations into their frameworks and operations.

The objective is to ensure that present and forthcoming trade facilitation efforts contribute to economic effectiveness while also responsibly addressing the environmental aspects of cross-border commerce. NTFCs may need to create specialised working groups or action plans that view cross-border trade and its environmental effects through a comprehensive lens.

It is imperative for NTFCs to acknowledge, quantify, and enhance the environmental contributions of trade facilitation initiatives, thus making them an essential and visible part of their agenda.