OPEN DIALOGUE WITH IGF LEADERSHIP PANEL

Report

The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) addressed various topics related to internet governance and connectivity. Private investment in rural and underserved communities was highlighted as a key issue for improving connectivity. It was noted that private companies and telecommunications companies often neglect these areas.

Concerns were also raised about the monopolization of the internet industry, particularly its impact on media-related businesses and the dynamics of political participation and democracy. The importance of inclusivity and the multi-stakeholder approach in internet governance was emphasized, with the IGF seen as successful in addressing global internet policy development.

The need for practical standards to reduce the internet’s environmental footprint and promote digitalization was discussed. Additionally, the role of internet and digital technology in empowering vulnerable groups, such as women, girls, migrants, and refugees, was highlighted. Suggestions for improving the IGF included simplifying the registration process, increasing remote participation, and providing additional resources and accessible tools.

The discussions highlighted the importance of private investments in underserved communities, addressing monopolization, promoting inclusivity and multi-stakeholder collaboration, developing practical standards, and empowering vulnerable groups. There were also calls for improvements in the IGF itself to make it more inclusive and effective.

Report

Carol Roach, a government official from the Bahamas, has recently been appointed as the Chair of the Ministerial Accountability Group (MAG). The MAG is a leadership panel with the objective of promoting accountability and transparency within the government. Roach, under her leadership, has been focusing on strengthening governance and ensuring the responsible use of public funds in the Bahamas.

In response to recent developments, the leadership panel has expressed the urgency for an emergency meeting in the Bahamas.

This meeting aims to address pressing issues and challenges faced by the government. The panel intends to discuss strategies to mitigate the impact of these issues and find solutions for the benefit of the entire nation.

The significance of this meeting cannot be overstated, as it enables the MAG to actively contribute to the decision-making process by providing valuable insights and recommendations.

Attending the meeting in person allows the leadership panel to engage in direct discussions with key stakeholders and government officials, effectively communicating the concerns and perspectives of the MAG.

Furthermore, the emergency meeting serves as an opportunity for the MAG to solidify its presence and importance within the government of the Bahamas.

By demonstrating dedication and commitment to promoting accountability and transparency, the leadership panel aims to gain support and recognition for their work.

In conclusion, Carol Roach, as the new Chair of the Ministerial Accountability Group, along with the leadership panel, is eager to attend the emergency meeting in the Bahamas.

This meeting provides a crucial platform for the MAG to address urgent issues, actively contribute to decision-making, and establish its role within the government. Through their active participation and engagement, the leadership panel aims to drive positive change and ensure responsible governance in the Bahamas.

Report

Gbenga Sesan, a strong advocate for the “Internet We Want” initiative, emphasises the vital role of receiving feedback and contributions from the public. He believes that to shape a comprehensive and inclusive “Internet We Want” paper, it is crucial to involve the public in the process.

The secretariat responsible for the initiative will actively welcome and consider public comments and contributions.

By opening the paper to public comments and input, Gbenga Sesan and the secretariat demonstrate their commitment to creating a document that reflects the perspectives and needs of a diverse range of stakeholders.

This inclusive approach ensures a more democratic and representative outcome.

Gbenga Sesan’s belief in the significance of public opinion is further highlighted by his appreciation of feedback received, such as that from Peter. He recognizes the value of engaging with the public to reduce any potential bias in the paper.

This demonstrates his commitment to producing a document that captures the desires and aspirations of the broader public, rather than being driven solely by specific interests or biases.

These actions align with SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions.

SDG 16 aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies, provide access to justice for all, and build effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions. By actively involving the public in shaping the “Internet We Want” paper, Gbenga Sesan and the secretariat contribute to promoting peace, justice, and strong institutions in the digital realm.

Overall, Gbenga Sesan’s advocacy for public input in the “Internet We Want” initiative reflects his commitment to creating an inclusive and well-rounded document that serves the interests and needs of all stakeholders.

By actively incorporating public feedback, he seeks to ensure transparency, fairness, and an open dialogue in shaping the future of the internet.

Report

Universal service funds are being utilized in many countries to encourage telecommunications coverage in rural areas. These funds, which are generated through taxation imposed on telecommunications companies (telcos), are reinvested into initiatives that support the expansion of coverage in rural regions.

Notably, the US government has pledged $40 billion to ensure coverage in rural areas.

Promoting sustainable investment in rural areas requires ongoing dialogue between government entities, regulators, and telcos. This collaboration aims to develop policies and strategies that promote the long-term viability and success of telecommunications projects in rural regions.

By fostering open communication and cooperation, stakeholders can address challenges, identify opportunities, and establish a framework that encourages investment in infrastructure and services for rural communities. This approach is crucial for achieving SDG 9 – Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure.

However, it is important to acknowledge the financial burdens and considerations telcos face when expanding coverage in rural areas.

Some argue that telcos should not be solely responsible for such investments and should receive additional support, such as tax relief, to invest sustainably in rural areas. By providing financial assistance and incentives, telcos can be encouraged to allocate resources towards building and enhancing infrastructure in underserved regions.

This perspective highlights the need to view telcos as more than just a source of revenue, but as partners in achieving equitable telecommunications access.

In conclusion, universal service funds play a vital role in encouraging telecommunications coverage in rural areas.

The US government’s commitment of $40 billion reflects the importance placed on ensuring connectivity in remote regions. To promote sustainable investment, ongoing dialogue between government bodies, regulators, and telcos is necessary. This collaboration permits the development of policies and strategies that support long-term success.

Furthermore, providing telcos with additional support, such as tax relief, can facilitate their investment in rural areas. By working together, stakeholders can strive towards achieving SDG 9 and bridging the digital divide in rural communities.

Report

The analysis highlights several key points regarding the deployment of infrastructure in rural areas. One argument put forward is that the government should play a significant role in this process, as relying solely on private investment may not yield profitable outcomes.

This suggests that there is a need for government support and intervention to ensure the development and implementation of infrastructure in rural areas.

Another potential solution is the use of universal service funds or subsidies. These mechanisms can provide financial support to companies or service providers, incentivising them to extend their coverage to rural areas.

By offering incentives, it becomes more economically viable for these entities to invest in infrastructure in places where profitability may otherwise be low or uncertain.

Furthermore, the analysis highlights the potential of new technologies, particularly non-terrestrial networks, in efficiently covering rural areas.

These technologies, such as mobile technology, rail satellite networks, and high-altitude platform systems, have the capability to cover wide areas of 50 to 100 kilometres with just one system. This presents a promising option for overcoming the challenges posed by the vast and remote nature of rural areas.

Overall, the analysis suggests that a multifaceted approach combining government intervention, universal service funds or subsidies, and the adoption of new technologies is necessary to improve infrastructure coverage in rural areas.

By recognising the limitations of private investment, exploring alternative financing options, and leveraging innovative technologies, it becomes possible to bridge the infrastructure gap and ensure equitable access to vital services for rural communities.

One noteworthy observation from the analysis is the emphasis on SDG 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure.

This sustainable development goal highlights the importance of infrastructure development and innovation in achieving sustainable and inclusive growth. By aligning efforts with this goal, governments and stakeholders can work towards creating a more connected and prosperous future for both urban and rural areas.

In conclusion, while private investment alone may not be sufficient, the government’s involvement in deploying infrastructure in rural areas is crucial.

The use of universal service funds or subsidies can also help improve coverage, and new technologies like non-terrestrial networks offer promising solutions. By adopting a comprehensive approach and aligning efforts with SDG 9, the goal of ensuring reliable and accessible infrastructure in rural areas can be achieved.

Report

The analysis explores the importance of collective input and consultation with other communities in relation to the “Internet We Want” paper. Lise Fuhr emphasizes the need for outreach and collaboration not only on the specific topic of the “Internet We Want” but also on other related topics within the leadership panel.

Her goal is to achieve the objectives set in the paper through collective input and consultation.

The analysis also highlights the significance of local solutions in addressing global problems in the context of internet governance and local issues.

Input is collected in national and regional Internet Governance Forums (IGFs) for analysis, which is then brought back to the IGFs. This ensures a feedback loop that involves communities in shaping solutions to global problems. It is acknowledged that global problems cannot be effectively addressed without considering local contexts and solutions.

The speakers stress the importance of perceiving and analyzing problems in a local context to find effective solutions.

They recognize the need to involve and consult with diverse communities and stakeholders to achieve desired outcomes. This collaborative and inclusive approach is essential in creating an internet that caters to the needs and aspirations of various communities, and in addressing global challenges by taking local perspectives into account.

Overall, the analysis underscores the significance of collective input and consultation with other communities in relation to the “Internet We Want” paper.

It emphasizes the need for outreach, collaboration, and a feedback loop with local stakeholders in the context of internet governance and local issues. By considering local solutions and involving diverse communities, it becomes possible to effectively address global problems and create an internet that benefits all.

Report

Maria Fernanda Garza is seeking help in identifying barriers that are hindering the achievement of the vision outlined in the ‘Internet We Want’ paper. This paper was recently worked on and presented, highlighting the importance of the International Governance Forum (IGF) members’ understanding of regional and global obstacles.

The sentiment surrounding this issue is positive, emphasizing the need to address these barriers to successfully realise the vision.

One of the supporting facts underscores the significant role played by IGF members’ knowledge of specific regional and global obstacles in overcoming these challenges.

Maria Fernanda Garza believes that to expedite progress towards the desired outcomes, specific goals, appropriate measurement methods, and the use of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are necessary.

These tools can help achieve faster progression towards the vision. This aligns with SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure, which emphasises the importance of advancing technology and connectivity.

In conclusion, Maria Fernanda Garza is looking to identify the barriers impeding the achievement of the vision presented in the ‘Internet We Want’ paper.

By emphasising the significance of IGF members’ awareness of regional and global barriers and advocating for the establishment of specific goals, measurement methods, and KPIs, she aims to expedite progress towards the outlined vision. The discussions surrounding this topic are in line with SDG 9, which focuses on advancing industry, innovation, and infrastructure.

Report

During a recent meeting, the importance of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) was discussed, with several speakers expressing the need for its continuation. The leadership panel emphasised that the IGF should continue to assess the effectiveness of the Global Digital Compact.

They believe that the forum plays a vital role in articulating the values needed for decision-making on the IGF’s future.

One of the main points highlighted was the need for feedback from IGF participants to further improve the forum.

Participants were encouraged to share their experiences and suggestions during the meeting. The leadership panel stressed that they are interested in hearing from the participants and want to know what aspects they appreciate and would like to continue.

The issue of internet access, especially in rural areas, was also discussed.

It was acknowledged that although internet penetration is generally good in the United States, rural areas still face challenges in terms of access. The leadership panel recognised that significant effort and funding are required to improve internet access in these underserved regions.

In the United States, for example, the government is investing $40 billion to address this issue in rural areas.

Recognising the potential of low-Earth-orbiting satellite systems, the meeting highlighted how these systems could provide technical access to the internet anywhere.

Starlink, for instance, plans to launch 40,000 satellites, and there are other anticipated LEO satellite systems as well. This development could greatly enhance internet connectivity, particularly in remote locations.

The meeting also touched upon the possibility of government subsidies to make internet service more affordable in rural areas.

It was suggested that in the absence of competition, government support could be crucial in bringing internet access to these remote regions.

The issue of internet monopoly and economic concentration was raised, with the meeting acknowledging that it is not the leadership panel’s responsibility to solve the problem of businesses whose models have changed due to new technology.

Instead, the leadership panel aims to facilitate discussions and bring together individuals who can consider various solutions to address these challenges.

National and regional internet governance activities were emphasised as being crucial in understanding and addressing local problems.

Such activities were considered as important, if not more, than the annual IGF meetings due to their local focus. The meeting highlighted that these activities articulate the unique challenges faced at a local level and can contribute to more effective governance of the internet.

In terms of communication, email was mentioned as one of the available tools for providing input to the leadership panel.

It was noted that email allows for direct and reliable communication with the panel, and the secretariat can invite comments and draw attention to important matters through this medium.

The partnership between the leadership panel and the Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG) was recognised as crucial for the IGF’s functioning.

It was acknowledged that the structure of the IGF would not exist without this partnership, emphasising the importance of collaboration and partnership in achieving the forum’s goals.

The meeting also discussed the need for more interaction with National and Regional Internet Governance Initiatives (NRIs).

It was suggested that there should be personal visits to NRIs or regular correspondence with them to enhance connectivity and strengthen relationships.

A noteworthy idea that emerged during the meeting was the concept of individuals creating their own IP addresses and becoming their own Internet Service Providers (ISPs).

This notion, presented by Christopher Tay from Connect Free and Internet 3, was deemed interesting and worth exploring. It was suggested that presenting this idea to the Internet Engineering Task Force could lead to further development and analysis.

The meeting recognized that increasing capacity from overhead satellites and undersea fiber would contribute to better internet access.

This development points towards a positive trend in terms of improving internet connectivity worldwide.

Azerbaijan’s contribution to the IGF as the host was appreciated, highlighting the importance of partnerships and collaboration between countries in achieving the forum’s goals.

Lastly, the meeting reiterated and assured continued support for the multistakeholder model.

The importance of multiple voices in global digital negotiations was emphasised, and the United Nations’ support towards a multistakeholder approach was appreciated.

Overall, the meeting generated various insights and proposals to improve the IGF. Suggestions included better meeting structure, reducing topic overlaps, and involving smaller states in hosting globally.

There was a consensus that reforms are needed to conduct the IGF meetings more effectively, ensuring less chaos and more structure. These recommendations and observations aim to enhance the IGF’s impact and strengthen its role in internet governance.