Risks and opportunities of a new UN cybercrime treaty | IGF 2023 WS #225

Report

In a discussion concerning the design of advancing technology, Ahmad Karim, representing the UN Women Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, stressed the importance of carefully considering the needs of girls, young adults, females, and marginalized and fragile groups.

It was noted that, in such discussions, there is often a tendency to overlook gender-related issues, which indicates a gender-blind approach.

Another argument put forth during the discussion underscored the significance of making the design of the metaverse and technologies more considerate towards marginalized and fragile groups, especially girls and women.

The rapid advancements in technology were acknowledged as having disproportionate effects on females and marginalized sectors of society. It was highlighted that national laws frequently do not adequately account for the specific needs and challenges faced by these groups.

The supporting evidence provided includes the fact that girls, young adults, and women are often underrepresented and encounter barriers in accessing and benefiting from technological advancements.

Additionally, marginalized and fragile groups, such as those from low-income backgrounds or with disabilities, are particularly vulnerable to exclusion and discrimination in the design and implementation of technology.

The conclusion drawn from the discussion is that there is an urgent need for greater attention and inclusivity in the design of advancing technology.

Consideration must be given to the unique needs and challenges faced by girls, young adults, females, and marginalized and fragile groups. It is imperative that national laws and policies reflect these considerations and ensure that these groups are not left behind in the technological progress.

This discussion highlights the significance of addressing gender inequality and reducing inequalities in the design and implementation of technology.

It sheds light on the potential pitfalls and repercussions of disregarding the needs of marginalized and fragile groups, and calls for a more inclusive and equitable approach to technological advancements.

Report

During the event, the speakers highlighted the significant importance of children’s digital rights in creating a safe and secure online environment. They stressed that children’s rights should be protected online, just as they are in the offline world.

General Comment Number 25 to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child was mentioned as a recognition of the importance of children’s digital rights, with state parties being obligated to protect children from all forms of online exploitation and abuse.

In terms of internet governance, the speakers advocated for a proactive and preventive approach, rather than a reactive one.

They argued that governments often find themselves playing catch-up with digital issues, reacting to problems after they have already occurred. A shift towards a preventive model of online safety was deemed necessary, which involves designing for safety before potential issues arise.

Effective implementation was seen as the key to turning digital policies into practice.

The speakers emphasized the need to understand how to implement policies in specific local contexts to realize the full benefits. They argued that implementation is crucial in ensuring that children’s rights are protected and upheld online.

The need for public understanding of technology and its risks and opportunities was also highlighted.

It was mentioned that improving public understanding is necessary for individuals to make informed decisions about their online activities. Empowering parents to understand technology and facilitate their children’s rights was seen as an important aspect of ensuring a safe online environment for children.

Trust was identified as a crucial element in the digital age, particularly with the growing reliance on technology.

The speakers discussed the importance of trust against the backdrop of emerging risks related to data breaches, data privacy problems, and unethical practices. Building and maintaining trust were seen as essential for a secure online environment.

Safeguarding the younger generations online was viewed as a collective responsibility.

The speakers stressed that parents and guardians cannot solely shoulder this responsibility and must have a certain level of knowledge of online safety. The importance of all stakeholders, including businesses, industries, and governments, working together to protect children’s rights online was emphasized.

Regulation was seen as an important tool for keeping children safe online.

However, it was noted that regulation alone is not a solution for the challenges posed by emerging technologies. The speakers argued that both regulation and prevention through education and awareness are crucial in effectively addressing these challenges.

Differentiated regulation based on context was advocated for.

The speakers highlighted that different online services offer different opportunities for children to learn and be creative. They also emphasized that children’s evolving capacities are influenced by various factors, such as their geographical and household contexts. Understanding the link between online and offline contexts was seen as essential in developing effective regulation.

Transparency, a culture of child rights, and collaborative efforts were identified as crucial for the protection of children’s rights online.

All stakeholders, including businesses, industries, and governments, were urged to work together and have a shared understanding of child rights. The need for transparency in their commitment to protecting child rights was emphasized.

The challenges faced by developing countries in terms of technology and capacity building were acknowledged.

The speakers discussed the specific challenges faced by countries like Bangladesh and Afghanistan in terms of accessing technology and building the necessary capacity. Opportunities for codes of conduct that can be adapted to different contexts were also explored.

Consulting children and young people was highlighted as an important approach to addressing online safety issues.

The speakers emphasized the need to understand how children and young people feel about these issues and to learn from approaches to regulation that have been successful.

Amy Crocker, one of the speakers, encouraged people interested in children’s rights issues to join the Dynamic Coalition and continue similar conversations.

Flyers and a QR code were mentioned as ways to sign up for the mailing list. The importance of creating more space within the IGF for discussing children’s rights issues was also emphasized.

In conclusion, the event highlighted the significant importance of protecting children’s digital rights and creating a safe and secure online environment for them.

It emphasized the need for proactive and preventive internet governance, effective implementation of digital policies, public understanding of technology, empowering parents, trust, collective responsibility, regulation along with education and awareness, differentiated regulation based on context, transparency, and collaborative efforts. The challenges faced by developing countries were acknowledged, and the involvement of children and young people was seen as essential in addressing online safety issues.

Report

The analysis addresses several concerns regarding child protection and the legal framework surrounding it. Firstly, there is concern about the unequal application of international standards for child protection, particularly between children from the Global South and the Global North. This suggests that children in developing countries may not receive the same level of protection as those in more developed regions.

Factors such as resource distribution, economic disparities, and varying levels of political commitment contribute to this discrepancy in child protection standards.

Another notable concern highlighted in the analysis is the inadequacy of current legislation in dealing with images of child abuse created by artificial intelligence (AI).

As technology advances, AI is increasingly being used to generate explicit and harmful content involving children. However, existing laws appear ineffective in addressing the complexities associated with such content, raising questions about the efficacy of the legal framework in the face of rapidly evolving technology.

On a positive note, there is support for taking proactive measures and demanding better protection measures from online platforms.

Efforts are being made to provide guidelines and recommendations to agencies working with children and adolescents, aimed at enhancing child protection in the digital space and promoting the well-being of young individuals online. This demonstrates an awareness of the need to keep pace with technological advancements and adapt legal frameworks accordingly.

Overall, the analysis underscores the importance of addressing the unequal application of international standards for child protection and the challenges posed by AI-generated images of child abuse.

It emphasizes the need for updated legislation that aligns with emerging technologies, while also advocating for proactive measures to enhance protection on online platforms. These insights provide valuable considerations for policymakers, child protection agencies, and stakeholders working towards establishing robust and inclusive frameworks for child protection globally.

Report

The discussions revolve around the significant impact that algorithms have on child safety in the digital realm. One particularly tragic incident occurred in the UK, where a child took their own life after being exposed to suicide-relevant content recommended by an algorithm.

This heartbreaking event highlights the dangerous potential of algorithms to make malicious content more accessible, leading to harmful consequences for children.

One key argument suggests that restrictions should be placed on surveillance capitalism as it applies to children.

The aim is to prevent the exposure of children to malicious content by prohibiting the gathering of data from known child users on platforms. These restrictions aim to protect children from potential harms caused by algorithmic recommendations of harmful content.

Another concerning issue raised during these discussions is the use of AI models to generate Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM).

It is alarming that in some countries, this AI-generated CSAM is not yet considered illegal. The argument is that both the AI models used in generating CSAM and the circulation of prompts to create such content should be made illegal.

There is a clear need for legal measures to address this concerning loophole and protect children from the creation and circulation of CSAM.

Furthermore, it is argued that platforms have a responsibility towards their users, particularly in light of the rapid pace of technological change.

It is suggested that platforms should impose a duty of care on themselves to ensure the safety and well-being of their users. This duty of care would help manage the risks associated with algorithmic recommendations and the potential harms they could cause to vulnerable individuals, especially children.

Importantly, the argument highlights the difficulty regulators face in keeping up with the ever-evolving technology, making it crucial for platforms to step up and take responsibility.

In conclusion, the discussions surrounding the impact of algorithms on child safety in the digital realm reveal significant concerns and arguments.

The tragic incident of a child’s suicide underscores the urgency of addressing the issue. Suggestions include imposing restrictions on surveillance capitalism as it applies to children, making AI-generated CSAM illegal, and holding platforms accountable for their users’ safety. These measures aim to protect children and ensure a safer digital environment for their well-being.

Report

AI adoption among children can pose significant risks, particularly in terms of data privacy. The presence of chatbots such as Synapse and MyAI has raised concerns as these tools have the capability to rapidly extract and process vast amounts of personal information.

This raises the potential for exposing children to various cyber threats, targeted advertising, and inappropriate content.

The ability of chatbots to collect personal data is alarming as it puts children at risk of having their sensitive information compromised.

Cyber threats, such as hacking or identity theft, can have devastating consequences for individuals, and children are especially vulnerable in this regard. Moreover, the information gathered by chatbots can be used by marketers to target children with ads, leading to potential exploitation and manipulation in the digital realm.

Inappropriate content is another concerning aspect of AI adoption among children.

Without proper safeguards, chatbots may inadvertently expose children to age-inappropriate material, which can have a negative impact on their emotional and psychological well-being. Children need a secure and regulated online environment that protects them from exposure to harmful content.

It is crucial to recognise the need to ensure a secure cyberspace for children.

This includes focusing on the development and implementation of effective measures related to artificial intelligence, children, and cybersecurity. Governments, organisations, and parents must work together to mitigate the risks associated with AI adoption among children.

In conclusion, AI adoption among children brings forth various risks, with data privacy issues at the forefront.

Chatbots that possess the ability to collect personal data may expose children to cyber threats, targeted advertising, and inappropriate content. To safeguard children’s well-being and protect their privacy, it is essential to establish a secure online environment that addresses the potential risks posed by AI technology.

The responsibility lies with all stakeholders involved in ensuring a safe and regulated cyberspace for children.

Report

Children today are immersed in the online world from a very young age, practically being born with access to the internet and technology. This exposure to the digital age has led to an increased need for trust in this new environment.

Trust is seen as a cornerstone of the digital age, particularly as we rely on technology for almost every aspect of our lives. Without trust, our reliance on technology becomes more precarious.

Creating a reliable and ethical digital environment for younger generations requires imparting fundamental digital knowledge and nurturing trust.

Building trust and instilling digital literacy are essential steps in safeguarding children online. Parents play a crucial role in this process, but it is also a shared responsibility that extends to all stakeholders. Informed parents are key as they are often the first line of defense for children facing challenges online.

However, they cannot do it alone, and it is important for all stakeholders to be aware of their responsibility in protecting younger generations.

The challenges faced by teenagers today in the online world are more multifaceted and harmful than ever before.

Cyberbullying has evolved from early stages of internet flaming and harassment via emails to more advanced forms like cyberstalking and doxing. The rise of generative AI has made creating hate image-based abuse relatively easier, contributing to a growing concern for online safety.

It is important to address these issues effectively and efficiently to ensure the well-being of young people online.

The approach to online safety varies across different jurisdictions, with each adopting their own strategies and measures. For example, Australia has an industry code in place, while Singapore employs a government-driven approach.

This diversity highlights the need for clear definitions and standards regarding online safety threats. A cohesive understanding of these threats is imperative to effectively combat them and ensure consistency across different regions.

Capacity building is essential for addressing the challenges of the digital age.

Empowering young people and ensuring their voices are heard can lead to a better understanding of their needs and concerns. Additionally, understanding the technical aspects of internet governance is vital in developing effective solutions to address issues of online safety and security.

Inclusion and diversity are crucial in creating a safe online space.

It is important to include the voices of different stakeholders and ensure that everyone has a seat at the table. Language can be a barrier, causing loss in translation, so efforts must be made to overcome this and make conversations more inclusive.

The perspective and insights of young people are valued in discussions on gender and technology.

Gaining fresh and unique insights from the younger generation can contribute to the development of more inclusive and gender-responsive approaches. Jenna, a participant in the discussion, highlighted the need to engage young people in discussions related to explicit content and self-expression, as well as providing safe spaces for their voices to be heard.

Modernizing existing legal frameworks is seen as a more effective approach to addressing the impacts of AI and other technological advancements.

Rather than a single legislative solution, updating legislation such as the Broadcasting Act, Consumer Protection Act, and Competition Act is seen as crucial in integrating present issues and adapting to the digital age.

Collaboration among stakeholders is essential for success.

Capacity building requires research support, and the cooperation of multiple stakeholders is crucial in terms of legislation and regulations. By working together and leveraging each other’s strengths, stakeholders can more effectively address the challenges faced in the digital world.

Lastly, inclusive involvement of the technical community in the policy-making process is advocated.

The technical community possesses valuable knowledge and insights that can contribute to the development of effective policies. However, it is acknowledged that their involvement may not always be the best fit for all policy-making decisions. Striking a balance between technical expertise and broader considerations is key to ensuring policies are robust and comprehensive.

In conclusion, children today are growing up in a digital age where they are exposed to the internet and technology from a young age.

Building a reliable and ethical digital environment requires imparting digital knowledge and nurturing trust. Safeguarding younger generations online is a shared responsibility, requiring the involvement of all stakeholders. The challenges faced by teenagers today, such as cyberbullying and hate speech, are advanced and harmful.

Different jurisdictions have varying approaches to online safety, emphasizing the need for clear definitions and standards. Capacity building and the inclusion of diverse voices are crucial in creating a safe online space. The perspective and insights of young people are valuable in discussions on gender and technology.

Modernizing existing legal frameworks is advocated, and engaging young people in discussions on explicit content and self-expression is important. Collaboration among stakeholders and the inclusion of the technical community in policy-making processes are considered essential for success in addressing the impacts of the digital age.

Report

The discussion emphasized the importance of regulating and supporting internet technology in developing countries, as evidenced by the interest and concern of participants from regions such as Bangladesh and Kabul University. This real-world engagement highlights the relevance and urgency of the issue in developing regions.

Jim, during the discussion, summarised and acknowledged the questions raised by participants from developing nations, demonstrating his support for addressing the challenges and needs specific to these countries.

He stressed the need to consider these perspectives when dealing with the issues surrounding internet technology in developing countries. This recognition of diverse needs and experiences reflects a commitment to inclusivity and ensuring that solutions are tailored to the circumstances of each country.

The overall sentiment observed in the discussion was neutral to positive.

This indicates a recognition of the importance of regulating and supporting internet technology in developing countries, and a willingness to address the challenges and concerns associated with it. The positive sentiment suggests support for efforts to enhance access to, and the effectiveness of, internet technology in these regions, contributing to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals of Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure (SDG 9) and Reduced Inequalities (SDG 10).

In conclusion, the discussion highlights the crucial role of regulation and support for internet technology in developing countries.

The participation and engagement of individuals from these regions further validate the significance and necessity of addressing their specific needs and challenges. By considering the perspectives of those in developing nations and taking appropriate actions to bridge the digital divide, we can work towards achieving a more inclusive and equitable global digital landscape.

Report

In a recent discussion focusing on the relationship between the metaverse and various sectors such as criminology and child safety, Katarzyna Staciewa, a representative from the National Research Institute in Poland, shared her insights and emphasized the need for further discussions and research in criminology and other problematic sectors.

Staciewa drew upon her experiences in law enforcement and criminology to support her argument.

Staciewa discussed her research on the metaverse, highlighting its significance in guiding the development of developing countries. The metaverse, an immersive virtual reality space, has the potential to shape the future of these countries by offering new opportunities and addressing socio-economic challenges.

Staciewa’s positive sentiment towards the metaverse underscored its potential as a tool for fostering quality education and promoting peace, justice, and strong institutions, as outlined in the relevant Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

However, concerns were raised during the discussion regarding the potential misuse of the metaverse and AI technology, particularly in relation to child safety.

Staciewa analyzed the darknet and shed light on potentially sexually interested groups involving children, revealing alarming trends. The risks associated with the metaverse lie in the possibility of AI-generated child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and the potential for existing CSAM to be transformed into virtual reality or metaverse frames.

The negative sentiment expressed by Staciewa and others reflected the urgency to address these risks and prevent harm to vulnerable children.

The speakers placed strong emphasis on the importance of research in taking appropriate actions to ensure child safety.

Staciewa’s research findings highlighted the constant revictimization faced by child victims, further underscoring the need for comprehensive measures to protect them. By conducting further research in the field of child safety and child rights, stakeholders can gain a deeper understanding of the challenges posed by the metaverse and AI technology and develop effective strategies to mitigate these risks.

In conclusion, the discussion on the metaverse and its impact on various sectors, including criminology and child safety, highlighted the need for more research and discussions to harness the potential of the metaverse while safeguarding vulnerable populations.

While acknowledging the metaverse’s ability to guide the development of developing countries and the positive impact it can have on education and institutions, concerns were expressed about the possibility of misuse, particularly with regards to child safety. The importance of research in understanding and addressing these risks was strongly emphasized, particularly in the context of the continuous victimization of child victims.

Report

Child rights are considered fundamental and should be promoted. Katz’s child-focused agency actively advocates for the promotion of child rights. However, conflicts between child rights and freedom of expression can arise. Survey results revealed such conflicts, underscoring the need for balance between these two important aspects.

Misunderstandings or misinterpretations of child rights are common and must be addressed.

Some people mistakenly believe that virtual child sexual abuse material (CSAM/SEM) can prevent real crime, indicating a lack of understanding or misinterpretation of child rights. Efforts should be made to educate and provide correct information regarding child rights to combat these misunderstandings.

Regulating AI in the context of child protection is a topic under discussion.

Many respondents believe that AI should be regulated to ensure child protection, particularly in relation to CSAM/SEM. However, opinions on this matter are mixed, highlighting the need for further dialogue and research to determine the most appropriate approach.

Public awareness of the risks and opportunities of AI needs to be raised.

Approximately 20% of respondents admitted to having limited knowledge about AI matters and associated risks. This signifies the need for increased education and awareness programs to ensure the public understands the potential benefits and dangers of AI technology.

Japan currently lacks regulations and policies concerning AI-generated imagery.

Katz’s observation reveals a gap in the legal framework, emphasizing the necessity of establishing guidelines and regulations to effectively address this issue.

There is also a need for greater awareness and information dissemination about AI developments. Katz suggests that the media should take more responsibility in informing the public about advancements and implications of AI.

Currently, people in Japan are not adequately informed about ongoing AI developments, highlighting the need for improved communication and awareness campaigns.

Katz recommends that the public should gather information from social networking services (SNS) about AI developments. This highlights the importance of utilizing various platforms to stay updated and informed about the latest developments in the field of AI.

A rights-based approach is crucial in designing regulation policies.

It is essential to ensure that the rights of children and humans are protected in the digital world. Advocating for the enhancement of child and human rights in the digital sphere is a vital aspect of creating an inclusive and safe environment.

In conclusion, promoting child rights is essential, although conflicts with freedom of expression may arise.

Addressing misunderstandings and misinterpretations of child rights is crucial. The regulation of AI in the context of child protection requires further examination and consideration. Public awareness about the risks and opportunities of AI needs to be improved. Japan lacks regulations for AI-generated imagery, and greater awareness about AI developments is necessary.

Gathering information from SNS can help individuals stay informed about AI happenings. A rights-based approach is needed when designing regulation policies, and enhancing child and human rights in the digital world is vital.

Report

In the analysis, the speakers engage in a discussion regarding the delicate balance between protecting children and upholding their rights. Larry argues that protection and children’s rights are sometimes in conflict. He cites examples of proposed US laws that could suppress children’s rights in the guise of protection.

Larry also highlights the UN Convention, which guarantees children’s rights to freedom of expression, participation, and more.

On the other side of the debate, another speaker opposes legislation that infringes upon children’s rights. They point out instances where such legislation may limit children’s rights, such as requiring parental permission for individuals under 18 to access the internet.

Their sentiment towards these laws is negative.

Lastly, a speaker emphasises the need for a balanced approach to regulation, one that can protect and ensure children’s rights while acknowledging the inherent risks involved in being active in the world.

They argue for a fair equilibrium between rights and protection. Their sentiment remains neutral.

Throughout the analysis, the speakers recognize the challenge in finding the proper balance between protecting children and preserving their rights. The discussion highlights the complexities and potential conflicts that arise in this area, and stresses the importance of striking a balance that safeguards children’s well-being while still allowing them to exercise their rights and freedoms.

Report

In a recent discussion on online safety, Microsoft emphasised its responsibility in protecting users, particularly children, from harmful content. They acknowledged that tailored safety measures, based on the type of service, are necessary for an effective approach. However, they also highlighted the importance of striking a balance between safety and considerations for privacy and freedom of expression.

One speaker raised an interesting point about the potential risks of a “one size fits all” approach to addressing online safety.

They argued that different services, such as gaming or professional social networks, require context-specific interventions. Implementing broad-scoped regulation could inadvertently capture services that have unique safety requirements.

Both legislation and voluntary actions were deemed necessary to address children’s online safety.

Microsoft highlighted their focus on building safety and privacy by design. By incorporating safety measures from the very beginning during product development, they aim to create a safer online environment for users.

However, concerns were also raised about the current state of legislation related to online safety and privacy.

It was noted that legislative efforts often lack a holistic approach and can sometimes contradict each other. Some safety and privacy legislations contain concepts that may not optimise online safety measures.

Microsoft also recognised the risks posed by AI-generated child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and emphasised the need for responsible AI practices.

They are actively considering these risks in their approach to ensure the responsible use of AI technologies.

The discussion strongly advocated for the importance of regulation in addressing online harms. Microsoft believes that effective regulation and a whole society approach are crucial in tackling the various challenges posed by online safety.

They emphasised the need for ongoing collaboration with experts and stakeholders to continuously improve online child safety measures and access controls.

Another key aspect discussed was the need for a better understanding of the gendered impacts of technology.

It was highlighted that current research lacks a comprehensive understanding of youth experiences, particularly for females and different cultures. Additional research, empowerment, and capacity building were suggested as ways to better understand the gendered implications of technology.

In conclusion, the discussion stressed the importance of collaboration, open-mindedness, and continuous learning in addressing online safety.

Microsoft’s commitment to protecting users, especially children, from harmful content was evident in their approach to building safety and privacy by design. The speakers highlighted the complexities of the topic and emphasised the need for context-specific interventions and effective regulation to ensure a safer online environment for all users.

Report

During the discussion on child safety and online policies, the speakers emphasised the importance of taking a balanced approach. While regulation was acknowledged as a crucial tool in ensuring child safety, the speakers also highlighted the significance of prevention, education, and awareness.

It was noted that regulation often receives more attention due to its visibility as a commitment to child safety.

However, the lack of proportional investment in prevention aspects, such as awareness-raising and education, was seen as a gap.

Addressing the specific needs of children in relation to their evolving capacities and contexts was deemed crucial. A differentiated approach to regulation was recommended, taking into consideration the diverse services and opportunities available for children to learn digital skills.

The household environment, geographical context, and access to non-digital services were identified as factors that influence children’s evolving capacities.

A unified understanding and commitment to child rights were highlighted as prerequisites for effective regulation. The speakers pointed out that there is often a significant variation in how child rights are interpreted or emphasised in different regional, cultural, or religious contexts.

It was stressed that a transparent commitment and culture of child rights are necessary from industries, businesses, and governments for any successful regulation to be established.

The tendency of developing countries to adopt policies and legislation from key countries without critically analysing the unique challenges they face was criticised.

The speakers observed this trend in policy-making from Southern Africa to North Africa and the Asia Pacific region. The need for developing countries to contextualise policies and legislation according to their own specific circumstances was emphasised.

An issue of concern raised during the discussion was the reluctance of countries to update their legislation dealing with sexual violence.

The process for legislation update was noted to be lengthy, often taking up to five to ten years. This delay was seen as a significant barrier to effectively addressing the issue and protecting children from sexual violence.

The role of industries and companies in ensuring child safety was also highlighted.

It was advocated that industries should act as frontrunners in adopting definitions and staying updated on technologically enhanced crimes, such as AI-generated child sexual abuse material (CSAM). The speakers argued that industries should not wait for national policies to change but should instead take initiative in adhering to certain definitions and guidelines.

The importance of engaging with children and listening to their experiences and voices in different contexts was emphasised.

The speakers stressed that children should have a critical say in the internet space, and adults should be open to challenging their own thinking and assumptions. Meaningful engagement with children was seen as essential to understanding their needs and desires in using the internet safely.

In addition, the speakers highlighted the need for cross-sector participation in discussing internet safety.

They recommended involving experts from various fields, such as criminologists, educators, social workers, public health specialists, violence prevention experts, and child rights legal experts. A holistic and interdisciplinary approach was deemed necessary to address the complex issue of internet safety effectively.

Overall, the discussion on child safety and online policies emphasised the need for a balanced approach, taking into account regulation, prevention, education, and awareness.

The importance of considering the evolving capacities and contexts of children, a unified understanding and commitment to child rights, and the role of industries and companies in taking initiative were also highlighted. Additionally, the speakers stressed the significance of engaging with children and adopting a cross-sector approach to ensure internet safety.

Report

The importance of children’s digital rights in the digital world is underscored by the United Nations. These rights encompass provision, protection, and participation, which are essential for children’s empowerment and safety in online spaces. General Commendation 25 by the UN specifically emphasises the significance of children’s digital rights.

It is crucial to ensure that children have access to digital resources, that they are protected from harm and exploitation, and that they have the opportunity to actively engage and participate in the digital world.

Young children often seek support from their parents and teachers when faced with online risks.

They rely on them as safety contact persons for any issues they encounter on the internet. As they grow older, children develop their own coping strategies by employing technical measures to mitigate online risks. This highlights the importance of parental and teacher support in assisting children in navigating the digital landscape and promoting their online safety.

Furthermore, the design of online spaces needs to be tailored to cater to the diverse needs of different age groups.

Children, as active users, should have digital platforms that are user-friendly and age-appropriate. Children are critical of long processing times for reports on platforms, advocating for more efficient and responsive mechanisms. It is important to consider children’s perspectives and ensure that their voices are heard when designing and developing online spaces.

Human resources play a significant role in fostering safe interactions online.

Children are more likely to use reporting tools that establish a human connection, thereby enhancing their sense of safety and anonymity. The THORN study conducted in the United States supports this viewpoint and suggests that human involvement positively affects children’s willingness to report online incidents.

The introduction of the Digital Services Act in the European Union is seen as a critical tool for protecting children’s data.

This legislation is set to come into force next year and aims to enhance data protection measures for individuals, including children, in the digital sphere. The act aims to address issues related to privacy, security, and the responsible use of digital services to safeguard children’s personal information.

Children’s rights by design and their active participation in decision-making processes regarding the digital environment should be prioritised.

The United Nations’ General Comment 25 highlights the importance of young people’s participation in decisions about the digital space. The German Children’s Fund has also conducted research that emphasises the need for quality criteria for children’s participation in digital regulations.

By involving children in decision-making, their perspectives and experiences can inform policies and ensure that their rights are respected and protected.

Creating safe socio-digital spaces for children and adolescents is of paramount importance. These spaces should not be primarily influenced by product guidelines or market-driven interests but rather should prioritise the well-being and safety of children and young people.

Civil society and educational organisations are seen as key stakeholders in shaping and creating these safe social spaces for children to engage in the digital world.

In conclusion, a holistic approach is necessary to advocate for children’s rights in the digital world.

This entails promoting children’s digital rights, providing support and guidance from parents and teachers, adapting the design of online spaces to meet the needs of different age groups, harnessing the potential of human resources for safe interactions, and enacting legislation such as the Digital Services Act for protecting children’s data.

Children and young people should be actively involved in their rights advocacy and be included in decision-making processes in the digital environment. The involvement of all stakeholders, including governments, organisations, and communities, is essential in advancing and safeguarding children’s rights in the digital world.

Report

In the United States, the states of Arkansas and California faced legal action for implementing a controversial rule that required legal consent from a parent or guardian for individuals under the age of 18 to use social media sites. Steve Del Bianco, representing an organization, sued the states and deemed this measure to be aggressive.

The sentiment expressed towards this rule was negative, as it was seen as a potential infringement upon the rights of children and young individuals.

The argument presented was that broad child protection laws have the potential to restrict a child’s access to information and their ability to freely express themselves. Judges who presided over the case acknowledged the importance of striking a balance between child rights and the need for protection from harm.

Steve Del Bianco, in the course of the proceedings, emphasized the significance of considering the best interest of the child.

He argued that the state’s laws should undergo a test that balances the rights of the child with their protection from potential harm. According to Del Bianco, these laws should not excessively limit a child’s access to information or their ability to express their beliefs.

Moreover, it became evident that lawmakers lacked an understanding of the broader implications of their laws.

This led to legal challenges and raised concerns about the effectiveness of these policies. Del Bianco’s organization obtained an injunction that effectively blocked the states from enforcing these laws. It was suggested that lawmakers should be educated and gain a better understanding of the potential consequences of their legislative decisions to avoid such legal challenges.

To summarize, the implementation of a rule requiring verifiable consent for underage individuals to use social media sites in certain US states sparked controversy and legal disputes.

The negative sentiment towards this rule arose from concerns about potential limitations on the rights of children to access information and express themselves freely. The need to strike a balance between child rights and protection from harm was highlighted. Additionally, the lack of understanding by lawmakers about the broader implications of their laws was emphasized, underscoring the importance of better education and consideration in the legislative process.

Report

During the discussion, the speakers highlighted the importance of ensuring the protection and promotion of child rights within AI strategies, policies, and ethical guidelines. They particularly emphasized the significance of these efforts in developing countries, such as Bangladesh. Both speakers stressed the need to include provisions that safeguard child rights in AI policies, especially in nations that are still in the process of development.

The speakers also connected their arguments to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), specifically SDG 4: Quality Education and SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions.

They proposed that by embedding measures to protect child rights in AI strategies and policies, countries can contribute to the achievement of these SDGs. This link between AI development and the attainment of global goals highlights AI’s potential role in promoting inclusive and sustainable development.

Although no specific supporting facts were mentioned during the discussion, the speakers expressed a neutral sentiment towards the topic.

This indicates their desire for a balanced and equitable approach to integrating child rights into AI strategies and policies. By addressing this issue neutrally, the speakers emphasized the need for a comprehensive and ethical framework that protects the rights and well-being of children in the context of AI development.

One notable observation from the analysis is the focus on child rights in the discussion of AI policies.

This underscores the growing recognition of the potential risks and ethical implications that AI may pose for children, particularly in countries with limited resources and regulations. The emphasis on child rights serves as a reminder that as AI continues to advance, it is crucial to ensure that these technologies are developed with the best interests of children in mind.

In conclusion, the discussion underscored the importance of protecting and upholding child rights within AI strategies, policies, and ethical guidelines.

The speakers highlighted the specific significance of this endeavor in developing countries like Bangladesh. The incorporation of child rights in AI policies aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals of Quality Education and Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions. The neutral sentiment expressed by both speakers indicates the need for a balanced approach to addressing this issue.

Overall, the discussion shed light on the need for a comprehensive and ethical framework that safeguards the rights of children amidst the development of AI technologies.