Promoting policies that make digital trade work for all (OECD)

4 Dec 2023 11:30h - 13:00h UTC

official event page

Table of contents

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the UNCTAD eWeek session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed. The official record of the session can be found on the UNCTAD website.

Full session report

Emma Savenborg

The speakers’ points revealed various insightful aspects of the discussions on digital trade. One notable issue highlighted is the lack of digital readiness, which hinders the full engagement of countries in global talks on e-commerce and digital trade. These discussions can be highly technical, and countries that lack digital readiness face challenges in effectively participating. This gap between multinational negotiations and local implementation creates a regulatory discrepancy.

Another topic of discussion was the disparity in approaches and thematic topics covered in digital trade negotiations. African countries frequently prioritize infrastructure, jobs, and market access to ICT goods, while developed countries focus more on cybersecurity, privacy, and data flows. This disparity in priorities and approaches adds complexity to the negotiations.

The intensity and structure of the negotiation processes were also identified as obstacles to full engagement. The demanding nature of these procedures, coupled with resource requirements, can be overwhelming for countries with limited resources. The parallel small group format and connection requirements with the capital further intensify these challenges.

To address these issues, it was suggested that countries initiate regional conversations before engaging in global discussions. This approach allows countries to better understand how to approach digital trade, considering their specific needs and challenges. Regional discussions are seen as a preferred starting point due to concerns over having rules dictated by others based on historical backgrounds.

Lowering barriers of entry and reducing tariff and non-tariff barriers are crucial for supporting e-commerce development. Harmonizing regulations is essential to facilitate international trade, enabling businesses to focus more on innovation and expand markets.

Digital skills and literacy were emphasized as important for SMEs, especially those in informal sectors. Many SMEs operate in informal sectors, and limited digital literacy hinders their ability to adopt advanced technology or upgrade their operations. Public-private partnerships are crucial for improving digital literacy among SMEs and supporting their growth in the digital economy.

There is a growing concern regarding security measures and investment screenings, which can obstruct international trade. These measures make it more challenging for international companies to engage in trade and hinder the free flow of goods and services across borders.

The analysis also highlighted the need to consider diverse policies that impact a country’s ability to export in digital trade negotiations. Developing countries and those facing specific challenges, such as fluctuating currencies, may have different needs and approaches. Inclusive and fair digital trade agreements should consider these factors.

In summary, the analysis underscores the significance of digital readiness, regional and global discussions, barriers reduction, digital literacy improvement, regulation harmonization, and inclusive negotiation processes in advancing digital trade. Connectivity is crucial in the digital economy, and development cooperation should be adapted to support trade in this context. It is also important for policymakers to identify regulatory gaps and communicate specific needs for development assistance that can be addressed by the global development community. By considering these factors, a more inclusive and prosperous environment for digital trade can be fostered.

Javier Lopez Gonzalez

Digitalization and digital trade have been found to offer significant benefits, not only for high-income countries but also for middle-income and low-income countries, as well as companies in all sectors. There is a direct correlation between the use of digital tools and an increase in both domestic and international sales. Specifically, a 1% increase in digital connectivity leads to a 2.1% increase in domestic sales and a 1.6% increase in international sales, as stated by econometric work conducted by the OECD.

However, realizing these benefits requires certain conditions to be met. One key condition is the presence of a regulatory environment that supports digital trade. Unfortunately, restrictions that affect digital trade have been increasing, as indicated by the Digital Services Trade Restrictiveness Index. However, there have also been positive changes, particularly in Africa, where many countries have implemented digital trade-supporting policies.

To effectively harness the benefits of digital trade, countries need to carry out both domestic and international efforts. Domestically, the focus should be on promoting connectivity, providing the necessary skills for the digital economy, and ensuring a supportive regulatory environment. Internationally, efforts should aim to establish an international regulatory framework that facilitates digital trade. Active participation in international trade forums and discussions, such as those held at the WTO, is crucial for the development of comprehensive and effective digital trade policies.

In addition to regulatory challenges, countries must address various other issues, such as digital readiness and connectivity skills. Restrictions on telecommunication services are associated with higher costs for internet access globally. Creating an enabling environment involves reducing tariffs on devices and network equipment, as well as addressing data flow and protection issues.

The recent change in the United States’ position towards digital trade in trade agreements has caused disruptions and increased uncertainty about the future of global digital trade. While there is ongoing internal discussion in the US regarding its position on digital trade, it has taken a step back from the discussions, allowing other actors to have more prominent roles.

There is also a significant gap between the amount of aid allocated for digital trade and the actual amount of trade that relies on digital technology. Bridging this gap and providing adequate support is essential to maximize the potential of digital trade.

Participating in international discussions and observing global trade debates is invaluable for countries to build capacity and enhance their understanding of complex issues related to digital trade. Regulations are important to ensure a fair and balanced digital trade environment, but there needs to be an optimal balance. Too many regulations can impede business expansion, while no regulations can undermine government policy objectives.

The private sector plays a key role in benefiting from trade regulations, and the benefits are driven by private sector actors. Trade regulations aim to ensure that regulations are not biased against specific countries or firms.

Overall, digitalization and digital trade present great opportunities for economic growth and development. To fully realize these benefits, countries need to address regulatory challenges, promote connectivity, enhance digital skills, and strike an optimal balance in regulations. International cooperation and participation in global trade discussions are crucial for capacity building and understanding complex issues.

Devi Ariyani

The analysis of the discussions highlights several important points. Firstly, there is a positive sentiment towards the adoption of digital goods and services in businesses. These digital tools are viewed as crucial in enhancing productivity, lowering costs, facilitating geographical expansion, and promoting inclusivity, particularly for women in the informal sector. A study conducted on 764 small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Indonesia revealed that the adoption of digital goods and services resulted in increased productivity, lower costs, expansion into new markets, and the formalization of previously informal businesses.

The discussions also emphasize the significance of regulatory coherence and certainty for businesses operating in the digital realm. Uncertainty and continuous regulatory changes pose challenges for businesses, especially when attempting to embrace digital technology and expand their operations. Therefore, there is a call for clear and steady regulatory frameworks to support the digitalization efforts of SMEs.

Another important aspect highlighted is the need to reduce barriers and costs associated with adopting digital technology in order to promote inclusive digital trade. Lowering entry barriers and making digital technology more affordable would enable more businesses, especially those in the informal sector, to participate in digital trade. This would contribute to reduced inequalities and support sustainable economic growth as outlined in SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth and SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities.

Connectivity and infrastructure are identified as crucial factors for the development of economies, such as Indonesia. The discussions underscore the importance of improving connectivity and infrastructure to support economic growth and create an enabling environment for digitalization.

Additionally, public-private partnerships are seen as essential in improving connectivity and infrastructure. Collaborative efforts between the public and private sectors are crucial to bridge the gaps in connectivity and infrastructure development, particularly in developing economies like Indonesia. These partnerships are aligned with SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure and SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals.

Furthermore, it is acknowledged that private sector consultation plays a vital role in policy formulation. Engaging with private sector stakeholders before making policies related to technology, innovation, and infrastructure is valuable in generating effective and inclusive policies that can drive sustainable development. This observation underscores the importance of involving all relevant stakeholders when formulating policies.

In conclusion, the analysis of the discussions reveals the positive impact of digital goods and services in supporting core business processes and promoting inclusivity, particularly for women. It emphasizes the need for regulatory coherence and certainty, lower barriers of entry and cost for adopting digital technology, enhanced connectivity and infrastructure, as well as the importance of public-private partnerships and private sector consultation in policy formulation. These findings contribute to the understanding of the role of digitalization and its implications for economic growth, inclusivity, and sustainable development.

H.E. Ronald Saborio

Digital transformation is fundamentally reshaping individuals’ lives and the operations of businesses, leading to increased engagement in international trade. This shift towards digital trade has the potential to level the playing field, but it requires a holistic approach to digital trade policy. This approach should consider issues such as digital skills, technology adoption, and access to digital networks.

One of the key benefits of digitalisation is its ability to bring about greater participation and inclusivity in trade. Smaller firms and women-owned enterprises are finding digital tools to be essential in expanding their export opportunities. Digitalisation has been referred to as a leveller, offering new opportunities for these groups.

However, there are concerns over the increasing barriers and restrictions in digital trade. Barriers are impeding the growth and potential benefits of digitalisation in trade. It is important to address these barriers through regulatory coherence, ensuring security, and establishing predictability in the digital trade environment. Uncertainty and continuously changing regulatory frameworks hinder businesses from expanding and operating effectively in the digital trade landscape.

For digital trade to truly benefit everyone, certain conditions need to be met at both domestic and international levels. A supportive domestic environment is vital, encompassing areas such as domestic policies, education, and infrastructure. At the international level, efforts through plurilateral negotiations at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and regional trade agreements are essential in facilitating digital trade.

Another significant aspect is the positive impact of digital trade on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Adoption of digital technology has led to increased productivity and lower costs for these businesses. Furthermore, digital trade has enabled SMEs to expand their operations beyond their local networks. This has been particularly beneficial for women-owned businesses and previously informal businesses, allowing them to formalise their operations through digital goods and services.

Amidst the benefits of digital trade, challenges remain. Regulatory coherence and compliance in different markets can be complex and pose obstacles to businesses. Different markets have diverse regulations, and navigating this landscape requires the help of digital transformation and compliance officers.

The discussions and narrative in the WTO should be less ideological and more grounded in the reality of industry stakeholders. It is crucial to base trade negotiations on real experiences. Trust is also vital in international trade negotiations. The need for trust is emphasised, and international trade negotiations should be built on trust rather than relying solely on legislation and policies.

Digital readiness is crucial for engagement in global economies. Countries with a lack of digital readiness, particularly in Africa, may be absent from global discussions. Having the necessary digital infrastructure, skills, and policies is essential for countries to actively participate in global economies. The case of Costa Rica highlights the importance of digital readiness, as the country’s decision to join the Information Technology Agreement (ITA) resulted in a boom in its IT sector, becoming its most important export sector.

A future-focused approach to shaping trade policies is advocated, as demonstrated by Costa Rica’s experience. Rather than basing trade policies solely on current production, Costa Rica adopted a forward-thinking approach, leading to the growth of its IT sector. This strategy allowed the country to adapt and capitalise on emerging opportunities.

When it comes to African countries, it is suggested that they may benefit more from greater involvement in global trade discussions rather than focusing solely on regional integration. Learning from the experiences of other countries, especially those that have successfully transitioned from agriculture-based to industrialised economies, can provide valuable insights for African nations.

In conclusion, digital trade, driven by digital transformation, is reshaping international trade and providing new opportunities for businesses and individuals. A holistic approach to digital trade policy is necessary to ensure that the benefits are realised by all. This includes addressing barriers, fostering regulatory coherence, and embracing digital readiness. By doing so, digital trade can contribute to global economic growth, reduce inequalities, and promote inclusive and sustainable development.

Audience

The need for trust and knowledge exchange among nations in international trade negotiations was highlighted. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) was commended for identifying best practices, while the World Trade Organization (WTO) was criticized for its lack of proactive measures in this area. It was stressed that learning from prosperous countries and adopting policies before legislative mandates, as seen in the OECD, can yield positive results. The impact of the United States’ revised position on digital trade and its implications for the Global Services Innovation (GSI) were questioned. The withdrawal of US support for certain provisions, such as trade agreements and data flow provisions, including source codes, has posed challenges in integrating them into a final agreement. Despite this, a possibility of more countries joining negotiations in later stages was suggested. Connectivity issues in rural areas of Latin America and the Caribbean were emphasized, calling for support from the international development community to improve technical readiness. Additionally, the importance of capacity building for effective e-commerce regulations, highlighted in ongoing negotiations in Asia and Africa, was emphasized. Concerns were raised about restrictive government regulations hindering private sector businesses, while others advocated for more accommodating policies to boost economic growth. The discussions reflected the significance of trust, learning from best practices, addressing contentious issues, and promoting collaboration in international trade negotiations.

Taras Tymoshcuk

The analysis examines various arguments and stances regarding digital transformation and policy-making in the IT sector in Ukraine. It highlights the significant growth of the Ukrainian IT sector over the past 30 years, attributing this growth to the benefits derived from digital transformation. The sector currently amounts to approximately $7.3 billion in US dollars. Furthermore, it is noted that each IT professional in the Ukrainian economy creates five new jobs within the local market, emphasizing the positive impact of the sector on employment and economic growth.

However, the analysis also raises concerns regarding the challenges posed by diverse regulations and policy landscapes across different countries. Operating in multiple jurisdictions, such as the United States, UK, and European Union, presents difficulties due to the varying legislative and policy frameworks. This observation underscores the need for standardized and unified global standards for digital transformation to streamline operations and promote efficiency.

The analysis also emphasizes the significant role of governments in creating a favorable policy framework that encourages digital readiness. It argues that governments should prioritize the establishment of policies that enable identity verification, digital services from the government, company incorporation, permits, certification processes, and the opening of bank accounts. These measures are seen as crucial for facilitating business operations and promoting digital transformation.

Furthermore, the analysis highlights the importance of supporting startups as the main drivers of digital transformation. It advocates for investment in startups and the provision of tax credits and research and development (R&D) grants. Startups are recognized for creating platforms and enablers for digital transformation. However, it also notes the presence of barriers that restrict startups with government grants to working only with local entities. This restriction is criticized, with the argument that startups should have the freedom to collaborate with international companies to access quality and innovative services at lower costs.

Additionally, the analysis raises concerns about the impact of withholding taxes on international services. It shares a negative sentiment towards withholding taxes, explaining how they can hinder digital transformation initiatives. An example is provided where withholding taxes were encountered during the digital transformation of a hospital in Latin America. This observation supports the argument against the imposition of such taxes.

The analysis also highlights the value of networking platforms, particularly for small companies from developed nations to interact with local companies in developing nations. It cites a successful experience where participation in the Stockholm Tech Summit led to the speaker’s company securing contracts. This underscores the importance of continued investment in developing networking platforms to foster collaborations and business opportunities.

Furthermore, the analysis advocates for investment in startups focused on alternative energy sources and internet accessibility. It implies that such investment is recommended, as demonstrated through an example where a startup in Kyiv faced infrastructure damage and temporary connectivity loss due to missile attacks. The startup successfully resolved this issue with the help of alternative sources such as Starlinks and alternative energy sources.

The analysis also stresses the significance of policy-making that addresses connectivity and infrastructure. It emphasizes that policy-making should prioritize these areas to ensure the provision of stable and reliable digital services. An example is provided where Kyiv faced heavy missile attacks, leading to infrastructure damage and connectivity issues, reflecting the temporary setbacks that can occur without proper policy measures in place.

Moreover, the analysis argues for the competition and emergence of new technologies for internet access, beyond traditional cables. It asserts that there should be a focus on promoting innovation and the adoption of advanced technologies to enhance internet access capabilities.

Lastly, the analysis highlights the importance of involving the private sector in policy decision making. It advocates for the collaboration of working groups composed of subject matter experts from different businesses and policy-making entities. By involving the private sector in the policy-making process, there is an increased likelihood of better acceptance and buy-in from those impacted by the policies.

In conclusion, the analysis explores various arguments and stances relating to digital transformation and policy-making in the IT sector in Ukraine. It recognizes the growth and benefits derived from digital transformation but also highlights challenges stemming from diverse regulations and policy landscapes. The analysis calls for standardized global standards, favorable policy frameworks, support for startups, removal of barriers, and the involvement of the private sector in policy decision making. By addressing these issues, the Ukrainian IT sector can continue to thrive and contribute to economic growth and innovation.

A

Audience

Speech speed

85 words per minute

Speech length

846 words

Speech time

600 secs

DA

Devi Ariyani

Speech speed

136 words per minute

Speech length

464 words

Speech time

205 secs

ES

Emma Savenborg

Speech speed

158 words per minute

Speech length

3209 words

Speech time

1216 secs

HR

H.E. Ronald Saborio

Speech speed

117 words per minute

Speech length

3570 words

Speech time

1831 secs

JL

Javier Lopez Gonzalez

Speech speed

186 words per minute

Speech length

3140 words

Speech time

1016 secs

TT

Taras Tymoshcuk

Speech speed

173 words per minute

Speech length

1708 words

Speech time

592 secs