The digital economy and enviromental sustainability
7 Dec 2023 10:00h - 11:30h UTC
Knowledge Graph of Debate
Session report
Full session report
Gerry McGovern
The analysis identifies multiple key points regarding the environmental impact of digital tools and technology. Firstly, it highlights the significant negative environmental impact of digital tools. The manufacturing process of devices like smartphones and laptops contributes to CO2 emissions and generates toxic waste and excessive water usage. The manufacturing of cloud servers, essential for data storage and online services, also adds to the environmental burden. Each cloud server is estimated to release between one and two metric tonnes of CO2 emissions, generate between five and ten metric tonnes of toxic mining waste, and consume hundreds of thousands of litres of water.
Another concerning aspect is the alarming growth of electronic waste or e-waste. E-waste is the fastest-growing waste stream globally. By 2050, it is projected that the amount of mining waste generated would be equivalent to the size of Mount Everest each year. This emphasizes the urgent need for proper e-waste management and sustainable practices.
The role of digital platforms like Amazon, Apple, Google, and Facebook in promoting overconsumption is also highlighted. These platforms contribute to rampant consumerism and excessive consumption patterns, depleting resources and exacerbating the environmental impact of manufacturing and disposal processes.
The analysis raises concerns about the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in contributing to environmental issues. While AI has the potential to aid in environmental preservation, the current focus of AI systems on advertising purposes rather than environmental considerations is problematic. There is also a risk of creating larger amounts of unnecessary data through AI, further adding to the environmental burden.
On a positive note, the analysis emphasizes the importance of wisdom and behavioral changes as solutions to the climate crisis. This includes adopting sustainable practices such as increasing walking and cycling and reducing overall consumption. The excessive accumulation of data is also identified, with 90% of stored data remaining unused after three months. This highlights the need for purposeful and efficient use of data, rather than its indiscriminate accumulation.
Furthermore, the analysis underscores the importance of holding big tech companies accountable and implementing regulations. Self-regulation by big tech monopolies is deemed unsatisfactory, considering their negative environmental impact. It is necessary to rein in their activities to ensure more sustainable practices.
A data tax is also suggested as a means to incentivize responsible and efficient data use. Much of the data produced currently is of little value and contributes to inefficiency. A data tax could promote more responsible data practices.
Moreover, the analysis emphasizes the need for international standards and cooperation. Incorporating environmental goals into trade agreements and digital ecosystems is crucial for ensuring responsible consumption and production patterns. Given the global nature of digital ecosystems, collective efforts are necessary to address environmental challenges effectively.
The analysis also highlights the outsourcing of environmental damage to poorer countries. The manufacturing of digital products often leads to mining waste and damage to societies, particularly indigenous communities. Additionally, poorer countries bear the brunt of e-waste dumping, exacerbating environmental and social issues.
Lastly, the analysis reveals the unequal distribution of responsibility for climate damage. The top 10% of the world’s population is responsible for 60% of climate damage, while 50% of the poorest people contribute to only 10% of the damage. This emphasizes the urgency of holding top contributors accountable and striving for a more equitable distribution of environmental responsibility.
In conclusion, the analysis presents a comprehensive overview of the significant negative environmental impacts of digital tools and technology. It calls for accountability, regulation, and changes in behavior to address these issues. Sustainable consumption and production patterns, international cooperation, and data responsibility are crucial in navigating the environmental challenges of the digital era.
Virginie Le Barbu
Lenovo, a global technology company, is committed to achieving net zero targets by 2050. This commitment has been approved by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTI), and Lenovo has been on their sustainability journey for the past 18 years. They are actively working to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
To achieve their climate goals, Lenovo is focusing on circular economy principles. They are developing solutions that consider the design, use, and return levels of their products. By implementing circular economy practices, Lenovo aims to reduce waste and promote the reuse and recycling of materials.
In terms of packaging, Lenovo is actively developing innovative and sustainable options. This approach aligns with SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production, which emphasizes the need to reduce waste and promote sustainable packaging practices. By prioritising sustainable packaging, Lenovo is demonstrating their commitment to responsible consumption and production.
Lenovo is also aware of the importance of responsible procurement in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. They have found that 56% of their emissions are linked to their upstream ecosystem, and 46% are linked to their downstream ecosystem. To address this, Lenovo is asking its suppliers to disclose emission and ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) data. They are also promoting energy efficiency and renewable energy practices among their suppliers. Through these efforts, Lenovo aims to reduce emissions throughout their supply chain.
Collaboration is another key aspect of Lenovo’s sustainability approach. They recognise that 46% of their emissions come from the way people use their products. Therefore, they believe that collaboration between the private sector and larger organisations is crucial for achieving environmental sustainability. By working together, these entities can share knowledge and resources to promote sustainable practices.
Lenovo acknowledges the changing expectations of consumers. They have observed that consumers now consider ESG criteria when selecting suppliers. This means that consumers prioritize environmentally responsible and socially conscious business practices. In response to this shift, Lenovo emphasizes the importance of training consumers to use their devices and solutions efficiently. This not only reduces energy consumption but also extends the lifespan of their products.
Policy advancement is another area of focus for Lenovo. They believe that policy initiatives are necessary to enhance collaboration between the private, public, and institutional sectors. Lenovo emphasizes the need for new policies and rules that can support and accelerate the transition towards a more sustainable digital economy. By aligning policies across sectors, there is potential for greater collaboration and unified efforts towards environmental sustainability.
In conclusion, Lenovo is committed to sustainability and has set ambitious net zero targets for the future. They are incorporating circular economy principles into their solutions, developing sustainable packaging options, and working to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through responsible procurement. Lenovo recognizes the importance of collaboration across sectors and emphasizes the need for training consumers to use their products efficiently. They also advocate for policy advancements to foster collaboration and accelerate the transition towards a sustainable digital economy.
Laura Létourneau
The use of digital technologies and data is considered necessary to bridge the implementation gap in ecological planning and transition. These technologies play a crucial role in combating climate change and biodiversity loss. It is recognized that an efficient and fair ecological transition requires the incorporation of digital technologies and the utilization of data.
However, it is important to regulate the risks associated with these technologies. Privacy concerns, issues related to artificial intelligence, and the digital divide need to be addressed to ensure the responsible and ethical use of digital technologies. Regulations should be put in place to mitigate these risks, approaching the development of digital technologies from an ethical, citizen-oriented, and humanist framework.
Furthermore, the implementation of public platform theory, which operates similarly to a city, is proposed for effective data management in ecological planning. Just as public authorities develop rules and regulations for urbanization and traffic control, digital technologies and infrastructure should be regulated in the same manner.
The importance of regulation and evaluation is emphasized in implementing an effective data management plan. Regular evaluations are planned to ensure efficient data management, and innovative solutions are sought. This approach addresses the challenges and complexities of managing data in ecological planning.
To accomplish the ecological planning plan, a collective journey involving all stakeholders from different sectors is necessary. This includes representation from local levels, such as regions and cities, as well as engagement with external stakeholders such as private companies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and agencies. Collaboration and involvement of all parties are crucial for the plan’s success.
While digital technologies and data play vital roles, it is important to balance their use with their impact on the environment and privacy. The French government acknowledges the need to find a balance between the opportunities offered by digital technologies and the protection of data needed for effective ecological planning. The government is concerned with ensuring that the shared data is necessary for implementing green technologies and minimizing environmental impact.
It is also highlighted that changes in consumption behaviors are of significant importance. Seeking technological solutions alone, without addressing the need for changes in consumption patterns, can overlook crucial aspects of sustainability. Information needs to be shared for effective planning, including identifying appropriate locations for renewable energy implementation.
Regulation is necessary to ensure the private sector adheres to rules, ethics, interoperability, and security. There is recognition of the need to regulate private sector practices to ensure the responsible and ethical use of digital technologies. Europe is working on implementing regulations, such as the Data Act Regulation and DMA and GSA, to ensure compliance among private sector entities.
Building alternative public platforms is suggested to aid in regulation and encourage compliance in the private sector. Such platforms can help guide the private sector in using the right data and methods while respecting ethical and quality standards.
Additionally, public platforms can support the private sector’s transition to greener practices. By leveraging digital components and data sharing infrastructure, the private sector can develop innovative environmental services and contribute to sustainable practices.
France emphasizes the importance of an efficient and fair green transition. The country recognizes its responsibility, along with developed countries, in addressing climate impact due to their past actions. It is crucial to focus efforts on an ecological and fair transition.
The issue of climate change is highlighted as a complex and systemic problem that requires integrated responses. It affects all demographic groups and regions, making holistic and interdisciplinary approaches essential.
Digital technology is regarded as playing a significant role in addressing climate change. Its potential is recognized in areas such as data collection, monitoring, and modeling climate change. By leveraging digital technologies, more sustainable practices can be developed to contribute to an efficient and fair green transition.
In conclusion, the use of digital technologies and data is necessary to fill the implementation gap in ecological planning and transition towards a sustainable future. Although risks are associated with these technologies, such as privacy concerns and the digital divide, regulation and ethical frameworks are essential. A collective journey involving all stakeholders, regulation, and public platform theory are means to ensure effective data management and encourage compliance in the private sector. Balancing the use of digital technologies with environmental impact and privacy considerations, alongside changes in consumption behaviors, is vital. The emphasis on an efficient and fair green transition, acknowledging responsibility, addressing climate change as a complex issue, and recognizing the role of digital technology in fighting climate change and biodiversity loss are key takeaways from the analysis.
Isabelle Kumar
The discussions highlight the interconnectedness between the digital economy and sustainability, acknowledging that they have a complex relationship. On one hand, the digital economy shows promise in reducing emissions and contributing to the goals set in the Paris Climate Accords. It has the potential to help reach the 1.5-degree targets, but this potential must be harnessed carefully to avoid adverse environmental consequences.
Sustainability is argued to be a crucial aspect that should be at the heart of all discussions and actions regarding the digital economy. This is particularly important given the current era of accelerated digital transformation. It is emphasized that sustainability needs to be the primary focus during this period of rapid technological advancement.
Infrastructure plays a vital role in digital regulation. The discussions highlight the importance of comprehensive regulation, which includes alternatives to existing infrastructure. It is suggested that infrastructure should be adapted to support digital regulation effectively. The development of the public platform theory, based on Laura’s experience in RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership), is seen as a valuable step in this direction. The public platform theory aids in enforcing rules and ethics on the private sector and provides a mechanism to observe compliance. It is argued that comprehensive regulation is required to address the diverse aspects of the digital economy, such as digital ethics, security, and infrastructure.
There is support for a balanced approach between the public platform and the private sector. The public platform is seen as an effective tool for regulating the private sector and achieving compliance. Additionally, it is believed that the private sector can benefit from becoming more ‘greener’ and providing newer environmental services. The discussions highlight the potential for public-private partnerships in achieving sustainability goals.
Collaboration is emphasized as a crucial element in the pursuit of sustainability. It is acknowledged that no single entity can achieve sustainability alone. The provision of infrastructure is seen as a catalyst for collaboration and progress. Collaborative efforts are essential in addressing the challenges associated with sustainability and achieving the desired goals.
In conclusion, the discussions underline the intricate relationship between the digital economy and sustainability. While the digital economy has the potential to contribute to environmental goals, careful management is necessary to mitigate risks. Sustainability should be a central consideration in all discussions and actions related to the digital economy, especially during the current era of accelerated transformation. Infrastructure plays a crucial role in digital regulation, requiring comprehensive regulations and alternatives to existing infrastructure. Collaboration is identified as a key element in achieving sustainability, and infrastructure provision can facilitate collaboration and progress towards sustainability goals.
Torbjörn Fredriksson
Digital technologies and innovations, such as the Internet of Things, robotics, and artificial intelligence, have the potential to revolutionize energy management, enhance efficiency, and facilitate the adoption of low-emission technologies. These advancements were highlighted by one speaker who emphasized their role in reshaping the energy sector and supporting sustainable practices in addressing environmental challenges. By incorporating digital technologies into energy management systems, it becomes possible to optimize resource use, reduce CO2 emissions, and improve overall operational efficiency. This has the potential to drive progress towards SDG 9, which focuses on industry, innovation, and infrastructure, as well as SDG 13, which aims to combat climate change.
However, the rapid digital transformation also brings about concerns regarding its environmental impact. Another speaker expressed worries about issues such as raw material depletion, energy and water usage, air quality, pollution, and waste generation. It was noted that global data centres alone accounted for approximately 1.3% of global electricity consumption in 2022, highlighting the significant energy demand associated with digital activities. Furthermore, it was highlighted that digital devices, data centres, and ICT networks account for a substantial portion, ranging from 6% to 12%, of global energy use. These concerns suggest the need for careful management and sustainable practices to mitigate the growing environmental footprint of digitalisation.
To address these concerns, it was emphasised that embracing sustainable practices is crucial in lessening the environmental impact of digitalisation and promoting ecological sustainability. The inclusion of energy efficiency, responsible resource management, renewable energy generation, and e-waste recycling was highlighted as essential components of managing digital transformation sustainably. Additionally, supporting least developed countries and small island developing states was deemed crucial in helping them navigate the challenges and leverage the opportunities presented by digital technologies. This aligns with SDG 7, which promotes affordable and clean energy, SDG 12, which advocates for responsible consumption and production, and SDG 13, which addresses Climate Action.
Multiple stakeholders were called upon to collaborate and work together in tackling the challenges associated with digitalisation. By fostering partnerships and leveraging collective expertise, these stakeholders can effectively address the multifaceted aspects of digital transformation, including environmental concerns. This collaboration aligns with SDG 17, which emphasises the importance of partnerships for achieving sustainable development goals.
It was also highlighted that developing countries face unique challenges and downsides in relation to digitalisation. These countries often lack the capabilities to fully take advantage of digital opportunities, which can exacerbate inequalities on a global scale. Furthermore, developing countries often receive significant amounts of e-waste, posing environmental and health risks. These observations reiterate the need for inclusive and equitable digitalisation, as well as support for developing nations to bridge the digital divide and ensure that they can reap the benefits of the digital revolution.
Tech platforms were recognised for playing a significant role in shaping digital transformation. With privileged access and control over massive data resources, these platforms hold considerable power in influencing the direction of digitalisation. It is important to monitor and regulate their practices to ensure that the benefits of digitalisation are equitably distributed and that privacy concerns are adequately addressed.
Global dialogue and collaboration were emphasised as vital in managing the changes brought about by digitalisation. By accelerating the discussion and sharing best practices, stakeholders can collectively navigate the challenges and uncertainties associated with digital transformation. Finding a balanced approach, rather than viewing digitalisation as a black-or-white situation, was highlighted as a crucial solution. This resonates with SDG 16, which aims to establish peace, justice, and strong institutions.
In conclusion, digital technologies offer immense potential in transforming energy management, improving efficiency, and supporting sustainable practices. However, the rapid pace of digital transformation also presents environmental challenges that must be carefully managed through the adoption of sustainable practices. Collaboration among multiple stakeholders is essential in addressing these challenges and ensuring that digitalisation benefits all nations, particularly developing countries. By embracing a balanced and inclusive approach, we can harness the power of digital technologies while minimizing their negative impact and fostering a sustainable and equitable digital future.
Golestan (Sally) Radwan
The discussions at COP28 focused on the need for a global environmental data strategy. It was acknowledged that there is a significant amount of fragmented and inadequate data available. To ensure effective decision-making, data needs to be reliable and suitable for specific applications. Stakeholders emphasized the importance of data interoperability, as it allows for the layering and combination of data, leading to more comprehensive analysis and better decision-making. It was argued that a global environmental data strategy is necessary to address issues around fair distribution and benefit extraction from data.
The United Nations (UN) was expected to take the lead in developing and implementing the global environmental data strategy. Stakeholders expressed their expectation that the UN should play a crucial role in this process. There was an overall sense of optimism from COP28, indicating progress in addressing environmental issues through data and technology.
The discussions also highlighted the potential of emerging technologies, such as generative AI. These technologies have the capability to provide dynamic and custom analysis. Non-technical staff can use a natural language interface to express their needs, and generative AI can generate various forms of information, including text, videos, images, and geo-spatial data.
Countries and stakeholders expressed their desire for sophisticated analyses and decision support for digital environmental issues. They emphasized the need for visualizing data on maps and other platforms, as well as the importance of flexibility to accommodate the varying needs of policymakers.
The role of the private sector in environmental sustainability was another important topic of discussion. While technology can be a useful tool in addressing environmental challenges, there is a need to hold the private sector accountable for any potential environmental damage caused by their solutions. However, it was also recognized that the private sector has shown a willingness to contribute to preserving the environment, and closer collaboration between public and private sectors is necessary.
Consumers were encouraged to demand transparency and accountability from businesses to prioritize environmental issues. It was noted that businesses primarily exist to make money, and without consumer demand for responsible consumption and production, environmental concerns may not be prioritized by the private sector.
In conclusion, the discussions at COP28 highlighted the importance of a global environmental data strategy, data interoperability, and the use of emerging technologies for comprehensive analysis. The UN is expected to take the lead in the global environmental data strategy, and there is a sense of optimism regarding progress in addressing environmental challenges. Closer collaboration between public and private sectors, as well as consumer demand for transparency and accountability, are crucial in prioritizing environmental issues. The role of technology as both a tool and a potential source of environmental damage was recognized, calling for a balanced approach that promotes environmental responsibility.
Audience
The discussions centred around various topics concerning the digital economy and the environment. One argument highlighted that data centres are mostly located in tax havens, rather than in energy-efficient locations. These tax havens attract data centres due to their economic benefits, but this raises concerns about the environmental impact and energy consumption of these centres. The presence of data centres in tax havens emphasises the need to consider energy efficiency when deciding on their locations.
Another argument emphasised the need to incorporate environmental considerations into free trade agreements. The current agreements do not adequately address environmental concerns, disregarding the potential negative effects of trade activities on the environment. This underlines the importance of ensuring that trade agreements account for environmental impacts and promote sustainable practices.
The dire state of the planet was highlighted by pointing out various indicators, including CO2 levels, global average temperature rise, glacier retreat, and the expansion of desert areas. These indicators provide compelling evidence of serious environmental problems, highlighting the urgent need for action to address climate change and mitigate its impact.
However, a speaker challenged the notion that more data is necessary to understand the state of the environment. Instead, they argued for the importance of wisdom and action based on existing data. This perspective suggests that while data is valuable, it should not hinder necessary measures to protect the environment.
It was noted that significant changes often occur in response to global crises, such as the recent cutbacks in air travel prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic and energy price shocks. This observation underscores the reactive nature of society and the need for substantial global events to drive major behavioural shifts.
In a positive light, one speaker advocated for a shift towards traditional values and a slower pace of living. They shared their personal experience of choosing train travel over flying, promoting the idea that contentment should take precedence over mere productivity. This perspective aligns with the sustainable consumption and production goals of the United Nations.
The acceleration of global warming was a cause for concern, with evidence indicating that it is happening at an alarming rate. Global warming has doubled in speed since 1981, highlighting the need for immediate action to combat climate change and prevent further harm to the planet.
The discussions also touched on the need for legislation in the digital ecosystem. The upcoming ministerial conference in February was highlighted as a platform for further discussions and decision-making. The question of whether legislation should be implemented at the national or international level was raised, calling for clarity on the jurisdiction responsible for regulating the digital ecosystem.
France was commended for its sustainable data value chains; however, concerns were raised regarding the historical context of France’s energy practices. The reliance on nuclear energy, with significant uranium extraction in Africa, notably Niger, raised questions about the overall sustainability of France’s data practices. This highlights the importance of considering the broader environmental impacts associated with data value chains.
Lastly, there was advocacy for a greener future in the digital economy, where data flows ensure that countries receive economic value from their data. This perspective emphasises the need for a fair distribution of economic benefits and calls for policies that enable countries to fully utilise the economic potential of their data.
Overall, the discussions emphasised the need to address environmental concerns in the digital economy and the importance of sustainable practices in trade agreements and data management. The urgency of taking action on climate change and the significance of making informed decisions based on existing data were also prominent themes. These insights provide valuable considerations for policymakers, businesses, and individuals as they navigate the intersection of the digital economy and environmental sustainability.
Foluso Ojo
The discussions revealed several noteworthy points regarding sustainability and the logistics sector in Africa. It was noted that Africa’s sustainability efforts are still at a basic stage, with a primary focus on waste management, recycling, and reducing fossil emissions. This suggests that there is room for improvement in implementing more comprehensive and sustainable practices.
On a positive note, the logistics sector in Africa presents boundless opportunities. Solutions such as trip aggregation and route optimization technology have been found to enhance efficiency in the sector. This indicates that there is potential for growth and innovation within the industry.
However, it was brought to attention that the logistics sector in Africa is plagued by gender discrimination. Many decisions and activities exclude women, and an overwhelming 99.1% of the drivers on the truck.ng platform, for example, are male. This highlights the need for increased gender inclusivity and equal opportunities within the logistics sector.
Another important point emphasized during the discussions is the need for sustainability solutions to be developed with a global perspective. It was noted that the challenges faced across different continents and worlds are different, and therefore, sustainable practices must take into account these variations.
Furthermore, it was argued that governmental investment in creating environmental awareness and infrastructure is crucial. Businesses find it difficult to embrace environmental practices without proper support and infrastructure. Public-private partnerships were also highlighted as essential for the effective implementation of sustainable practices.
Digital literacy among businesses was identified as essential for understanding environmental practices. It was emphasized that businesses must comprehend the impact of their actions on the environment and possess awareness and understanding to make informed decisions.
Enforcement of sustainability laws and rewarding businesses for sustainable practices were seen as important measures. It was noted that practices and rules supporting environmental sustainability are not adequately enforced, and offering incentives for sustainable practices can encourage wider participation.
Adequate awareness of climate change and carbon emissions was stressed as necessary. Both individuals and businesses need to be properly informed about these issues to take appropriate actions. It was acknowledged that businesses and individuals cannot combat what they do not know.
In conclusion, the discussions highlighted the need for Africa to further develop its sustainability efforts, address gender discrimination in the logistics sector, adopt a global perspective in sustainable practices, invest in environmental awareness and infrastructure, promote digital literacy for businesses, enforce sustainability laws, and raise awareness of climate change and carbon emissions. These insights can serve as valuable guidance for policymakers, businesses, and individuals who aim to contribute to a more sustainable future in Africa.
Speakers
A
Audience
Speech speed
174 words per minute
Speech length
1443 words
Speech time
499 secs
FO
Foluso Ojo
Speech speed
197 words per minute
Speech length
1077 words
Speech time
328 secs
GM
Gerry McGovern
Speech speed
152 words per minute
Speech length
1148 words
Speech time
453 secs
G(
Golestan (Sally) Radwan
Speech speed
161 words per minute
Speech length
1551 words
Speech time
578 secs
IK
Isabelle Kumar
Speech speed
177 words per minute
Speech length
3101 words
Speech time
1051 secs
LL
Laura Létourneau
Speech speed
152 words per minute
Speech length
3167 words
Speech time
1248 secs
TF
Torbjörn Fredriksson
Speech speed
167 words per minute
Speech length
1579 words
Speech time
567 secs
VL
Virginie Le Barbu
Speech speed
209 words per minute
Speech length
1194 words
Speech time
343 secs
Related event
