How to Prevent an Anxious Generation?
18 Jan 2024 09:00h - 09:30h
Event report
From the advent of smartphone apps to novel incentive structures on social media, the latest technological advances mark a change in the nature of childhood in recent years, removing limits to screen time and impacting time for play and face-to-face conversations.
What steps are needed to tackle emerging harms for children and young adults and reverse the trend of a growing anxious generation?
More info: WEF 2024.
Table of contents
Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the WEF session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed. The official record of the session can be found on the WEF YouTube channel.
Knowledge Graph of Debate
Session report
Full session report
Nita Farahany
The constant use of technology by children is reshaping their cognitive landscape, resulting in negative consequences such as increased anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbances. From 2014 to 2023, there has been a significant rise in the number of children who are almost constantly online. Excessive screen time is believed to contribute to the growing trend of psychological issues among children.
However, it is important to acknowledge that not all screen time is bad. Technology can be beneficial for children when used actively for educational purposes and critical thinking. Generative AI, for example, shows promise in providing tailor-made tutoring experiences for each child based on their individual needs and experiences. Striking a balance in children’s exposure to technology is crucial, promoting active and purposeful use while avoiding excessive and passive consumption.
Education and policy play a vital role in redesigning technology with children’s cognitive liberty and well-being in mind. Countries like Finland have integrated technology into their curriculums to prepare children for misinformation and ensure digital literacy. Privacy-first social media platforms and child standard policies, seen in the UK, EU, and China, aim to protect children’s privacy and prevent targeted advertisements and data extraction.
Parents require more education and practical advice to manage their children’s screen usage effectively. Current recommendations, such as limiting screen time to two hours per day, lack practicality. By offering more nuanced and evidence-based guidance, parents can navigate the complex landscape of technology usage better.
The impact of screens on individuals is complex and extends beyond the content consumed. It involves trade-offs in terms of digital immersion versus real-world experiences. Even when people limit their screen time and report feeling happier, they tend to revert back to their devices. This could be due to dopamine hits from device rewards or the influence of peers and established cognitive constructs around digital immersion.
Peer pressure and addiction can also significantly influence a child’s screen usage. Children who do not have phones or devices due to peer pressure may face negative social consequences. Consideration of these factors is crucial for developing guidelines and policies around children’s screen usage.
On a positive note, incorporating technology in child development can empower children and reduce inequalities. Platforms like Mightier, designed for cognitive and emotional development, have a positive impact on children’s growth and learning.
Data privacy is another critical aspect to consider. Nita Farahany advocates for children’s data privacy protection. Implementing policies to protect children’s data privacy is essential for their safety and well-being.
In conclusion, while the constant use of technology by children has drawbacks, not all screen time is detrimental. To navigate the complex landscape of children and technology, it is important to strike a balance, redesign technology with children’s well-being in mind, provide education and practical advice to parents, and protect children’s data privacy.
Tali Sharot
The analysis explored various topics related to mental health and online engagement, including the existence of a feedback loop between declining mental health and negative online searches. Research has indicated that individuals suffering from depression or anxiety are more likely to have negative thoughts, leading them to conduct further negative searches online. This perpetuates a cycle that worsens their symptoms over time.
To address this issue, the concept of ‘nutrition labels’ for webpages was proposed. These labels would offer users information about the content’s positivity or negativity, its potential to enhance knowledge, and its likelihood to influence actions. By implementing these labels through a browser plugin, users would be able to make more informed decisions about the type of content they consume, potentially improving their mental well-being.
The analysis also highlighted the benefits of taking breaks from social media, particularly platforms like Facebook. Economist Hans Alcott conducted a study in which 1,000 individuals were paid $100 each to abstain from using Facebook for a month. The study found that these individuals experienced higher levels of well-being and happiness compared to those who continued using the platform. However, despite reporting improved well-being, many participants returned to Facebook after the experiment, thus underestimating the negative impact of social media on their happiness.
Additionally, the analysis explored the notion that excessive social media use mirrors addiction. Addiction is characterized by escalated usage over time and continued use despite awareness of its negative effects. Even though individuals acknowledge the detrimental consequences of social media use, they persist in engaging with it.
The importance of policy intervention in addressing the effects of social media was emphasized. At present, there are limited regulations in place, and platforms themselves are unlikely to voluntarily implement necessary changes. The speakers stressed the need for policymakers to create incentives for platforms to address the negative impacts of social media and combat misinformation.
Furthermore, age restrictions on data usage were supported, particularly in the context of safeguarding children. The argument put forth is that data usage should be restricted to protect children from potential abuse, exploitation, trafficking, violence, and torture.
In conclusion, the analysis shed light on the intricate relationship between mental health and online engagement. It underscored the need for measures such as ‘nutrition labels’ for webpages, breaks from social media, policy intervention, and age restrictions on data usage to mitigate the adverse effects of online engagement and promote good mental health.
Adam Grant
Tali Sharot, a researcher, has developed a plugin that acts like a nutritional label for webpage content. This innovative tool provides users with a preliminary idea of whether the content is positive or negative. Adam Grant, an advocate for mental health, supports the use of such plugins, recognizing their potential in aiding individuals’ mental well-being.
Regarding children’s mental health, Adam Grant expresses concern over the negative impact of early exposure to smartphones and social media. Grant highlights a study involving over 27,000 participants, which revealed poorer mental health outcomes in young adults who were given smartphones at an early age. Interestingly, the study found that girls appeared to be particularly vulnerable to the detrimental effects.
The discussions undertaken by both Tali Sharot and Adam Grant emphasize the significance of mental health, especially in the digital age. They advocate for the implementation of tools and interventions that can assist individuals in maintaining their overall well-being.
In conclusion, Tali Sharot’s plugin serves as a helpful tool by providing users with a forewarning about the positivity or negativity of webpage content. Adam Grant supports the use of such plugins and raises concerns about the adverse effects of early exposure to smartphones and social media on children’s mental health. Both speakers underscore the importance of mental health and endorse the adoption of strategies to promote well-being in today’s digital landscape.
Speakers
AG
Adam Grant
Speech speed
222 words per minute
Speech length
529 words
Speech time
143 secs
Arguments
Adam Grant is in favour of more users using plugins that help gauge the positivity or negativity of web content, which may aid with mental health.
Supporting facts:
- Tali Sharot has developed a plugin that acts like a nutrition label for webpage content, giving users forewarning about the positivity or negativity of the content.
Topics: mental health, internet usage, plugins
Report
Tali Sharot, a researcher, has developed a plugin that acts like a nutritional label for webpage content. This innovative tool provides users with a preliminary idea of whether the content is positive or negative. Adam Grant, an advocate for mental health, supports the use of such plugins, recognizing their potential in aiding individuals’ mental well-being.
Regarding children’s mental health, Adam Grant expresses concern over the negative impact of early exposure to smartphones and social media. Grant highlights a study involving over 27,000 participants, which revealed poorer mental health outcomes in young adults who were given smartphones at an early age.
Interestingly, the study found that girls appeared to be particularly vulnerable to the detrimental effects. The discussions undertaken by both Tali Sharot and Adam Grant emphasize the significance of mental health, especially in the digital age. They advocate for the implementation of tools and interventions that can assist individuals in maintaining their overall well-being.
In conclusion, Tali Sharot’s plugin serves as a helpful tool by providing users with a forewarning about the positivity or negativity of webpage content. Adam Grant supports the use of such plugins and raises concerns about the adverse effects of early exposure to smartphones and social media on children’s mental health.
Both speakers underscore the importance of mental health and endorse the adoption of strategies to promote well-being in today’s digital landscape.
NF
Nita Farahany
Speech speed
188 words per minute
Speech length
3971 words
Speech time
1269 secs
Arguments
The constant use of technology by children is reshaping their cognitive landscape
Supporting facts:
- From 2014 and 15 to 23, there is a roughly doubling of children who are almost constantly online
- The increasing trend of anxiety and depression as well as sleep disturbances due to excessive screen time
Topics: Children and Technology, Internet Usage
There must be a balance in children’s exposure to technology
Supporting facts:
- The advice given by Gen Z to future generations focuses on managing and limiting screen time.
- Cultivating digital intelligence can prepare children for a world of increasing digital immersion.
Topics: Children and Technology, Digital Wellness
Parents need more education and concrete advice on children’s screen usage
Supporting facts:
- Evidence from the UK indicates that 3-year-olds are increasingly owning smartphones
- Current advice such as limiting screen time to two hours per day from the American Pediatric Association lacks nuance and practicality
Topics: Parenting, Education, Screen Time, Childhood Development
No black and white rules apply when giving a child a phone or a device
Supporting facts:
- There are negative social consequences for children who don’t get a phone or a device due to peer pressure
Topics: Screen Time, Social Pressure, Parenting
The overuse of screens is problematic because it replaces other vital activities
Supporting facts:
- People on persistent screen time are not going outside, engaging in nature or having face-to-face interactions
- There is a decline in hours of sleep for children due to late night screen time.
- Studies show sleep disturbances due to constant engagement with screens.
Topics: Social media, Screen time, Childhood experience
People go back to devices due to various reasons such as cognitive constructs, peer influence and reward stimulation
Supporting facts:
- Kids who limited screen time to 30 minutes a day were happier, yet still went back to devices.
- The dopamine hits from the rewards of being on the devices are a possible reason.
- It could be due to the influence of friends being on social media or the cognitive constructs established around digital immersion.
Topics: Social media, Screen time, Childhood experience, Peer influence, Cognitive constructs
Addiction alone doesn’t tell a story
Supporting facts:
- a friend’s usage of nicotine patches
Topics: Addiction, Nicotine, Stimulants
Kids’ incorporation on devices should lead to their empowerment and development
Supporting facts:
- Usage of video game platforms like Mightier designed for cognitive and emotional development
Topics: Technology, Child development, Online platforms
Nita Farahany advocates for privacy around data for kids.
Topics: Data Privacy, Child Protection
Report
The constant use of technology by children is reshaping their cognitive landscape, resulting in negative consequences such as increased anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbances. From 2014 to 2023, there has been a significant rise in the number of children who are almost constantly online.
Excessive screen time is believed to contribute to the growing trend of psychological issues among children. However, it is important to acknowledge that not all screen time is bad. Technology can be beneficial for children when used actively for educational purposes and critical thinking.
Generative AI, for example, shows promise in providing tailor-made tutoring experiences for each child based on their individual needs and experiences. Striking a balance in children’s exposure to technology is crucial, promoting active and purposeful use while avoiding excessive and passive consumption.
Education and policy play a vital role in redesigning technology with children’s cognitive liberty and well-being in mind. Countries like Finland have integrated technology into their curriculums to prepare children for misinformation and ensure digital literacy. Privacy-first social media platforms and child standard policies, seen in the UK, EU, and China, aim to protect children’s privacy and prevent targeted advertisements and data extraction.
Parents require more education and practical advice to manage their children’s screen usage effectively. Current recommendations, such as limiting screen time to two hours per day, lack practicality. By offering more nuanced and evidence-based guidance, parents can navigate the complex landscape of technology usage better.
The impact of screens on individuals is complex and extends beyond the content consumed. It involves trade-offs in terms of digital immersion versus real-world experiences. Even when people limit their screen time and report feeling happier, they tend to revert back to their devices.
This could be due to dopamine hits from device rewards or the influence of peers and established cognitive constructs around digital immersion. Peer pressure and addiction can also significantly influence a child’s screen usage. Children who do not have phones or devices due to peer pressure may face negative social consequences.
Consideration of these factors is crucial for developing guidelines and policies around children’s screen usage. On a positive note, incorporating technology in child development can empower children and reduce inequalities. Platforms like Mightier, designed for cognitive and emotional development, have a positive impact on children’s growth and learning.
Data privacy is another critical aspect to consider. Nita Farahany advocates for children’s data privacy protection. Implementing policies to protect children’s data privacy is essential for their safety and well-being. In conclusion, while the constant use of technology by children has drawbacks, not all screen time is detrimental.
To navigate the complex landscape of children and technology, it is important to strike a balance, redesign technology with children’s well-being in mind, provide education and practical advice to parents, and protect children’s data privacy.
TS
Tali Sharot
Speech speed
211 words per minute
Speech length
1102 words
Speech time
314 secs
Arguments
People with worse mental health are more likely to conduct searches that lead them to negative information, causing a feedback loop that worsens symptoms
Supporting facts:
- Research has found a feedback loop between worse mental health and the impact of online searches
- People with depression or anxiety are more likely to have negative thoughts, leading to more negative searches online
Topics: Mental Health, Online Engagement, Digital Behaviour
Creation of ‘nutrition labels’ for webpages can empower users to make better decisions on content consumption
Supporting facts:
- This concept allows users to make informed decisions on whether to consume negative or positive content
- These ‘nutrition labels’ for webpages would be delivered through a browser plugin and include information on how positive or negative the content is, how likely it is to enhance knowledge, and how likely it is to influence actions
Topics: Online Content Consumption, Mental Health
Causational studies show a decrease in depression and increase in happiness when people took a break from Facebook
Supporting facts:
- The economist Hans Alcott conducted a study paying 1,000 individuals $100 each to get off Facebook for a month, and then 1,000 individuals, he paid them $100 to just go on as usual. At the end of the month, he measured well-being, and on every single dimension, those people who were off Facebook for a month were doing better, less depressed, happier.
Topics: Social media, Mental health, Facebook, Digital Detox
Overuse of social media mirrors addiction
Supporting facts:
- Addiction is characterized by increasing usage with time and continued use despite awareness of negative effects.
- Despite the known negative effects of social media use, people continue to use it.
- Some people are willing to pay money for social media not to exist.
Topics: Social Media Overuse, Addiction
Sharot believes policy is urgently needed to regulate social media and its effects
Supporting facts:
- There is currently very little policy on social media regulation
- Platforms themselves are unlikely to implement necessary changes
- Policymakers need to create incentives for these changes
Topics: Policy, Social Media Regulation, Mental Health
Data usage should be age restricted
Topics: data usage, age restriction
Report
The analysis explored various topics related to mental health and online engagement, including the existence of a feedback loop between declining mental health and negative online searches. Research has indicated that individuals suffering from depression or anxiety are more likely to have negative thoughts, leading them to conduct further negative searches online.
This perpetuates a cycle that worsens their symptoms over time. To address this issue, the concept of ‘nutrition labels’ for webpages was proposed. These labels would offer users information about the content’s positivity or negativity, its potential to enhance knowledge, and its likelihood to influence actions.
By implementing these labels through a browser plugin, users would be able to make more informed decisions about the type of content they consume, potentially improving their mental well-being. The analysis also highlighted the benefits of taking breaks from social media, particularly platforms like Facebook.
Economist Hans Alcott conducted a study in which 1,000 individuals were paid $100 each to abstain from using Facebook for a month. The study found that these individuals experienced higher levels of well-being and happiness compared to those who continued using the platform.
However, despite reporting improved well-being, many participants returned to Facebook after the experiment, thus underestimating the negative impact of social media on their happiness. Additionally, the analysis explored the notion that excessive social media use mirrors addiction. Addiction is characterized by escalated usage over time and continued use despite awareness of its negative effects.
Even though individuals acknowledge the detrimental consequences of social media use, they persist in engaging with it. The importance of policy intervention in addressing the effects of social media was emphasized. At present, there are limited regulations in place, and platforms themselves are unlikely to voluntarily implement necessary changes.
The speakers stressed the need for policymakers to create incentives for platforms to address the negative impacts of social media and combat misinformation. Furthermore, age restrictions on data usage were supported, particularly in the context of safeguarding children. The argument put forth is that data usage should be restricted to protect children from potential abuse, exploitation, trafficking, violence, and torture.
In conclusion, the analysis shed light on the intricate relationship between mental health and online engagement. It underscored the need for measures such as ‘nutrition labels’ for webpages, breaks from social media, policy intervention, and age restrictions on data usage to mitigate the adverse effects of online engagement and promote good mental health.