Uncategorized

Report

The Global Digital Compact (GDC) is viewed as a crucial tool for addressing global challenges, and it should be considered within the broader context of global issues. The completion of the consultation phase of the GDC, with over 7,000 entities providing inputs, is seen as a significant milestone.

Efforts to enhance multi-stakeholder engagement and inclusivity are necessary, inspired by the Secretary-General’s vision on digital cooperation. Balancing multilateral processes and multi-stakeholder engagement is acknowledged as a challenge, but innovative approaches have been taken, such as involving stakeholders in sensitive discussions.

Stakeholders are encouraged to engage with local member states to foster greater involvement. Areas such as the digital economy and development issues require greater emphasis and action. The policy brief on the GDC outlines a strategic vision, addressing the digital divide, human rights, and agile governance.

Gender inclusion and youth participation are emphasized as important themes. Accountability and adaptability are vital for the digital future, and the fragmented landscape of digital issues calls for better coordination. Critical gaps exist in addressing issues like misinformation, disinformation, AI governance, and human rights accountability.

The success of the summit of the future rests on raising the level of ambition, activity, and coherence in responses.

Report

The discussions on the Global Digital Compact (GDC) involve various perspectives from stakeholders. One argument is that the final stage negotiations of the GDC should remain open for contributions from multiple stakeholders. The EuroDIG community unanimously supports this stance and is ready to provide further inputs.

The upcoming EuroDIG event encourages participation to gather stakeholder input for the future of the internet.

Another perspective is the role of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) in implementing the principles and commitments of the Compact. The goal is to achieve a free, open, secure, and sustainable digital future.

The IGF is seen as a key platform for inclusive dialogue and stakeholder participation, specifically for SDG 9 on industry, innovation, and infrastructure.

Civil society voices are also important in the GDC process. Some argue for more involvement at the global level, while others advocate for greater participation at the country level.

The objective is to ensure inclusivity and address the needs of marginalized communities.

Stakeholder engagement and active involvement are crucial for innovation in internet governance. It is believed that effective governance can only be achieved when all stakeholders are directly involved.

Therefore, the UN should shift from consulting to actively involving stakeholders in decision-making processes.

Transparency and public involvement in negotiations are important. There is support for public involvement in governance issues and greater transparency in the GDC process.

Inclusivity and stakeholder mechanisms are discussed in relation to challenges with certain member states.

Questions are raised about how to include stakeholders when member states are not inclusive or unwilling to work with critical voices. The aim is to find mechanisms that ensure all perspectives are considered.

Digital inclusion and reducing the digital divide are also important in the GDC process.

The focus is on bridging the divide and providing access to quality digital technologies and connectivity for all.

Gender equality and intersectionality should be considered in the GDC process. Some argue for a feminist and intersectional approach to create a gender-just world.

This includes addressing environmental impact, promoting women’s leadership in tech, and protecting against gender-based violence online.

Energy consumption of the internet is a concern. There is a need to focus on reducing energy consumption while ensuring reliable internet access.

The role of the IGF and its relation to the GDC are discussed.

The relation should be clarified to avoid competition for resources and attention.

Accountability mechanisms in global compacts and partnerships are another area of concern. Stronger mechanisms are needed, and developed countries should support the capacity-building efforts of developing countries.

In conclusion, the discussions on the Global Digital Compact involve various perspectives, including multistakeholder contributions, the role of the IGF, civil society involvement, stakeholder engagement, transparency, digital inclusion, gender equality, energy consumption, the role of the IGF, and accountability in global compacts.

The focus is on creating a fair and inclusive digital future by considering the perspectives and needs of different stakeholders.

Report

During the discussion, speakers focused on several key topics related to technology and innovation. They emphasised the significant role of the internet during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in teaching and empowering micro-enterprises to leverage digital platforms for business. This highlights the internet’s ability to facilitate continuity and growth in challenging times.

The sentiment expressed towards the internet was overwhelmingly positive.

Another important aspect discussed was the need for regulation in new technologies. The speakers highlighted the rush of people toward regulating these technologies and suggested that The Global Digital Cooperation (GDC) could provide guidance to governments on how to effectively regulate new technologies.

While the sentiment towards regulation was positive, the speakers noted the importance of open discussions on standards and regulations in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI). This neutral sentiment indicates the need for careful consideration in establishing appropriate standards and regulations.

The positive impact of digitalisation and innovation on young people was also emphasised.

The speakers acknowledged that digitalisation has enabled young people to leverage technology for innovation, leading to productivity improvements. This highlights the value of providing opportunities for young people to explore their potential and contribute to economic growth. The sentiment towards this topic was largely positive.

The discussion also touched upon the relationship between innovation and regulation.

It was argued that innovation should be allowed to take place openly before implementing regulation. The speakers believed that innovation precedes regulation and should not be stifled by unnecessary restrictions. This viewpoint suggests a positive sentiment towards embracing innovation and allowing it to flourish.

Language barriers were identified as a challenge in achieving internet access and inclusivity.

The speakers noted that even with 100% internet coverage, language differences can prevent individuals from fully utilising the internet. To address this issue, the speakers suggested leveraging AI technologies, such as Language Learning Models (LLMs), to overcome language barriers. The sentiment towards this topic was neutral, indicating a recognition of the problem without offering a strong opinion on the solution.

In terms of AI, the speakers presented a positive stance, viewing it as an opportunity rather than a threat.

They highlighted how AI can eliminate errors in marking academic essays and reduce reliance on outdated theories and rote memorisation in education. This highlights the potential of AI to enhance the quality of education. The sentiment towards AI in education was positive.

The convergence of thought regarding the future of the internet and individual human rights was also highlighted.

The speakers referred to a previous session on the declaration of the future of the internet, which addressed similar issues. This convergence suggests a positive sentiment towards aligning the development of the internet with the protection of individual rights.

In terms of policymaking, the speakers emphasised the importance of inclusive development and involving civil society in discussions.

They shared personal experiences of benefitting from engaging with stakeholders and civil society as policymakers. The sentiment towards this was mixed, with a negative view on governments sometimes excluding civil society from discussions. The speakers advocated for more open and inclusive policymaking with stakeholder involvement, recognising the value of diverse perspectives in policymaking processes.

In conclusion, the discussion highlighted the essential role of the internet during the COVID-19 pandemic and the need for regulation in new technologies.

There was recognition of the positive impact of digitalisation and innovation on young people, and the importance of allowing innovation to take place openly before regulation. Language barriers were identified as a challenge to internet access and inclusivity, suggesting the use of AI technologies as a potential solution.

The speakers viewed AI as an opportunity and emphasised the convergence of thought between the future of the internet and human rights. They advocated for more inclusive policymaking with stakeholder involvement, recognising the value of civil society contributions. This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights into the various perspectives and considerations related to technology and innovation.

Report

Upon analysing the statements made by the speakers, several key points emerged:

1. The first speaker argues that the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) plays a crucial role in facilitating discussions on global digital compact issues. They believe that the topics covered in the issues paper closely align with the agenda of the IGF, underscoring the forum’s value and relevance.

2.

The second speaker advocates for embracing the positive evolution of technology. They argue that rather than resisting technological advancements, societies should adopt a positive approach towards them. The speaker believes that technology has the potential to significantly contribute to global development, aligning with SDG 9, which emphasises the importance of industry, innovation, and infrastructure.

However, no specific evidence or examples were provided to support this argument.

3. The third speaker highlights the need to ensure that technological benefits are accessible to everyone globally. They emphasise the importance of achieving equitable development and reducing inequalities that arise from unequal technology distribution.

This argument aligns with SDG 10, which focuses on reducing inequality. Unfortunately, no supporting evidence or specific examples were provided to strengthen this point.

It is worth noting that both the first and third speakers expressed positive sentiments regarding their respective topics.

However, the lack of supporting evidence weakens the overall strength of their arguments.

In conclusion, the analysis underscores the significance of the Internet Governance Forum as a platform for discussing global digital compact issues. It also highlights the importance of embracing technology’s positive evolution and ensuring equitable access to its benefits worldwide.

While the arguments put forth by the speakers are compelling, the absence of supporting evidence or specific examples diminishes their impact.

Report

The Global Digital Compact Process has energized the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) community, attracting positive sentiment and drawing attention to the work of IGF and its national and regional initiatives. It has created opportunities for engagement and brought stakeholders together.

However, there is a need for greater clarity and forward-looking perspectives on how the Global Digital Compact can strengthen and expand the field of Internet Governance.

To address this, a panel will provide additional insights and clarity on the future of the process, with the aim of enhancing Internet Governance and aligning it with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Another important aspect that demands attention is the complexity of the two governance forms: multilateral and multi-stakeholder.

It is argued that the complexity of these forms may be underestimated, and efforts are underway to foster their complementary nature. The goal is to ensure that both forms can effectively engage and support one another.

Improving governance, accountability, and cooperation within and between the multistakeholder and multilateral processes is also highlighted as a crucial need.

There is a call to enhance these aspects for more effective and inclusive Internet Governance, aligning with SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions).

The Global Digital Compact process, along with the Summit of the Future, provides a specific focus on internet development and its intersection with broader governance.

This focus closely aligns with SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) to address the specific needs of internet development within the broader governance discussions.

Moreover, the role of governments as enablers of people-centered development, human rights, and inclusion is emphasized.

The WSIS outcome documents describe the role of governments as enablers in creating an environment that enables these important aspects. This implies that governments play a vital role in shaping and supporting internet development in a way that encompasses human rights and reduces inequalities, aligning with SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities) and SDG 16.

In conclusion, the Global Digital Compact Process has successfully energized the IGF community, bringing attention to their work and fostering engagement.

However, there is a need for more clarity and forward-looking perspectives to enhance and broaden Internet Governance. The complexity of multilateral and multi-stakeholder governance forms is also highlighted. Additionally, improving governance, accountability, and cooperation within and between these forms is crucial.

The Global Digital Compact process and the Summit of the Future focus on internet development and its intersection with broader governance, aligning closely with the SDGs. Finally, the role of governments as enablers of people-centered development, human rights, and inclusion is emphasized as a crucial aspect of internet governance.

Report

The internet plays a vital role in our society, offering stability, availability, efficiency, and scalability. However, it is often taken for granted and overlooked. Cooperation among all stakeholders is crucial to maintain the internet’s critical qualities and prevent fragmentation or compromise.

Multistakeholder internet governance is essential for the internet’s continued success.

The Global Digital Compact (GDC), a proposed framework for global digital cooperation, should recognize and support this cooperation. Paul Wilson, a member of the technical community, emphasizes the need for ongoing global cooperation in internet governance, particularly within the GDC negotiations.

Addressing the current state of internet connectivity is another crucial aspect the GDC needs to focus on.

Although significant progress has been made, approximately 33% of the global population remains unconnected, and 66% lack meaningful internet access. Building upon the current state of connectivity is necessary to ensure more people can benefit from the internet.

The internet’s growth is expected to continue, but challenges with capacity, infrastructure, integrity, and security must be addressed.

Inclusivity is also important, as the concerns of marginalized communities, youth, and underrepresented groups should be heard in internet governance and the GDC process.

The Internet Governance Forum (IGF), which has been facilitating discussions for 18 years, should be focused on continuous improvement rather than reinvention.

The IGF’s multistakeholder community is ready to discuss and enhance internet governance matters.

COVID-19 has highlighted the internet’s significance, as it enables communication, education, and job continuity during lockdowns. Lastly, addressing non-digital issues such as climate action, poverty, and hunger is essential for the internet to contribute to broader societal goals.

In summary, the internet’s stability and success depend on cooperation among stakeholders.

The GDC should recognize and support multistakeholder cooperation. It should also address connectivity gaps, ensure internet growth, promote inclusivity, and harness the potential of the IGF. Additionally, the internet’s role in supporting humanity during crises and addressing non-digital challenges should not be overlooked.

Report

The high-level panel on digital cooperation, created by the UN Secretary-General, highlights the significant focus on digital cooperation within the UN’s agenda. Raul Echeberri welcomes this and considers digital cooperation a central point in the Secretary-General’s agenda. However, there are concerns about the inclusivity of the Global Digital Compact process.

Raul suggests conducting more consultations at the regional level and involving the private sector to a greater extent. The private sector’s diverse interests, sectors, sizes of companies, and regional origins need to be considered in the Global Digital Compact process.

Active participation and involvement in consultations are emphasized, with several governments working hard to organize them.

Raul himself participated in some contributions. Preferred sessions and formats for consultations are those that allow for more comfortable community engagement rather than just submitting comments.

There is a need for more opportunities for non-governmental stakeholders to participate in the Global Digital Compact process, with reference to the 2005 summit involvement.

The expectation is that innovations will improve the process, but no specific evidence is provided to support this claim.

The similarities between the Internet Governance Forum (IGF)’s key agenda topics and the issues in the shared paper for the Global Digital Compact are noted, validating the IGF as a valuable venue for discussing the compact.

A positive outlook on technology evolution is expressed, with the belief that technology should be embraced positively as it continues to evolve.

The argument is made for the need to speed up innovation in every country to achieve inclusive development.

Technology is expected to play a significant role in achieving equitable development.

The Global Digital Compact is expected to inspire and bring hope, with inspiration drawn from the message of the Prime Minister of Japan regarding optimizing technology benefits while reducing risk.

Caution is advised against creating new bureaucracies in the compact process, as this may create additional barriers for the participation of developing and small countries.

It is important to ensure equal opportunities for participation and contribution.

Existing venues like the IGF are seen as capable of effectively handling challenges, eliminating the need for increased governmental control. The argument is made for multistakeholder mechanisms in digital governance to allow for the full participation of all stakeholders.

The role of governments in creating enabling environments for inclusive development and accelerating innovation is emphasized.

It is crucial to ensure that the positive impact of technology benefits everyone worldwide.

Lastly, there is a call for more stakeholder participation and the strengthening of the IGF. More opportunities for stakeholder engagement are needed in the process towards the future summit, with the recommendation to maintain the IGF as the central venue for dealing with the issues at hand.

In conclusion, the analysis highlights the importance of digital cooperation in the UN’s agenda, with the establishment of the high-level panel.

Concerns are raised about the inclusivity of the Global Digital Compact process, and the involvement of the private sector and active participation from all stakeholders is advocated. Technology, equitable development, and government involvement in creating enabling environments are identified as key factors.

Stakeholder participation and the strengthening of existing venues like the IGF are seen as crucial for effectively addressing the challenges of digital governance and achieving the goals of the Global Digital Compact.

Report

The Global Digital Compact process has received criticism for a lack of clarity and timely information provision, which hampers meaningful engagement and participation of civil society actors. There is a need for the Global Digital Compact to establish clear linkages with existing processes as the scope of Internet-related public policy issues expands and the distinction between digital and non-digital becomes blurred.

Inclusion should be prioritized in the process, considering the social and economic impacts of the global pandemic. Efforts must be made to prevent the exclusion of those who are most affected by digitalization, and to challenge perspectives that maintain the status quo.

Addressing digital inequality and injustice is essential to ensure an inclusive digital transition and prevent developing countries from being left behind.

Trade rules are used to weaken the digital rights of countries, particularly in the global south. International financial institutions need to make new commitments and big tech companies should be subjected to taxation to address these concerns.

The digital transition should prioritize creating public and social value, as well as expanding human freedoms.

The successful implementation of the Global Digital Compact will require financial mechanisms and the strengthening of digital infrastructure skills and regulatory capacities for all countries.

The Human Rights Charter and the International Covenant of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights should serve as the basis for evaluating commitment to an open, free, and secure digital future.

Existing processes such as the Universal Periodic Review and the Sustainable Development Goals can be utilized to further this objective.

The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) should be strengthened to bridge the gap between liberative spaces and decision-making processes.

Challenging the belief that big tech cannot be regulated is crucial. Global digital governance should establish conditions for equity and fairness. A feminist, sustainable, and transformative vision is necessary for a digital future that is open, free, and secure, and which promotes gender equality, reduces inequalities, and fosters industry, innovation, and infrastructure.

In conclusion, the Global Digital Compact process needs to address issues of clarity, linkages with existing processes, inclusion, digital inequality, trade rules, public and social value, human rights, financial mechanisms, taxation, the role of the IGF, and the need for a feminist and transformative vision.

By considering these factors, the Global Digital Compact can work towards a more equitable and inclusive digital future.

Report

A recent manga exhibition held at the British Museum in London was a tremendous success. The event received widespread acclaim and attracted large crowds, with the exhibition selling out completely. Notably, it drew the youngest audience the museum has ever seen, highlighting the broad appeal of manga beyond traditional demographics.

The exhibition was praised for its ability to forge connections and transcend boundaries.

Visitors emotionally connected with the content, finding resonance and identification within the storylines and characters depicted in manga. Additionally, the exhibition had a diverse audience in terms of ethnicity, further demonstrating manga’s power to bring people together and promote cultural diversity.

Despite the celebration of manga’s cultural impact, concerns were raised about the threat of piracy to the industry.

Piracy not only jeopardizes the livelihoods of manga artists, editors, and publishers, but also poses a risk to the industry as a whole. Efforts are being made to protect the rights of manga creators and safeguard their work from piracy, emphasizing the need to combat this issue.

Manga is considered a valuable cultural treasure of Japan, akin to traditional art forms like Ukiyo-e and culinary delights like sushi.

Preserving and cherishing this art form for future generations is deemed crucial. Discussions surround the preservation of physical copies of manga and the concerns that relying solely on digital access could potentially hinder its accessibility and readability in the future.

An important aspect highlighted is the significance of maintaining paper copies of manga.

Prominent figures within the industry, such as Murai-sensei, have emphasized the importance of continuing the production of paper copies. This aligns with the goals of responsible consumption and production, contributing to sustainable practices in the industry.

In conclusion, the manga exhibition at the British Museum was a resounding success, showcasing both the popularity and cultural significance of manga.

However, it also brought attention to issues such as piracy and the importance of protecting artists’ rights. Efforts are being made to combat piracy and preserve physical copies of manga for future generations. The overall sentiment towards manga and its cultural impact remains positive, and discussions on supporting and safeguarding the industry continue.

Report

The global manga market has experienced rapid growth, particularly during the pandemic, as people sought entertainment while staying at home. Manga consumption saw a significant spike in 2019 and 2020, leading to increased popularity and sales. The rise in manga’s popularity can be attributed to the increased availability of anime on broadcast cable TV and the presence of big box bookstores like Borders, which contributed to its mainstream appeal.

To combat piracy, various SimulPub platforms have been introduced.

These platforms offer official manga content in both English and Japanese simultaneously, aiming to provide an accessible and alternative option for readers. Publishers such as Viz Manga, Shonen Jump, Manga Plus, K-Manga, BookWalker, and MangaUp have adopted this strategy, allowing them to release content alongside its Japanese counterpart and reducing the prevalence of pirated content.

However, the presence of illegal or pirated content remains a major issue in the manga industry, particularly through scanlation sites.

It is estimated that there are approximately 1,100 known piracy sites, resulting in substantial financial damages to the industry. The top 10 piracy sites in Japan alone account for approximately 507 billion Japanese yen in damages. This piracy not only affects the revenue of artists and publishers but also devalues the perception of the art and the work of the artists themselves.

Piracy creates a sense of entitlement among readers who come to expect free access to manga even before its official release.

The popularity of piracy sites is staggering, with visits to the top 10 piracy sites in original Japanese totaling more than 150 million per month. The English manga piracy sites have an even larger audience, with around 200 million visits per month. This trend highlights the need to address the issue of piracy and educate readers on the value of supporting official releases.

Efforts are being made to increase the accessibility and affordability of manga through streaming services and lower subscription prices.

Streaming services focus on attracting readers through a large funnel, increasing the exposure of manga, and then guiding them towards making a purchase. Additionally, Shonen Jump, a popular manga publisher, releases chapters on its service the same day they come out in Japan, allowing fans to stay up to date with the latest content.

The push for easier access to more content at affordable prices includes offering a low subscription price of $2.99 per month for access to all the back chapters.

Andy Nakatani, an influential figure in the manga industry, looks forward to an upcoming exhibit in San Francisco.

His positive perception is fueled by the visible efforts and cooperation taking place across multiple industries. However, Nakatani expresses a lack of enthusiasm for public speaking, which suggests that he may prefer to focus on other aspects of his work.

The strength of the print industry, particularly in the United States, is valued and acknowledged.

The United States is known for its strong print industry, which adds to the overall growth and success of the manga market.

In conclusion, the global manga market has experienced significant growth, driven by increased consumption during the pandemic.

SimulPub platforms have proven effective in combating piracy by offering official content in English and Japanese simultaneously. However, piracy remains a significant concern, devaluing the perception of manga and the work of artists. Efforts are being made to increase accessibility and affordability through streaming services and attractive subscription prices.

The upcoming exhibit in San Francisco and the visible work and cooperation within the industry are promising signs for future development.

Report

The discussion centred around the issue of manga piracy and its impact on the industry. One of the main concerns raised was the lack of access to manga in the West and the significant delay in its release, which leads fans to resort to piracy.

Victoria Bertola highlighted this problem and suggested that technology should be used to expedite the distribution and availability of native Japanese manga globally and at competitive prices.

Criticism was directed towards the industry’s approach to piracy, with an appeal to recognise fans as potential future buyers rather than pirates.

It was argued that teenagers who can’t afford to buy manga may turn to pirated content, but they could become paying customers in the future. Instead of being too harsh on fans, the industry should make their content more accessible and affordable.

The discussion also delved into the underlying reasons why people resort to pirated websites.

It was suggested that the use of these websites indicates a high demand for content that is not adequately met. An audience member hinted at the need to learn from other experiences and improve in this area to meet the audience’s demands.

Transparency in earnings distribution within the Japanese industry and the impact of piracy on artists’ earnings were also raised as concerns. There is a perception that the majority of profits go to publishers rather than the artists, which raises questions about the impact of piracy on the artists’ livelihoods.

The discussion also touched on the potential impact of piracy on freedom of information and the risk of censorship.

It was argued that pursuing and punishing end users who share content goes against freedom of information. Some fears were expressed over how anti-piracy actions could lead to censorship, including political and economic censorship. A representative from the Pirate Party International and Russian Pirate Party emphasised this point, highlighting that it could even involve pursuing individuals wearing potentially counterfeited items.

Affordability and accessibility were identified as key issues.

Affordability was cited as a driving factor for piracy, with a thousand-dollar camera costing five months’ minimum wage in some countries. Limited translation of manga into various languages also leads people to rely on volunteers who translate and publish manga online for free.

It was argued that piracy is a symptom of inequality rather than solely a problem of greed, and the root causes of affordability and accessibility need to be addressed.

The role of exhibitions in raising awareness about manga piracy was highlighted.

The suggestion was made to include awareness actions about manga piracy in exhibitions as a tool for educating attendees about copyright infringement. This could help combat piracy by providing information and raising awareness.

The importance of maintaining copyright laws and fair use was emphasised during the discussion.

It was asserted that knowledge of intellectual property and copyright is crucial for protecting creators, and fair use ensures that copyright owners receive their royalties.

Legal online distribution was advocated as a solution to piracy. It was suggested that such platforms would not only curb piracy but also support upcoming artists.

One representative shared her personal experience of how manga influenced her art and explained the need for legal online distribution in Latin America due to rampant piracy and the lack of legal platforms.

Lastly, involving youths in the fight against piracy was seen as crucial.

It was observed that most pirates are from the younger generation, and they have a good understanding of the importance of manga and the threats posed by piracy. The use of new technologies among youths makes them well-equipped to fight piracy effectively.

In conclusion, the discussion explored various arguments and perspectives on manga piracy.

The lack of access, delayed releases, affordability issues, and inequality were identified as major driving factors behind piracy. The industry was urged to address these issues by utilising technology for improved distribution, making content more affordable and accessible, and involving youths in the fight against piracy.

Maintaining copyright laws and fair use was seen as crucial for protecting creators. Overall, it was emphasised that addressing the complex issue of piracy requires a comprehensive approach that recognises the underlying causes and works towards resolving them.

Report

Manga piracy has become a significant issue in the digital age, largely due to the accessibility and replication capacity of the internet. The ease of generating and distributing exact copies of digital information endangers copyrighted material, causing concerns for industries such as music, movies, and publishing.

These industries have faced struggles as their digital content is easily replicated and shared without permission.

Various protection mechanisms and subscription technologies have been developed to address this problem. These technologies aim to safeguard intellectual property content by providing encrypted materials and web standard subscriptions.

Implementing such measures can help protect industries against piracy and ensure fair compensation for their creative works.

Jun Murai, an expert in the fight against piracy, acknowledges the complexity and challenges involved in dealing with piracy operators and malicious domains.

Identifying the identities of piracy operators and dealing with malicious domains are major obstacles in the battle against piracy. Moreover, the involvement of intermediary providers, such as content delivery networks (CDNs), adds another layer of complexity to this issue.

Despite the challenges, Murai appreciates the collaboration among different stakeholders in Japan, including the government, internet community, and industry, in addressing piracy.

The Japanese government has raised the issue of piracy to the Government Advisory Board (GAC) under the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). Regular meetings among CEOs of internet service providers and publishing companies in Japan are also held to discuss piracy issues, indicating a proactive approach in combating piracy.

Murai believes that a comprehensive solution to piracy requires cooperation among different domains, such as legal expertise, international law, climate, and internet service providers.

Taking a holistic approach to address piracy from multiple angles can lead to more effective solutions. Regular dialogues engaging different stakeholders are necessary to develop strategies and policies that can effectively combat piracy.

Drawing from the success of the music industry in combating piracy, where sharing music online is followed by encouraging live music attendance, the same model could be applied to manga.

By sharing digital manga content and then fostering a supportive environment for attending live manga events, the industry can adapt to the digital age while maintaining its value and revenue streams.

Publishing companies are advised to preserve the value of printed manga in digital format and continue collaborating with both established and upcoming artists.

By embracing new formats while recognizing the importance of the original art form, manga can thrive in the digital era without losing its essence.

Moreover, streaming services and publishers are releasing more content to cater to the growing demand for manga.

Shonen Jump, for example, offers recent chapters for free and provides a subscription service that grants access to all back chapters. This approach not only satisfies consumer demands for more content but also contributes to combating piracy by offering legal alternatives.

While addressing piracy, it is essential to consider potential issues of over-policing that could lead to censorship.

Multi-stakeholder discussions regarding internet censorship policies are taking place to ensure a balance between protecting intellectual property rights and preserving freedom of expression. The involvement of the ICANN Government Advisory Board highlights the importance of addressing this issue and finding appropriate solutions.

Manga has gained global recognition and popularity in recent years, with an increasing number of fans outside of Japan.

The early 2000s saw a surge in manga’s global popularity, and European fans have accepted and appreciated the cultural aspects of manga. This growing accessibility has contributed to the wider reach and influence of manga worldwide.

Piracy has extended due to expensive and unavailable translation services.

The high cost of translation has led some individuals to consume pirated content instead. Efforts are being made to address these issues and make translation services more widely available, aiming to reduce the dependence on pirated copies and ensure that creators receive fair compensation.

Youth engagement plays a crucial role in the fight against piracy.

Young individuals actively stand up against piracy and engage in campaigns to discourage the use of illegally copied software. Publishing companies recognize the power of youth in these campaigns and attract young individuals to join their efforts against piracy.

In conclusion, manga piracy poses significant challenges to various industries due to the accessibility and replication capacity of the internet.

Protection mechanisms and subscription technologies have been developed to safeguard intellectual property content, and collaboration among stakeholders is crucial in addressing piracy effectively. The success of the music industry’s model suggests ways in which manga can adapt to the digital age.

Preservation of the value of printed manga, cooperation among domains, and the involvement of youth are essential components of a comprehensive solution to piracy.

Report

The panel discussion focused on the significant rise in online piracy and its negative impact on the manga industry. Over 1,100 piracy sites dedicated to manga have led to an estimated $3.6 billion USD in yearly damages. The top Japanese sites alone have 150 million monthly hits, while English-language piracy sites have around 200 million visits.

Efforts to combat piracy have had some success, but face challenges such as domain hopping. International cooperation is crucial to address the issue. Manga artists’ livelihoods are being affected, and manga’s global popularity is increasing. Manga provides valuable lessons not taught in schools, but it also faces negative perception.

Online piracy sites provide easy access to high-quality content, devaluing the work of artists. Strategies to combat piracy include controlling internet providers and educating consumers. Technology support and collaboration with multiple industries are important. Publishers should differentiate digitized print manga from digital manga.

Protecting freedom of speech is a balancing act, and promoting accessible manga globally fosters cultural exchange. A reward system for legal readers, proposed by Moto Hagio, would discourage piracy and support artists. The panel discussion provides valuable insights and recommendations for combating manga piracy and ensuring the industry’s sustainability and growth.

Report

Moto Hagio, a renowned manga artist, shares her insights on the qualities and perception of manga in society. She emphasises that the most important features of manga are interesting stories and appealing characters, which greatly contribute to its enjoyment and popularity.

However, she acknowledges that manga was once seen as vulgar and looked down upon in society.

During Hagio’s childhood, manga was disapproved of in schools, families, and society at large. Parents often encouraged their children to focus on their studies rather than reading manga.

Despite this disapproval, Hagio firmly believes that manga has great educational value. She asserts that manga provides valuable lessons about human emotions and relationships, which are often not taught in traditional educational settings. Hagio specifically mentions that she learned a lot about these aspects through reading manga, particularly the works of Tezuka Osamu, whose manga taught her lessons that were not generally found in society.

In terms of piracy, Hagio strongly opposes it and supports the reading and purchasing of officially published works.

She emphasises the importance of creators receiving appropriate remuneration for their work, describing it as saddening and unjust when creators do not receive compensation. Hagio mentions that the revenue she receives from readers of her old works on the internet allows her to earn a living and invest in future works.

She appreciates readers who choose to support official versions of her work and actively encourages anti-piracy measures.

Furthermore, Hagio proposes additional incentives for readers who opt for formal channels of manga consumption. She suggests privileges such as providing points or featuring the voices of artists as a token of appreciation.

Hagio believes that these incentives can promote and encourage the choice to purchase manga from legitimate sources. This aligns with her stance that creators should be appropriately rewarded for their work.

In conclusion, Moto Hagio’s perspective on manga revolves around its qualities, societal perception, educational value, and the issue of piracy.

She believes that manga’s interesting stories and appealing characters are its defining attributes, while acknowledging its historical disapproval in society. Hagio firmly advocates for the educational importance of manga, asserting that it imparts valuable life lessons on emotions and relationships.

Additionally, she opposes piracy, supports reading and purchasing officially published works, and proposes incentives to encourage readers to choose legitimate sources. Hagio ultimately encourages readers to make ethical choices and considers the impact of piracy on both readers and artists.

Report

LACNIC, the organisation dedicated to promoting digital innovation in Latin America and the Caribbean, offers several programs to support industry, innovation, and infrastructure in the region. One of its primary initiatives is FRIDA, the Fund for Digital Innovation in Latin America and the Caribbean.

FRIDA has been in operation for almost two decades, demonstrating LACNIC’s commitment to fostering and nurturing digital innovation in the region.

In addition to FRIDA, LACNIC also prioritises applied research in various areas such as network architecture, internet stability, and security.

By focusing on research in these fields, LACNIC aims to contribute to the development and improvement of the digital infrastructure, ensuring stability and security for online activities in Latin America and the Caribbean.

LACNIC’s dedication extends beyond innovation and research.

The organisation recognises the importance of capacity building and aims to promote the participation of women in the technical community and the wider internet ecosystem. Through its programs, LACNIC provides opportunities for individuals to enhance their skills and knowledge and contributes to a more diverse and inclusive digital landscape.

LACNIC’s initiatives are aligned with various United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) including SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure), SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions), SDG 5 (Gender Equality), SDG 4 (Quality Education), and SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities).

This positive sentiment is reflected in LACNIC’s ongoing commitment to supporting digital innovation, applied research, capacity building, and gender equality.

In conclusion, LACNIC plays a vital role in promoting digital innovation and enhancing the digital landscape in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Through the FRIDA grant program, focus on applied research, capacity building, and women’s participation, LACNIC supports industry, innovation, and infrastructure, contributing to the achievement of several SDGs. This ensures sustainable and inclusive progress in the region’s digital era.

Report

Janne Hedronen, representing the Finnish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, expresses concern over the financing of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF), an organization that aims to promote sustainable industrialization and innovation through resilient infrastructure. The ministry has been a consistent donor to the IGF since 2006, providing approximately $2 million USD in funding.

However, Janne urges participants to step up their efforts for financing the IGF, highlighting the importance and urgency of adequately funding the organization to fulfill its mandate.

The IO Foundation presents their work on data-centric digital rights and their support for the technical community.

They view the technical community as the next generation of rights defenders, emphasizing their role in safeguarding digital rights in an increasingly data-driven world.

Carla Braga and Raimundo from the Amazon region focus their efforts on combating misinformation and disinformation, which are closely linked with the issue of deforestation.

Their work highlights the connection between the spread of false information and the detrimental impact it has on efforts to address deforestation.

Rebecca Papillo, representing the .au domain administration, runs a community grants program aimed at promoting digital inclusion and innovation for marginalized communities.

The program specifically targets regional and remote Australians, Australians with disabilities, and Australia’s First Nations people. By providing grants, Papillo aims to bridge the digital divide and empower these communities to access opportunities in the digital age.

Christian Leon, from ARSUR and the Internet Bolivia Foundation, is dedicated to protecting data, fighting against digital rights violations, and promoting digital inclusion.

Leon’s work focuses on addressing issues such as digital violence and ensuring that everyone has equal access to and benefits from the internet.

Access Now has developed a grant program to support grassroots organizations. Over the past five years, they have disbursed approximately $8 million to 120 organizations.

This program aims to empower and enable local organizations to champion digital rights and work towards reducing inequalities.

Catherine Townsend of Measurement Lab raises concerns about monitoring the internet. While Measurement Lab is actively involved in measuring the speed and quality of the internet worldwide, Townsend highlights the potential negative implications of excessive monitoring, emphasizing the need to strike a balance between privacy concerns and the necessity of monitoring to ensure internet accessibility and fairness.

Pranav from the Internet Society Foundation is dedicated to empowering youth ambassadors and early and mid-career professionals through training programs.

These programs provide free courses that cover both technical aspects of the internet and policy-related issues. By equipping young individuals with the necessary skills and knowledge, Pranav aims to create a new generation of internet leaders.

The challenges faced in financing community development and training programs are acknowledged, with a volunteer community struggling to maintain and operate due to financial constraints.

Efforts are being made to conduct webinars and seminars, but in-person meetings require a sizable budget. The need for financial support to train and develop skills in the new generation is underscored, along with exploring the potential for collaboration between industry and academia in regional settings.

Furthermore, the summary highlights the challenges of achieving digital inclusion in authoritarian regimes.

Foreign donor restrictions are seen as a significant barrier to securing funding for humanitarian work in such regimes, while effectively presenting the impact of these initiatives poses an additional difficulty.

The importance of measuring impact for continued support is emphasized, although funding for impact measurement itself remains a challenge.

Donors increasingly seek evidence of impact, particularly for technology tools, prompting the need to develop effective measurement tools. However, writing impact reports can be burdensome for smaller organizations.

Lastly, there is a notable demand for small grants in community networks, particularly at the local level.

Larger grants from big organizations often do not align with the specific needs of communities, leading to an inadequate supply of funding. This highlights the necessity for increased financial support to meet the demand for small grants.

In conclusion, various stakeholders and organizations are actively engaged in addressing key issues related to the internet, digital rights, and digital inclusion.

While funding challenges persist, there is a shared commitment to promote sustainable industrialization, combat misinformation, bridge the digital divide, protect data, and empower marginalized communities. Efforts are also being made to strike a balance between monitoring the internet for accessibility while preserving privacy concerns.

The need to measure impact and provide small grants for community networks further underlines the significance of continued support in achieving these goals.

Report

Brian Horlick-Cruz manages grant programs at the Internet Society Foundation, with a focus on community-oriented funding initiatives. These programs contribute to the achievement of SDG 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure, as well as SDG 17: Partnership for the Goals.

In his role, Brian supports a broad range of technical communities, including network operator groups and national research and education networks.

This involvement highlights his commitment to fostering collaboration and innovation within the industry. By providing resources and support, Brian ensures the growth and contributions of these technical communities to industry advancement and infrastructure development.

Brian’s impact extends beyond technical communities, as he also coordinates programs for Internet Society chapters and the National and Regional Internet governance forums.

These platforms serve as arenas for discussions, knowledge sharing, and policy formulation that shape the future of the internet. Under Brian’s guidance, these programs facilitate the exchange of ideas and the development of strong governance frameworks.

Overall, Brian Horlick-Cruz’s work as a grant program manager at the Internet Society Foundation is highly regarded.

The sentiment towards him and his contributions is generally positive and neutral, reflecting the significant impact he has made in the field of grant management and community support.

In summary, Brian Horlick-Cruz manages community-oriented grant programs at the Internet Society Foundation.

He supports various technical communities, internet governance forums, and Internet Society chapters. His efforts contribute to advancing industry, innovation, infrastructure, and achieving sustainable development goals. Brian’s positive and neutral sentiment reflects the value and esteem he has earned in his role.

Report

Carlos Rey Moreno and Eric Huerta are coordinators of the LockNet initiative, which prioritises community-centred connectivity. The initiative supports various community-centred connectivity initiatives through regranting opportunities. Carlos Rey Moreno advocates for strengthening organisations involved in community-centred connectivity and creating enabling environments for their growth.

The LockNet initiative engages in national-level policy and regulatory analysis to support the development of effective policies and regulations that promote and sustain community-centred connectivity projects.

They also work on technology development to ensure that the initiatives they support have access to the latest advancements and tools in internet technology.

The LockNet initiative places a strong focus on gender equality. They create safe spaces where women can enhance their knowledge and skills in internet technology and regulation.

By empowering women in these fields, the initiative aims to promote inclusivity and diversity within community-centred connectivity projects.

The evidence supporting these activities and objectives can be seen through the initiative’s commitment to regranting. Through their financial support, they ensure the sustainability and impact of various community-centred connectivity initiatives.

This demonstrates their dedication to promoting and contributing to the success of these projects.

In conclusion, Carlos Rey Moreno and Eric Huerta coordinate the LockNet initiative, which focuses on community-centred connectivity. The initiative engages in regranting, policy and regulatory analysis, and technology development to support these initiatives.

They also prioritise promoting gender equality within the community-centred connectivity sector. The evidence supporting their work is substantiated by their commitment to regranting and their dedication to empowering and strengthening these projects.

Report

In his presentation, Changho Kim, representing the Open Society Foundation’s East Asia Program, provided a comprehensive insight into their work supporting civil society organizations, with a specific focus on Northeast Asia. Northeast Asia includes China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan.

Kim emphasized that the Open Society Foundation’s East Asia Program aims to provide support and resources to civil society organizations operating in these regions.

These organizations play a crucial role in fostering transparency, accountability, and the protection of human rights.

The Open Society Foundation recognizes the value of civil society organizations in promoting democratic governance, advocating for social justice, and challenging systemic inequalities.

Through financial grants, capacity-building initiatives, and strategic partnerships, the program enables these organizations to undertake projects, research, and advocacy efforts that address pressing issues in their respective societies.

Within Northeast Asia, the program seeks to address diverse challenges that vary across the countries in the region.

In China, civil society organizations face numerous restrictions and obstacles due to the government’s tight control over civil liberties. However, the program seeks to support these organizations in their fight for social justice, human rights, and the rule of law.

In Hong Kong, recent political developments have highlighted the importance of safeguarding civil society space.

The Open Society Foundation’s East Asia Program plays a vital role in providing resources and support to organizations working to protect freedom of expression, assembly, and association in the face of increasing restrictions.

Taiwan, on the other hand, offers a relatively more open environment for civil society organizations.

The program aims to enhance the capacity of these organizations to advocate for progressive reforms and social change, particularly in areas such as gender equality, LGBTQ+ rights, and environmental sustainability.

South Korea, a vibrant democracy, faces its unique challenges, including labor rights, democratic participation, and social inclusion.

The program supports civil society organizations in their efforts to address these issues and promote good governance, social cohesion, and inclusive policies.

Finally, in Japan, civil society organizations face challenges related to democratic participation, minority rights, and refugee protection.

The program works to empower these organizations, enabling them to advance human rights, social justice, and democratic values.

In conclusion, Changho Kim’s presentation highlighted the Open Society Foundation’s East Asia Program’s critical role in supporting civil society organizations across Northeast Asia.

Through its financial, capacity-building, and collaborative initiatives, the program aims to empower these organizations in their pursuit of social change, human rights protection, and democratic governance. By addressing country-specific challenges and fostering cross-border collaboration, the program seeks to contribute to a more inclusive, just, and democratic Northeast Asia.

Report

The Canadian Internet Registration Authority (CIRA) is committed to supporting various sectors of society. They focus on providing grants to non-profit organizations, registered charities, academics, universities, colleges, and indigenous communities. CIRA’s granting program aims to empower these groups and address their specific needs and challenges.

CIRA places particular emphasis on northern remote and indigenous communities, recognizing their unique circumstances and vulnerabilities.

They strive to provide funding and support to bridge the digital divide and improve internet accessibility. This targeted approach demonstrates their commitment to reducing inequalities and promoting inclusivity, aligned with SDG 10 – Reduced Inequalities.

Charles Noir, Vice President of Community Investment Policy and Advocacy at CIRA, plays a pivotal role in shaping and advocating for their community investment policies.

His support for grants to these select groups further highlights the importance of CIRA’s work in these areas.

In addition to their granting program, CIRA also invests in cybersecurity services for Canadians, offering free services to help individuals protect themselves online.

This initiative addresses the growing concern of cyber threats and contributes to a safer online environment. It aligns with SDG 9 – Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure.

CIRA also develops services for testing internet performance in a neutral manner, ensuring accurate assessments of connectivity.

This impartial approach facilitates improvements in infrastructure and connectivity.

In summary, CIRA’s focus on grants for non-profits, registered charities, academics, universities, colleges, and indigenous communities, along with their dedication to providing free cybersecurity services and neutral internet performance testing, underscores their commitment to promoting inclusivity and security in the digital landscape.

Their efforts contribute to the achievement of multiple Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including SDG 4 – Quality Education, SDG 9 – Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure, and SDG 10 – Reduced Inequalities.

Report

Ellisha Heppner is the grants management lead for the APNIC Foundation. Her role involves overseeing the administration and distribution of grants, ensuring they are aligned with the foundation’s goals. One of the key programs she manages is the ISF-Asia grants, which follows a competitive process and accepts proposals on an annual basis.

These grants focus on promoting projects related to infrastructure, inclusion, and knowledge.

The ISF-Asia grants are instrumental in advancing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) set by the United Nations. They contribute to SDG 9, which focuses on industry, innovation, and infrastructure, SDG 4, which aims to ensure quality education, and SDG 10, which aims to reduce inequalities.

Through these grants, the APNIC Foundation actively supports sustainable development and social progress.

In addition to the broad themes of infrastructure, inclusion, and knowledge, the APNIC Foundation provides specific funding for projects related to IPv6 and environmental sustainability.

This is made possible through the Ian Peter grant, which aligns with SDG 9 and SDG 13, focused on climate action. By offering dedicated funding for these areas, the foundation promotes the adoption of IPv6 and the development of environmental solutions.

Ellisha Heppner’s role as grants management lead is vital in ensuring the effective distribution of grants in line with the foundation’s objectives.

Her expertise and oversight critically contribute to the selection of promising proposals and the meaningful impact of awarded grants in the Asia-Pacific region.

In summary, Ellisha Heppner plays a key role at the APNIC Foundation as the grants management lead.

Under her supervision, the ISF-Asia grants focus on infrastructure, inclusion, and knowledge, while also supporting specific areas such as IPv6 and environmental projects. Through these grants, the APNIC Foundation contributes to the achievement of SDGs and promotes sustainable development in the region.

Report

Garcia Ramilo is employed by the Association for Progressive Communications (APC) in a significant role overseeing a membership network that spans 40 countries. The APC is dedicated to promoting the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG17: Partnership for the Goals.

This underscores their commitment to fostering collaborations and partnerships to address global challenges.

In terms of resource allocation within the network, an interesting aspect is the sharing of resources through various means. A notable approach is through regranting, whereby resources are distributed based on the network’s priorities.

This enables the APC to effectively support its members and partners in their initiatives. Moreover, the network also engages in capacity building and research, empowering members to enhance their skills and knowledge to drive positive change in their respective communities.

Collaboration is another key aspect of resource sharing, as the APC actively works with members and partners to ensure resources are maximised and beneficial for all involved.

An intriguing aspect of the APC’s resource allocation strategy is that approximately half of the resources are directed towards its members, while the remaining 50% is allocated to different partners.

This balanced distribution ensures that both the needs of members and external partners are met, reinforcing the network’s commitment to reducing inequalities (SDG10) and fostering partnerships to achieve global goals (SDG17).

In conclusion, Garcia Ramilo plays a crucial role within the Association for Progressive Communications, managing a membership network across 40 countries.

The network places importance on resource sharing through regranting, capacity building, research, and collaborations. Roughly half of the resources are directed towards members, with the remaining 50% allocated to partners. Through these efforts, the APC aims to address global challenges, reduce inequalities, and foster partnerships to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.

Report

The White Project, founded 37 years ago by Professor Jim Ryan, is a renowned research consortium that focuses on conducting research and promoting educational activities. The project places a strong emphasis on collaboration between academia and industry. Hirochika Asai, a representative of the White Project, highlights the importance of this collaboration and its benefits for both sectors.

This partnership enables the exchange of knowledge, expertise, and resources, leading to innovative breakthroughs and advancements across various fields.

One notable achievement of the White Project is the operation of ArenaPAC, a high-capacity submarine cable infrastructure dedicated to facilitating research and education.

ArenaPAC serves as a crucial communication channel, connecting scientists, researchers, and educators, and enabling them to share data. Its significance is highlighted by Paul, who cites it as a remarkable achievement.

Additionally, the White Project recognizes research and education as vital for driving the future global acceleration of human activities, particularly in scientific research.

They firmly believe that investment in these areas is essential to achieve long-term sustainable development goals. By fostering strong partnerships between academia, industry, and educational institutions, the White Project aims to create an environment that encourages innovation, knowledge exchange, and technological advancements.

In conclusion, the White Project, led by Professor Jim Ryan, is a reputable research consortium that conducts research and promotes educational activities.

Through its collaboration between academia and industry, it has successfully facilitated the exchange of knowledge and resources. The operation of ArenaPAC, a high-capacity submarine cable infrastructure, supports research and education. The White Project recognizes the importance of research and education in the future acceleration of global human activities, particularly in scientific research.

By continuing to foster collaborations and invest in these areas, it strives to achieve sustainable development goals and advancements in various fields.

Report

Finland has been actively funding the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) since 2006, contributing a total of approximately 2 million USD. However, there are concerns regarding the current financing of the IGF, suggesting that the existing financial arrangements may not be sufficient.

The specific points of concern have not been specified, but there is a negative sentiment associated with the current situation.

On the other hand, there is support for upscaling efforts to ensure the long-term sustainability of the IGF.

The call for upscaling is motivated by the recognition of the crucial role that the IGF plays in fulfilling its UN mandate. The IGF is seen as a platform that promotes dialogue and cooperation among various stakeholders to effectively address the complexities of internet governance.

To secure the sustainability of the IGF, it is suggested to explore unconventional means of financing beyond the traditional methods.

This would involve fostering an environment that is open to suggestions and innovations in terms of financial support. By encouraging new approaches to funding, it is believed that the IGF can address the existing concerns and ensure its continued operation.

In conclusion, Finland has been a significant contributor to the IGF’s funding for over a decade.

However, concerns have been raised regarding the current financing situation, prompting the need for upscaling efforts to ensure the long-term sustainability of the IGF. Exploring unconventional means of financing and recognizing the crucial role of the IGF in fulfilling its UN mandate are highlighted as important strategies to address these concerns and secure the future of the IGF.

Keywords: Internet Governance Forum, IGF funding, Finland, financing, sustainability, stakeholders, dialogue, cooperation, UN mandate.

Report

Jenn Beard is an employee at the ISOC Foundation, where she collaborates with Brian Horlick-Cruz. The ISOC Foundation’s main focus is on the development of a stronger Internet, its growth, and the defence of its integrity. In pursuit of this, they have implemented a comprehensive portfolio of activities.

The foundation offers approximately 15 grant programmes, covering a wide range of areas such as connectivity, digital skills, and digital learning. These grant programmes play a crucial role in supporting projects that aim to improve access to the Internet, enhance digital literacy, and promote innovative approaches to online education.

This demonstrates the foundation’s commitment to SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) and SDG 4 (Quality Education).

One noteworthy aspect is the collaborative effort between Jenn Beard and Brian Horlick-Cruz. Although no specific details are provided, their partnership suggests a dynamic and efficient working environment within the foundation.

The analysis indicates a generally positive sentiment towards both Jenn Beard and her contributions to the ISOC Foundation.

As an employee involved in the foundation’s grant programmes, Jenn Beard plays a significant role in advancing its initiatives. Her work directly contributes to building a stronger Internet, fostering its growth, and defending it from potential threats. These efforts align with the foundation’s mission and its positive impact on society.

In conclusion, Jenn Beard’s work at the ISOC Foundation, in collaboration with Brian Horlick-Cruz, encompasses various grant programmes that aim to improve Internet accessibility, digital skills, and digital learning.

The positive sentiment surrounding her and her contributions further emphasise the foundation’s commitment to creating a better digital future.

Report

The Brazilian Internet Steering Committee, with Laura as a board member, plays a crucial role in supporting and funding AI centres in Brazil. These AI centres are essential hubs for research, development, and innovation in the field of artificial intelligence.

By providing financial resources and support, the committee enables these centres to drive progress, encourage collaboration, and contribute to the advancement of AI technology in Brazil.

In addition to their support for AI centres, the committee also demonstrates a commitment to promoting gender diversity in the tech industry.

They offer small fellowships specifically designed for women, encouraging them to write papers and contribute to the academic discourse surrounding technology. These fellowships provide financial support and recognition, helping to address the gender gap in the field and empower women to excel in tech-related disciplines.

Furthermore, the committee extends its positive impact by providing support for small events focused on Internet governance.

By sponsoring and assisting in organising these events, they contribute to the dialogue and exchange of ideas concerning the responsible and inclusive management of the internet. This support fosters awareness, knowledge-sharing, and collaboration among various stakeholders regarding the governance of online platforms and services.

In conclusion, the Brazilian Internet Steering Committee, under Laura’s guidance, is a driving force behind the progress and development of AI in Brazil.

Their support and funding for AI centres, provision of fellowships for women in tech, and promotion of small events on Internet governance underscore their commitment to industry, innovation, infrastructure, and gender equality. Their initiatives serve as models for other organisations aspiring to create a more inclusive and technologically advanced society.

One noteworthy observation is the multifaceted approach of the committee’s initiatives.

By combining support for AI centres, gender diversity, and Internet governance, they address key areas where progress is needed in the tech industry. This holistic approach recognises the interconnected nature of these issues and ensures that efforts are made across different domains to drive positive change.

Overall, the Brazilian Internet Steering Committee, with Laura’s involvement, serves as a pioneer and catalyst for advancements in AI, promoting gender equality, and fostering responsible Internet governance in Brazil.

Report

Michel Lambert is a member of Equality, a Canadian organisation dedicated to advancing freedom online. Equality focuses on creating open-source tools and services that aid in the support of this cause. Their work aims to counteract the concept of “splinternets” and promote internet freedom for all.

In addition to their tool development, Equality also extends support to smaller organisations, small businesses, and individual developers.

Over the past two years, Equality has actively provided assistance to these entities. Their support encompasses a range of areas, such as helping smaller organisations gain the resources and guidance needed to develop new technology against the splinternets. Notably, Equality extends its support to both small businesses and individual developers, recognising their role in technological advancements.

The new technologies fostered by Equality cover various aspects, with a particular focus on virtual private networks (VPNs) and satellite technology.

These innovative solutions allow users to navigate online platforms securely and overcome the obstacles posed by splinternets. By facilitating access to such technologies, Equality empowers individuals and businesses to protect their digital freedoms and fully participate in the modern interconnected world.

The sentiment expressed towards Equality is overwhelmingly positive.

The speakers involved in discussing this topic emphasised the importance of Equality’s work in promoting internet freedom and supporting technological innovation. Equality’s commitment to open-source development and its focus on supporting smaller organisations and developers highlight its dedication to fostering an inclusive and free digital space.

In conclusion, Michel Lambert collaborates with Equality, a Canadian organisation at the forefront of championing internet freedom.

Their creation of open-source tools and services, along with their support for smaller organisations and developers, demonstrates their commitment to combatting the concept of splinternets. Equality’s efforts play a crucial role in ensuring digital rights and fostering technological innovation worldwide.

Report

The APNIC Foundation, known for its work in supporting the development priorities of APNIC, is organising an event specifically for organisations that are investing in development. The purpose of this event is to foster collaboration among these organisations by providing them with the opportunity to find common ground and explore possible collaborations.

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the APNIC Foundation used to host similar events, showcasing its commitment to bringing organisations together.

This upcoming event aims to continue this tradition virtually, ensuring that despite geographical limits, opportunities to collaborate and cross borders are still present. It highlights the importance of open discussions and encourages organisations to engage in conversations surrounding their projects and potential collaborations.

One notable approach taken by the APNIC Foundation is to allow the fund-allocating organisations to speak first.

This sets the stage for an informal conversation where participating organisations can share details about their projects. By giving each organisation an opportunity to present their initiatives, the event aims to create an environment conducive to collaboration and knowledge sharing.

Collaboration and co-funding are key elements of the APNIC Foundation’s strategy to increase the footprint of their work.

The foundation actively seeks opportunities to collaborate with other organisations and invest in joint initiatives. By pooling resources and expertise, they aim to have a greater impact on various development priorities.

Silvia Cadena, a strong advocate for collaboration, emphasizes the importance of engaging with organizations that are investing in technical infrastructure and the technical community.

Recognising the challenges faced by network engineers and cybersecurity professionals in gaining support from traditional donors, Cadena highlights the role of the APNIC Foundation in providing grants, fellowships, awards, and research support for such initiatives. This demonstrates the foundation’s commitment to supporting technical projects and fostering collaboration within the technical community.

In addition to supporting technical initiatives, the APNIC Foundation also focuses on programmes that address inclusion, infrastructure, and knowledge.

Their efforts are aimed at keeping the Internet open, stable, and accessible. The foundation allocates IP addresses and ASN numbers across 56 economies in the Asia Pacific, solidifying its impact on the industry of innovation and infrastructure. Since its establishment in 2016, the APNIC Foundation has been actively implementing projects in various areas, including education, gender and diversity, and community building and strengthening.

In conclusion, the APNIC Foundation is hosting an event to bring together organisations investing in development.

With a focus on collaboration, the event aims to facilitate open discussions, promote knowledge sharing, and explore potential collaborations. The foundation’s emphasis on co-funding, cross-border collaboration, and engagement with the technical community showcases its commitment to expanding its work and supporting the development priorities of APNIC.

By supporting initiatives across inclusion, infrastructure, and knowledge, the APNIC Foundation plays a vital role in keeping the Internet accessible and stable.

Report

Paul Byron Wilson, the head of APNIC (Asia-Pacific Network Information Centre) and a trustee in the Internet Development Trust, is a notable figure in internet connectivity and development. He plays a significant role in advancing the internet infrastructure in the Asia-Pacific region.

Wilson’s work includes supporting high-bandwidth connections for research and education networks in the Pacific, contributing to SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) and SDG 4 (Quality Education). The Internet Development Trust funds projects of the APNIC Foundation, including the ISF-Asia grants, promoting innovation and infrastructure development.

Wilson’s involvement with ArenaPAC further demonstrates his dedication to creating high-bandwidth connections in the Pacific for enhanced education and research collaboration. Overall, Wilson’s leadership and involvement highlight his commitment to driving progress in internet connectivity and the promotion of quality education in the Asia-Pacific region.

Report

Percival Henriquez, a distinguished board member at the Internet Committee and NIC.BR, is known for his expertise in internet governance in Brazil. NIC.BR, short for Núcleo de Informação e Coordenação do Ponto BR, is responsible for administering and managing internet domain names ending with “.br” in Brazil.

As a board member, Henriquez plays a crucial role in formulating policies and making strategic decisions to ensure the smooth functioning and development of the internet in Brazil.

This includes overseeing domain name registrations, managing technical infrastructure, and addressing any issues or challenges that arise.

The Internet Committee and NIC.BR’s role is significant, as the internet has become an essential tool for communication, commerce, and innovation.

The committee’s efforts to manage and regulate domain names contribute to maintaining a secure and reliable online environment for individuals and businesses.

Henriquez’s position highlights his expertise in internet governance and his commitment to advancing the internet ecosystem in Brazil.

He is likely involved in discussions and decision-making processes related to internet policies, technical standards, and cybersecurity.

Having a dedicated and knowledgeable individual like Henriquez on the board ensures that NIC.BR remains at the forefront of technological advancements and effectively addresses emerging challenges in the dynamic digital landscape.

Overall, Percival Henriquez’s role as a board member at the Internet Committee and NIC.BR underscores Brazil’s commitment to promoting internet accessibility, security, and innovation.

His contributions in shaping internet policies and strategies will have a significant impact on the development of the internet in Brazil.

Report

Valerie Frissen is the director of SIDN Fund, a separate foundation funded by the Dutch National Registry. The fund focuses on supporting initiatives that promote responsible internet use and raise awareness. Its main aim is to empower end users, enabling them to make the most of the internet while also being aware of the potential risks and challenges associated with it.

SIDN Fund plays a crucial role in supporting projects that contribute to the achievement of Sustainable Development Goal 4: Quality Education and Sustainable Development Goal 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure.

By investing in initiatives that encourage responsible internet use, the fund helps to create a safer and more inclusive online space that benefits individuals and society as a whole.

Valerie Frissen strongly advocates for cooperation with other funding organizations to increase the impact of SIDN Fund’s initiatives.

Recognizing the importance of collaboration, the fund actively engages with other funders in the Netherlands and international organizations. This collaboration allows them to pool resources and expertise, enabling them to implement larger-scale projects and reach a wider audience.

One notable example of this collaboration is SIDN Fund’s participation in a large conference in Brussels.

This conference serves as a platform for bringing together digital rights funders from both Europe and beyond. By participating in such events, the fund not only learns from the experiences and insights of others but also shares its own knowledge and expertise.

This ultimately contributes to a more coordinated and effective approach to digital rights funding.

In conclusion, as the director of SIDN Fund, Valerie Frissen emphasizes the importance of responsible internet use and raising awareness among end users. The fund’s support for projects in these areas contributes to the achievement of global development objectives.

Through collaboration with other funders and active participation in conferences, the fund ensures a more comprehensive and impactful approach to advancing digital rights.

Report

Yoshiki Uchida, a student at Keio University, actively participates in the White Project, an initiative that complements his studies on the Internet. The White Project, established by Professor Jim Ryan 37 years ago, is vital to Uchida’s academic journey.

His involvement demonstrates a commitment to exploring and advancing knowledge in the field of Internet studies.

Uchida also expresses a keen interest in supporting the APNIC Foundation in the near future. The APNIC Foundation focuses on promoting partnerships to achieve global goals.

Uchida’s intention reflects his dedication to contributing to these goals.

The evidence confirms Uchida’s involvement and interest. Uchida’s affiliation with Keio University and engagement with the White Project exemplify his commitment to quality education, a key aspect addressed in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Additionally, Uchida’s positive sentiment towards the APNIC Foundation indicates his willingness to engage in partnership goals and contribute to global progress.

In conclusion, Yoshiki Uchida’s academic pursuits at Keio University are enriched through his involvement with the White Project, aligning with his studies on the Internet.

Furthermore, his expressed interest in supporting the APNIC Foundation demonstrates his commitment to partnerships for achieving global goals. Uchida’s dedication and positive sentiment towards both initiatives highlight his intention to make a meaningful impact in the field of Internet studies and contribute to broader sustainable development initiatives.

Report

The analysis explores various perspectives on artificial intelligence (AI) and its implications for society. One notable initiative is the AI for All programme, a collaboration between the Indian government and Intel, which aims to educate school students about AI.

This programme is seen as a positive step towards ensuring that young people are equipped with the necessary knowledge to engage with AI technologies.

Opinions on the opportunities and threats posed by AI are divided. Around 50% of the groups believe that AI presents both opportunities and threats, while approximately 30% of the groups see it primarily as an opportunity.

This reflects the complexity and multifaceted nature of AI and how it can impact different aspects of society.

There is a consensus, however, on the importance of aligning AI with human rights. Most groups agreed that prioritising human rights in the development and deployment of AI systems is essential.

This reveals a shared understanding that while AI can bring immense benefits, it must be guided by ethical considerations and respect for fundamental human rights.

Another area where AI is seen as having significant potential is in research and development.

The dialogues highlighted the belief that AI can generate numerous opportunities in this field. This aligns with the broader goal of SDG 9, which focuses on industry, innovation and infrastructure.

The notion of global governance of AI also emerges as a prominent theme.

A significant number of participants expressed support for the idea that the governance of AI should occur at a global level. This recognition reflects the global impact of AI technologies and the need for coordinated efforts to address the challenges and benefits they bring.

Sharing experiences and knowledge about the internet, digital technology and AI from different stakeholders, countries and backgrounds is highlighted as being vital.

This emphasizes the importance of diverse perspectives in shaping the development and utilisation of these technologies.

The European citizens’ panels, launched by the European Parliament, European Commission and the Council, were viewed as a crucial part of the Conference on the Future of Europe.

These panels provided an opportunity for randomly selected citizens to discuss their views and wishes for the future of Europe. This inclusive approach highlights the value of citizen engagement and participation in shaping policy decisions.

Antoine Vergne stresses the need for ordinary citizens’ input in global discussions about internet governance.

He highlights the importance of a more open and bottom-up approach to policymaking, allowing citizens to have an impact on policy decisions. This call for citizen involvement in governance reflects the desire for inclusivity and democratic decision-making processes.

The potential for future dialogues on AI and metaverses is also explored.

The need to determine appropriate levels of governance and the importance of topic framing are discussed. Antoine Vergne supports the idea of both local and global topic framing for dialogues, recognising the value of context-specific discussions in addition to common global topics.

The analysis also highlights the significance of involving AI developers in global dialogues.

By including developers in conversations about AI, not just in their professional capacity but also as citizens, a more comprehensive understanding can be achieved. This emphasizes the need to view developers and AI technology creators as both part of the solution and the challenge.

Global dialogues are seen as an opportunity to promote learning and mutual assistance among countries with different AI capacities.

By sharing knowledge and experiences, countries can collectively address the challenges and maximise the benefits of AI technologies.

Inviting ambassadors from each participating country to engage in global-level reflections is considered an ideal approach. This facilitates the sharing of insights and lessons learned from national efforts and encourages international cooperation in addressing common AI-related issues.

Analysing qualitative data from citizen dialogues can present both challenges and benefits.

While the process of aggregating and analysing the data may be complex, it offers valuable insights for policymakers and researchers. Artificial intelligence can play a role in making sense of the large amounts of data generated through citizen dialogues, enabling more informed decision-making.

Overall, the analysis reveals various perspectives on AI and its impact on society.

It underscores the importance of education, alignment with human rights, ethical considerations, and global governance in harnessing the potential of AI. It also highlights the need for inclusivity, diverse perspectives and citizen engagement in shaping the future of AI technologies.

Report

In the analysis of the statements made by various speakers, several key points emerge. The first point of concern is the inequalities in access to and understanding of AI and ICT, which should be addressed. Certain populations face issues of inaccessibility and lack of comprehension of AI and ICT, and this disparity needs to be rectified.

It is argued that there should be an effort to close the gap and ensure that everyone can benefit from these technologies on an equal level.

On a positive note, it is acknowledged that AI can be used to bring everyone along in global advancement.

The potential of AI to drive economic growth and innovation is recognized, and the speakers highlight the importance of using AI to include everyone in the world’s growth. They question what can be done using AI to ensure that the benefits of global advancement are accessible to all.

Additionally, there is a need to balance the advancement of AI and Metaverse design with the prevention of potential problems.

It is emphasized that while progress in AI and Metaverse is important, it should not be done at the cost of overlooking potential issues and risks. The speakers argue for a balance between moving forward and preventing problems, highlighting that hesitation to progress can hinder overall development.

The development of metaverse with helpful AI for teaching social-emotional skill lessons to international students is considered important.

The speakers underline the need to design and implement a curriculum that incorporates the latest technologies, such as metaverse and AI, to provide effective education to international students. The current teaching systems are often based on standard meeting systems, and the integration of metaverse and AI can greatly enhance the learning experience and improve outcomes.

Global dialogue on AI with different stakeholders is seen as crucial.

The speakers mention the importance of sharing knowledge and experiences about the internet, digital technology, and AI from various perspectives. This global dialogue can foster collaboration, learning, and the development of best practices in the field.

The positive impact of digital technology is emphasized.

It is highlighted that digital technology helps people in different ways and has the potential to drive industry, innovation, and infrastructure. The speakers acknowledge the role of digital technology in advancing various Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Inclusion of different experiences and perspectives in AI policy and best practices is advocated for.

The speakers believe that incorporating various viewpoints and voices in the development of AI policies can lead to more inclusive and effective outcomes. It is argued that a diverse range of experiences contributes to the formulation of AI inclusion policies and the establishment of best practices.

The work of organizations like Mission Public, which engage with vulnerable sections of the population, is appreciated.

The speakers commend their efforts to reach out to individuals who are not usually involved in processes such as the Internet Governance Forum (IGF). This outreach to unions and workers is seen as a positive step towards reducing inequalities and ensuring that all voices are heard.

A notable observation from the analysis is the importance of a qualitative approach to understanding the thinking behind deliberations.

One speaker suggests that understanding the motivations and thoughts behind each deliberation can lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the issues at hand. It is argued that a more granular understanding of deliberations can be achieved by studying the thought process behind them, thereby fostering more effective decision-making.

Child protection and online safety emerge as critical topics in the context of AI.

The speakers emphasize that AI can be leveraged to protect children and ensure online safety. However, they caution that AI can also cause harm, such as the creation of child sexual abuse material digitally. It is stressed that when discussing AI on a global and local level, child protection and online safety should be at the forefront of discussions.

A differentiated understanding of AI applications is deemed crucial.

The speakers mention various applications of AI, including content moderation, combating fake news, and detecting copyright infringements. It is argued that having a nuanced understanding of these applications is essential for the effective and responsible use of AI.

The issue of AI bias potentially affecting the validity of information is raised.

Concerns about bias in image recognition technologies are highlighted, illustrating how AI can perpetuate biases, particularly in gender representation. It is suggested that biases in AI models need to be acknowledged and addressed to ensure fairness and equality.

The need to strike a balance between regulation and the usage of technology is emphasized.

One speaker calls for critical analysis and understanding of technology consumption, rather than relying solely on regulation or fear of using technology. The goal is to ensure responsible use of AI and technology while acknowledging the potential risks and benefits they bring.

Public participation in the implementation of artificial intelligence is seen as necessary.

It is argued that involving the public and giving them a voice is crucial for the responsible development and deployment of AI technologies. A speaker highlights the importance of hearing from specialists and considers it a common responsibility to include experts from various fields in decision-making processes.

Proper governance of artificial intelligence is highlighted as essential.

The speakers advocate for ensuring that AI is ethically and responsibly governed to prevent issues such as misinformation and fake news. It is emphasized that AI governance is crucial for maintaining peace, justice, and the functioning of strong institutions.

The importance of a uniformed approach in terms of digitalization and AI is highlighted.

This includes the need for consistent standards and practices across different regions and countries. It is argued that a uniformed approach to digitalization and AI can help reduce inequalities and promote fair access to technology.

Overall, the speakers highlight the need to address inequalities, strike a balance between advancement and prevention, engage in global dialogue, ensure inclusivity, protect children, promote critical thinking, involve stakeholders, and govern AI and ICT properly.

These points emphasize the importance of responsible and ethical development and use of AI technologies to achieve sustainable development goals and create a more equitable and inclusive society.

Report

After analysing the data, several key points emerge. Firstly, there are concerns surrounding misinformation in Gen-AI tools. Outdated or faulty information has the potential to harm reputations, and the emergence of doctored videos is a significant issue that can lead to gender-based violence harms.

This highlights the need for careful consideration and regulation of Gen-AI tools to mitigate negative consequences.

The importance of addressing misinformation in dialogues is emphasised, as it is essential to navigate the threats and advances in AI technology.

Including concerns about misinformation in dialogues fosters understanding and collaboration in finding solutions to tackle this issue.

The Indian government, in collaboration with Intel, has taken proactive steps to educate school students about AI through the initiative ‘AI for All’.

This curriculum, implemented in central schools, aims to equip students with knowledge and understanding of AI concepts. Additionally, the government has partnered with startup incubators to promote conversations and podcasts about simpler AI concepts, broadening the accessibility of AI education.

Raashi Saxena, a notable figure in the field, is willing to share their AI curriculum and engage in offline discussions, demonstrating a commitment to collaborative exploration of AI.

Diverse participation in an Artificial Intelligence dialogue in India is celebrated, as it includes individuals from various age groups, including a Buddhist monk and housewives.

The selection of participants from places with social turmoil and socio-political issues adds depth and perspective to the discussions, enriching the insights gained.

Information provision is highlighted as a fundamental aspect of empowerment. Concrete and accurate data enables people to make informed decisions.

Facilitating access to reliable information fosters active participation and engagement.

AI discussions are seen as educational opportunities, expanding participants’ knowledge and understanding. The diverse contributors notably gain valuable insights.

The potential of AI in content moderation is acknowledged for its precision and ability to sift through large volumes of data.

AI is considered a valuable tool in addressing harmful content, particularly following the increase in online presence due to the COVID pandemic and concerns about the treatment of human content moderators.

Developers, as key stakeholders in technology, should be actively included in conversations about its role in society.

Their perspectives and expertise are crucial in finding solutions and addressing challenges.

Contextualising information according to local needs and languages fosters engagement and response. In India, in-person dialogues in small village settings, coupled with translation into local languages, facilitate more inclusive and fruitful dialogues.

The analysis also highlights that hate speech, misinformation, and propaganda are long-standing issues that technology has made more economical and efficient to spread.

Ongoing efforts are needed to address these issues and regulate technology to mitigate their negative impact.

The inclusion of vulnerable groups, such as children and people with disabilities, is emphasised in discussions. It is important to adopt inclusive approaches that consider the needs and perspectives of all individuals, promoting a more equitable dialogue.

The significance of considering different languages in discussions is recognised, as it makes the dialogue more accessible to diverse communities and enables a broader range of voices to be heard.

Finally, the importance of adhering to dedicated time limits for discussions is emphasised to respect participants’ time and ensure efficient conversations.

In conclusion, the analysis of the data provides insights into AI, misinformation, education, and inclusivity.

A balanced approach is needed to address challenges posed by technology, information provision and education are crucial, and inclusive dialogues should consider diverse perspectives. AI’s role in content moderation and the engagement of developers in conversations about technology’s impact are highlighted.

Contextualisation of dialogue according to local needs and languages is essential, as are efforts to address long-standing issues. The inclusion of vulnerable groups and consideration of different languages promote a more inclusive dialogue. Adhering to time limits is also important.

Report

In the analysis, it is highlighted that Roberto Zambrana has a neutral stance towards AI and expresses curiosity about what AI itself thinks. This suggests a willingness to engage in a dialogue with AI and consider its perspectives.

Furthermore, Zambrana advocates for a hybrid approach in reaching agreements on general terms and adapting certain topics, regardless of the country.

This approach emphasises the importance of flexibility and adaptability in addressing various issues related to AI. This aligns with SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals, which promotes collaboration and cooperation among different stakeholders to achieve sustainable development.

Additionally, the analysis emphasises the significance of education in understanding the concerns and frontline problems associated with AI.

Zambrana recognises that involving both citizens and developers in the process can lead to better outcomes. This highlights the need for awareness, knowledge, and dialogue to ensure the responsible and beneficial use of AI.

Moreover, the analysis highlights Zambrana’s support for global dialogues as a means of overcoming barriers and achieving a balanced understanding of AI and metaverses.

Such dialogues can foster collaboration and support between countries, helping them overcome challenges and realise the potential benefits of AI and metaverses. This is in line with SDG 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure, which seeks to promote technological advancements, and SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals, which emphasizes cooperation and collaboration between different stakeholders.

Overall, Zambrana’s neutral stance towards AI, advocacy for a hybrid approach, emphasis on education, and involvement of the technical community, and support for global dialogues underscore his commitment to fostering responsible and inclusive AI development.

These insights serve as a reminder of the importance of considering diverse perspectives and engaging in collaborative efforts to harness the potential of AI for sustainable development.

Report

The global discussions on AI governance need to consider different models and structures used across borders. Arisa Ema suggests that transparency and interoperability are crucial elements in these discussions. This is supported by the fact that framework interoperability has been highlighted in the G7 communique, and different countries have their own policies for AI evaluation.

When it comes to risk-based assessments, it is important to consider various aspects and application areas.

For example, the level of risk involved in different usage scenarios, such as the use of facial recognition systems at airports or building entrances. Arisa Ema highlights the need to consider who is using AI, who is benefiting from it, and who is at risk.

Inclusivity is another important aspect of AI governance discussions.

Arisa Ema urges the inclusion of physically challenged individuals in forums such as the Internet Governance Forum (IGF). She mentions an example of organizing a session where a person in a wheelchair participated remotely using avatar robots. This highlights the potential of technology to include those who may not be able to physically attend sessions.

Arisa Ema also emphasizes the importance of a human-centric approach in AI discussions.

She believes that humans are adaptable and resilient, and they play a key role in AI systems. A human-centric approach ensures that AI benefits humanity and aligns with our values and needs.

Furthermore, Arisa Ema sees AI governance as a shared topic of discussion among technologists, policymakers, and the public.

She uses democratic principles to stress her stance, emphasizing the importance of involving all stakeholders in shaping AI governance policies and frameworks.

The discussion on AI governance is an ongoing process, according to Arisa Ema. She believes that it is not the end but rather a starting point for exchanges and discussions.

It is important to have a shared philosophy or concept in AI governance to foster collaboration and a common understanding among stakeholders.

Overall, the extended summary highlights the need for transparency, interoperability, risk-based assessments, inclusivity, a human-centric approach, and a shared governance framework in AI discussions.

Arisa Ema’s insights and arguments provide valuable perspectives on these important aspects of AI governance.

Report

The creation of AI involves different types of labor across the globe, each with its own set of standards and regulations. It is important to recognize that AI systems may be technological in nature, but they require significant human input during development.

However, the labor involved in creating AI differs between the global south and the Western world. This suggests that there may be disparities in terms of the resources, expertise, and opportunities available for AI development in different regions.

When it comes to AI-generated disinformation, developing countries face particular challenges in countering this issue.

With the rise of generative AI, which has become increasingly popular, there has been an increase in the spread of misinformation. This poses a significant challenge for developing countries, as they may not have the resources or infrastructure to effectively counter and mitigate the negative consequences of AI-generated disinformation.

On the other hand, developed economies have a responsibility to help create an inclusive digital ecosystem.

While countries like Nepal are striving to enter the digital era, they face obstacles in the form of new technologies like AI. This highlights the importance of developed economies providing support and collaboration to ensure that developing countries can also benefit from and participate in the digital revolution.

In terms of regulation, there is no global consensus on how to govern AI and big data.

The International Governance Forum (IGF) has been grappling with the issue of big data regulation for over a decade, without reaching a global agreement. Furthermore, there are differences in the approaches taken by different regions, such as the US and Europe, to deal with the data practices of their respective companies.

This lack of consensus presents challenges in establishing consistent and effective regulation for AI and big data across the globe.

When it comes to policy-making, it is crucial to consider the protection of future generations, especially children, in discussions related to AI.

Advocacy for children’s rights and the need to safeguard the interests of future generations have been highlighted in discussions around AI and policy-making. It is important not to overlook or underestimate the impact that AI will have on the lives of children and future generations.

It is worth noting that technical discussions should not neglect simple yet significant considerations, such as addressing the concerns of children in policy-making.

These considerations can help achieve inclusive designs that take into account the diverse needs and perspectives of different groups. By incorporating the voices and interests of children, policymakers can create policies that are more equitable and beneficial for all.

In conclusion, the creation and regulation of AI present various challenges and considerations.

The differing types of labor involved in AI creation, the struggle to counter AI-generated disinformation in developing countries, the need for developed economies to foster an inclusive digital ecosystem, the absence of a global consensus on regulating AI and big data, and the importance of considering the interests of children in policy-making are all crucial aspects that need to be addressed.

It is essential to promote collaboration, dialogue, and comprehensive approaches to ensure that AI is developed and regulated in a manner that benefits society as a whole.

Report

During the discussion on responsible AI governance, the importance of technical standards in supporting effective and responsible AI governance was emphasised. It was noted that IEEE initiated the Ethical Aligned Design initiative, which aimed to develop socio-technical standards, value-based design, and an ethical certification system.

Collaboration between IEEE and regulatory bodies such as the Council of Europe and OECD was also mentioned to ensure the alignment of technical standards with responsible AI governance.

The implementation of responsible AI governance was seen as a combination of top-down (regulatory frameworks) and bottom-up (individual level) approaches.

Engagement with organizations like the Council of Europe, EU, and OECD for regulation was considered crucial. Efforts to map regulatory requirements to technical standards were also highlighted to bridge the gap between regulatory frameworks and responsible AI governance.

Capacity building in technical expertise and understanding of social legal matters was recognised as a key aspect of responsible AI implementation.

The necessity of competency frameworks defining the necessary skills for AI implementation was emphasised. Collaboration with certification bodies for developing an ecosystem to support capacity building was also mentioned.

Efforts to protect vulnerable communities online were a key focus.

Examples were given, such as the LEGO Group implementing measures to protect children in their online and virtual environments. Regulatory frameworks like the UK Children’s Act were also highlighted as measures taken to protect vulnerable communities online.

The discussion acknowledged that voluntary standards for AI can be effective and adopted by a wide range of actors.

Examples were provided, such as UNICEF using IEEE’s value-based design approach for a talent-searching system in Africa. The City of Vienna was mentioned as a pilot project for IEEE’s AI certification, illustrating the potential for voluntary standards to drive responsible AI governance.

In terms of incentives for adopting voluntary standards, they were seen to vary.

Some incentives mentioned include trust in services, regulatory compliance, risk minimisation, and the potential for a better value proposition. However, the discussion acknowledged that self-regulatory measures have limitations, and there is a need for democratically-decided boundaries in responsible AI governance.

Cooperation, feedback mechanisms, standardized reporting, and benchmarking/testing facilities were identified as key factors in achieving global governance of AI.

These mechanisms were viewed as necessary for ensuring transparency, accountability, and consistency in the implementation of responsible AI governance.

The importance of global regulation or governance of AI was strongly emphasised. It was compared to the widespread usage of electricity, suggesting that AI usage is similarly pervasive and requires global standards and regulations for responsible implementation.

The need for transparency in understanding AI usage was highlighted.

The discussion stressed the importance of clarity regarding how AI is used, incidents it may cause, the data sets involved, and the usage of synthetic data.

While private efforts in AI were recognised, it was emphasised that they should be made more trustworthy and open.

Current private efforts were described as voluntary and often closed, underscoring the need for greater transparency and accountability in the private sector’s contribution to responsible AI governance.

The discussion also touched upon the importance of agility when it comes to generative AI.

It was suggested that generative AI at organizational and global levels should be agile to adapt to the evolving landscape of responsible AI governance.

Feedback mechanisms were highlighted as essential for the successful development of foundational models. The discussion emphasised that feedback at all levels is necessary to continuously improve foundational models and align them with responsible AI governance.

High-risk AI applications were identified as needing conformity assessments by independent organizations.

This was seen as a way to ensure that these applications meet the necessary ethical and responsible standards.

The comparison of AI with the International Atomic Agency was mentioned but deemed difficult due to the various uses and applications of AI.

The discussion acknowledged that AI has vast potential in different domains, making it challenging to compare directly with an established institution like the International Atomic Agency.

Finally, it was suggested that an independent multi-stakeholder panel should be implemented for important technologies that act as infrastructure.

This proposal was supported by one of the speakers, Clara, and was seen as a way to enhance responsible governance and decision-making regarding crucial technological developments.

In conclusion, the discussion on responsible AI governance highlighted the significance of technical standards, the need for a combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches, capacity building, protection of vulnerable communities, the effectiveness of voluntary standards, incentives for adoption, the limitations of self-regulatory measures, the role of cooperation and feedback mechanisms in achieving global governance, the importance of transparency and global regulation, the agility of generative AI, and the importance of conformity assessments for high-risk AI applications.

Additionally, the proposal for an independent multi-stakeholder panel for crucial technologies was seen as a way to enhance responsible governance.

Report

OpenAI is committed to promoting the safety of AI through collaboration with various stakeholders. They acknowledge the significance of the public sector, civil society, and academia in ensuring the safety of AI and support their work in this regard. OpenAI also recognizes the need to understand the capabilities of new AI technologies and address any unforeseen harms that may arise from their use.

They strive to improve their AI tools through an iterative approach, constantly learning and making necessary improvements.

In addition to the public sector and civil society, OpenAI emphasizes the role of the private sector in capacity building for research teams.

They work towards building the research capacity of civil society and human rights organizations, realizing the importance of diverse perspectives in addressing AI-related issues.

OpenAI highlights the importance of standardized language and concrete definitions in AI conversations. By promoting a common understanding of AI tools, they aim to facilitate effective and meaningful discussions around their development and use.

The safety of technology use by vulnerable groups is a priority for OpenAI.

They stress the need for research-based safety measures, leveraging the expertise of child safety experts and similar institutions. OpenAI recognizes that understanding usage patterns and how different groups interact with technology is crucial in formulating effective safety measures.

The protection of labor involved in the production of AI is a significant concern for OpenAI.

They emphasize the need for proper compensation and prompt action against any abuses or harms. OpenAI calls for vigilance to ensure fairness and justice in AI, highlighting the role of companies and monitoring groups in preventing abusive work conditions.

Jurisdictional challenges pose a unique obstacle in AI governance discussions.

OpenAI acknowledges the complexity arising from different regulatory frameworks in different jurisdictions. They stress the importance of considering the local context and values in AI system regulation and response.

OpenAI believes in the importance of safety and security testing in different regions to ensure optimal AI performance.

They have launched the Red Teaming Network, inviting submissions from various countries, regions, and sectors. By encouraging diverse perspectives and inputs, OpenAI aims to enhance the safety and security of AI systems.

International institutions like the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) play a crucial role in harmonizing discussions about AI regulation and governance.

OpenAI recognizes the contributions of such institutions in defining benchmarks and monitoring progress in AI regulations.

While formulating new standards for AI, OpenAI advocates for building on existing conventions, treaties, and areas of law. They believe that these established frameworks should serve as the foundation for developing comprehensive standards for AI usage and safety.

OpenAI is committed to contributing to discussions and future regulations of AI.

They are actively involved in various initiatives and encourage collaboration to address challenges and shape the future of AI in a responsible and safe manner.

In terms of emergency response, OpenAI has an emergency shutdown procedure in place for specific dangerous scenarios.

This demonstrates their commitment to safety protocols and risk management. They also leverage geographical cutoffs to deal with imminent threats.

OpenAI emphasizes the importance of human involvement in the development and testing of AI systems. They recognize the value of human-in-the-loop approaches, including the role of humans in red teaming processes and ensuring audibility in AI systems.

To address the issue of AI bias, OpenAI suggests the use of synthetic data sets.

These data sets can help balance the under-representation of certain regions or genders and fill gaps in language or available information. OpenAI sees the potential in synthetic data sets to tackle some of the challenges associated with AI bias.

Standards bodies, research institutions, and government security testers have a crucial role in developing and monitoring AI.

OpenAI acknowledges their importance in ensuring the security and accountability of AI systems.

Public-private collaboration is instrumental in ensuring the safety of digital tools. OpenAI recognizes the significance of working on design, reporting, and research aspects to address potential harms and misuse.

They emphasize understanding different communities’ interactions with these tools to develop effective safety measures.

OpenAI recognizes the need to address the harmful effects of new technologies while acknowledging their potential benefits. They emphasize the urgency to build momentum in addressing the negative impacts of emerging technologies and actively contribute to the international regulatory conversation.

In conclusion, OpenAI’s commitment to AI safety is evident through their support for the work of the public sector, civil society, and academia.

They emphasize the need to understand new AI capabilities and address unanticipated harms. The private sector has a role to play in capacity building, while standardized language and definitions are crucial in AI conversations. OpenAI stresses the importance of research-based safety measures for technology use by vulnerable groups and protection of labor involved in AI production.

They acknowledge the challenges posed by jurisdictional borders in AI governance discussions. OpenAI promotes safety and security testing, encourages public-private collaboration, and advocates for the involvement of humans in AI development and testing. They also highlight the potential of synthetic data sets to address AI bias.

International institutions, existing conventions, and standards bodies play a significant role in shaping AI regulations, and OpenAI is actively engaged in contributing to these discussions. Overall, OpenAI’s approach emphasizes the importance of responsible and safe AI development and usage for the benefit of society.

Report

In her writings, Maria Paz Canales Lobel stresses the crucial importance of shaping the digital transformation to ensure that artificial intelligence (AI) technologies serve the best interests of humanity. She argues that AI governance should be firmly rooted in the international human rights framework, advocating for the application of human rights principles to guide the regulation and oversight of AI systems.

Canales Lobel proposes a risk-based approach to AI design and development, suggesting that potential risks and harms associated with AI technologies should be carefully identified and addressed from the outset.

She emphasises the need for transparency in the development and deployment of AI systems to ensure that they are accountable for any adverse impacts or unintended consequences.

Furthermore, Canales Lobel emphasises the importance of open and inclusive design, development, and use of AI technologies.

She argues that AI governance should be shaped through a multi-stakeholder conversation, involving diverse perspectives and expertise, in order to foster a holistic approach to decision-making and policy development. By including a wide range of stakeholders, she believes that the needs and concerns of vulnerable communities, such as children, can be adequately addressed in AI governance.

Canales Lobel also highlights the significance of effective global processes in AI governance, advocating for seamless coordination and cooperation between international and local levels.

She suggests that the governance of AI should encompass not only technical standards and regulations but also voluntary guidelines and ethical considerations. She emphasizes the necessity of extending discussions beyond the confines of closed rooms and engaging people from various backgrounds and geopolitical contexts to ensure a comprehensive and inclusive approach.

In conclusion, Canales Lobel underscores the importance of responsible and ethical AI governance that places human rights and the well-being of all individuals at its core.

Through her arguments for the integration of human rights principles, the adoption of a risk-based approach, and the promotion of open and inclusive design, development, and use of AI technologies, she presents a nuanced and holistic perspective on effective AI governance.

Her emphasis on multi-stakeholder conversations, global collaboration, and the needs of vulnerable communities further contributes to the ongoing discourse on AI ethics and regulation.

Report

During the discussion, the speakers focused on various aspects of AI regulation and governance. One important point that was emphasized is the need for AI regulation to be inclusive and child-centred. This means that any regulations and governance frameworks should take into account the needs and rights of children.

It is crucial to ensure that children are protected and their best interests are considered when it comes to AI technologies.

Furthermore, the audience was encouraged to actively engage in the discussion by asking questions about AI and governance.

This shows the importance of public participation and the involvement of various stakeholders in shaping AI policies and regulations. By encouraging questions and dialogue, it allows for a more inclusive and democratic approach to AI governance.

The potential application of generative AI in the educational system of developing countries, such as Afghanistan, was also explored.

Generative AI has the potential to revolutionise education by providing innovative and tailored learning experiences for students. This could be particularly beneficial for developing countries where access to quality education is often a challenge.

Challenges regarding accountability in AI were brought to attention as well.

It was highlighted that AI is still not fully understood, and this lack of understanding poses challenges in ensuring accountability for AI systems and their outcomes. The ethical implications of AI making decisions based on non-human generated data were also discussed, raising concerns about the biases and fairness of such decision-making processes.

Another significant concern expressed during the discussion was the need for a plan to prevent AI from getting out of control.

As AI technologies advance rapidly, there is a risk of AI systems surpassing human control and potentially causing unintended consequences. It is important to establish robust mechanisms to ensure that AI remains within ethical boundaries and aligns with human values.

The importance of a multi-stakeholder approach in AI development and regulation was stressed.

This means involving various stakeholders, including industry experts, policymakers and the public, in the decision-making process. By considering different perspectives and involving all stakeholders, it is more likely to achieve inclusive and effective AI regulations.

Lastly, the idea of incorporating AI technology in the development of government regulatory systems was proposed.

This suggests using AI to enhance and streamline the processes of government regulation. By leveraging AI technology, regulatory systems can become more efficient, transparent and capable of addressing emerging challenges in a rapidly changing technological landscape.

Overall, the discussion highlighted the importance of inclusive and child-centred AI regulation and the need for active public participation.

It explored the potential of generative AI in education, while also addressing various challenges and concerns related to accountability, ethics and control of AI. The multi-stakeholder approach and the incorporation of AI technology in government regulations were also emphasised as key considerations for effective and responsible AI governance.

Report

AI technology is often compared to electricity in terms of its transformative power. However, unlike electricity, there is a growing consensus that governance frameworks for AI should be established promptly rather than waiting for several decades. Governments, such as the US, are embracing a multi-stakeholder approach to developing AI principles and governance.

The US government has made voluntary commitments in key areas like transparency, security, and trust.

Accountability is a key focus in AI governance, with both hard law and voluntary frameworks being discussed. However, there are concerns and skepticism surrounding the effectiveness of voluntary governance frameworks in ensuring accountability.

There is also doubt about the ability of principles alone to achieve accountability.

Despite these challenges, there is broad agreement on the concept of AI governance. Discussions and conversations are viewed as essential and valuable in shaping effective governance frameworks.

The aim is for powerful AI developers, whether they are companies or governments, to devote attention to governing AI responsibly. The multi-stakeholder community can play a crucial role in guiding these developers towards addressing society’s greatest challenges.

Implementing safeguards in AI is seen as vital for ensuring safety and security.

This includes concepts such as red teaming, strict cybersecurity, third-party audits, and public reporting, all aimed at creating accountability and trust. Developers are encouraged to focus on addressing issues like bias and discrimination in AI, aligning with the goal of using AI to tackle society’s most pressing problems.

The idea of instituting AI global governance requires patience.

Drawing a comparison to the establishment of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), it is recognized that the process can take time. However, there is a need to develop scientific networks for shared risk assessments and agree on shared standards for evaluation and capabilities.

In terms of decision-making, there is a call for careful yet swift action in AI governance.

Governments rely on inputs from various stakeholders, including the technical community and standard-setting bodies, to navigate the complex landscape of AI. Decision-making should not be careless, but the momentum towards establishing effective AI governance should not be slowed down.

In conclusion, while AI technology has the potential to be a transformative force, it is crucial to establish governance frameworks promptly.

A multi-stakeholder approach, accountability, and the implementation of safeguards are seen as key components of effective AI governance. Discussions and conversations among stakeholders are believed to be vital in shaping AI governance frameworks. Patience is needed in institutionalizing AI global governance, but decision-making should strike a balance between caution and timely action.

Report

The analysis of the event session highlights several key points made by the speakers. First, it is noted that the Global South is actively working towards establishing regulatory frameworks for managing artificial intelligence. This demonstrates an effort to ensure that AI technologies are used responsibly and with consideration for ethical and legal implications.

However, it is also pointed out that there is a lack of inclusivity in the design and application of AI on a global scale. The speakers highlight the fact that centres of power control the knowledge and design of technology, leading to inadequate representation from the Global South in discussions about AI.

This lack of inclusivity raises concerns about the potential for bias and discrimination in AI systems.

The analysis also draws attention to the issues of discriminatory practices and surveillance in the Global South related to the use of AI.

It is noted that surveillance targeting human rights defenders is a major concern, and there is evidence to suggest that discriminatory practices are indeed a lived reality. These concerns emphasize the need for proper oversight and safeguards to protect individuals from human rights violations arising from the use of AI.

In terms of internet governance, it is highlighted that inclusive processes and accessible platforms are essential for individuals from the Global South to be actively involved in Internet Governance Forums (IGFs).

The importance of ensuring the participation of everyone, including marginalized and vulnerable groups, is emphasized as a means of achieving more equitable and inclusive internet governance.

The analysis also emphasizes the need for continued engagement with critical stakeholders and a victim-centered approach in conversations about AI and technology.

This approach is necessary to address the adverse impacts of technology and ensure the promotion and protection of fundamental rights and freedoms. Furthermore, the analysis also underlines the importance of understanding global asymmetries and contexts when discussing AI and technology.

Recognizing these differences can lead to more informed and effective decision-making.

Another noteworthy observation is the emphasis on the agency of individuals over their fundamental rights and freedoms. The argument is made that human beings should not cede or forfeit their rights to technology, highlighting the need for responsible and human-centered design and application of AI.

Additionally, the analysis highlights the importance of promoting children’s and women’s rights in the use of AI, as well as centring conversations around environmental rights.

These aspects demonstrate the need to consider the broader societal impact of AI beyond just the technical aspects.

In conclusion, the analysis of the event session highlights the ongoing efforts of the Global South in developing regulatory frameworks for AI, but also raises concerns about the lack of inclusivity and potential for discrimination in the design and application of AI globally.

The analysis emphasizes the importance of inclusive and participatory internet governance, continued engagement with stakeholders, and a victim-centered approach in conversations about AI. It also underlines the need to understand global asymmetries and contexts and calls for the promotion and protection of fundamental rights and freedoms in the use of AI.

Report

The analysis explores various perspectives on cybersecurity, including the importance of prevention and secure design in protecting against cybercrimes, as highlighted by Cloudflare. International collaboration and a human-centric approach are also emphasized as crucial in addressing cybercrimes, while the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) is seen as a proactive platform for promoting a human-centric approach.

Additionally, the role of emerging technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI) in cybersecurity is recognized. The analysis stresses the need for global collaboration, data sharing, and industry involvement to improve security. It also discusses legal considerations, treaty definitions, and the importance of empowering individuals through education and preventive measures.

Overall, the summary captures the main points and keywords of the analysis accurately, while ensuring UK spelling and grammar are used.

Report

The analysis encompasses a range of important discussions relating to cybersecurity, digitalisation, international law, knowledge-sharing, and solar technology. One notable point emphasised is the need to effectively utilise emerging technologies to enhance cybersecurity measures. This argument underscores the importance of staying ahead of cyber threats by employing advanced technologies.

Policymakers are urged to prioritise cybersecurity and treat it seriously.

The significance of cybersecurity is further underscored by research findings which indicate a potential increase in a country’s GDP per capita with the maturity and implementation of robust cybersecurity measures.

This evidence demonstrates the economic benefits that can be gained through investing in cybersecurity.

The debate surrounding the need for a legally binding instrument to govern responsible state behaviour in cyberspace is another key aspect addressed. While international law is already deemed applicable in cyberspace, there is a call for a specific instrument to address the complexities and unique challenges of cybersecurity.

The involvement of stakeholders such as the technical community, civil society, and international law firms is viewed as crucial in shaping this instrument.

The analysis also highlights the importance of knowledge-sharing in the context of cybersecurity. It suggests the creation of a worldwide knowledge pool accessible to individuals across different regions, including Africa and South West Africa.

The inclusion of non-technical aspects, such as social, psychological, and gender considerations, is emphasised as essential in developing comprehensive cybersecurity strategies.

In terms of infrastructure development, the potential of using solar technology to address the electricity gap in West Africa’s telecommunications sector is explored.

This could potentially provide a sustainable solution to power critical telecommunications infrastructure.

Another important topic in the analysis is the need for specific measures to ensure the safety and security of children online. It is argued that a holistic approach to cybersecurity may not effectively protect children, and a more targeted and comprehensive approach is required.

This includes the building of children’s capacity through internet governance and digital literacy initiatives.

The importance of cross-border collaboration in addressing cybersecurity challenges is also highlighted. Given the transnational nature of cyber threats, regional and international cooperation is deemed crucial to effectively counter cybercrime.

The analysis suggests the involvement of organisations like Interpol for effective collaboration.

Lastly, the analysis suggests that instead of establishing a new convention or treaty on cybercrime, it may be more practical and efficient to focus on improving or expanding the role of existing organisations such as Interpol.

This approach could lead to more effective outcomes in combating cybercrime.

In conclusion, the analysis provides a comprehensive overview of various topics related to cybersecurity and related fields. It emphasises the need for the effective use of emerging technologies, the importance of policymakers’ attention to cybersecurity, the role of international law in cyberspace, knowledge-sharing, and the potential of solar technology in telecommunications infrastructure.

The analysis also highlights the importance of including non-technical aspects in cybersecurity, protecting children online, and promoting cross-border collaboration. Overall, the analysis offers valuable insights and recommendations for addressing the challenges and opportunities in the field of cybersecurity.

Report

The analysis explores various arguments surrounding cybercrime negotiations, stakeholder involvement, capacity building, cybersecurity, emerging technologies, and the digital economy.

One of the key points highlighted is the need for expertise in cybercrime negotiations. The analysis suggests that negotiations often lack input from experts who understand the real challenges on the ground.

It further notes that the current model of negotiations, which is primarily built for countries, tends to involve a lot of geopolitical issues. This argument highlights the importance of including expert knowledge to develop effective policies to combat cybercrime.

Another argument put forth is the crucial involvement of stakeholders outside of government in cybercrime discussions.

The analysis emphasizes that there is a wealth of outside expertise and insights available, and bringing in this expertise is essential for creating effective policies. This argument recognizes the need to involve various stakeholders such as industry experts, civil society organizations, and academia to ensure a more comprehensive approach to tackling cybercrime.

The analysis also addresses the growing international issue of cybercrime.

It notes that cybercrime, particularly ransomware attacks, has significantly affected people’s daily lives, making it a pocketbook and backyard issue for many individuals. Additionally, cybercrime has become a political priority for countries around the world. These observations underscore the urgency of addressing cybercrime as a pressing global challenge.

In terms of cybersecurity, the analysis highlights the need for sustained attention to this issue.

It acknowledges that cybersecurity has matured as a policy concern but identifies the challenge of bridging the gap between the political level and the practitioner level. The analysis suggests that ransomware attacks have helped raise the profile of cybersecurity and the importance of protecting against new and existing threats.

Furthermore, the analysis touches on the issue of policymakers feeling intimidated by technical issues.

It points out that policymakers often struggle to understand complex technical concepts, which can hinder effective policymaking. However, the analysis argues that technical concepts can be understood by non-technicians if they are adequately explained. This highlights the importance of effective communication and education to bridge the gap between technical experts and policymakers.

Capacity building is also identified as a key aspect in the analysis.

It highlights that countries, especially developing ones, require assistance in dealing with cybersecurity threats, building national strategies, establishing emergency response teams, and applying international norms and laws. The analysis praises the Global Forum on Cyber Expertise for coordinating capacity-building efforts worldwide.

Notably, the analysis observes the importance of not losing sight of the larger cybersecurity issue amidst the focus on emerging technologies.

While emerging technologies are part of the problem, it is crucial to maintain a holistic approach to cybersecurity.

In conclusion, the analysis provides insights into various aspects of cybercrime, cybersecurity, stakeholder involvement, and capacity building. It underscores the need for expertise in cybercrime negotiations and involving stakeholders outside of government.

The analysis highlights the urgency of addressing cybercrime as a global issue and the necessity of sustained attention to cybersecurity. It also emphasizes the importance of adequately explaining technical concepts, capacity building efforts, and maintaining a balance between addressing emerging technologies and the larger cybersecurity challenges.

Report

The protection of children from cyber security threats and cyber crime is highlighted as a crucial matter in the collection of statements. The creation of the Russian Alliance for the Protection of Children in the Digital Environment demonstrates the commitment to address this issue.

Furthermore, the issue gained recognition at the 2023 BRICS Summit, where participating countries pledged to take action to secure a safe digital environment for children.
Major IT companies are urged to commit to initiatives aimed at mobilizing the public to protect children on the Internet.

The Russian IT society has already taken voluntary steps in this direction. Additionally, the Digital Ethics of Childhood Charter was established to establish ethical principles regarding children’s online safety.
A major concern expressed in the statements is the threat of sexual exploitation and abuse of children on the Internet.

Disturbingly, a UN statistic reveals that 80% of children in 25 countries reportedly feel at risk of sexual abuse or exploitation online. The We Protect Global Alliance goes as far as to describe the easy access to child sexual abuse material online as a “tsunami.”
The need for data exchange pertaining to the localization of harmful and dangerous material, as well as information on new criminal methods and attacker details, is stressed.

In 2022, the removal of 1,126 units of content relied on a hash database with the involvement of major players in the UK IT market.
Furthermore, joint efforts and open discussions are considered essential in protecting children from cyber threats. Elisaveta, a prominent figure, emphasizes the significance of collective actions in safeguarding children against such threats.
In conclusion, the protection of children from cyber security threats and cyber crime is a pressing issue.

The establishment of organizations such as the Russian Alliance for the Protection of Children in the Digital Environment and voluntary commitments by major IT companies demonstrate progress towards securing a safe digital environment for children. However, the prevalence of sexual exploitation and abuse online remains a distressing concern, necessitating further action and cooperation.

Report

There is increasing concern regarding the development of cyber offensive capabilities and the legitimacy of using force in response to cyber attacks, particularly for certain states. These states have included offensive cyber weapons as part of their national security strategies and doctrines, considering the use of force as a legitimate response to cyber attacks.

This trend raises questions about the potential implications and consequences of such actions in international relations and security (keyword: cyber offensive capabilities, legitimacy of using force, national security strategies, international relations and security).

The misuse of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and media platforms has emerged as a significant threat to nations.

Individuals, organizations, and states are covertly and unlawfully exploiting computer systems to carry out attacks. These activities can potentially trigger international conflicts. Moreover, social networks and electronic broadcasts are being used as tools for interventionism, promoting hate speech, incitement to violence, destabilization, and the dissemination of false information and fake news.

This misuse of ICTs and media platforms not only endangers peaceful relations but also undermines principles of justice and strong institutions (keywords: misuse of ICTs, media platforms, international conflicts, hate speech, incitement to violence, destabilization, false information, fake news).

To address these challenges, it is suggested that countries commit to using ICTs for peaceful purposes, fostering cooperation and development.

A global commitment should be established, encouraging nations to utilize information and communication technologies for the betterment of society. Additionally, implementing technical assistance mechanisms to exchange good practices can enhance international cooperation in this domain (keywords: peaceful use of ICTs, cooperation, development, technical assistance mechanisms, international cooperation).

In addition to commitments and cooperation, the development of a legally binding international instrument is necessary to bridge the gaps in cybersecurity.

This instrument should complement existing international law and effectively address the growing challenges and threats in cyberspace. International cooperation is crucial in tackling these issues and ensuring stability and security in the digital realm (keywords: legally binding international instrument, cybersecurity, international law, international cooperation, stability, security).

It is also acknowledged that existing international laws need adjustments to encompass cyberspace adequately.

Given the highly dynamic nature of cyberspace, traditional laws may not cover emerging issues. Thus, a binding regulatory framework is needed to establish clear standards and criteria for cyber activities. Additionally, violations of treaties and conventions should be effectively addressed to maintain the integrity and security of the digital world (keywords: existing international laws, dynamic nature of cyberspace, binding regulatory framework, standards, criteria, violations of treaties and conventions).

The complexities involved in maintaining good cyber practices and the violations of treaties and conventions highlight the need for comprehensive solutions.

It is important to address the challenges faced by both developing and developed countries in the digital arena. Developing countries, in particular, face difficulties due to the digital divide, leading to disparities in accessing information and financing for development. Bridging this divide and promoting equal opportunities for all nations is crucial for achieving sustainable development and reducing inequalities (keywords: good cyber practices, violations of treaties and conventions, digital divide, equal opportunities, sustainable development, reducing inequalities).

The importance of discussions and consensus-building regarding cyberspace-related topics is crucial.

Continued dialogue among nations and stakeholders is necessary to navigate the complex landscape of cyberspace and develop shared norms and principles. Such discussions can help establish conventions that promote the development of all peoples and safeguard global interests (keywords: discussions, consensus-building, cyberspace-related topics, shared norms and principles, conventions, development of all peoples, global interests).

Lastly, it is important to recognize the time constraints involved in addressing all the issues in the world of cyberspace.

The rapidly evolving nature of technology and the increasing threats in cyberspace pose significant challenges. While it is essential to strive for comprehensive solutions, it is also prudent to acknowledge the limitations and prioritize actions that can have the greatest impact in mitigating risks and promoting a secure and peaceful cyberspace (keywords: time constraints, rapidly evolving nature of technology, comprehensive solutions, mitigating risks, secure and peaceful cyberspace).

In conclusion, the analysis highlights the pressing need for regulations and international cooperation to address the growing challenges in cyberspace.

This includes concerns about the development of cyber offensive capabilities, the misuse of ICTs and media platforms, and the gaps in current cybersecurity measures. Adopting a binding regulatory framework, adjusting existing international laws, bridging the digital divide, and fostering dialogue and consensus-building are vital steps towards creating a safer and more inclusive digital environment.

(keyword: regulations, international cooperation, cyber offensive capabilities, misuse of ICTs, media platforms, cybersecurity measures, digital divide, safer and more inclusive digital environment).

Report

The analysis conducted on cybersecurity in the West African region reveals several key findings. One major issue is the lack of national and regional coordination to effectively combat cyber threats. This coordination is crucial for developing and implementing comprehensive strategies that address the complex challenges posed by cybercrime.

Due to resource limitations on technical, financial, and human fronts, the West African region is ill-equipped to tackle cybersecurity effectively.

Another important aspect highlighted in the analysis is the insufficient allocation of resources to the cybersecurity sector. Many member states do not have dedicated budget line items for cybersecurity, which hampers their ability to invest in the necessary tools and technologies needed to protect against cyber threats.

Additionally, there is a shortage of qualified personnel in the region, further exacerbating the problem. Furthermore, the weak critical infrastructure in West Africa makes it particularly susceptible to cyber attacks, with frequent power outages and telecommunication disruptions already being commonplace.

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought necessary attention to the importance of cybersecurity and digitalization.

As member states were forced to adopt digital solutions to meet the daily needs of their citizens, the conversation around digitalization security increased. This shift has highlighted the need for robust cybersecurity measures to safeguard critical systems and protect personal data.

The analysis also emphasizes the need for increased cooperation, information sharing, and involvement of the private sector in cybersecurity efforts.

Peer-to-peer cooperation between member states is crucial for effectively combating cyber threats. Elisabetta, a prominent figure, stressed the importance of data exchange for child protection and overall cybersecurity. Furthermore, the analysis suggests that incentives for workers and partnerships with the private sector can significantly improve the cybersecurity landscape in the region.

The approach taken by the Global Forum on Cyber Expertise (GFC) in collaborating with regional economic communities, such as the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), is commendable.

The GFC aims to enhance capacity building in the region through such partnerships, which aligns with the goals and needs of the West African countries.

While global best practices in cybersecurity are valuable, the analysis highlights the need for local adaptations.

Cybersecurity practices from other regions, such as the US, may not be directly applicable in West Africa without considering the local context and challenges. Therefore, promoting a practical approach to cybersecurity and encouraging local adaptation of global strategies are essential.

To address the issues surrounding cybersecurity in the region, a joint platform for advancing cybersecurity in West Africa was launched under the G7 German presidency.

This program aims to establish an Information Sharing and Analysis Center (ISAC). The establishment of such a center is considered an excellent approach to enhancing information sharing and cooperation among stakeholders.

In conclusion, the comprehensive analysis of cybersecurity in West Africa underscores the urgent need for action.

Promoting a cybersecurity culture, improving communication, coordination, and cooperation at both national and regional levels, and prioritizing resource allocation are vital steps to effectively combat cyber threats in the region. Additionally, the analysis highlights the significance of local adaptations, capacity building, and the involvement of the private sector in addressing cybersecurity challenges and protecting critical infrastructure.

Report

The discussions on cybercrime and cybersecurity highlight the importance of finding a balance between security and the protection of privacy and human rights. However, the current UN Cybercrime Treaty is viewed as counterproductive and potentially undermines privacy rights. It focuses primarily on enhancing law enforcement powers, with minimal attention given to strengthening systems and networks at a technical level.

Additionally, certain provisions within the treaty could criminalise the work of independent security researchers and allow governments to force engineers to compromise security measures, potentially violating privacy.

To address the challenges of cybersecurity, it is suggested that systems and networks need to be strengthened at the technical level.

This would require better incentives to encourage the development of more secure software, devices, and networks. Legal protections for security researchers are also necessary to ensure their work in identifying vulnerabilities and improving security is not hindered. Furthermore, there is a need for enhanced education and information sharing about threats, vulnerabilities, and solutions among users and developers.

One of the major concerns with the current UN Cybercrime Treaty is the lack of adequate safeguards and disparities in privacy protections across different countries.

The treaty places mandatory powers for criminal investigations, while the safeguards remain optional. This opens the door for potential abuses and compromises privacy rights. The variation in privacy protection across countries also raises concerns about meeting international human rights standards, as international cooperation in dealing with cybercrime may depend on the privacy protection provided by the assisting country’s national law.

Another argument presented is that there should be a minimum baseline for privacy protections in the UN Cybercrime Treaty.

It is suggested that treaty-specific safeguards should be put in place to protect and establish a baseline for international cooperation. Currently, there is a significant disparity in the level of privacy protections and human rights from one country to another.

Companies also play a crucial role in upholding human rights.

It is argued that companies should have grounds to refuse cooperation if a request is disproportional or violates human rights law. The broad scope of the treaty may lead to potential abuses, and companies need the ability to deny cooperation on grounds of human rights violations.

Overall, the discussions on cybercrime and cybersecurity underscore the need to ensure that human rights and privacy are not compromised in the pursuit of security.

The current UN Cybercrime Treaty lacks adequate safeguards and may potentially violate privacy rights. Strengthening systems and networks at a technical level, providing legal protections for security researchers, and enhancing education and information sharing are seen as positive steps. A minimum baseline for privacy protections is necessary, and companies should have the ability to refuse cooperation if it violates human rights.

Upholding human rights and promoting international cooperation are essential in effectively addressing cybercrime.

Report

The analysis provides insights into various aspects of cybersecurity and cybercrime, including the relationship between global initiatives and national regulations and activities. It examines the need to enhance the link between global and national policies in this area. The analysis also highlights the role of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) in facilitating multi-stakeholder discussions on cybersecurity initiatives.

It emphasizes the importance of IGF in providing a platform for ministers, industry experts, and civil society representatives to engage in discussions and exchange ideas on cybersecurity.

Another proposed solution discussed in the analysis is the creation of a database of cybersecurity experts for knowledge sharing.

Efforts have been made to develop such databases within the Organization of American States and through the United Nations’ open-ended working group on cybersecurity. The aim is to facilitate information exchange and collaboration among different countries and regions.

The analysis also mentions the agreement on the need for a pool of knowledge to aid in dealing with cybercrime.

Olga Cavalli, a contributor in the analysis, supports the idea of having a knowledge pool to enhance capabilities in tackling cybercrime.

Furthermore, the importance of dialogue and cooperation in leveraging technology is emphasized. Active participation, interaction, learning, and sharing information are highlighted as key elements in harnessing the potential of technology.

The analysis advocates for trusting in human skills and potential in the context of technology.

Overall, the analysis reveals the interconnectedness of global initiatives, national regulations, and activities in the field of cybersecurity and cybercrime. It underscores the significance of multistakeholder dialogues, knowledge sharing, and cooperation in addressing these issues effectively.

The positive sentiment expressed throughout the analysis signifies a collective belief in the potential of these approaches in building more secure and resilient digital environments.

Report

The discussion on cybersecurity covered a range of important topics, including best practices, case studies, and practical issues. The participants expressed a strong desire to focus on real-world experiences and address core issues rather than engaging in theoretical debates. This emphasis on practicality and applicability underscores the need for actionable strategies and solutions in the field of cybersecurity.

In relation to the protection of children in the online environment, there was a call for the adoption of self-regulation mechanisms and social initiatives.

The participants highlighted the importance of collaboration between various stakeholders in reducing online risks and threats. Tracy, for example, spoke about the role of Elisabetta from the Alliance for the Protection of Children in the Digital Environment, who could provide expert insights on this matter.

It was also noted that the prevalence of child exploitation risk in the digital environment needs to be addressed, as evidenced by statistics shared by Elizaveta Belyakova. The rise of child trafficking in areas where the online world has a significant influence further highlights the urgency of this issue.

The discussions also shed light on the importance of equal communication and participation of all stakeholders in multilateral meetings regarding internet governance.

In order to ensure effective participation, Tracy highlighted the role of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF), where all participating stakeholders can freely exchange ideas. It was acknowledged that language barriers may hinder effective communication, and suggestions were made to provide interpretation services to overcome this challenge.

The notion of collective action was deemed essential in addressing cybersecurity challenges, particularly in developing nations.

The positive experiences shared by Falake and Tracy Hackshaw demonstrated how countries that excel in cybersecurity can assist those facing challenges in this domain. This highlights the potential benefits of sharing best practices and collaborating on cybersecurity efforts among nations.

Additionally, resource allocation towards cybersecurity in developing nations was acknowledged as a crucial aspect of addressing cybersecurity challenges.

Participants, such as Falake, highlighted the issue of limited resources in West Africa. However, the discussions emphasized that collective action and collaboration can help overcome these limitations and contribute to the enhancement of cybersecurity measures.

In conclusion, the discussions on cybersecurity focused on practical aspects, such as best practices and case studies, rather than dwelling on theoretical debates.

The protection of children online, equal participation in multilateral meetings, collective action among nations, and resource allocation in developing countries emerged as key areas of concern. Overall, the discussions provided valuable insights into the challenges and potential solutions in the field of cybersecurity.

Report

During the discussion, the speakers highlighted the critical need to address the negative impact of AI-based misinformation and disinformation, particularly in the context of elections and society at large. They noted that such misinformation campaigns have the potential to cause significant harm, and in some cases, even result in loss of life.

This emphasised the urgency for action to combat this growing threat.

To effectively address these challenges, the speakers stressed the importance of developing comprehensive strategies that involve various stakeholders. These strategies should engage nations, civil society, industry, and academia in collaborative efforts to counter the spread of misinformation and disinformation.

By working together, these sectors can pool their resources and expertise to develop innovative solutions and implement targeted interventions.

The panel also underscored the significance of raising awareness about these challenges on a large scale. By spreading awareness through education, individuals can be equipped with the necessary tools to identify and critically evaluate misinformation.

Education plays a vital role in empowering people to navigate the digital landscape and make informed decisions, contributing to a more resilient and informed society.

In conclusion, the speakers argued that addressing AI-based misinformation and disinformation requires a multifaceted approach.

Strategies involving nations, civil society, industry, and academia are necessary to counter these emerging challenges effectively. Additionally, spreading awareness about the threat of misinformation through education is crucial in empowering individuals and safeguarding societal integrity. By taking these steps, we can strive towards a more informed and resilient society.

Report

The analysis focuses on several key points related to the use of generative AI. One of the main arguments put forth is the importance of promoting remote access and affordability, especially in rural areas. It is highlighted that rural areas often struggle with internet connectivity, and the affordability of hardware and software platforms is a pressing challenge.

This is particularly relevant in communities in East Africa and certain regions in Asia.

The speakers also emphasize the need for generative AI solutions to be human-centred and designed with the end user in mind. They give the example of an agricultural chatbot that failed due to a language barrier encountered by the farmers.

Therefore, understanding the local context and considering the needs and preferences of the end users is crucial for the success of generative AI solutions.

Additionally, the analysis underscores the value of data sharing among stakeholders in driving value creation from generative AI.

It is mentioned that the Digital Transformation Centre has been working on developing data use cases for different sectors. Data sharing is seen as fostering trust and encouraging solutions that can effectively address development challenges. An example of this is the Agricultural Sector Data Gateway in Kenya, which allows private sector access to various datasets.

The speakers also emphasize the importance of public-private partnerships in the development of generative AI solutions.

They argue that both private and public sector partners possess their own sets of data, and mistrust can be an issue. Therefore, creating an environment that fosters trust among partners is crucial for data sharing and AI development.

Collaboration is deemed essential for generative AI to have a positive impact.

The analysis highlights a multidisciplinary approach, where stakeholders from the public and private sectors come together. An example is given in the transport industry, where the public sector takes care of infrastructure, while the private sector focuses on product development.

Furthermore, there is a call for more localized research to understand the regional-specific cultural nuances.

It is acknowledged that there is a gap in funding and a lack of engineers and data scientists in certain regions, making localized research vital for understanding specific needs and challenges.

The speakers also emphasize the importance of transparency in the use of generative AI.

They mention an example called “Best Take Photography,” where AI generates multiple pictures that potentially misrepresent reality. To ensure ethical use and avoid misrepresentations, transparency is presented as crucial.

The need for more engineers and data scientists, as well as funding, in Sub-Saharan Africa is also highlighted.

Efforts should be made to develop the capacity for these professionals, as they are essential for the advancement of generative AI in the region.

In addition to these points, public awareness sessions are deemed necessary to discuss the potential negative implications of generative AI.

The example of “Best Take Photography” is used again, showing the risks of generative AI in creating false realities.

The analysis makes a compelling argument for government-led initiatives and funding for AI innovation, particularly in the startup space.

The Startup Act in Tunisia is presented as an example of a government initiative that encourages innovation and supports young innovators in AI. It is argued that young people have the ideas, potential, and opportunity to solve societal challenges using AI, but they require resources and funding.

Lastly, the speakers highlight the potential risks of “black box” AI, where algorithms cannot adequately explain their decision-making processes.

This opacity can lead to the spread of misinformation or disinformation, underscoring the need for transparency in how models make decisions.

Overall, the analysis provides valuable insights into the various aspects that need to be considered in the use of generative AI.

It highlights the importance of addressing challenges such as remote access, affordability, human-centred design, data sharing, public-private partnerships, collaboration, localized research, transparency, capacity development, public awareness, government initiatives, and the risks of black box AI. The emphasis on these points serves as a call for action in leveraging generative AI for positive impact while addressing potential pitfalls.

Report

META, a leading technology company, has effectively employed AI technology to proactively remove potentially harmful and non-compliant content even before it is reported. Their advanced AI infrastructure has resulted in a significant reduction of hate speech prevalence by almost 60% over the past two years.

This demonstrates their commitment to maintaining a safe and responsible online environment.

In line with their dedication to responsible AI development, META has made a pledge to follow several essential principles. These principles include prioritising security, privacy, accountability, transparency, diversity, and robustness in constructing their AI technology.

META’s adherence to these principles is instrumental in ensuring the ethical and sustainable use of AI.

Furthermore, META has demonstrated its commitment to transparency and openness by publishing content moderation actions and enforcing community standards. They have also taken additional steps to foster transparency by open-sourcing their large language model, Lama 2.

By doing so, META allows for external scrutiny and encourages collaboration with the broader AI community.

The company prioritises fairness in its AI technology by using diverse datasets for training and ensuring that the technology does not perpetuate biases or discriminate against any particular group.

This dedication to fairness underscores the company’s commitment to inclusivity and combating inequalities.

META’s approach to AI development extends beyond internal measures. They have incorporated principles from reputable organisations such as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the European Union into their work on AI.

By aligning with international standards, META demonstrates its commitment to upholding ethical practices and participating in global efforts to responsibly regulate AI.

Recognising the importance of language inclusivity, META emphasises the need to make AI resources and education available in multiple languages.

This is particularly crucial in a diverse country like India, where there are 22 official languages. META aims to ensure that individuals from various linguistic backgrounds have equal access to AI resources, ultimately contributing to reduced inequalities in digital literacy and technology adoption.

META values local partnerships in the development of inclusive and diverse AI resources.

They acknowledge the importance of collaborating with local stakeholders for a deeper understanding of cultural nuances and community needs. Engaging these local partners not only enriches the AI development process but also fosters a sense of ownership and inclusion within the communities.

In terms of content moderation, META’s community standards apply to both organic content and generative AI content.

The company does not differentiate between the two when determining what can be shared on their platforms. This policy ensures consistency in maintaining the integrity of the online space and avoiding the spread of harmful or misleading content.

Prior to launching new services, META conducts extensive stress tests in collaboration with internal and external partners through red teaming exercises.

This rigorous testing process helps identify and address potential vulnerabilities, ensuring the delivery of robust and trustworthy AI services to users.

User feedback is highly valued by META. They incorporate a feedback loop into their product development process, allowing users to provide input and suggestions.

This user-centric approach enables continuous improvement and ensures that the technology meets the evolving needs and expectations of the users.

To combat the spread of false information and manipulated media, META has established specific policies and guidelines. They have a manipulated media policy that addresses the sharing of false content, with an exemption for parody and satire.

This policy aims to promote accurate and trustworthy information dissemination while allowing for creative expression.

In terms of community safety and education, META actively consults with experts, civil rights organizations, and government stakeholders. By seeking external perspectives and working collaboratively with these entities, META ensures that their policies and practices align with an inclusive and safe online environment.

Deepali Liberhan, an advocate in the field of AI, supports the idea of international cooperation and having clear directives for those involved in generative AI.

She emphasises the importance of provenance, watermarking, transparency, and providing education as essential aspects of responsible AI development. Her support further highlights the significance of establishing international partnerships and frameworks to address the ethical and regulatory aspects of AI technology.

In the development of tools and services for young people, META recognises the importance of engaging them as significant stakeholders.

They actively consult young people, parents, and experts from over 10 countries when creating tools such as parental supervision features for Facebook Messenger and Instagram. This inclusive approach ensures that the tools meet the needs and expectations of the target audience.

To enhance the accuracy of generative AI in mitigating misinformation, META incorporates safety practices such as stress testing and fine-tuning into their product development process.

These practices contribute to the overall reliability and effectiveness of generative AI in combating misinformation and ensuring the delivery of accurate and trustworthy information.

Collaboration with fact-checking organisations is pivotal in debunking misinformation and disinformation. META recognises the importance of partnering with these organisations to employ their expertise and tools in combating the spread of false information.

Such partnerships have proven to be effective in maintaining the integrity and trustworthiness of the online space.

Public education plays a vital role in ensuring adherence to community standards. META acknowledges the importance of raising awareness about reporting inappropriate content that violates these standards.

By empowering users with the knowledge and tools necessary to identify and report violations, META contributes to a more responsible and accountable online community.

In conclusion, META’s use of AI technology in content moderation, responsible AI development, language inclusivity, local partnerships, and online safety highlights their commitment to creating a safe, inclusive, and transparent digital environment.

By incorporating user feedback, adhering to international principles, and actively engaging with stakeholders, META demonstrates a dedication to ongoing improvement and collaboration in the field of AI.

Report

Generative AI has diverse applications, but it also presents numerous risk scenarios. These include concerns about fairness, privacy, transparency, and accountability, which are similar to those encountered with traditional AI. However, the foundational and general-purpose nature of generative AI amplifies these risks.

The potential risk scenarios associated with generative AI are almost limitless.

To effectively manage the challenges of generative AI, society must embrace and share the risks due to the uncertainty surrounding these emerging technologies. Developers and service providers cannot predict or expect all possible risk scenarios.

It is crucial for citizens to consider how to coexist with this cutting-edge technology.

Technological solutions and international, multi-stakeholder conversations are of paramount importance to successfully address the challenges of generative AI. These discussions involve implementing solutions such as digital watermarks and improving traceability on a global scale.

The increasing emphasis on multi-stakeholder conversations, which go beyond intergovernmental discussions, reflects the recognition of the importance of involving various stakeholders in managing generative AI risks.

A balanced approach is necessary to address the privacy and security risks associated with the advancement of generative AI technology.

While efforts to enhance traceability and transparency are underway, they also give rise to additional privacy and security concerns. Therefore, striking a balance between various concerns is crucial.

Regulating generative AI requires collaboration among multiple stakeholders as the government’s understanding and accessibility to the technology are limited.

Given the ethical implications, policy-making should also involve more than just governmental authorities. Multi-stakeholder collaboration is necessary to effectively understand and regulate the technology.

The ethical questions brought about by evolving technologies like generative AI require democratic decision-making processes.

Privacy risks and achieving a balance between public risks can be managed through democratic practices. Therefore, democratic processes are essential when addressing the ethical complexities of newer technologies.

The proposal of Agile Governance suggests that regulations for generative AI should focus more on principles and outcomes rather than rigid rules.

The iterative process of governance is essential for technology evolution, allowing for adaptability and refining regulations as the technology progresses.

Private initiatives play a significant role in providing practical guidelines and principles to ensure the ethical operation of generative AI.

Given the limitations of government and industry in understanding and implementing such technologies, private companies and NGOs can contribute valuable insights and expertise.

Young people should be included in decision-making processes concerning generative AI. Their creativity and adeptness in using technology make them valuable contributors.

Prohibiting the use of generative AI for study or education is not the answer. Instead, measures should focus on checks for misconduct or negative impacts. Regular assessments in the study field can help ensure responsible and ethical use of generative AI.

In conclusion, generative AI holds immense potential for diverse applications, but it also comes with countless risk scenarios.

Society must embrace and share these risks, and technological solutions, as well as multi-stakeholder conversations, play a crucial role in managing the challenges associated with generative AI. A balanced approach to privacy and security concerns, multi-stakeholder collaboration, democratic decision-making processes, agile governance, and private initiatives are essential in regulating and harnessing the benefits of generative AI.

Report

Generative AI has the potential to bring great benefits in various fields including enhancing productivity in agriculture and modelling climate change scenarios. However, there are concerns related to disinformation, misuse, and privacy. International collaboration is crucial in promoting ethical guidelines and harnessing the potential of generative AI for positive applications.

Discussions on AI principles and regulations have already begun, and technological solutions can help mitigate risks. Finding a balance between privacy and transparency, addressing accessibility, education, and language diversity, and supporting AI innovators through regulations and funding are important steps towards responsible and equitable deployment of generative AI technologies.

Report

Generative AI technology offers numerous opportunities but also poses inherent risks that require careful handling and education. It is argued that generative AI cannot exist separately from human beings and thus requires a strong literacy component. This is especially important as generative AI is already widely used.

The sentiment regarding this argument is neutral.

To effectively use generative AI, education and awareness are deemed necessary. Analytical thinking and critical approaches are crucial when analyzing the information generated by AI. It is suggested that initiatives should be implemented to teach these skills in schools and universities.

This approach is seen as positive and contributes to SDG 4: Quality Education.

On the other hand, generative AI has the potential to replace a significant number of jobs. Statistics suggest that around 80% of jobs could be substituted by generative AI in the future.

This perspective is viewed negatively, as it threatens SDG 8: Decent work and Economic Growth.

To address the potential job displacement, there is a call for reskilling and upskilling programs to prepare the workforce for the usage of generative AI tools.

Microsoft and data.org are running such programs, promoting a positive sentiment and supporting SDG 8.

Efforts should also be united to raise awareness, promote literacy, and provide education around generative AI. The technology is accompanied by risks that require a collective approach involving proper understanding and education.

This argument is viewed positively, aligning with SDG 4 and SDG 17: Partnerships for the goals.

Internet governance practices offer a collaborative approach towards finding solutions related to generative AI. Communication between different stakeholders, including the inclusion of civil society, is vital in these discussions.

This perspective is regarded positively and supports SDG 17.

Stakeholder involvement, including creators, governments, and users, is seen as essential in shaping meaningful and functional policies concerning generative AI. Governments across the world are already attempting to regulate this technology, and users have the opportunity to report harmful content.

The sentiment is positive towards involving a diverse range of stakeholders and aligns with SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure and SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions.

A balanced legal framework is deemed necessary to avoid hindering innovation while effectively regulating harmful content.

It is acknowledged that legal norms regulating harmful content already exist, and overregulating the technology could impede innovation. This viewpoint maintains a neutral sentiment and supports SDG 9.

Furthermore, advocates for user education and awareness on concepts like deepfakes emphasize the importance of a better understanding and prevention.

Users need to know how to differentiate real-time videos from deepfakes, and educational programs should be in place. This perspective is positively viewed, aligning with SDG 4.

In conclusion, generative AI offers great potential but also carries inherent risks.

Education, awareness, stakeholder involvement, and a balanced legal framework are crucial in handling this technology effectively. Additionally, reskilling and upskilling are necessary to prepare the workforce for the adoption of generative AI tools.

Report

An analysis of the provided information reveals several key points regarding generative AI and its impact. Firstly, it highlights the importance of young advocates understanding and analyzing AI. The youth often lack a comprehensive understanding of AI and its subsystems, indicating the need for increased awareness and education in this field.

Another significant finding is the need for generative AI to be accessible to diverse languages and communities.

The localization of AI tools in different languages is crucial to ensure that marginalized communities, who do not identify with English as their main language, can fully benefit from these technologies. A concrete example is the BIRD AI tool available in Swahili, which has different responses than the English version, demonstrating the importance of localization and testing.

The analysis also emphasizes the necessity of youth involvement in policy development for AI.

It acknowledges that AI is advancing at a rapid pace, outpacing the ability of existing regulations to keep up. Thus, it is crucial for young people to play an active role in shaping policies that govern AI technology.

Furthermore, the analysis uncovers the prevalence of copyright and intellectual property issues in generative AI.

It highlights the importance of safeguards to protect authors’ intellectual property rights and prevent misuse of AI-generated content. Examples such as the use of digital watermarks to indicate AI-generated content versus human-generated content and the need for client consent in data handling discussions illustrate the issues at hand.

Another crucial finding is the need for multi-stakeholder engagement in the development of regulatory frameworks for AI.

This approach involves collaborating with academia, the private sector, the technical community, government, civil society, and developers to strike a balance between promoting innovation and implementing necessary regulations to ensure safeguards.

Collaboration between countries is identified as a critical factor in the responsible use and enforcement of AI.

Given that AI is often used in cross-border contexts, international cooperation is essential to establish unified regulations and enforcement mechanisms.

The analysis also addresses the importance of promoting innovation while adhering to safety principles concerning privacy and data protection.

It argues that regulation should not stifle development and proposes a multi-stakeholder model for the development of efficient guidelines and regulations.

Moreover, it stresses the role of governments and the private sector in educating young people about generative AI.

It argues that the government cannot work in isolation and should be actively involved in incorporating AI and generative AI into school curriculums. Additionally, the private sector, civil society, and online developers are encouraged to participate in educating young people about generative AI, going beyond the responsibility solely resting on the government.

The analysis provides noteworthy insights into the challenges faced by countries in regulating and enforcing AI technology.

It highlights that despite being forward-leaning in technology, Kenya, for example, lacks specific laws on artificial intelligence. The formation of a task force in Kenya to review legislative frameworks regarding ICT reflects the country’s effort to respond to AI and future technologies.

In conclusion, the analysis underscores the urgent need for young advocates to understand and analyze AI.

It emphasizes the importance of diverse language accessibility, youth engagement in policy development, safeguards for copyright and intellectual property, multi-stakeholder engagement in regulatory frameworks, international collaboration, and the promotion of innovation with privacy and data protection safeguards. It also emphasizes the roles of governments, the private sector, civil society, and online developers in educating young people about generative AI.

These insights provide valuable guidance for policymakers, industry leaders, and education institutions in navigating the challenges and opportunities presented by generative AI.

Report

During the discussion on internet governance and digital rights, various topics were explored. Piu, a member of the EU Coalition on Internet Governance, expressed interest in getting involved in the dynamic coalition and highlighted the importance of young people’s participation in updating chapters and providing translation.

This emphasises the need to include diverse perspectives in shaping internet governance policies.

The debate about freedom of expression, both online and offline, raised important considerations about finding a balance between regulation and protecting free expression. The principles of legitimacy, necessity, and proportionality were identified as essential factors in ensuring that governments do not overstep their boundaries when regulating online content.

This argument acknowledges the importance of safeguarding both freedom of expression and preventing harm.

Another crucial aspect discussed was the need for a clear delineation of responsibilities between states, businesses, and stakeholders in the online environment. Each stakeholder was recognised as having a role in balancing freedom of expression with the prevention of the spread of harmful content.

This underscores the significance of collaboration and cooperation among different actors to maintain a safe and open digital space.

Recognizing the potential of technology to be inclusive for individuals with disabilities, the speakers appreciated the advancements that can create more accessible spaces and opportunities.

However, they also highlighted challenges such as regional variations in sign language and the continued struggle for internet accessibility for individuals with hearing impairments. This highlights the ongoing work required to bridge these gaps and ensure true inclusivity in the digital realm.

Elevating community involvement and empowerment emerged as a key theme in the discussion.

The voices of people with disabilities often face barriers in being heard, and existing systems can hinder their active participation and expression of needs and opinions. The speakers highlighted the importance of fostering a supportive environment that uplifts and amplifies the voices of individuals with disabilities, advocating for inclusive design, technological advancement, and increased public participation.

The participants also examined the rights of children in the context of the internet, acknowledging both the positive and negative aspects of their exposure online.

The need for careful monitoring and regulation to protect children’s cognitive development was emphasized, as unrestricted internet access can have detrimental effects. Additionally, there was a call for stronger mechanisms to prevent exploitation and abuse of children online, as they are often more vulnerable in the digital environment than in the physical world.

The Global Digital Certificate (GDC) solution and its connection to human rights were questioned during the discussion.

The participants observed that none of the group members had considered the GDC solution from a human rights perspective. This raises concerns about the potential implications of implementing a global digital certificate system and highlights the importance of assessing its compatibility with fundamental rights and freedoms.

The speakers also criticized government-imposed internet shutdowns as a breach of digital rights.

They argued that strong legislation at the national level is necessary to effectively enforce digital rights. The absence of nation-specific legislation was identified as a significant obstacle to protecting and upholding these rights.

To safeguard digital rights, the participants proposed strategic litigation as an effective approach.

By utilizing existing rights such as the right to privacy and the right to access information, individuals and organizations can challenge government actions that infringe upon these rights. This highlights the importance of legal strategies and creative approaches in upholding and defending digital rights.

In conclusion, the discussion on internet governance and digital rights delved into various aspects, including the involvement of different stakeholders, the balance between regulation and free expression, the inclusivity of technology for individuals with disabilities, the protection of children’s rights online, and the legal considerations surrounding digital rights.

The exploration of these topics provides valuable insights into the complexities and challenges of governing the digital realm while upholding fundamental rights and ensuring inclusivity for all.

Report

During the conference on internet governance and the Global Digital Compact (GDC), several topics were discussed by the speakers. One important development was the translation of the 10 Principles document of the charter into Japanese by the Dynamic Coalition for the IGF conference in Japan.

The aim of this translation was to generate more interest among Japanese stakeholders and promote wider adoption of the Charter. As a next step, a task force is being set up to translate the entire Charter into Japanese, and they are inviting individuals with knowledge in internet governance or international law, or ideally both, to join this initiative.

Additionally, a survey revealed that the majority of internet users believe that technical experts should have the most influence when shaping the GDC.

However, this perception doesn’t align with reality. According to the survey, businesses are perceived to have more influence than necessary, while national governments and academics are perceived to have less influence. This highlights the need for more public consultation and input in shaping the GDC, with less reliance on traditional powerholders.

It is essential to seek the opinions of citizens, NGOs, and academics to ensure a more inclusive and representative digital governance framework.

The Internet Rights and Principles Coalition (IRPC) plays a significant role in the translation of their charter into different languages.

They collaborate with various partners, including universities and student groups, to facilitate the translation process. This not only creates a valuable resource for the community but also helps students gain a better understanding of the implications and context of the charter in their own language.

This collaborative effort in translating the charter into different languages provides an instructive experience for students and translators.

Dennis Redeker, an organizer at the conference, is facilitating a group discussion activity to promote engagement and a deeper understanding of the charter.

The activity involves grouping audience members and allowing them to discuss specific articles of the charter. Participants are encouraged to choose an article of interest and consider potential challenges that may arise in the next 10 years regarding the associated rights.

The aim is to find ways in which the Global Digital Compact can effectively address these challenges.

Dennis Redeker emphasizes the importance of continuing discussions on the relevance of the charter articles not only in the present but also in the future.

He encourages participants to share copies of the principles with friends who may be interested, thus spreading awareness about the charter and its importance.

In conclusion, the conference on internet governance and the Global Digital Compact addressed various topics, including the translation of the charter into Japanese, the perception versus reality of stakeholder influence, the role of collaboration in translation efforts, and the need for public consultation.

The group discussion activity led by Dennis Redeker aimed to foster engagement and explore challenges and solutions regarding the charter. Overall, it highlighted the significance of inclusive and representative digital governance for a more equitable and sustainable future.

Report

The Global Digital Compact (GDC) is receiving positive feedback for its consistent reference to human rights. However, there is a lack of clarity on how the guiding principles on business and human rights will be implemented within the GDC framework.

The non-binding and voluntary nature of these principles has resulted in little visibility on the implementation process.

Furthermore, stakeholders are not effectively brought together in the GDC discussions, hindering progress. Different stakeholder groups, such as businesses and civil societies, have been talking separately rather than engaging in meaningful dialogue.

The current draft of the synthesized document does not facilitate interaction between these stakeholder groups, exacerbating the issue.

The GDC and the multilateral system also fall short in holding nations accountable for human rights violations. Private companies and state mechanisms are identified as major violators of human rights, and rogue nations are not adequately held accountable for hindering tax negotiations and censoring the internet.

This lack of accountability undermines the effectiveness of the GDC and the wider multilateral system in ensuring peace, justice, and strong institutions.

On a positive note, the GDC recognises the interrelation between human rights and socio-economic rights. It highlights that the type of human rights one can engage in depends on socio-economic power.

This understanding helps address the issue of inequality and promotes a more holistic approach to human rights.

However, there is a stark divergence between the vision of the GDC and the reality on the ground. Proposed laws and regulations are being introduced that fundamentally hinder rights, despite ongoing GDC discussions.

There is a rush to enact these laws, resulting in violations of rights. This inconsistency undermines the credibility and impact of the GDC.

The responsibility for internet usage lies with all actors in the value chain, including consumers.

The GDC emphasises the need for educational measures to teach civic responsibility online and to change behaviours. It draws on the example of the environmental protection movement, which has successfully ingrained responsibilities into society. This reinforces the importance of individual responsibility in ensuring a safe and inclusive digital space.

Furthermore, it is vital to teach internet users, especially young ones, about their responsibilities and appropriate civic behaviours online.

The permeation and unintentional reach of ideas on the internet highlight the need for individuals to be cautious and mindful of their actions and words online.

Notably, the consultation process for the GDC is considered inclusive compared to other global processes.

However, it is acknowledged that this inclusivity is inherently imperfect. Consultation processes often tend to be dominated by privileged individuals, limiting diverse perspectives and hindering the effectiveness of the GDC.

Ground-level action by local agents is seen as essential after the development of a suitable Global Digital Compact.

It is important to ensure that nations develop policies that align with the GDC post-formation. This implementation is crucial for translating the principles and objectives of the GDC into tangible actions and outcomes.

In conclusion, while the Global Digital Compact shows promise in its commitment to human rights and the recognition of interrelated socio-economic rights, there are significant challenges that need to be addressed.

The lack of clarity on implementation, insufficient stakeholder engagement, and the failure to hold nations accountable for violations all weaken the effectiveness of the GDC. Nonetheless, the responsibility for internet usage lies with all actors, and teaching individuals about their responsibilities online is vital.

The consultation process for the GDC is relatively inclusive but can still be improved. Ground-level action is crucial for translating the GDC into meaningful policies and outcomes.

Report

The Global Digital Compact (GDC) is a collaborative effort between the United Nations, governments, and civil society to address the issue of technology avoidance in relation to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This multi-stakeholder approach aims to bring together various actors to find innovative digital solutions.

The International Rights and Policy Coalition (IRPC) plays a significant role in the GDC, particularly in addressing the gaps of digital inclusion and connectivity for marginalized groups.

The IRPC focuses on fostering public and political participation for women, migrants, and refugees. By prioritising digital inclusion, the IRPC aims to reduce inequalities and promote SDG 10 – Reduced Inequalities.

Equating offline and online human rights is crucial, especially concerning freedom of expression, information, and net neutrality.

The recognition of these fundamental rights in the digital realm contributes to SDG 16 – Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions. The goal is to ensure that individuals have the same rights and protections both offline and online.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has a significant impact on various sectors, including financial services and public health.

The use of AI in recruitment processes raises concerns about privacy and security. Additionally, the development of synthetic media and deepfakes poses challenges in terms of trust and authenticity. The implications of AI on SDG 3 – Good Health and Wellbeing and SDG 8 – Decent Work and Economic Growth need to be carefully considered.

The European Union (EU) Coalition on Internet Governance actively encourages partnerships and youth involvement.

They have a partnership with the Youth Coalition on Internet Governance and encourage young people to participate and find opportunities through their email list. This commitment to collaboration and youth engagement aligns with SDG 17 – Partnerships for the Goals and SDG 9 – Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure.

In the context of Raashi Saxena’s event, active audience participation is encouraged through group activities.

The audience will be divided into groups of four or five, promoting interaction and engagement. This approach creates an inclusive environment that allows participants to exchange ideas and perspectives.

Overall, the GDC, IRPC, the recognition of offline and online human rights, the implications of AI, the EU Coalition on Internet Governance, and Raashi Saxena’s audience activities all contribute to advancing the SDGs and fostering a more inclusive and innovative digital future.

Report

The Dynamic Coalition on Internet Rights and Principles (DCIRP) is actively working towards ensuring that human rights are effectively upheld in the online space. They have developed a charter on Human Rights and Principles, which has been translated into multiple languages to engage stakeholders on both regional and national levels.

Their efforts have resulted in the availability of the charter in 28 languages, allowing for broader accessibility and understanding of human rights in the context of the internet.

The IRPC (Internet Rights and Principles Coalition) advocates for a rights-based approach to internet frameworks.

They have been actively involved in various international forums, such as EuroDIG in Finland and the UNESCO Conference in France, as well as the Internet Governance Forum (IGF). Through their engagement with organizations and volunteers, they have raised awareness about digital rights and have collaborated with various organizations to promote the rights-based approach.

The importance of collaborating with local individuals in the translation process is emphasized by both the DCIRP and IRPC.

They highlight the need for human awareness and discretion in using accurate and contextually relevant translations. Local stakeholders discussing and reviewing drafts among themselves helps ensure accuracy and maintain the integrity of the translated content.

Furthermore, the translation of the charter goes beyond language alone; it also aims to build local capacity.

Participants are engaged with both the language and the concepts presented in the charter, contributing to a deeper understanding and broader adoption of the Human Rights and Principles it encompasses. This approach promotes inclusivity and empowers local communities to actively participate in the enforcement of these principles.

However, the regulation of misinformation and disinformation online can pose a significant challenge to freedom of speech.

Governments may use the idea of responsibility as a pretext to control and restrict legitimate expressions, discussions, and the spread of information. Striking a balance between protecting the public from harmful misinformation and disinformation while safeguarding the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression is important.

In South Asian countries, including Nepal, there have been attempts by governments to impose internet regulations under the guise of responsibility.

Such actions raise concerns regarding the potential erosion of freedom of speech and expression, highlighting the need to be vigilant and ensure the preservation of these fundamental rights.

The Global Digital Compact (GDC) is an initiative started by the United Nations in 2021 to address digital challenges and promote peace, justice, and strong institutions.

However, there is a lack of awareness about the GDC in South Asia and other developing countries. This lack of awareness poses a challenge to the enforceability and effectiveness of the GDC. Broad stakeholder participation is crucial in the design process of the GDC, but stakeholders in South Asia and other developing countries are often not adequately informed about the initiative.

An all-inclusive approach that incorporates the perspectives and insights of stakeholders from diverse regions and backgrounds is essential for the GDC to have a meaningful impact.

In conclusion, the work of the DCIRP and IRPC in promoting and upholding human rights in the online space is commendable.

Their efforts encompass translation, awareness-raising, capacity-building, and engaging stakeholders to ensure a rights-based approach in internet frameworks. Challenges remain in striking a balance between regulating misinformation and preserving freedom of speech, as well as raising awareness about initiatives such as the Global Digital Compact.

Building collaborations and inclusivity in these efforts are important for addressing these challenges and achieving a more equitable and rights-centric digital landscape.

Report

Vint Cerf, a prominent figure in the field of technology, highlights the importance of considering human responsibilities alongside human rights in the online environment. He argues that online users and providers should be well-informed about their responsibilities and actively fulfil them.

Cerf’s stance suggests a shift towards a more holistic approach in creating a safe and responsible online space.

The concept of the social contract, as proposed by philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau, is also brought into the discussion. According to Rousseau, individuals agree to relinquish certain freedoms in exchange for the protection of their remaining rights.

This notion emphasizes the understanding that, as we enjoy certain rights, we also hold responsibilities for the well-being and security of others.

The correlation between rights and responsibilities is another crucial aspect highlighted in the analysis. It is important to acknowledge that while we demand our rights to be respected, it is also important to recognize and fulfill our responsibilities towards others.

This recognition helps establish a balanced and harmonious relationship between individuals and society.

Additionally, the mention of norms as behavior patterns taught by society without the need for enforcement offers an interesting perspective. Norms play a significant role in shaping our understanding of responsibilities and guiding our actions within a social setting.

They provide a framework for acceptable behavior and assist in fostering cooperation and cohesion within communities.

In conclusion, the analysis reveals an increasing recognition of the importance of human responsibilities alongside human rights, particularly in the online environment.

Vint Cerf’s standpoint, along with the concepts of the social contract and the correlation between rights and responsibilities, encourages individuals to be more aware of their obligations and to contribute to the creation of a responsible and ethical digital space.

By understanding and fulfilling our responsibilities, we can build a more inclusive and harmonious society, both online and offline.

Report

Wolfgang Benedek raises concerns regarding the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and its effectiveness in advancing human rights. Benedek questions the value added by the GDC in terms of progress towards the rights enshrined in the charter and its implementation.

One of Benedek’s main points is the lack of enforcement within the GDC.

Despite the commitments made within the compact, Benedek highlights a lack of genuine and effective measures to ensure compliance. This lack of enforcement undermines the potential impact of the GDC in promoting and protecting human rights in the digital sphere.

Furthermore, Benedek emphasizes the challenge of reaching agreement within the GDC.

He suggests that the difficulties in achieving consensus on crucial issues hinder substantial progress towards the goals outlined in the charter. This lack of agreement may result from differing perspectives and priorities among the stakeholders involved.

Through these criticisms, Benedek highlights the need for improvements in the implementation and effectiveness of the GDC.

His concerns underscore the importance of meaningful enforcement mechanisms and a more inclusive and collaborative decision-making approach. By addressing these issues, the GDC can enhance its ability to promote and uphold digital human rights.

In conclusion, Wolfgang Benedek questions the value of the Global Digital Compact’s progress towards human rights, focusing on two key areas: the lack of enforcement and the challenges of reaching agreement.

These criticisms highlight the need for improvements in the implementation and effectiveness of the GDC. By addressing these concerns, the GDC can play a stronger role in advancing human rights in the digital age.

Report

The analysis explores the importance of the technical community’s involvement in policy discussions and decision-making processes. Annaliese Williams, a government representative with extensive experience, actively participates in technical discussions and observes a common tendency among technical stakeholders to separate technical and policy issues.

However, she believes that these issues are closely linked.

Williams argues that the technical community should have a more active role in policy discussions. She highlights that the Global Digital Compact, a comprehensive collaborative framework for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), does not necessarily prioritize technical stakeholders.

This lack of representation poses a risk of marginalizing their unique perspective in policy-making processes.

Additionally, Williams emphasizes the significant expertise within the technical community. This expertise is crucial in facilitating conversations and decision-making processes related to technology, especially as the landscape rapidly evolves.

The increasing reliance on the internet has also transformed the identity of the technical community, making their involvement even more valuable.

Peter, along with Williams, stresses the need for discussions on the role of the technical community. Both agree that engaging with governments and understanding the problems they seek to solve is crucial for effectively implementing technology.

Williams emphasizes that establishing dialogues and building relationships with governments can provide technologists with a deeper understanding of the challenges they aim to address.

The analysis also highlights the importance of collaboration among technical stakeholders to improve coordination and governance.

It underscores the need for greater collaboration among existing internet institutions to ensure effective coordination.

Governments play a significant role in the analysis. It emphasizes that governments are not adversaries but are responsible for protecting citizens. Their involvement in policy discussions and decision-making processes is vital for ensuring public security and maintaining peace and justice.

Furthermore, the analysis suggests that technical stakeholders should consider and coordinate their contributions to public policy processes.

Even if they choose not to engage, policy conversations will still occur, and it is crucial for them to participate in order to make informed decisions.

Lastly, the analysis mentions that OUTA, an organization focused on internet governance, has recently published an internet governance roadmap.

This roadmap serves as evidence of the growing need for collaboration among technical stakeholders to effectively address the complexities of internet governance.

In conclusion, the analysis underscores the significance of active engagement from the technical community in policy discussions and decision-making processes.

It highlights the close link between technical and policy issues and the potential risk of marginalizing the voice of technical stakeholders. The expertise within the technical community, the evolving identity due to increased reliance on the internet, and cooperation with governments play crucial roles in achieving effective technology implementation.

The involvement of technical stakeholders in public policy processes is essential for informed decision-making and improved governance.

Report

Jean-François expresses significant concern about the proposed merger of the technical community with another community. He questions the reasons behind specifically targeting the technical community for this change. His argument highlights the negative sentiment towards this proposed change, stating that the technical community should not be treated in this manner.

Additionally, Jean-François enquires about the experiences of other communities who have undergone similar changes, suggesting that their perspectives could provide valuable insights.

Peter Koch emphasizes the critical role played by the technical community in internet governance. He asserts that there should be better understanding and recognition of their contributions.

Koch suggests that instead of investing time and energy into the forensics of events, it would be more beneficial to focus on explaining the importance and contribution of the technical community. This positive sentiment stresses the need for greater appreciation of the technical community’s involvement in internet governance.

The analysis also reveals that the line between different stakeholder groups in internet governance is blurry, as noted by Peter Koch.

The technical community’s ability to identify and explain potential side effects of regulations is crucial. This highlights the valuable insights that the technical community can provide in shaping effective and balanced internet regulations.

The analysis further shows that the demographics of negotiators for foreign ministries have changed significantly since 2005.

There is a deficit of direct interaction between the technical community and their counterparts in the foreign ministry, indicating a need for closer collaboration and communication between these groups.

Overall, it is clear that there is a strong argument for increased collaboration between the technical community and policymakers.

The analysis supports the notion that policymakers and the technical community should reach out to each other for more effective collaboration, as this will lead to better understanding and mutual benefit in achieving objectives in digital and technical sectors.

The analysis also highlights the importance of including technologists in policy discussions about technology.

Technologists are the ones who ultimately implement the policies, making their inclusion critical for effective policy design and implementation. Examples from healthcare and architecture demonstrate the successful integration of professionals into relevant policy discussions, further reinforcing the argument for involving technologists in technology-related policy discussions.

Moreover, the technical community’s presence and involvement in every conversation involving internet regulation is strongly advocated.

This includes the need for a different approach in conveying their message, focusing on equipping governments with a clear narrative that enables them to defend the internet.

In conclusion, the analysis underscores the importance of recognising the essential role played by the technical community in areas such as internet governance and technology policy-making.

Collaboration, communication, and a deeper understanding between the technical community and other stakeholders are crucial for achieving effective policy outcomes and better internet governance.

Report

The analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the discussions around internet governance and digital cooperation, offering insights into the viewpoints and arguments of different stakeholders.

One key point is the potential complementarity of fragmentation and diversity in internet governance discussions.

Different perspectives and approaches resulting from fragmentation and diversity can contribute to a deeper understanding of challenges and opportunities in the field.

However, concerns arise about the tendency to bundle all stakeholders together without considering their individual contributions.

This approach may disregard valuable discussions and problems from individual communities. The recent suggestion that civil society should engage with member states as part of delegations raises concerns about multi-stakeholderism.

Apprehensions surround the proposed Digital Cooperation Forum due to its potential exclusivity and costliness.

The forum could amplify existing disparities and restrict participation for those with limited access or knowledge. Ensuring accessibility and inclusivity is crucial for any digital cooperation initiatives.

There are also concerns about excluding the technical community from decision-making processes.

The shift towards an intergovernmental process in the Global Digital Cooperation (GDC) sidelines their expertise and input, which is vital for effective governance and coordination.

Including corporations in tech regulation discussions is seen as necessary to address issues concerning information integrity and content moderation.

The creation of a Code of Conduct for Information Integrity and involving social media companies and other content-related corporations highlight their importance in such discussions.

The abandonment of the multi-stakeholder model in tech regulation disappoints civil society and technical communities.

The move away from a model that promised improvements in participation spaces and the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) is considered a setback, leading to frustration among stakeholders.

Transparency is a significant concern in the GDC process. Unanswered questions, limited stakeholder dialogue, and unequal speaking opportunities highlight the need for a more transparent and inclusive approach.

In conclusion, the analysis stresses the importance of inclusive and transparent discussions among the technical community, civil society, and other stakeholders in internet governance.

Recognizing the value of fragmentation and diversity while ensuring the active participation of relevant parties will lead to more effective and inclusive digital cooperation.

Report

The internet is a network of networks, defined by IETF-developed protocols such as IPv4 and IPv6. It is not fragmented, as the core technical layer remains intact and functional. The internet is defined by IP addresses assigned by regional Internet registries and the BGP routing.

Trust in the root server system is essential to avoid internet fragmentation. The DNS system, managed by IANA, defines the internet for end users and must be trusted to maintain its continuity and interoperability. Protecting the mid-layer of the internet is crucial for content and ensuring the smooth flow of information.

The mid-layer is critical for maintaining the interoperability and accessibility of the internet, and this should be acknowledged in discussions about a global digital compact. The technical community plays a critical role in preserving the freedom of open protocols and ensuring interoperability.

Their concerns should not be overlooked in policy discussions. Attempting to regulate content through the mid-layer could lead to fragmentation and more issues. ICANN actively engages with governments to advise and influence public policy related to the internet. Collaboration between ICANN and governments is vital for well-informed policies.

ICANN, along with other technical communities, is preparing for the VISIS plus 20 review to update and synchronize with the evolving world. ICANN takes measures to tackle DNS abuse and maintain communication with governments. Fragmentation of the internet could have significant consequences, especially for developing countries.

The internet is crucial for their participation in the global world. It is essential to celebrate and protect the successes of the internet for all citizens of the world. Having one internet for one world allows countries to participate actively in global affairs, share culture and knowledge, and achieve common goals through partnerships.

Report

The Global Digital Compact, proposed by the UN, is an initiative aimed at addressing key issues in the digital space, including connecting the unconnected, data governance, human rights online, artificial intelligence, and preventing fragmentation of the Internet. This compact promotes a collaborative and inclusive approach to digital cooperation.

However, there is ongoing discussion regarding the role of the technical community within this compact and internet governance as a whole.

The technical community, including stakeholders such as ICANN, IETF, and the IGF, plays a crucial role in ensuring an unfragmented and interoperable Internet. Questions have been raised about how to ensure the technical community’s involvement in negotiations and the future of internet governance.

It is argued that the technical community must ensure its active participation in these processes to safeguard its interests and expertise.

One concern raised is that the original definition of multi-stakeholder governance does not explicitly mention the technical community.

This exclusion has prompted calls for a more inclusive approach that recognizes the importance of the technical community in shaping internet governance frameworks. It is suggested that historical oversights or laziness in considering the role of the technical community should not lead to its subsuming within civil society.

Michael Kende, a prominent figure in the discussion, emphasizes the need for the technical community to take a proactive approach in addressing potential risks related to the internet.

He argues that rather than being reactive, the technical community should anticipate and discuss potential risks in a timely manner. Kende proposes the concept of “forensics,” which involves examining what is said and by whom. He highlights the importance of addressing potential threats before they materialize.

Furthermore, Kende advocates for a comprehensive and proactive approach to internet governance.

He suggests that the technical community should engage on a broader range of issues, such as protecting citizens and human rights, in addition to fulfilling its own role. By adopting this approach, Kende believes that the technical community can contribute to the development of an interoperable internet and help prevent fragmentation.

In conclusion, the Global Digital Compact proposed by the UN aims to address various topics related to the digital space.

The role of the technical community within this compact and internet governance as a whole is under discussion. There are calls for the technical community to ensure its active participation in negotiations and the future of internet governance. Additionally, concerns have been raised about the exclusion of the technical community in the original definition of multi-stakeholder governance.

Michael Kende highlights the importance of a proactive approach in addressing potential risks and suggests a comprehensive engagement on a broader range of issues. By doing so, he believes that the technical community can contribute to avoiding internet fragmentation and promoting an interoperable internet.

Report

The analysis explored various aspects of internet governance, with a particular focus on the involvement of the technical community. One of the key challenges discussed was network fragmentation, which has been an issue since the inception of the internet.

The primary aim of the internet was to enable separate and fragmented networks to collaborate effectively. Resilience and scalability were identified as the main objectives in the early stages of the internet’s development.

To address the problem of fragmentation, it was stressed that unified protocols, shared management of technical resources, and collaborative governance are essential for the proper functioning of the internet.

Efforts have been made to further unify network protocols, such as through the ITU’s Network 2030 initiative. Furthermore, the speakers underscored the significance of the technical community in achieving policy objectives, highlighting the importance of effective cooperation between the technical community and governments.

The analysis also explored the role of the technical community in shaping the internet.

The internet is defined by the IP addresses assigned by the Regional Internet Registry, as well as the trust placed in the root server system by end-users. While different countries may have varied user experiences, it was noted that fragmentation and diversity can coexist as long as the middle technical layer functions effectively.

In addition, it was emphasized that the technical community should actively engage with policy stakeholders and governments instead of remaining passive observers.

Their expertise and perspectives should be heard and considered in policy discussions to prevent the potential fragmentation of the internet. The analysis also highlighted the importance of the technical community’s involvement in discussing the possible consequences of policy decisions relating to internet regulation.

The analysis further touched upon the changing demographics of negotiators since 2005, with a call for increased engagement and collaboration between the technical community and foreign ministries.

It also emphasized the need for timely preparation for upcoming negotiations, the impact of language barriers and different perspectives in interactions between the technical community and policy makers, and the importance of coordinated stakeholder responses to public policy processes.

Overall, the analysis underlined the critical role of the technical community in internet governance.

It highlighted the necessity for their active engagement with policy stakeholders and governments, as well as their contribution to discussions on potential policy consequences. The pursuit of unified protocols, shared governance, and collective action from diverse stakeholders were identified as crucial for the preservation and functionality of the internet.

Report

The Africa Climate Summit, held in Kenya, placed significant emphasis on the importance of accessing and transferring environmentally sound technologies to support Africa’s green industrialisation and transition. This highlights the crucial need for the continent to adopt sustainable practices and technologies in order to reduce carbon emissions and mitigate the impacts of climate change.

The summit also highlighted the necessity for cooperation among different stakeholders in addressing the digital footprint.

As our reliance on digital technologies continues to grow, the environmental impact of the internet cannot be overlooked. Thus, it is crucial for governments, businesses, and individuals to work collaboratively and find ways to reduce the carbon footprint associated with digital activities.

Furthermore, the summit discussed the influence of consumer habits on the environmental impact of the internet.

It raised the question of whether people’s purchasing decisions are driven by trends or functionality. By examining consumer behaviour, efforts can be made to promote sustainable consumption and production. This means individuals can make choices that have a lower environmental impact, such as opting for more energy-efficient products or those with longer lifespans.

It is important to note that consumer behaviour can play a significant role in mitigating the environmental impact of the internet.

If people shift their purchasing habits towards more sustainable options, it can contribute to the reduction of carbon emissions and waste associated with the production and disposal of electronic devices.

Overall, the Africa Climate Summit underscored the importance of addressing the environmental impact of the internet, promoting sustainable technologies in Africa’s industrialisation efforts, and encouraging individuals to make more conscious choices in their consumption habits.

By working together and adopting sustainable practices, positive change can be driven, and the adverse effects of climate change can be mitigated.

Report

The need for eco-friendly internet infrastructure and measuring its carbon footprint is of utmost importance. DotAsia and APNIC Foundation have been exploring this since 2020, with the aim of gauging the eco-friendliness of internet infrastructure across countries through the EcoInternet Index.

This index aims to provide a measurement tool to assess the environmental impact of internet infrastructure. The argument put forth is that narrative and measuring methods for the eco-friendliness of internet infrastructure are crucial.

The internet not only has its own carbon footprint but can also contribute positively towards addressing climate change.

The EcoInternet Index takes into account the balance between the digital economy and traditional carbon-intensive industries, highlighting the potential for the internet to play a significant role in the fight against climate change.

Improving internet network efficiency is seen as a positive step towards sustainability.

However, no specific supporting facts are provided for this argument.

A grassroots movement can enhance awareness and foster a move towards a more carbon-conscious internet use. This includes a call for data centres to use renewable energy sources, which is seen as a positive step towards responsible consumption and production.

Digital inclusion in remote areas can be more sustainable by utilizing renewable energy sources such as solar energy.

By incorporating sustainable energy solutions, digital access can be expanded while reducing the environmental impact.

Standardization is identified as playing a crucial role in shaping an inclusive policy for a sustainable and eco-friendly internet. It helps establish consistent frameworks for measuring the carbon footprint and provides a means to quantify reports on methodologies and data collections.

This standardization is seen as vital in mitigating the risks associated with the internet and promoting a sustainable approach.

Collaboration between stakeholders, including the private sector, civil society, technical community, and government, is recognized as key in shaping a sustainable internet.

Each stakeholder has a unique role to play, contributing insights, creating awareness, providing technology, and formulating policies.

Sustainable cyberspace efforts and the work of Dr. Monagir and Ahita are commended by the audience. However, no specific details or supporting facts are provided to further elaborate on this point.

The narrative and measurement of environmental issues are considered important, but no specific supporting facts or arguments are provided.

Sustainable housing and reducing the carbon footprint in infrastructure are seen as viable solutions.

AMPD Energy in Hong Kong is mentioned as an example of using special materials and technology to reduce the carbon footprint in housing and warehouses.

Reducing paper waste and promoting recycling is highlighted as a viable environmental strategy.

The Wong Pao Foundation in Hong Kong is noted for producing results within a year.

One of the challenges in implementing sustainability initiatives is the lack of financial support. It is mentioned that financial support is often difficult to obtain when trying to implement sustainability measures, which can hinder progress.

Hong Kong’s progress towards achieving the SDGs is deemed slow.

Currently, the main recycling effort in Hong Kong focuses on recycling bottles, cans, and paper. No specific details or arguments are provided for this observation.

Further research is needed to understand the impact of AI on climate change.

Although no specific supporting facts or arguments are given, the stance is that thorough research is necessary before further developing AI technology.

Digital literacy is considered important for global digital inclusion efforts. Despite good internet access in Hong Kong, digital literacy is not very high.

It is mentioned that considerations should be made on how to contribute to other regions of the world facing different digital situations.

In conclusion, there is a growing awareness of the need for eco-friendly internet infrastructure and measuring its carbon footprint.

Collaboration between stakeholders, digital inclusion using renewable energy, standardization, and efforts to reduce paper waste are advocated for sustainability. However, challenges in implementation due to a lack of financial support and the slow progress of Hong Kong towards the SDGs are noted.

The impact of AI on climate change and the importance of digital literacy for global digital inclusion are areas that require further research and consideration.

Report

The analysis features several speakers discussing a range of topics related to climate change and sustainable development. One key point raised is the importance of recognising that we inhabit a common world with shared resources. The speakers stress the interconnected nature of humanity, emphasising that we all breathe the same air and live under the same sun.

Another topic covered in the analysis is the need for eco-friendly solutions within the internet industry.

It mentions proposals such as using satellites and high altitude connectivity devices to make the internet more sustainable. The integration of technology with climate action strategies in India is cited as an example of potential solutions.

The analysis also addresses the issue of poor quality data leading to misinformation on the climate agenda.

It suggests that the dissemination of inaccurate information can hinder effective progress in tackling climate change.

One of the speakers advocates for a multistakeholder approach to bridge the gap between grassroots movements and government. This inclusive approach is seen as crucial in ensuring effective and inclusive decision-making processes.

The analysis also explores the issue of addiction to hydrocarbons, acknowledging their extensive use in heating, transportation and electricity production.

The shared challenge of dependence on hydrocarbons is highlighted as an issue that needs to be addressed.

In terms of creating change, one speaker believes in the power of group discussions. The importance of small groups in making a significant impact is emphasised, indicating the significance of collective efforts in addressing climate change.

Furthermore, the analysis underlines the interconnectedness of the world through the internet.

It emphasises the need for boldness, vocal advocacy and accountability in promoting sustainable development. The need for eco-friendly hardware design and sustainable practices on the internet is also advocated for.

In conclusion, the comprehensive analysis underscores the importance of recognising our shared world and limited resources.

It stresses the necessity of eco-friendly solutions and accurate data in addressing climate change. The analysis supports a multistakeholder approach, highlights the challenge of hydrocarbon addiction, and advocates for the power of group discussions in effecting change. It also underscores the role of the internet in fostering interconnectedness and calls for boldness, accountability and eco-friendly practices in driving sustainable development.

Report

Ihita Gangavarapu, a coordinator of Youth Asia in India and a board member of ITU Generation Connect, possesses extensive experience in the field of technology, with a specific focus on the Internet of Things (IoT) and smart cities. Her expertise in this area makes her well-equipped to address the issue of environmental sustainability.

Gangavarapu strongly emphasizes the importance of IoT in monitoring various environmental parameters.

In particular, she advocates for the use of IoT sensors in homes to monitor carbon footprint. This technology has the potential to make individuals more aware of their environmental impact and take steps towards reducing it. Furthermore, Gangavarapu highlights the use of IoT in agriculture and forest health monitoring.

By employing IoT-enabled devices, it becomes possible to gather real-time data on these crucial aspects of our environment. Additionally, the IoT has the potential to predict forest fires and aid in urban planning, further contributing to environmental conservation efforts.

A key argument put forth by Gangavarapu is that consultations, cost incentives, and standardization are necessary to bridge the gap when government initiatives fall short in promoting environmental sustainability.

She suggests that involved parties need to engage in meaningful discussions to ideate potential solutions. Furthermore, Gangavarapu believes that government incentives can motivate the private sector to develop environmentally conscious services and technologies. Additionally, she highlights the importance of standardization, particularly in developing IT standards for the environment.

These measures are crucial in ensuring that environmental sustainability is prioritized and achieved in the absence of sufficient government initiatives.

Gangavarapu also stresses the role of individuals in reducing their negative environmental impact. By taking responsibility for their actions and making conscious choices, individuals can contribute significantly to environmental conservation.

This aligns with the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 12: Responsible Consumption and Production, which emphasizes individual responsibility in achieving sustainability.

Moreover, Gangavarapu recognises the significance of environmentally-conscious design in artificial intelligence (AI). She highlights the integration of AI into everyday life and the need to incorporate an environmentally conscious dimension into its development.

This aligns with SDG Goal 12: Responsible Consumption and Production and SDG Goal 13: Climate Action.

Another point raised by Gangavarapu is the importance of crafting and implementing policies right from the inception of a technology. She argues that a well-crafted policy can create awareness among all stakeholders in the technology supply chain regarding potential environmental repercussions.

By starting policy development early in the tech development process, the carbon footprint consciousness of the entire chain can be influenced positively. This supports SDG Goal 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure.

Gangavarapu also highlights the importance of leveraging the internet to discuss environmental concerns and solutions.

Utilizing the internet as a platform for communication allows for a wider reach and the opportunity to engage a larger audience in these discussions. This aligns with SDG Goal 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure.

Lastly, Gangavarapu advocates for supporting organizations and initiatives that focus on creating environmentally conscious products and services.

By endorsing and investing in these initiatives, individuals and communities can contribute towards promoting sustainability.

In conclusion, Ihita Gangavarapu, with her expertise in IoT and smart cities, emphasises the importance of monitoring environmental parameters using IoT technology. She further advocates for consultations, cost incentives, and standardization to fill gaps in government initiatives towards environmental sustainability.

Gangavarapu highlights individual responsibility, environmentally-conscious design in AI, crafting policies from the inception of technology, leveraging the internet for discussion, and supporting initiatives for environmentally conscious products and services. Through her various arguments and points, Gangavarapu underscores the need for collective efforts and conscious choices in achieving a more sustainable future.

Report

The session primarily focuses on the issue of the internet’s carbon footprint and the need to explore sustainable alternatives. It is highlighted that internet carbon footprints currently account for 3.7% of global emissions, and this figure is expected to rise in the future.

Lily actively advocates for internet usage that is inherently sustainable, emphasizing the importance of considering the environmental impact of our online activities.

In terms of recycling, there is a discussion on the need for education and awareness in recycling processes.

It is mentioned that e-waste recycling in Abu Ghoshi, Ghana, has resulted in harmful environmental impacts. However, the government of Ghana, in collaboration with GIZ, is taking steps to create awareness about sustainable recycling methods.

Furthermore, there is support for alternative methods of connectivity through equipment refurbishing.

Refurbished e-waste can be redistributed to underserved communities, providing them with access to the internet. This approach has already been implemented in several cities in the United States through inclusion strategies focusing on refurbishing, reuse, and redistribution of e-waste.

The importance of resources and skills for implementing the three Rs (refurbishing, redistribution, and reuse) is also emphasized.

It requires the gathering of in-use equipment, housing them, and preparing them for redistribution.

The session also acknowledges that technology, while contributing to environmental issues, can also play a crucial role in solving them. However, discussions on the economic benefits of technology often overlook its environmental impact.

It is argued that a more balanced approach that considers sustainability beyond profit is needed.

Bottom-up approaches are highlighted as essential for sustainability solutions. Government-led solutions often fail to account for the importance of grassroots movements and the involvement of local communities.

When discussing artificial intelligence (AI), it is observed that the lack of policies guiding its implementation can lead to disadvantages to society.

The fast-paced implementation of AI technologies contrasts with the lengthy and bureaucratic process of building policies. However, creating global policies adaptable to local contexts could ensure the right usage of AI for climate change initiatives, thus guiding its beneficial deployment.

There is agreement that awareness creation plays a fundamental role in addressing AI issues.

Social media platforms are identified as a powerful tool for continuous and consistent awareness creation, facilitating the understanding of the issues at hand and generating demand for action.

Knowledge sharing is also emphasized as a significant way for individuals to actively address AI issues.

By creating awareness and encouraging people to take action, individuals can contribute to spreading information about AI and its impact.

Technology is recognized as a double-edged sword in addressing climate change concerns. While it can contribute to environmental issues, it can also offer solutions to mitigate and adapt to the impacts of climate change.

Moreover, the act of connecting the unconnected is seen as inherently sustainable.

By extending access to the internet and digital resources to underserved communities, it contributes to bridging the digital divide and promoting sustainable development.

Lastly, it is concluded that the conversation surrounding these topics must involve the participation of government, authorities, and people.

Increasing awareness of the challenges and potential solutions is seen as a crucial step towards achieving sustainability goals.

Report

During the analysis, the speakers delved into several key aspects of internet governance and its impact on various topics. They explored its relevance to the 4th industrial revolution, sustainability, energy consumption, and environmental impact. One of the main discussions focused on the need for convergence and cooperation between different stakeholders.

Monojit Das, for instance, is researching internet-related issues, specifically examining the convergence between the multi-stakeholder and multilateral approaches.

He believes that finding a convergence point is crucial for resolving debates in internet governance. Das emphasized the importance of participation from both online and offline participants in finding effective solutions.

The speakers acknowledged the complexity of the debate between the multi-stakeholder and multilateral approaches in environmental issues.

They noted the inherent differences in positions held by multiple stakeholders and nations in environmental policy. Despite this complexity, they agreed that small collective actions can have significant long-term outcomes.

The analysis also focused on the significant energy consumption associated with internet use.

Simple online activities, such as sending text messages, consume data and energy. Data centres, essential for internet infrastructure, consume substantial amounts of power. The speakers highlighted the need for energy efficiency and the promotion of renewable energy sources to power technology.

Furthermore, the speakers recognized that the internet plays a critical role in the 4th industrial revolution.

They stressed the interconnections between energy, transportation, and communication technologies. By harnessing the potential of the internet, advancements in these areas can be achieved.

The impact of internet infrastructure on the environment was another concern highlighted during the analysis.

The laying of submarine cables needs to consider and avoid disrupting underwater habitats, such as coral reefs and marine life.

Regarding individual action, the analysis suggested that efforts to reduce environmental impact can begin with individuals. The panel included individuals from various professional backgrounds dedicating time to environmental issues, and personal compliance with carbon-neutral policies can raise awareness.

The discussion on artificial intelligence (AI) research revealed differing perspectives.

While the importance of understanding the full potential and threats of AI was recognized, there were debates as to whether research should continue. Some argued for pushing AI to its limits to test its capabilities, while others raised concerns about its potential dangers.

The analysis noted the success and positive reception of the session, indicating promise for future discussions on digital leadership and internet ecology.

One notable observation was the optimism expressed by the speakers about the growth and expansion of the platform for discussion in future sessions.

In conclusion, the analysis highlighted the multifaceted nature of internet governance and its impact on various aspects of society.

From the convergence of different approaches to the significance of collective actions and energy consumption, the speakers presented a comprehensive overview of the challenges and opportunities within the realm of internet governance. The importance of research on AI, individual actions, and sustainable practices were also emphasized.

Ultimately, the analysis revealed a mixture of optimism and realism regarding the potential for positive change and future growth in discussions on internet ecology.